The Weekend On One With Brendan O'Connor

Ah the oul Wifi that's important

Ah yes , that would explain why SF lackeys and fellow travellers dislike her. As we well know , SF would have no truck with anything that smacks of lying or hypocrisy.

Ah he's no loss anyway-I just wonder what we're paying him for, listen, c'mere to me.

What an absolute borefest this has become with panel after panel of talking heads, one the same as the other, never a contrarian view in case it might frighten the horses.. Rte certainly know how to kill a show, of course Brendan "we must be careful here" O Connor didn't help

What a pleasure this morning to hear guests being able to form their thoughts without being interrupted every scond sentence by BOC.

She actually asked one panellist 'What do you think ? ' rather than 'What's your reaction to what I think?'

Exactly, the radio panels are flat-out lying to us this morning. The majority of the population have already made it clear they are against the Govmt policies in question i.e. immigration policy, hate-speech (and they're too scared to conduct a poll to ask about gender in schools) The Govmt have equally made it clear we are not allowed to disagree and will not relent from funding endless NGO research to explain that anyone objecting to their radical policies are right-wing extremists. Modern Ireland indeed!

It's the NGO mention does it, clearly an up to the minute and enthusiastic scholar from YouTube University.

Lukey's craving for showbiz, especially for a man of his vintage, has certainly not gone unnoted amongst his friends.

Perfect opportunity to repeat: there's no climate crisis until the private jets are grounded. When the people making the rules act scared (i.e. fly commercial or Zoom meetings) then the rest of us will act scared. btw: there's absolutely ZERO chance of that happening!

The audible gasp from the panel today when they were confronted with the fact that majority of EU countries don't like the globalist immigration agenda, ah diddums, LOL!

Listen, c'mere-we can't say that. He's a quiet boy since the whole Rory thing.

He used to have fewer boundaries shall we say. In his efforts to retain his plum gig, he may well jeopardise it as a result of a gelded and overly cautious approach. There's no spark about him at all.

Happy to. It can be encapsulated in a single word-Pantigate.

https://medium.com/chrissy-curtin/pantigate-an-illustrated-timeline-dafef882b0be

Mark little seems to want public entities to have more control over what appears on social media, there's not enough public media says he and he would like the likes of the BBC and Rte to help to fund people to report on their communities, no thanks I would never trust public media to give the full story, too much vested interests... There can never be too much Information imv, the more the better, let citizens consume it and make their own minds up and give them the educational tools to analyse situations and a events past the childlike George Bush mindset of "you are with us or against us", neat black and white worldview, no the likes of Little imv just want to be in control of the flow of information in an ever increasing infantilisation of the populace