Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Hurt Locker: Ireland v South Africa. Saturday 23rd September. Stade DeFrance

12021222426

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,830 ✭✭✭irelandrover




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Fancy going through life worried about things you have no control of.

    I for one are enjoying the moment because whatever happens next will happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,283 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If we don't beat Scotland well, we deserve to come home. No business proceeding to the QF's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    Absolutely. For me it's like watching the Cork hurlers. I still can't look at Hansen's try - I was convinced he went over the dead ball line.

    Bring back the days when we were well beaten after 20 minutes. Far more relaxing :-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,283 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    A still from the video posted a while ago should let you enjoy it. Ball was down well before the elbow.




  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭lunarhog


    ladssss, would ye all relax. We are winning the whole thing



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I didn't particularly enjoy the pool win over a poor Scotland side in 2019 and losing against Japan most certainly "really counted"

    Try to stop forcing your pessimistic, history repeating narrative on different events. But look, if you want to be a curmudgeon and not enjoy the win suit yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,900 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    Long time doom merchant here -

    Unreal performance and what really stood out is the calmness with the exception of going to the corner a few times when maybe 3 points was the right call.

    Very few missed tackles and very few silly penalties. Sexton led by example and fronted up as best he physically could and that rubbed off on everyone else. Aki was immense.

    I think if the fixture is to be repeated, Pollard at 10 could do damage however it will be a battle.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,961 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I didn't particularly enjoy the pool win over a poor Scotland side in 2019

    Ah, doesn't that make you a doom merchant?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think the issue a lot of posters have is that you constantly move the goalposts.

    For example, we’re also looking to peak for the knockout stages, but you were happy to criticise our “poor” form in the warm-ups.

    That’s just completely contradictory. And there’s plenty more examples.

    After the 2022 6 Nations, I’m fairly sure you criticised our attack. We had just scored the joint-2nd highest ever number of tries, 7 more than the next team.

    After the 1st Test in NZ, you criticised the mentality of the team. We went on to win the series.

    For the 2023 6 Nations, you said anything but a Grand Slam would be a failure. We won it.

    You keep saying “we’ve been here before” when many posters have pointed out the circumstances are very different.

    And tbh, that’s all without even mentioning your posts about Leinster.

    If anything, your negativity is giving me even more hope for the QF tbh.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No, because we went in as a dysfunctional team and that wasn't a particularly indicative result over a bad Scotland team. It is not remotely the same as a win over a SA team, fresh off a hammering of NZ, in which we counteracted their major strengths.

    I enjoyed our win over France but was exceptionally worried about the injury toll it wrought.

    I enjoyed our win over Aus but the fuckery with the team afterwards was a concern.

    I enjoyed the win over SA, am thrilled to come out with no injuries, and think we will be favourites in every game we go into from now on. We have the bad fortune of having to play NZ in the QF, but I intend to enjoy our continued reign as the best team in the world until it is no longer true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,900 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    Judging new Zealand I think we would be hot favourites and the confidence boost we could get from thumping them might be exactly what we need to take home the cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Knocked us down to 3rd place in the rankings in the process.

    I will now proceed to use a term which my Irish wife reserves for the mosquitoes...

    Wanker Bastards.


    Still want a SA vs Ireland final.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Ha! If that was the only time we’d seen the miserable attitude then you might have a point. This one incident is one in a long, long list of incidents. You’re being judged on them all, not just one. And it’s a fair judgement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,644 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    One of the things that farrell has brought to the team and shows on the pitch is consistency.

    We do t have ups and downs. There are mistakes but they are forgotten about.

    We dont have bad days. We have some days where we are excellent and other days we are very good.

    NZ have problems in their pack which could lead to a terrible day out at some stage.

    England have discipline problems which will count against then at some stage.

    Ireland are far more well rounded.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    Looking to peak by losing in the group stages

    Got ya



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Think we were unlucky not to get a penalty from the Aki turnover at the end. Perhaps we could've been cuter buying one there, instead of kicking the ball away hurriedly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    There's some kind of narrative forming about SA getting Ireland later and they'll beat them, it'll be different next time etc.

    I am thinking the opposite, we could beat them by 10-15 next time, to me it looked like we were the rustier team coming into peak form and they were the waning team, trying to carry their peak for a few more games. I think timing suits Ireland better, we will be fully battle hardened by the knockouts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,283 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Very true.

    Defeat at this stage and in that game in particular could take a heavy toll. It certainly looked like it had on the final whistle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Surely, policing the lineout gap should be a relatively straightforward matter?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭Ardillaun




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Whatever about timing peaks, SA will wonder where their improvement comes from. Obviously a solid kicker helps, but they sacrifice something significant in their attack bringing in Pollard. A bigger issue for Rassie is that the SA pack did not do a number on Ireland and the bomb squad fell flat. Maybe they can up their intensity but Ireland can do that too, and counter more effectively. Ireland's discipline held tight while SA were definitely getting into card territory at some pints in that match. Add a functional lineout, and maybe taking points off the tee earlier in the match while going for the corner later on, and Ireland for me have more headroom.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    I can’t process positive Awec. It doesn’t make sense to my brain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It was interesting that we barely challenged their lineout, only two jumps from memory? I'd say POC and Farrell will be very happy at how well we defended the maul. Could stand us in good stead if we gave England in the semi.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭OldRio


    I have utterly no understanding of that post. Zero.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Positive thinking, man. It got me where I am. You think living in a swamp hundreds of miles from anywhere happens on in its own?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭OldRio


    More of a Stoicism man myself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭Ardillaun




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,205 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    There were loads here praising the referees performance and I strongly disagreed.

    This is so biased, it shows very little of the South Africa fouls not called by the referee but there's so much here that it's more than enough to show how bad the referee was.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Absolutely agree that the Irish front row is better. Hooker is close but the Irish props are way better. Disagree about the second row. All 3 AB locks are better than Henderson, if Barrett can stay on the field he has been one of the best in the world this season. And Rettallick in form is one of the best. Loose forwards, only Savea would make the Irish trio. Maybe Frizzel at his best.

    Of the 6 halfbacks in the 2 squads, Smith is easily the best but Ireland has better depth. Mouaga hasn't really delivered at test level in a big match so Sexton gets the nod there. Agree on 12. Theres not much between Jordie and Bundee. The rest of the backline I think is in NZ's favour, partly due to pace.

    As you say, it will be won up front and Ireland definitely have the edge there. Though I wouldn't be too confident on scrum dominance as the Irish scrum has been minced a few times recently. Overall Ireland are definitely favourites for a match with NZ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭ersatz


    The vast majority of this is rubbish, there are some very marginal calls being identified here as something other than the ref letting the game go on. Many of the rolling away shudda been penalties are nothing of the sort. Guys end up on the wrong side in tackles and are compelled to make an effort to roll away, if they can't its a penalty, if they do and aren't obviously interfering with play then it would be insane to award a penalty every time, their mere presence on the wrong side is not a penalty. The video seems to indicate that it should always be a penalty or its bias. Mad, there would be a penalty at every ruck and no spectators.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,205 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    There's loads of erroneous errors in there as well.

    I didn't even see what Bundee did at that maul until it was pointed out in that video. We are so lucky he got away with it.

    Anyway I can't do things like that but you say marginal calls and I pointed out a few of them that were blown up, very marginal offside, if they were even offside, calls and not near the ball. The invisible Irish hand that touched the ball to give South Africa a lineout which at the end of the day after a penalty gave South Africa the chance to have that final maul.

    There's enough big and obvious errors by the referee in that video to prove he was awful. And if I could do a video like that it'd be nearly twice as long after I added all the calls made that favoured South Africa.

    And if you seen my post I clearly said his calls didn't favour one side or the other. It wasn't about that, he was just awful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,205 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It wouldn't surprise me one bit if Rassie was involved in the making of that. 😁

    Thing is there's enough erroneous errors in that video to show how bad the referee was. And as I keep saying its a very biased video showing very little of the mistakes made where South Africa were fouling and got away with it or anything that he got wrong that favoured South Africa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I doubt Rassie would suggest that Nche should cop a red card for stamping on VdF's hand when he was being held, or had just been held. I was freaking out seeing that as VdF looked to have injured his hand in his first tackle.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    This ref-bashing crap is absolutely pathetic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Just stop. You could over analyse every single ruck and maul in any high intensity match and find some potential infringement by one or both teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,744 ✭✭✭Field east


    I assume that all teams - especially the top ones know the refs ‘ likes and dislikes’ - what they will let go and not let go- and therefor ‘play the ref’. SA were better at this than Irl were. When one team wants to play ‘clean ‘ rugby and the opposition will play ‘as close to the edge’ as possible, the clean team is at a clear disadvantage.

    in GAA terms some teams constantly throw the ball to another player as against hand passing it because the ref will more than likely call play back for a free. Some teams exploit this to the n th degree.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Yeah and half of them are bollox too. Like the one they’re calling for a neck roll by JGP on Etzebeth. Which wasn’t actually a neck roll and Etzebeth was penalized for not releasing in the tackle. So even if it had been a neck roll, it was already a penalty to Ireland, so it would have made no difference.

    Micro analyzing a referees performance using slow motion footage is complete and utter horse sh1t. The referee has one perspective, can see one area at a time. Not multiple camera angles in slow motion.

    It’s interesting that they didn’t highlight Kitshoff’s illegal actions at pretty much every ruck he was involved in.

    I thought that BOK was running a little scared of Rassie at times on Saturday. Though he got most of the big calls right and was consistent in his interpretations. Which is about all you can ask for from a ref, in such s dynamic and physical encounter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    Keenan with yet another brilliant performance. If he could have got to the line here it would have been a sensational try from Ireland. Maybe even the best Irish RWC try!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Here's a story, now that I see that photo of PSdT on the ground.

    His family/parents own the farm Kloovenburg which is about an hour's drive from where I am in Cape Town. My company did some work for them twice before. About 2 weeks ago his youngest brother called me to come out to them and quote on some stuff they want done. I was there on thursday and had a look. Saturday evening I was watching the game with my business partner, who is also mad into his rugby. I think there was about 2 or 3 times during the game where PSdT made mistakes where I looked at my partner and told him their quote has just gone up by 5%.

    Right now im busy working on that quote...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,644 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Retallick and whitelock would be fine if they were in a great pack but they are not and they are being asked to do to much.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    With De Groot and Lomax, Cane and Frizell in the pack, I dont really see any weaknesses in NZ's front 8 to be honest. Their replacements are not fantastic, but then again we have Dave Kilcoyne



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    I assume that you are being sarcastic because to me; De Groot, Lomax and Cane starting for the ABs shows just how weak their pack is.



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,004 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    New Zealand have the weakest front row of all the top 4 favs for the competition. There very little point of different between theyre first choice props and reserves, a which is not a good place to be. De Groot, Lomax, Newell, Williams, lualala and tu'ungafasi are all decent players but none of them strike fear into any of their opposition. None of them are destructive scrummagers either. Codie Taylor is the best of their front row option, Coles is past it and Taukei’aho is for the future.

    Thats where we can get at the ABs, heavy carrying and set piece.

    Obviously the slower we make their ball in defense the more impotent that very very good backline will be. So if we do end up playing NZ i expect us to go in as favourites and i expect, if we play at our best, we can beat them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    If we end up facing one another, I would put us against NZ as probably 65/35 in our favour right now....maybe less. It really depends on whether NZ turn up on the day and I'd imagine they will. There's an incredible recency bias at play with how we see things. NZ are regularly being spoken of as not a patch on the team they once were but only 2 months ago, everyone was saying that NZ were back as possible favourites for the tournament (and the bookies had them there too) after they obliterated Argentina and comfortably beat a very strong SA 23 (probably stronger than the one from the weekend).

    Whilst we now have no fear of them, they have never feared us nor will they if we face them.

    I think the series win last year was an absolutely massive moment for the Irish squad psychologically. We've gone on to be a better and more confident team since then but NZ showed more ability to break us down than any other team in the last 2 years regardless of their form. There are only a handful of occasions that we've conceded more than one try in a game over the last couple of years:

    • France in Paris in 2022 - 2 tries
    • Italy in Rome in 2023 - 2 tries
    • Italy in Dublin in August (significantly weakened team) - 2 tries
    • Fiji in Dublin in 2022 (significantly weakened team) - 2 tries
    • South Africa in Dublin in 2022 - 2 tries
    • NZ in Dublin in 2021 - 2 tries
    • NZ in Auckland in 2022 - 6 tries
    • NZ in Dunedin in 2022 - 2 tries
    • NZ in Wellington in 2022 - 3 tries

    But they didn't score in that final 20 minute period in Wellington and since then, our defence has largely been incredible. We've conceded 18 tries in 14 subsequent tests. Hopefully that carries over into any future games against NZ as they certainly have an uncanny ability to score tries against us.

    I don't think they'll be able to stop us scoring but we need to be at the top of our game defensively to keep them at bay as France saw too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,546 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I'd go further and say New Zealand's entire front 5 is the weakest of the favourites. Whitelock and Retallick are two all time great second rows, but neither is the player they were even in the 2019 World Cup. And back then they weren't as good as their 2015 form either. Scott Barrett is a grub and entirely flaky.

    They're still very good rugby players and they obviously win the most recent Rugby Championship. They must be respected. But we saw Ryan and Beirne and the rest of the pack get the better of them last year. I'm confident they can do it again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,900 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    Interesting analysis - I agree there was questionable engagements from both sides , it was like the ref and especially the TMO was advised let a lot of stuff slip - a lot of cheap shots on players, late contact and obstruction. I dont think I have seen a game in the last 10 years with so little TMO involvement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Thud


    There has been noticeably less TMO involvement in the RWC games, assume its some directive to let games flow



Advertisement