Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

MV Matthew and shipping drugs

  • 27-09-2023 12:54pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,793 ✭✭✭Field east


    Just heard discussion from senior army officer re seizure of the container ship. A very technical report from the officer that I suggest went over most of our heads. The presenter let him talk away and did not control the discussion

    Am wondering if the following questions would be of interest to the general public:-

    1 - how many rangers were winched onto the ship and were they all winched from the one helicopter

    2- why was it not possible for the guards/customs officers no able to board the ship from a boat

    3- how many crew were on the ship.?

    4- were one or a number of rangers capable of steering the ship .

    5- what was meant by securing all the crew. Lock them into a secure area, ; handcuff them or what?

    6 - given that it is a container ship - therefor jam packed with containers and therefor all have to be opened the check for drugs- how come that customs in a matter of circa 18 hours were able to say the value of the drugs on board.

    7- did the Irish services - army rangers, et. al - get a tip off from eg . Interpol and they then just go to the ship and check it out

    8-the occasion was used to make the case for more assets so that’s can be more successful in catching more such ships /trawlers. Given that there is international survalence of all types going on and sufficient cooperation all around , then how come that This event is rear. So what are we doing with the assets we have ?

    9 - all those involved were adequately trained for the task and all had back up services from air and sea and the weather was not very rough so the risk to life was low. The only serious risk to life , IMO, was when the rangers were being lowered onto the ship and would have been very vulnerable re defending themselves . I assume that they did not know if the crew had guns on board that they could use , how many crew were on board and where were they throughout the ship.

    Post edited by Beasty on


«134567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,883 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    2- why was it not possible for the guards/customs officers no able to board the ship from a boat

    Those in control of the ship were not cooperating with Naval instructions to stop, and were turning the ship aggressively making a water based boarding operation highly dangerous/impossible given the sheer size of the ship..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,815 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Most of these are never going to be made known to Joe Public for fairly obvious reasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,231 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    I doubt they'd want to let the public know every intricate detail of what happened and who was involved, not at this stage anyway. All you're ever going to get are snippets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The Rangers deployed a handful going by images and videos and other sources,it was a time sensitive mission hence why they Gardai played little or no actual role in the boarding,yes the Rangers being deployed might have been vunerable but it's why they are trained to carry out such i missions, they also had cover from the helicopter carrying more armed forces, likely door gunner and snipers,

    Boat ran a ground at the weekend and raised 50 red flags the ball started rolling from there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,883 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Boat ran a ground at the weekend and raised 50 red flags the ball started rolling from there

    It was a separate smaller trawler that ran aground wasn't it? As they believe the MV Matthew was out doing loops off the coast while transferring it's 'cargo' to smaller boats (like this trawler), who were actually bringing the stuff ashore.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,073 ✭✭✭10-10-20


    4- were one or a number of rangers capable of steering the ship .

    At a guess, as it was an adverse boarding and the captain was operating the ship in a offensive manner, the rangers would have secured the bridge and obliged the captain to stop the engines and then relived him of his position by securing him with the rest of the crew. None of the rangers would likely have had pilotage experience up to a container-ship level, so once the ship was secured they would have provisioned a suitably trained pilot to operate the deck while tugs were deployed to bring the ship into Cork harbour.

    6 - given that it is a container ship - therefor jam packed with containers and therefor all have to be opened the check for drugs- how come that customs in a matter of circa 18 hours were able to say the value of the drugs on board.

    I don't believe that it's a container ship - I believe it's a bulk-carrier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Yeah that's it the Matthew seems to be a significant mothership,I believe some of the crew were trying to burn bales of cocaine when the lads boarded,the navy fired warning shots across it's now too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,339 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro


    Will they pursue the gang leaders?

    A file will be sent sent to the DPP.

    Its estimated 1 - 2% of shipments into Europe are intercepted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Some pics of the lads equipped with night vision goggles and h&K 416A5 rifles




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭jmcc


    "2- why was it not possible for the guards/customs officers no able to board the ship from a boat"

    Chasing after a large ship like the MV Matthew in a RIB is a less than optimal approach. The method used was effective. Also, there were multiple helicopters involved.

    "9 - all those involved were adequately trained for the task and all had back up services from air and sea and the weather was not very rough so the risk to life was low. The only serious risk to life , IMO, was when the rangers were being lowered onto the ship and would have been very vulnerable re defending themselves . I assume that they did not know if the crew had guns on board that they could use , how many crew were on board and where were they throughout the ship."

    There would probably have been a sniper team on overwatch to eliminate any threats to the rangers roping from the helicopter. There was also a navy vessel nearby. The weather wasn't exactly calm either.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    And we are a weak link when it's comes to stopping and deterring the boat,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,017 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Are there circumstances under which the naval vessel would have tried to fire a disabling shot at the cargo ship?

    Seems like the cargo ship just ignored the warning shots if it continued to maneuver aggrresively.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    2- why was it not possible for the guards/customs officers no able to board the ship from a boat


    The freeboard is too high.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    6 - given that it is a container ship - therefor jam packed with containers and therefor all have to be opened the check for drugs- how come that customs in a matter of circa 18 hours were able to say the value of the drugs on board.


    It isn't. It is a bulk carrier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    7- did the Irish services - army rangers, et. al - get a tip off from eg . Interpol and they then just go to the ship and check it out


    ARW were called in by Customs/Revenue/Naval service.

    The ARW had to become Customs Officers, as Customs Officers are allowed board vessels.

    It took an hour to appoint the ARW as Customs Officers.



    "The Director General of Revenue and Customs’ Operations said provisions in the Customs Act 2015 were used for the first time to appoint Defence Forces personnel as customs officers to go on board and secure the vessel.

    Gerry Harrahill said appointed customs officers can board a vessel at sea but because of the weather conditions and the movements of the ship, customs were not equipped to board.

    The ship did not comply and he said it became obvious that force was required.

    "Our legislation provided for it," he said, "It was the first time we had to use it."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,888 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    Mark, Luke and John got through so all good on the streets.

    Joe public, snowed with cost of living inflation/childcare costs/ failed heath care etc etc could give a damn about this stuff.

    Great to see them getting a chance to see some real action

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,694 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    I'm no expert, but surely a huge ship behaving in that manner only raises suspicion?

    It's OK for planes to circle, but not ships. Behaviour like that surely could be picked up by automated monitoring systems? Or with AI they'll stand out in future?

    Or perhaps the owners let this one be caught? To get others through?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,883 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Yes and no I guess.

    Quite normal for ships to wait outside ports for their slot to open up, but to just circle around the Atlantic off the coast of Cork does seem very odd, and would certainly raise suspicions...

    I usually see the Irish Ferries Ship WB Yeats just idling around north of Howth once a week as the way the scheduling works, it arrives into it's berth, and it's next scheduled sailing isn't until the next day, so it leaves Dublin Port and just rambles around off the coast of North County Dublin at about 1-2 knots while the other Irish Ferries ships come in and use the same berth....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They fire warning shots usually tracer Rounds first and if they are ignored they fire live rounds across the bow and close to the wheel house, it's mainly used to get the boats to stop or rapidly change course



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,017 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    But ultimately, would they try to hit the wheel house, if the vessel carried on its course?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    On that the wb Yates is regularly used for training the ARW and Naval forces for boarding exercises at sea



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,117 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Congratulations to all personnel involved on a successful mission.

    We often get posts on here belittling and running down our armed forces.Some even questioning the need for them.

    Yesterday they gave a good account of themselves and did the State some service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Apparently Ireland is still seen as a major entry for drugs into Europe. Lot's of coastline and apparently not that well patrolled? I guess they are just trying to look for the weakest link.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,741 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    We often get posts on here belittling and running down our armed forces.Some even questioning the need for them.

    Don't worry, give it time and there will be plenty of people coming up with some edgey take on all of this that will rope in migrants, refugees and the housing crisis.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,974 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    1 - how many rangers were winched onto the ship and were they all winched from the one helicopter - That would be classified for obvious reasons

    2- why was it not possible for the guards/customs officers no able to board the ship from a boat - The ship was uncooperative, it would have been dangerous to come alongside a ship not under control. From a risk point of view it makes more sense to board from the air

    3- how many crew were on the ship.? - We probably won't know for a while

    4- were one or a number of rangers capable of steering the ship . - Unlikely

    5- what was meant by securing all the crew. Lock them into a secure area, ; handcuff them or what? - Most likely cable tied and put under armed guard

    6 - given that it is a container ship - therefor jam packed with containers and therefore all have to be opened the check for drugs- how come that customs in a matter of circa 18 hours were able to say the value of the drugs on board. - It's a bulk carrier, generally just huge open voids that stuff like stone or grain is stored, the figure may change with further investigation. They may also have been tracking the shipment for a long time and had an idea already as to how much would be expected to be on board.

    7- did the Irish services - army rangers, et. al - get a tip off from eg . Interpol and they then just go to the ship and check it out - i believe the ship has been tracked for quite a while in an international effort. With these type of things the plan can change very quickly so at some point the best course of action it was decided was to board from the air. The Ranger Wing are the most qualified in Ireland to do this, it is part of their remit and they would be well trained. Taking over a huge ship is a lot different than taking over a trawler which the Naval service would have done so in the past.

    8-the occasion was used to make the case for more assets so that’s can be more successful in catching more such ships /trawlers. Given that there is international surveillance of all types going on and sufficient cooperation all around , then how come that This event is rear. So what are we doing with the assets we have ? - There has probably been cases like this before where it was decided to observe and see what the modus operandi is before attempting anything else, detailed plans drawn up etc.

    9 - all those involved were adequately trained for the task and all had back up services from air and sea and the weather was not very rough so the risk to life was low. The only serious risk to life , IMO, was when the rangers were being lowered onto the ship and would have been very vulnerable re defending themselves . I assume that they did not know if the crew had guns on board that they could use , how many crew were on board and where were they throughout the ship. - This is exactly the type of scenario the Ranger Wing is trained for, they training specifically for scenarios where they have little intelligence and a high risk to life. By using trained personnel like special forces, the risk to life is reduced. A "low risk" operation for the Ranger Wing could be an extremely high risk operation for the Naval Service. It is also likely that they had intelligence as to how many crew, arms etc. but for obvious reasons this is classified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,641 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The ship was uncooperative, it would have been dangerous to come alongside a ship not under control. From a risk point of view it makes more sense to board from the air


    As somebody else said it would have been impossible to board an uncooperative ship from a RIB or other small vessel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭Geuze




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,192 ✭✭✭yagan


    There'll be a green party rep along to ask if the bullets were biodegradable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,793 ✭✭✭Field east


    But who tipped off customs/Gardai ?. I I hope that customs authority will continue on that practice in future similar operations. Now that the lads from ‘ Colombo’ know what they might face in further shippings they might ‘ up their game’. So the Elite Rangers need to be aware of that possibility .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @artanevilla 1 - how many rangers were winched onto the ship and were they all winched from the one helicopter - That would be classified for obvious reasons

    Not classified being the AW 139 can carry 8 fully armed troops ,in this case all 8 wouldn't have been dropped as at least one would have provided overwatch with sniper rifle and another door gunner manning the 7.62 FN mag ,

    By all accounts this wasn't meticulously planned for months it was a very a rushed job ,I believe one lads was involved may have been wearing trainers at the time ,they deployed rapidly from Waterford, only after a trawler ran a ground very much a short notice operation,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,761 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Will be interesting what will happen to the crew, they would have been all aware something was odd early on in the voyage after it slowed a couple of times crossing the Atlantic. Very little they could do even if they wanted to in alerting authorities along the way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭spaceHopper




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Usually the operations at Sea especially the ones I've seen they use both ribs and helicopters for carrying out boarding on large vessels, most forces train and use the same methods,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,641 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    My point still stands. It would be impossible to board an uncooperative ship from a rib.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,824 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    So the Elite Rangers need to be aware of that possibility

    'Thank god your man on boards.ie told us to be aware next time'

    I think they'll be alright without your help.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    Sea was too rough to board it from sea.

    couple of shots fired across it bow to let it know they weren’t messing around but still didn’t cooperate and kept goin so only way to bring it under control was board it from the air as quickly as possible before they started throwing stuff overboard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,192 ✭✭✭yagan


    This probably kicked off with that small boat that got in trouble Sunday night, it probably didn't take long to deduce that they were waiting on a larger vessel and then any ship loitering with no good cause in the south east came under immediate scrutiny. That's my guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    The lad they bought the trawler off said they were taking straight back to England and they sailed on up the Wexford coast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    I'll leave to those who do it regularly to decide this one



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    Antwerp is, spain next, no patrols there is it?

    These drugs are for ireland

    why would you bring drugs to Ireland to a rocky outcrop to then have to navigate bringing them to Uk or the mainland

    the weakest link is that most cargo is never inspected, theres to much of it and theres always someone who can be paid off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,803 ✭✭✭prunudo


    There's no way a rib was intercepting that ship lads. For starters it wasn't co-operating and secondly look how high its sitting in the water. Helicopter was the best tool for the job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I would presume the international drug barons would consider the Irish coastline, and once in Ireland they can go via NI to GB.

    How protected is the Irish coast anyway. The Irish navy does patrol the coast, but so I hear some ships are not active at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,883 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    And as it was being boarded from the air, it was making a huge left turn, which would have put any sea boarding party under enormous risk.... simply not worth it when you have a helicoptor that can get boots (and trainers) on deck much easier, quicker & crucially safer...

    Its all about risk mitigation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    theres no point just presuming though

    look at these lads, patrolling? The ships have trackers onboard

    you still have to get on a ferry to the UK.

    how much was on the trawler? the rest is going elsewhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    I’ve played Call Of Duty so I’m hardly an amateur.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,048 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    6 of our 8 Navy ships are tied up. Customs do have boats but I'm not sure how often they're at sea either - there's one based in Dun Laoghaire, and in years and years of sailing two or three times a week out of there, I've seen it off the dock once or twice.

    I would say that our coastline is considered to be largely unprotected, and a piss easy target for landing all sorts.

    I sailed to Spain a few years ago, and off the coast of Galicia we were buzzed by a customs plane, and I was assured by the skipper (who had done that trip loads of times) that if there was any query or concern, a boat would arrive along and we'd be boarded (I think he had been once before). There is nothing like that level of surveillance going on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 688 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    the cargo ship was sitting very high,from the photos she had very little cargo aboard so the freeboard looks to be at least 30ft...way too high to board from a rib especially with a crew that arent co-operating...


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    ps wheres my free,fancy rte flip-flops...?

    pps wheres my wheres my rte macaroons,kevin?

    "You are him…the one they call the "Baba Yaga"…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,761 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    A bulk carrier is a totally different design than a car ferry. Have a look at the first 40 seconds of this video, similar ship and weather conditions to yesterday and this is with a co-operating ship...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,641 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    That is a training exercise. the fact they didnt try that should tell you it wasnt an option.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement