Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1677678680682683804

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    And if ultimatley, neither is going to achieve the housing required, we need to park it and look at other deliverables that each govt actually CAN produce.

    Its at that point that SF run on empty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Yes they can go much higher and yes they will increase interest rates.

    Living the life



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,578 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    A couple of years is 2-3. I doubt if that was bought for 160k in that time frame

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,578 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Explain to me where the labour to build them comes from as well as all the other resources without a significant increase in costs

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭danfrancisco83




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The resources are there, as I already replied outlining. All thats missing is the political will.

    At this point in time we know both FF and FG have no intention of doing so.

    SF, Lab, the SocDems are all claiming they'll increase housing completition numbers dramatically. Will they be able to? Who knows. But at least they'll try, and are extremely likely to increase the numbers somewhat at least.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭Blut2


    https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cif_2_southcon23-constructionindustry-economics-activity-7105501973084282880-aniu?

    Jim Power from the CIF is on the record recently at this conference stating labour is no longer the problem. Its planning permission. I'm sure you can find minutes of it if you care to look.

    (which would stand to reason with the huge downturn currently happening in commercial development)

    I would assume he knows somewhat better than you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Increase the total supply or just increase the number of social housing at the expense of private housing….Maybe read the fine print because when this question was asked of SF there was a deafening silence during a debate a few years back on tv.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Increasing the supply of social housing by building more of it increases the supply of private housing. There are currently 60,000 households on HAP, because our recent FF&FG governments stopped social housing building a decade ago. If those households were in social housing instead of the private sector housing, as they should be, we'd have 60,000 more private housing units instantly.

    Our current government is doing the opposite, and is both keeping social housing tenants in private housing on HAP, and in recent years leasing entire blocks of private sector housing to use as social housing. They're both wasting huge amounts of tax payers money on this, and outbidding taxpayers on this housing with their own tax money. Its terrible policy from any perspective of fairness, effectiveness, financial prudence, or even just logic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,578 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Well fair play to him it was a great deal, its in Dublin, while you will buy apartments in Limerick for that at present its about the bottom of the market. How come I did not buy it.

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    FFG dont have a plan to deliver social housing directly. That is clear. But there is no evidence to say SF will do anything differently.

    FFG are standing over a fair number of housing delivery at 30k, and again, there is no evidence that SF will even match the 30k, let alone beat it.

    The liklehood is that SF wont get in to power anyway, as they will need FF to form a govt.

    As long as FFG close ranks on them again, the current govt will be returned - with the Greens probably replaced by indies/Soc Dems as the third leg.

    30k ish new homes over the next few years, possibly rising to 40k is as good as we will get for the next 5 years or so I would say.



  • Registered Users Posts: 802 ✭✭✭Relax brah




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭wassie


    Jim Powers is essentially the chief lobbyist for large builders in this country, so his views are inherently biased. Planning reform undoubtedly needs to happen, but its the construction industry leading the push to make judicial reviews against planning decisions more difficult.

    Also when you say commercial development, are you actually referring to a subset of commercial being offices (and possibly retail?). Commercial itself is quite broad and includes others like pharma, logistics, data centre, education, hotels, medical etc. all of which are still quote strong.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,618 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Watched that and if I remember correctly it was a 50/50 split social, affordable/private market. There was a graphic

    If they were to achieve that it would be a significant improvement on the number of new homes being offered for sale to the general public for private sale



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,578 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I am not sure there will be the massive inflow of labour and especially skills from the commercial building sectors as many think.

    First the downturn is in office accommodation, (which may be changing as more companies restrict WFH) and maybe the agri sector not across all the sectors.

    While in the office construction sector in Dublin this should throw free workers in Dublin other parts will not. However a lot of commercial buildings labour is more semi skilled than full trades. A large section will be steel fixers, mass concrete labour, crane operatives etc. You generally do not tend to have a substantial amount of Plasters, Carpenters and brickies involved.

    The skills involved are more in tune with building Apartments than houses which will be 30-50% more expensive than houses

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,578 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    HTF could the government start a social housing program in 2010. We were bankrupt. We had no control over our finances. Ya I can see it now government prepared it budget 10k Social houses and show it to the IMF and this would be the IMF reaction 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    We had houses that could not be sold and the IMF was going to agree to key the government build more. Nobody saw the resurgence of the Irish economy or Brexit( a substantial reason we see the demand for accommodation and demands in construction) in 2010. The present problems were not even visible in 2016 it was from that on they started to emerge.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭Blut2


    SF's policy documents state they will very much do things differently. "Theres no evidence that SF will even match the 30k" is based on... what? Given they've never been in power? At present the only definitive evidence that we have is that FF&FG are either unwilling, or unable, to solve the housing crisis after over 12 years in power.

    "a far number of housing delivery" is not an accurate way of describing 30k units per year, as as been discussed in this thread many, many times. We need 35k new housing units a year simply to hold the 100k population increase we've had every year now for multiple years. To account for existing unit replacement, and making a dent in the housing crisis, we'd need 60k+.

    SF are polling at almost the same as FF&FG combined according to today's Irish Times, and rising. They're the massive favourites to be in power come 2024 or 2025 with every bookie, and according to every political analyst. We're going to find out what they can do very soon.

    In the mid 2010s we were far from bankrupt as a country. By 2015 the Irish economy was very much back on track. HAP became operational in 2017, we could, and should, have been building social housing instead by that stage. As has now been proven.

    There were TDs in the Dail, and think tanks, asking questions about the brewing housing crisis in social housing as early as 2014, so it very much was a problem that was visible in 2016.

    "What we are currently experiencing is a rental and social housing crisis especially in Dublin" according to DNG of all people, back in 2015. http://pdf.dng.ie/pdf/DNG-Paper-Ireland-AHousingCrisisNov2015.pdf



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    So if you’re in the market for a private house there will be less houses available to buy unless all the landlords of the people moved into social housing decide to sell. Without overall supply increasing all that is happening is the pain point is moving to a different cohort…in this case FTB’s

    and that is on the assumption that rental property is released and the new social housing isn’t used first on homelessness. It’s nothing more than musical chairs without total supply increasing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭The Student


    For what it's worth the State does not want council housing because of the problems associated with providing it. How many council tenants are in arrears with their rents which are substantially below market rate? How maxny have been evicted?

    Why do you think the housing of these people have been outsourced to approved housing bodies and the private sector?

    I always find it funny how people think there is some conspiracy to inflate property prices. A property only has a value when it comes to selling it.

    If there is a massive social housing building spree are we going to return to purely council estates? If there is anti social issues/rent arrears how will these be dealt with? Remember by and large these are the very members of the voting public who would vote SF.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    This argument is made time and again remember back before the 08 crash we were churning out 70k+ properties a year without breaking a sweat. So if could be done again if the will was there to do so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    They are not polling at a rate to form a majority govt. They still need FF.

    There is no evidence to say SF can deliver more than 30k. They are unproven, but you seem to think its a given that they will deliver 60k or so per year.

    I can all but assure you. They wont.

    As I say, I think its largely a moot point, as long as FF hold their stance and dont let them in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    We have different cost and labour bases now and are consumed by multiple larger infrastructural projects.

    Then is not the same as now.

    If SF can cost and price how they would deliver 70k homes per year, fair enough. Fair play to them.

    I havent seen that document yet.

    And I suspect I never will.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,578 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    But in 2010 we were. Demand for housing did not start to rise until 2016 and after. If an Irish government had decided to go building houses before 2016 they have been a riot.

    The first thing was trying to actually get the construction industry going again. There was a lot of excess housing still available until after 2016. The IMF was still.in control until about late 2013 if I remember right.

    And yes the country was still broke in 2015

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,540 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I suspect the poster you are replying to was in school in 2010 and doesn’t remember the full estates of empty and unfinished houses, and the cut backs in government spending demanded by the troika in return for their bailout, who will forget the reports, and dread which used to coincide with their representatives visits to Dublin.

    But Blut thinks the government not only could have, but should have added to the number of empty houses, by building more in 2010.

    Go figure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭Blut2


    No, you're not understanding the problem at all. As things currently stand the Irish state is paying the rent of close to 60,000 households on HAP, keeping them in the private rental market. The state is also signing long term leases for entire apartment blocks that are already completed, to use for social housing, taking those apartments out of the private rental market. Both of these measures drastically reduce the supply of homes in the private rental market, and are being done because FG in particular have an ideological opposition to building social housing.

    If the state instead had a large scale social housing construction program, as it has had in past decades, every household moved into a social house when it gets built by the state would be one less in the private rental market.

    More social housing built by the state = fewer people in the private rental market = more housing supply in the private rental market for actual tax payers = a more functional rental market, is the fairly simple equation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,578 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭wassie


    The workers that we will import......as soon as we find a place for them to rent!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭The Student


    The issues in the corporation and social housing estates of the past won't happen in these new houses?



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    An interesting question. I think times have changed considerably. Families are much much smaller. It would be interesting to try again



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭The Student


    If anything I personally think the issues would be even worse.

    I am old enough to remember when we as a country had no money.

    Times have changed were we have an " entitlement culture".



Advertisement