Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

Options
1185186188190191199

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Nonsense.

    GDP is US$ 530 billion

    GNI* (modified Gross National Income) the VERY conservative measure of non FDI/brass plate operations is US$ 280 Billion.

    Iceland's GDP is about 4% of Ireland's and their GNI* is about 7%.

    Per capita amounts are pretty irrelevant at that scale as they give no real representation of government spending power. And also Iceland's defence policy is to be a big aircraft carrier for others in NATO.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    What I'm saying is our Tax take as a % of GDP is a more accurate measure of how wealthy the state's economy really is. Our GDP is mostly fictional.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    And as pointed out repeatedly there are plenty of Mechanisms that strip out the distortions of our GDP and give a far more conservative position on our economy. It’s still miles different than Iceland, your statement is just factually wrong. Our Tax take is a result of our tax policies due to politics rather than just declaring that it’s fictional.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Just to highlight the numbers we are talking about, though admittedly from Wiki:

    I would really like to hear how measures like GNI stripping out Multinationals are still so wrong and in actual fact we have an economy the size of something like Cyprus or any of the Baltics with vastly smaller populations and active economic workers? Hell smaller than Luxembourg (another well known creative tax nation).



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Correct, so we don't use it.

    The Government don't use it, the CSO don't use it, the Central Bank and the NTMA don't use it. Its redundant!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    But it is fictional.

    Delpple Computers, Googlebook, or intelsoft have a brass plate here because they have facilities here.

    However while they declare their trading income here, they return no tax here. We include their gazillions in profit in our GDP even though we have very little to show for their presence here, apart of course from the contribution their staff provide to the local economy. They tell us they pay tax at their Company HQ, in Silicon Valley, but who is to know really. Their staff get paid from a shell company that creates nothing, but exists only to pay wages. Because it creates nothing, it pays no income tax. It claims back the loss as a tax credit. It costs the state money. Its only outgoing is paying staff. We charge then just 13.5% on the capital taxes they declare.

    John Murphy from Ballytown, only an hour from Dublin, employs a staff of 4 making timber pallets. He returns income tax on whatever profit his company makes here, as well as paying his staff wages. All his suppliers are local, his vehicles are sourced locally, he rents his premises from an Irish based landlord. He contributes more % of his company earnings to the irish economy than the Multinationals. We charge him 40% Income tax on his profits because he is a sole trader.

    We include the sales of both examples in calculating GDP, but the state only benefits from the activities of the smaller business, in monetary terms.

    Do you get it yet?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I get that you have decided that you will ignore all the other data points that are designed to strip out exactly what you are complaining about to try and justify a nonsense position that you have taken.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    As I get you are too stubborn to try and see the point I am trying to make by using a facetious analogy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    No, just not willing to let you put forward nonsense that can’t be defended. There are measures in place that strips out what you are complaining about, as you aren’t the only one that has ever noticed the issue of distortion of gdp, even with those it puts us nearer to $400 billion, which still places us around 17th out of all of Europe (including non EU nations), so no not a poor nation however you try to put it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Our Tax take says otherwise.

    €87bn in 2020, (Iceland was 7.3bn)

    Per capita, Ireland pays €15k in tax while poor Iceland pays €20k.

    So we are either paying too little tax, or we aren't as wealthy a state as we pretend to be.

    Round these parts we have an area the locals called Sausage hill, for the same reason. 2 new cars in the driveway, but only sausages in the fridge. Outwardly wealthy, without substance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I'm not sure why a normally rational analyser of things like yourself, can't understand when its being pointed out to you that you're comparing apples with oranges.

    Let me put it to you in the simplest and most basic terms:

    Leave aside tax take, leave aside GDP and GNI and tax burden per capita. This, below, is the bottom line.

    As a State, assets are increasing by about €4 billion per financial quarter and liabilities are decreasing by about €2.3 billion. So, according to the Central Bank, the net financial wealth of Ireland inc, is about €150 Billion in deposits, equities, bonds, gold etc. And its increasing by an average of 12 to 18% annually.

    Thats not current income to be budgeted against current expenditure, that is 'SOVEREIGN WEALTH' and it something we never traditionally had and it is growing quicker than most global States, even the big dogs.

    We. Are. Rich.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Why then is the average household struggling to pay the bills?

    Why is the Health system in shambles?

    Why are there so many people homeless?

    Why is so little spent on public infrastructure, defence and security?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Because we import our energy supplies which are vulnerable to supply and demand and refuse to explore options like Nuclear.

    Because it would need to be nuked from orbit and built from nothing (and that includes all involved sectors/interest groups/employees), and even then it actually is pulling ahead of what was once held here the gold standard of the NHS.

    Because we have a structural housing issue brought on due to a multiple of factors from planning, to public policies, to NIMBYs to the construction sector never recovering from the Crash, all of which inhibits the sector driving up costs impacting affordability and access.

    The reality is if you were on a French boards, or German, British or even the States you could have much the same list of issues even though they are G7 nations... How many are homeless in those countries? How many complain about their healthcare systems? How many households are struggling?

    We aren't unique in anyway in that regards, doesn't make us a poor country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    a) They aren't, not compared to other households in Europe. House sales are buoyant, car sales are up significantly, not just on 2022 but also on pre-Covid 2019. Retail sales are up 7.5% on 2022, not just in price, but in volume. Outbound travel is exploding. We have full employment and a lower percentage of welfare dependent households than most any of our EU counterparts.

    b) Mismanagement, mismanagement, mismanagement. But specifically a failure to plan for an increasing population, not a funding issue.

    c) 12,000 homeless for a population of 5.2 million is not untypical. Doesn't mean its right, but the Irish housing market suffered a massive yo-yo shock from 2007 to date, and we effectively lost a decade. See population issue above. We require a massive planning overhaul to provide for the reasonable and sustainable development of this State out to 2100 and beyond.

    d) See b)

    I don't agree about all public infrastructure, but some things have been better provided for than others.

    In the case of defence, we all know why. No threats, no votes, no need.

    But I agree with your general point, Ireland is a very rich Country, it is the lack of proper project management in the public sector and the indulgence of certain lobbies and vested interests that make it very inefficient.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    This is how rumours start. 13.07

    https://youtu.be/oZbpuUOYVpg?si=VrRWQA4Jjo96zyBA



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Will the italians throw in a few helicopters as part of the deal?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Oh I'm sure they would be happy to give us a package deal, but we are still going to be paying Cash for anything...



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    It would be an easy and cheapish win for the government to say M346 now solves our air policing problem once they dont tell the public what speed it can do. Air Station Finner camp here we come.



  • Registered Users Posts: 238 ✭✭mupper2


    Ah it's a oood laugh lads,.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Amusingly, the youtube ad that came up when I clicked on the link, was for Pizza.

    But no, the 346 does not satisfy our capability gap, it is too slow and lacks the range to police the EEZ and close to intercept civil aviation jets.

    The video itself says it, when Hawks were used as short-range air policing aircraft, it was only in support to the Mach 2.2 Tornado F3.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I would guess that the comment in the video may be based at least in part from the Leonardo submission to the Commission, weren't they plugging the 346 as an option? That being said, whether or not it actually would do anything about our capability gap is besides the point, as seen even in the last week it would be enough for the Government of the day to say "we've done this" and pretty much get away with wasting money on an airshow plane.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,769 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Agree, we need to abandon the notion of using LiFT or similar to fulfil our air policing need. The training of pilots can be farmed out to one of the large EU training schools, 1 of which coincidentally is run by Leonardo. Theres also the UK option via Lockheed/MFTS and plenty of other options available for fast jet training. Ireland buying a pool of LiFT/Advanced Trainers to service the relatively small numbers of pilots we would have? Is a waste of resources IMO. For advanced flight training there is immediate economy of scale available if we outsource that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The M346 be like the young lads in the 90s driving around in 1.6 bog standard scubbies with a WRX sticker on the back. Looks the business but no punch.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,480 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    The difference there being the 1.6 with gold wheels and a WRX sticker did the job , effectively and probably more efficently than a genuine sti - it was going to get the lad to work on monday morning and drive around the town with the stereo blasting at the weekend - with less chance of blowing the turbo or needing an expensive tech to tune it - cos it was never going to actually be raced ..

    However if the state wants air-policing that wont really cut it, it may not need an f35 or a rafalle but it would need something more than an m346 , fine if thats a step in the programme, but it seems a bit unnecessary

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    I still say if that's the route we were going to take, forking out the extra few euro on the FA-50 would at least give us supersonic capability. Subsonic for air policing only works if you are trying to protect Farmleigh House or Dromoland Castle.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,108 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Seems a good fit. Malaysia recently bought 18 of the highest specced block 20 version for 919,000 million USD.

    https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/malaysia-fighter-jets-south-korea-defence-fa-50-3525046



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    With the use of Microlights on the attack on israel yesterday there may be still need for HMG in the role of air defence



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The purchase is part of the Royal Malaysian Air Force’s (RMAF) Fighter Lead-in Trainer - Light Combat Aircraft (FLIT-LCA) programme, which seeks to replace its ageing BAE Hawk 108/208 in the trainer and light fighter roles as well as its Aermacchi MB-339 trainer aircraft.

    For about the 17th time on this thread.

    FA-50, Trainer!

    M346, Trainer!

    L159, Trainer!



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,769 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Even disregarding the Microlight example(not that it's irrelevant , it isn't but countering a microlight crosses with the same threat ID, low, slow and likely armed as mini Drones)Ukraine, Nagorno Karabakh, Syria and the rest of the ME have highlighted the need for HMG and small calibre AAA(sub 40mm) in the anti-Drone role.

    If you're threat matrix includes drones? A nation would quickly run out of SAM if they didn't have AAA and ideally proximity fused or AHEAD style fuzing available.

    Drone swarms and kamikaze drones are a new reality and they cannot be met effectively with high cost SAM. Even the "cheap" stinger, igla and similar manpads are orders of magnitude more expensive than a drone with a 3D printed grenade harness.

    Skyranger and other CRAM have a part to play in point defence, but? HMG with appropriate Thermal and NVG will fill the gap between fixed CRAM positions and Gepard/SkyRanger style systems.

    The SkyRanger turret and CV90 pair up is one that will do well on international market IMO.

    **Edit** I've just realised that the 30mm SkyRanger turret has been adapted for MOWAG Piranha/Stryker hulls. Not that out lot would see that as advantageous.

    Post edited by banie01 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Likelihood of a Jet trainer being purchased over a front-line fighter aircraft.



Advertisement