Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2023 RWC Buildup, Squads, Fixtures 'etc'

1163164166168169306

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 401 ✭✭Shank Williams


    But only 2 of those games (Japan and Ireland games) aren’t a foregone conclusion. So far from a massive weekend at all really is it.


    ”if New Zealand beat Uruguay” lol ffs- don’t you mean when New Zealand b team destroy Uruguay then France are under the massive pressure of having to beat the biggest pack of wasters in the 6 nations

    france “ playing for survival “ you have to be taking the piss



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,772 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think somebody is trying to wind you up Jacovs. Settle the horses! 😁



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,484 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I've never seen so many bolt upright tackles in my life as in SA v Tonga. Absolutely ridiclous to have this happen 100 times a match and then go all surprised pikachu, shock horror, think of the childre, where's me smelling salts when there's a clash of heads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    I dont think Japan vs Argentina is a foregone conclusion, and depending on whether England send out a B team or not (since they have nothing to gain by winning the game), Samoa have a chance too.

    I agree NZ will win their game, and France theirs, but there is always a slim chance. Read "playing for survival" as "chance of still being knocked out", even if its the slimmest of chances.

    Nearly every game decides something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭Jacovs




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    I meant hoping for that result.

    Irelands management and players will be looking to win.

    Although it would be a bit humorous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    I wont be hoping for that, and wouldnt find it funny, but I know what you mean, from a non-SA perspective.

    Especially with my Irish wife, and my Irish/SA 7 year old daughter choosing to wear an Irish rugby shirt to school on Bok Friday when they are supposed to be wearing Springbok clothes to school. I'd never hear the end of it.

    And I would find it that much harder to support Ireland the rest of the way if they colluded to knock SA out on purpose.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Bizarre segue about Scotland game; Ireland will aim to win and strangle the Scots outright. I don't doubt they'll push us, perhaps even more than the Boks did... but I don't anticipate this game being a problem, ultimately.

    As to the broader worry for a 24 team competition: worth thinking on that in that expanded tournament, Scotland would be also playing for qualification into the Round of 16 as one of the best 3rd placed teams. IE, more Tier 1 nation match-ups.

    You can be sure all those perennial 3rd place finishers will vote for the expanded tournament for their own continued participation in an otherwise abbreviated WC



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 696 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Your daughter sounds cool! Piss daddy off.

    Be no collusion with this Irish team. We want to trounce Scotland regardless od qf opponents.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,884 ✭✭✭TheRona


    Ah na, NZ wouldn't care who they meet in the quarter. It would just be funny to see SA get kicked out after all their misguided confidence and ridiculous 'innovations' and mind games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Mapimpi out of the world cup with a facial fracture. Which the referee didnt deem to meet the yellow card threshold. But he had to be talked down from giving Etzebeth a yellow.

    Wonder if they will bring Am over. We have plenty of cover at centre and wings, so may not be necessary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Some weird decisions in that match.

    But I don't think severity of injury should be included in decisions. That's an impossible task.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,917 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    That would be a great idea. I'm surprised they haven't thought about it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,220 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It's not remotely agreed. Two of their penalty attempts came off the back of prior missed kicks and their try came from the missed kick off the crossbar. Just adding up their missed points is both ridiculously reductive but also just plain wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,917 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Hang on, so you are saying that if they scored two of those missed penalties that Ireland would still have won?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It's an irrelevant question because if those kicks were made, it changed the shape of the game - we can't know how Ireland would have responded. We might still have won given that our gameplan would/might have changed to reflect the points scored by SA. It's all "if my granny had wheels" territory cos it doesn't say anything except apply arbitrary logic without applying context to follow suit.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,220 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Well they wouldn't have scored their try so yeah.

    It's obviously a stupid argument either way. Outside of a last minute kick to win it's always a stupid argument.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,220 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Georgia beat Wales the last time they played a year ago. I suspect they are unlikely to repeat, but it's not a "foregone conclusion".



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,484 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Was that the one where the defender was basically on his knees and Mapimpi charged headlong into him? If so, it was the first sensible decision I've seen. No shade on Mapimpi, everyone is encouraged to carry like that, but it's about time we stopped expecting players to magically dematerialise out of the way.

    Etzebeth only being a penalty was the second sensible decision. Absolutely nothing in that, even if you want to forensically examine the contact area and height off the ground.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Wont argue with that, I think both correct too. Just the referee didnt initially.

    We seem to get a lot more replays where foul play is suspected, compared to replays when tries are scored. You just hear the TMO and referee talking in the background while the player lines up for the conversion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 423 ✭✭legend99


    Traditionally rugby has this in a lot of competitions - Bowl, Shield, Plate on top of the main Cup. Even extends to the 7s series where all teams continue to play out for something.

    If you were doing, I think all teams should play on. If you had 5 team groups as now, leave 1/2 into main cup quarters; 3/4 into the Shield quarters; put fifth place in Bowl semis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,537 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'm surprised that this hasn't happened already. Could sell so much more advertising and tickets. No brainer



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    IIRC the Rugby Europe Championship has play offs as well, all the way down to 7th Vs 8th (Belgium v Poland, for anyone curious lol); the World Cup is a bit of an outlier structurally but then maybe it just comes down to simple cost. Play offs and "shield" competitions means more outlay to to spend on host stadia, facilities, staff, etc etc.

    Honestly the more I've thought about it, the more the 24 team expansion will be the best of both worlds here. Fewer lopsided games in the pools and more meaningful clashes, while giving the traditional 3rd placed teams something proper to play for - a place in the knockout stages. I don't think it'll be the disaster some claim.



  • Registered Users Posts: 423 ✭✭legend99


    Assume cost must be part of it? How much would hosting all those extra nights cost versus how much would it generate?

    Which raises the question in general - who pays for the costs of participating teams in general?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,537 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Hopefully the chancers running the CC will take more of the benefits of group structures like that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,772 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Mapimpi gone and the Pollard/Libbock conundrum must be hugely upsetting SA's prep and confidence.

    Have to be the top team in worst shape going into the last weekend of the pools.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,164 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    They've played their 4 pool games. They've just sit back and see what happens this weekend.

    Am has been added to the squad to replace Mapimpi.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,506 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Who is buying these tickets though, especially at literally a few days notice? They have the main draw years in advance supposedly because such a long lead time is needed for sales.

    So under a plate/shield competition we find out next Sunday that fixtures like Tonga v Uruguay, Chile v Portugal and Scotland v Japan are happening a week later. How many fans are going to purchase tickets for these games and travel to France (or Australia in 4 years)? How many fans already in France are going to stay on? How many advance sales could have been made to locals when the teams were unknown (Group A 4th v Group B 4th is a pretty tough advance sell).

    And advertising/broadcast revenue. How much are these games actually worth to advertisers/broadcasters? Very little imo - if you are paying X to be a sponsor or broadcaster of the main event, then I don't believe you'd pay any extra money. You might accept the games as a free content filler, but paying money for them? I see it as a bit like the soccer EPL decision to televise every game during Covid - they quickly found out that Picks 8/9/10 had no commercial value and broadcasters weren't willing to pay so they became freebies to Sky/BT/Amazon.

    And finally the players - depending on how long pre-camp was they have been away for around 7 weeks. Is there really much enthusiasm to hang around for another 2 weeks to participate in a Shield/Plate? Or just get the hell home?

    So whilst I can see the merit of the idea in a sporting sense, I don't think it stacks up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 423 ✭✭legend99


    Yes. Doing it in the 7s model, when it's all done in a weekend, when everyone is there anyway, is one thing, but everything you've raised here on the practicalities of the 15s game and it going on for weeks more for those teams, is very valid.



Advertisement