Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1330733083310331233133691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    They left Ukraine because Europe offered refuge. Not everyone can fight, and not everyone wants to fight.

    Millions left the areas Russia annexed quickly (people that didn't wish to live under Russian occupation) and also areas near current front lines within range of Russian artillery and other attacks, which fighting has made unlivable.

    Without the easy access to the EU, the people would mostly have had to be rehoused and supported in unoccupied regions of Ukraine, a large burden for a country trying to defend itself. As already mentioned movements in/out of Ukraine have been ebbing and flowing since then, with the progress of the war etc.

    Govt.'s of countries that are facing existential threat + are a gonner if the military fails [a situation we could find it hard to bend our noodles around] will try and urge people to join the military, and will use conscription when they have to. Should not be a big shock.

    That this happens is not actually a reflection of public support in Ukraine for continuing fighting, or for the current positions of their govt. on land concessions to Russia to stop the figting etc. No one rational usually wants to fight "to the death" and of course should situation becomes hopeless for Ukraine (it is not I think), they will stop fighting.

    It is all just the heaping of misery their neighbour has piled on them, but for some reason you criticise govt. there or those giving military aid that helps them keep fighting.

    Russia of course has no need to fight and no reasons to force people into their meat grinder but they are busy doing both all for a filthy war of choice with pretty base goals. Putin can try & throw a coat of patriotic Mother Russia paint on it but we outside the bubble should be able to see what it is. People piping up about Ukraine & conscription don't have very much to say about this here usually!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt



    More bad news but they do mention they've still got half their stocks so it should last a while. Need to get their act together though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Look at the end of the day, the only way the war will end is through negotiations. Whether that’s today, tomorrow, next week, month or year.

    I’ll be happy once it’s over and people can get back to some semblance of normality. Apparently that makes me some form of Putin supporter. The world is not black and white. There are shades of gray everywhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Ive been saying this for weeks , ramping up production for artillery won't reach maximum capacity until 2028 , Ive posted previous articles saying exactly this was going to happen,the several companies who produce shells are trying to supply NATO and Ukrainian but NATO orders will be getting Priority due to the shortages , NATO does not have unlimited supplies of munitions,and still only 7 Countries out of 30 are making the 2% gdp spending requirements for NATO ,but Ukraine are chewing through thousands of rounds of artillery week in and week out,



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,272 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Well either you are a bullshitting Putin's useful idiot spreading disinformation (most likely) or you haven't a breeze about what is at stake for Ukraine and their only way of seeing a peaceful end to this.

    Either way you are spouting waffle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    The thing is, what follows is that every time Russia chooses to invade a territory they get a favourable deal. You're also ignoring that there's gonna be a huge amount of animosity from Ukrainians towards Russia so it's unlikely that the public mood will favour handing over territories. The only favourable scenario in negotiations is Russia's immediate exit from the country and reparations for the war, that is not likely to happen.


    You've also made pretty untruthful claims such as claiming Fico isn't pro Putin even though he's actively justified the war in recent weeks. That's not shades of grey, that's either ignorance or being dishonest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭macraignil


    How do you negotiate with someone who has proven they won't stick to an agreement? Ukraine gave up its soviet era nuclear weapons with an agreement with russia that their borders were to be respected yet now putin has taken part of Ukraine and sent hundreds of thousands of troops there to occupy the land they ceased or die trying to do so. I have read some of the weapons they gave up have actually been fired back at Ukraine by putin's forces just to make it even clearer that putin can not be trusted.

    The idea that there was going to be a massive break in the moskovyte lines this summer and the occupying troops would be expelled quickly from Ukraine was a nice idea but I suspect Ukraine is aware that they need to destroy putin's war machine so it can't be used against them again and unfortunately I don't think that is going to be achieved very quickly. The Ukrainians are however making progress.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭TokTik


    We’ll see how it ends. I’m guessing talks and agreements. You lads have some heroic victory over the Russians. Only one of us will be right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,392 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭zv2


    If you want to engage in some good old-fashioned Russian Whataboutery what about the tens of thousands of Ukrainians who willingly defend their country? What about the millions who endure and are willing to see this through? Whataboutism - Wikipedia

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,318 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Explain what agreement can be reached with a country who sees Ukraine as a lost region of Russia, its leader writing a literal essay on the concept, without using ideas that amount to appeasement.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭jmreire


    if you think that Ukrainians will accept any kid of " Deal" with the monster who has unleashed hell on their country, its you who needs to think again. If all support for Ukraine was to collapse in the morning ( it won't) and Putin rode into Kiev on his tanks in victory celebrations,, his hell would only be starting. In 10 years Russia was unable to subdue Afghanistan, and remember, his military had the full run of the Country on land and in the air. Yet they failed. And one of the reasons they failed was because the cost of keeping in Afghanistan the military to keep it subdued. It was driving Russia to bankruptcy. Another reason was the Nr of body bags coming home each week, and this was microscopic compared to the Nr of dead and injured Russian's that have and are coming back to Russia on a weekly basis from Ukraine. Ukraine will still be there and still Ukrainian long after Putin and his mafia thugs are long dead and gone. Puti bit off more than he can chew, and already the indigestion is settling in and eventually, it will kill him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭TokTik




  • Registered Users Posts: 429 ✭✭thereitisgone


    Lets see in 1 year the importance of artillery, no doubht it will still be important, but drones are coming ahead in leaps and bounds rapidly

    Much cheaper and more accurate to send one drone instead of 4 shells

    This war is constantly changing, not just this war but probably also wars in the future



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes Putin's reign began in blood, continues in blood, and will end in blood. Seems to be the standard for Russian's.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Yeah and no ,

    Drone is effective where and when you don't have to deal with electronic warfare systems,but when you have dedicated modem systems drones loose effectiveness,the fpv drones being used in Ukraine are operating on 2.5-5 GHz Radio, Jam those properly your drones become a paperweight, where 4 155mm do serious damage and you Can't jam them ,and while drones look like the future more and more counter drones are coming online , small drones have very limited operating times something like 25 minutes at most and that drops dramatically in cold weather



  • Registered Users Posts: 983 ✭✭✭Mike3549


    Air alerts and bavovnas in Sevastopol again. Good



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,155 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭zv2


    It is interesting that he says "we" got him in...we as in FSB.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's well documented putin was put into power, it's been discussed time and time again on here



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭zv2


    True and when you extend the argument the question becomes 'Is this really Putin's war or is he just a useful fanatic, fronting a sinister FSB war?' People say Putin went a bit crazy during lockdown and started a war. I think it is more complex than that.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The point now though is who controls who..??? Once Putin got his hands on the levers of power, did he lay down his authority on everyone, including the feared FSB? He certainly brought his FSB /KGB colleagues with him to the Kremlin anyway. So as he is still in power, it appears that he presently has their support. Time will tell



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭relax carry on


    There is no point negotiating with Russia. Russia doesn't abide by its own agreements. Putin may not be immortal but there is no great appetite for a functional democratic society in Russia. Who comes after Putin will be just as bad or worse.

    The only way Ukraine survives is for Russia to be completely broken or Russia to withdraw to its own borders while agreeing to hand over it's citizens involved in the multitude of war crimes committed by Russia; along with Russian assets being used to cover the reconstruction of the sovereign country it decided to invade. There is no happy ending here and no amount of Hellen Lovejoy esque wringing of hands will make it ok.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,502 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Since you are the preeminent poster on this thread championing negotations, what do you think a peace agreement will look like?

    Just in broad terms? Will Ukraine give up territory? Will Russia have some other influence over their affairs? Who will pay for all the damage and destruction? Will people who commit war crimes be held accountable? Will Ukraine be guaranteed that its seabourne freight will not be interfered with?

    Ive asked everyone who champions a negotatied peace but never get an actual answer - what do you see this peace actually looking like?



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,502 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    And Ive been saying for weeks that the big problem isnt that NATO countries cant produce enough shells, its that it isnt worthwhile scaling up to producing 5m dumb shells a year (which they could easily do if NATO countires really wanted to) its that no one wants to invest in the capacity to produce so many shells when, once the Russian war is over, demand will drop off a cliff for dumb munitions.

    Arms manufacturers will produce enough shells so that in a worst case scenario they will keep producing them at the same rate for years to come, or they will produce them in accordance with existing capacity, or they will increase production if governments take the risk and invest or commit to long term large orders.

    In reality, the difficulties in producing dumb shells can be compared to the supply constriction in the Vinyl records industry. Its not that they cant produce enough, its that they dont want to put significant investment into an old technology because of a sudden increase in demand for outdated tech.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,708 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Someone just as bad as Putin or worse.... This is what people say, but if I think about it, if that person exists, it begs the question why they haven't taken power already or are agitating for it in an effective way. They wouldn't be politely waiting in line. If they are, it strongly suggests they're under the yoke of Putin's political machine as much as anyone else is in Russia which isn't a great indicator of their ability to consolidate power.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    As you know he's his one loyal army within the military,two main objective squash decent and keep him in power,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,406 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Has been rumours for weeks now (could be just fanciful or wishful thinking) that Ukraine would launch a large scale offensive by sea directly into Crimea itself.

    All Eyes On Rafah



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement