Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland v Scotland. Saturday 7th October. Stade DeFrance

123468

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There's nothing to decide, the rules are clear, no confusion.

    Section 2.3.


    "For clarification, in the case of a tie between three or more Teams at the end of the pool phase, once the highest ranked Team has been determined following the above criteria, to determine the next higher ranked Team the process would repeat, starting at criterion 1."



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    I think that was a prank, twitter post taken down since.

    I think the twitter poster was saying the rules had been changed for Pool A so France would be through on points difference instead of losing out on head to head if they lost to Italy and drew on match points with Italy.

    But the rules are still the rules for both Pool A and B, no matter how stupid the rules are.

    They should have made the rule that the top 2 teams would be qualified by virtue of points difference as the first criterion for more than 2 teams on the same match points total. I presume it will be changed for the next world cup, as well as an update to say if you win all 4 matches you automatically top the group.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,422 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Was there a suggestion that the rules were changing mid tournament? That wouldn’t have even been discussed that would be a recipe for legal cases



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Technically, those are the 2019 rules (aside from anything else, I really hope the final tie-breaker isn't the world rankings as of October 14th, 2019). The 2023 rules are here: https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2023/05/03/fb8ea1ec-b3d9-46c6-933e-bdd1105e3bed/RWC-2023-Tournament-Rules.pdf, but yes, the tie-break rules have not changed apart from using the rankings at October 2nd 2023.

    The social media posts were simply incorrect (or debatably just poorly-worded/ambiguous), and were subsequently taken down. The rules are clear.

    They should have made the rule that the top 2 teams would be qualified by virtue of points difference as the first criterion for more than 2 teams on the same match points total. I presume it will be changed for the next world cup

    Why would you presume that? They're the same rules as were in place for 2019, and 2015. Points difference in a three-way tie is not an objectively better way to do it than the current system. You could just as easily end up in a scenario where you are knocked out by a team that you beat in your head-to-head, but they ran up a monster score in an end-of-pool game against an already-eliminated Tier 3 team.

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    If between the three tied teams they all have won one match and lost another, best rule is to use points difference to eliminate the team with the lowest points difference. Simple and logical. Whichever team goes out could claim a team they beat got through, so it's flawed to use that as a tie-breaker.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Scots are a strange bunch, listening to Jim Hamilton interviewing Stuart Hogg and if Ireland were playing France he would want France to win, he even has northern ireland relatives. Also they talked about which current Scottish players would get into the team and he offered Gilchrist, Russell and VDM, the conversation petered out I think they knew it was a poor answer



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Gilchrist over who?


    James Ryan?

    Berne?

    Henderson?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    Squad, maybe. Team, no. Sexton is, and always will be a better flyhalf. VDM is a turn-style in defense. And as for Gilchrist? GTFO.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Another forum saying Henshaw has picked up an injury in training



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,808 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    I guess it will answer the question of who makes the bench. McCloskey or JOB?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Has to be McCloskey surely, saying that as a Leinster fan btw



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,812 ✭✭✭accensi0n


    Big loss, hopefully he's good for after the Scotland game.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    With henshaw doubtful with a niggle, do they put job or mcloskey on the bench to get 1 of them a bit of game time?

    Jimmy o brien for me Can give him 20 minutes in a multiple of positions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭kuang1


    I watched that last night and I thought the exact same thing. Hamilton asked Hogg "which Scottish players get into that Irish side" and Hoggs body language was saying "oh ffs...you didn't just ask me that. I have to lie now." After listing 3 players he just wanted to change the subject.

    Nothing wrong with the question of course, but no Scotsman would like the honest answer to it!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,711 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I’d go with JOB. McCloskey could make more of an impact but would be a risk against that Scottish midfield if we had to reunite the Aki and McCloskey midfield axis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I would 100% cheer for France against Scotland and I have Scottish relatives. What's strange about that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭Rigor Mortis


    For me it cements Crowley at 22 with O'Brien going 23.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,711 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Someone had a couple of miserable childhood summer holidays.

    In fairness, it’s the normal competitive edge between close neighbours. Out of interest, would you cheer for England or Wales if they played Scotland?



  • Registered Users Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever


    Have a horrible sneaky feeling earls might make the 23.

    Looking 1 game ahead to NZ, if ringrose or AKI pick up a niggle, do they start stu against NZ for his WC debut?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    It'd depend on the current team. Right now I'd probably lean:

    Scotland v England - Scotland

    Wales v England - England

    And my many childhood summer holidays, in France, were wonderful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 891 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    Probably the best would be to use the points difference but only for the matches between the teams themselves, ignoring the matches with the other teams. The problem with using two different criteria (points difference & then head-to-head) is that you have the crazy situation where, for example, Ireland would be out at a certain score on Saturday but would qualify if they lost by more!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,595 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Yeah, I'd be far more comfortable if it was O'Brien defending in the 13 channel compared to Aki. Was it the Italy game in the last 6N where Aki looked shaky defensively playing outside McCloskey? JOB is a canny defender and technically-sound tackler. Teams won't get much change out of him at 13.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    delete



  • Registered Users Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever


    My point being if Henshaw is not right for next week. McCloskey needs to make the 23 this week.

    Otherwise they run the risk of either Ringrose or AKI picking up an injury on Saturday throwing stu into the big time the following week with Absolute no game time



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'd be surprised if he picks McCloskey over JOB for the 23. Gives up so much versatility, and JOB is quality in his own right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    If Henshaw is a doubt I’d say Stu starting against Scotland and then either Aki or JOB at 23. I just don’t see how a question at 12 opens a spot for Earls. It’s a classic needs must moment for Farrell, adversity and flexibility determined by circumstances is his/their secret weapon. The manner in which the team adjusted to SAs defensive tactics comes to mind, problem solving when presented with new circumstances, etc. nothing drastic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    If Henshaw is left out of the 23 entirely, I would see Stu benching.

    As has been said a number of times, Ringrose is the key man in determining the 23 jersey.

    His ability to cover wing allows a specialist 12 on the bench.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Bundee or Stu don’t offer the cover at 13 that cover at 13 that Henshaw does though when Ringrose goes to the wing



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    The more I hear contributions from Scots like on OTB or on Left wing , I'm getting more nervous. Naturally they are going to talk up their own team, really just hope we get off to string start then kill the game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Fair point, yeah. But Faz was happy to go with Bundee at 13 against Italy in March when Ringrose was injured last minute; whether he is still seen as a potential 13 against a stronger team, I guess we'll find out tomorrow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    Thornley have Earls, Kelleher and Conan on the bench.

    Sheehan starting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,711 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    We looked very porous against Italy. Wouldn’t want to see that partnership repeated against the strongest unit of a good Scottish team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Moving Aki from 12 isn't the answer to any question. He has had 3 MOTM performances on the trot. Let him do what he does best.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You are nervous of no.1 ranked Ireland being beaten by Scotland, who we beat easily earlier this year, after losing several players to injury and having to cobble together a front row and line out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Who is the replacement for Ringrose were he to go down? Maybe Farrell saw Henshaw going to 13 up until now but Im not sure he has an alternative to Aki in the absence of Henshaw. JOB is the other option who has played at 13 for Ireland...not forgetting Keet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    12 is the forward in the back line. Too important to mess with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,751 ✭✭✭This is it


    While you can always have an upset, I don't expect it Saturday and I think we'll win by 15-20 points.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Cian Trcaey in the Indos predicted team.Hendo in for Ryan.

    Possible Ireland team: H Keenan, M Hansen, G Ringrose, B Aki, J Lowe; J Sexton (capt), J Gibson-Park; A Porter, D Sheehan, T Furlong; T Beirne, I Henderson; P O’Mahony, J van der Flier, C Doris. Reps: R Kelleher, D Kilcoyne, F Bealham, J Ryan, J Conan, C Murray, J Crowley, K Earls/S McCloskey/J O’Brien.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    To be fair we didn't beat them easily and its a one off game. I completely get what you are saying, but this is like a cup final, anything can happen.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    We beat them 22-7, and lost 5 players to injury. Not ignoring this:

    "With both Irish hookers, Dan Sheehan and his replacement Ronan Kelleher, forced off, it seemed there may never be a better time for Scotland to break a long pattern of Irish dominance. For most sides losing two hookers is a crisis, but Farrell's men barely noticed. Josh van der Flier threw perfectly well into the line-out, while substitute prop Cian Healy slotted in at number two and promptly helped his side win a scrum penalty."

    And that was in Murrayfield.

    Ireland will win easily on Saturday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,836 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    There's nothing wrong with a few nerves, in fact they are necessary IMO, it keeps the focus. Obviously it makes no difference if we're nervous as fans, but I hope the players feel it too. Everything is on the line on Saturday night.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    We did beat them easily in the end. We won 22-7 and had 2 or 3 chances to get the TBP where we made some unforced errors to stop ourselves getting it. They scored just once all game. And that was in Murrayfield with all the aforementioned injuries. The first half was a close battle, but we pulled away in the second half with relative ease.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    "Why GENIUS Finn Russell scares Ireland"

    I watched this video thinking Ireland would win by around 10 points.

    By the end, I completely changed my mind. Ireland will now win by around 20 points.


    There's absolutely no "genius" whatsoever displayed in any of the clips they show on Russell:

    Clip #1 = He panics against SA blitz and kicks it straight at one of SA's players, gifting them possession in midfield.

    Clip #2 = This is a set play off a lineout that our second if not third-choice 10 could do.

    Clip #3 = another set play off lineout, he did well here but it was completely prescribed and against Tonga (who were too narrow).

    Clip #4 = most compelling piece of out-half play so far, he marshaled the troops well (but again... against Tonga).


    They then go on to discuss the lineout, breakdown and other issues. It's actually decent content, interesting stuff. But my lord do they overestimate Russell. We put vdF on a QB-spy mission on first phase play, and then otherwise watch our spacing. Bundee will handle Tuipulotu, and there is genuinely not much else to the Scottish attack.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭TRC10


    The build up to literally all of our games against Scotland is the exact same. We constantly hear "oh Scotland are an excellent side" "they have the tools to hurt us" "they can beat anyone on their day" "Finn Russell this, Finn Russell that". It's the same every time we play and frankly I'm f*cking bored of it. We invariably beat them every time. Even in 2019 when we were utter dogsh*t, we easily dispatched them in 40 minutes.

    I strongly dislike both Scotland and Wales. However Wales have on occasions in the recent pass, beaten us, won some titles and got to World Cup semi finals, so while I don't like them, I have a level of respect for them. I have no respect for Scotland. They talk themselves up time and time again as though they're some great team, and time and time again they fail to backup the talk and this weekend will be no different. I'm not worried about this game in the slightest. We're a better team in every way and I expect us to win by at least 10, probably more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,148 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    Flying over today with my 9 yr old son. A trip we've been planning for for 18 months. I'm wide awake with excitement because its an amazing thing to be able to do. Our first away game too!

    It will be an amazing experience. My son has never seen Jonny play for Ireland so that's great. We had the pleasure of meeting Peter O'Mahony after a Leinster v Munster game and he was such a top guy. He left a lasting impression on my son and (touch wood) it will be a privilege for us both to be in attendance for his 100th cap.

    Nervous about the game because there's so much riding on it. We can take comfort from the Murrayfield performance this year but it could be close. Fingers crossed.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,529 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    TRC not worried about the opposition....

    I'm putting a tenner on the Scots



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I'm very confident of beating them but there has been an incredible amount of revisionism about that game.

    Up until JGP came on the field for the last 25 minutes and sparked us into life, it was 8-7 to us and we were lucky to be ahead. Scotland had blown one certain try in the first half by VDM not giving a simple pass and then we bundled them into touch as they went for the line on the stroke of half time.

    There were two narratives after the game. The first was complimentary to Ireland finding a way to win and remaining so calm through a very unusual scenario of having no hooker and multiple early injuries. The second was that Scotland blew it and played with their heads up their arses, missing the opportunity to turn the screw when Ireland had no hooker.

    But the game wasn't easy. It was in the balance for the majority of it. We had another level to go to and Scotland couldn't live with that which is what I hope/assume will happen again but Scotland forced us to dig deep and go to that level which many teams haven't done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭Shehal


    JOB had a great outing at 13 versus SA in November last year off the bench so I really dont see why the coaches arent backing him there, he seems like the obvious 23rd man when you also consider the other positions he covers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭Nigzcurran




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement