Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

17374767879410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,998 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    No, to win an appeal you have to show the action taken was wrong. The broader context is irrelevant. They appealed a specific decision and had that appeal of that specific decision dismissed. If you rob a hundred quid off someone who only has a hundred quid, it impacts them far more than if you rob a hundred quid off someone who is a billionaire. But the action is the same, and will be judged the same way.

    And again, even beyond dismissing the appeal, they did not punish or sanction the referee who made the decision, or the VAR official who recommended it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    So can point to where these rules are written down? How to win an appeal etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,998 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Because it's literally how all law works. It's the entire basis behind that wee statue you see in courthouses with the blindfold and scales. It's basic common sense here.

    Can you perhaps point towards where specific decisions being appealed are not actually judged on those specific decisions, but rather how big the impact is of those decisions? Like, by your rationale, no appeal will ever be won unless it changes the end result, regardless how right or wrong it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    Just as I thought. Nothing concrete to back up your opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,998 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Well, mine is rooted in all established law. Yours is rooted in fantasy.

    I don't know how better to explain that when you appeal a decision, that appeal is about that decision. If that appeal is dismissed, it is because that decision was judged to be ok.

    And again, if there were a problem we'd have seen the ref and VAR official punished. They weren't.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    You're taking 2+2 and getting 5 from the France Tunisia game because it suits you that it could have been a precedent for the Liverpool goal standing the other night despite it being against all established laws of the game. That's the only fantasy here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,998 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    We're going around in mad deranged circles here. It's a precedent because a different version of the same situation playing out. A goal decision was incorrectly judged, just like in the Liverpool game. It was discovered to have been an error after play had resumed, just like in the Liverpool game. But there, the VAR and ref stepped in and fixed the error. There was a specific appeal against that specific decision, which was dismissed. And no ref or VAR was ever sanctioned or punished for their decision. Ergo, it is reasonable to suspect that had similar actions unfolded similarly, we may have had similar outcomes.

    That's as far as I can go on this before I lose my mind I think 😅



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    We don't know on what grounds the appeal was dismissed. That's my whole point. All we know from FIFA is the one line sentence I quoted earlier.

    "The FIFA Disciplinary Committee has dismissed the protest submitted by the French Football Association in relation to the Tunisia v. France FIFA World Cup match played on Nov. 30"

    In other words you are just surmising.

    Anyway per your last line we'll agree to disagree



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭davemckenna25


    If FIFA decided the referee was correct to call back the game and award the goal in the French game outside of the rules, can you explain why they haven't changed the rules to make it the correct course of action?


    Would it be because they still think it was the wrong course of action?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,998 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    No idea - it's quite the mixed messaging. On the one hand dismissing the French appeal, and not punishing or sanctioning the ref who made the decision, or declaring that what happened was wrong, are all clear indications that they were happy enough with the refs ad hoc solution. But on the other hand not going the extra step towards changing the law suggests they had reservations. Could perhaps be a bit of what we have in actual law all the time, like Roe V Wade being protected by precedent for decades, without ever being protected by law (which eventually became its undoing). Maybe by not condemning the action, but not changing the law, they stop the possibility of frivolous appeals to go back plaguing matches, while maintaining the option of just letting it go if the need is clear, as they did with the Tunisia game. Who knows.

    I doubt they'll ever come out and tell us, so we can only guess. Hopefully they take that extra step now, or find some other solution so the path and outcome can be more certain for everyone involved.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,833 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    So many clubs taking pish out of then now even European clubs.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,902 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,257 ✭✭✭joeguevara




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,065 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Genuinely surprised at the amount of posters who are taking Klopp's comments as literal.

    This is what the top end managers do all the time. They use their platform to create a narrative around their sides.

    As sure as the sun will raise tomorrow Liverpool will get a few nice decisions over the next few weeks.

    Same at the start of the season - as soon as Wolves didn't get that penalty and all the up roar that followed you knew Utd would be shafted in the coming weeks. Next game... Shafted.

    It's something I wish ETH would do more of. The best manager create an environment where you better be damn sure you aren't giving a slightly contentious decision against them or you'll have them on your back in the media.

    I've seen posters even call it a "siege mentality", which just shows that it works.

    Liverpool's next game the ref and the VAR will not give anything they are even slightly unsure of against Liverpool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Did Wolves get any dodgy decisions?


    Can we expect Tottenham to get screwed rather than Liverpool get good decisions then by this logic?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    I would have thought that conceding a goal at 0-0 when that team is down to 10 men but then the ref after saying it is a goal forgets to include it is enough good decisions for 2023:)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,321 ✭✭✭The Big Easy


    Is Southgate trying to get sacked!?

    How can he in all seriousness continue to pick Maguire and Henderson? It's a complete joke!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,253 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,257 ✭✭✭joeguevara




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    And that is why the calls for a replay are completely nonsensical. Without VAR, the goal was ruled out. With VAR, the goal was also ruled out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,737 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Loyalty? They're effectively already qualified, I assume he'll phase Henderson out before the tournament. Maguire he seems to trust but if he continues sitting on United's bench he'll eventually lose his place (in the starting 11 at least).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,902 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Or without VAR the linesman have to do their jobs again fully and not relay on the back up of VAR so it would never have gotten that far as if the linesman thought it was offside his flag would have gone up right away. Swings and roundabout here now at this stage. Just wonder if it was any other team would there have been as much whataboutery

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    We let the kids ref the game when they are starting out up to U10, think it might be worth a try this weekend in the PL, would be entertaining if nothing else. They could not review the first yellow card where the spurs player's foot made contact with Jota's knee though obviously we all know Jota was using his knee to foul that player.

    https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/38573537/panel-says-diogo-jota-red-card-liverpool-spurs-was-incorrect



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,065 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Not sure. Spurs may well struggle.

    But I know it's highly likely Liverpool will be on the "Postive" side of a few decisions over the next few weeks because that's the standard we have in the PL.

    Sure you don't have to believe me. We'll revisit in a couple of weeks and we'll see if Liverpool suddenly end up on the other side of a few calls.

    If they don't I'll hold my hands up and say I was wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    I agree though the great thing about the current standard of referees is the uncertainty of what they will do.

    Each referee should be reviewed and rated by an independent person/body of people after each match; there should be an ability for those refs in lower leagues to move up whilst those in the PL if they maintain a really low level can be moved down a league.

    I could never understand why most of the refs just stay in the PL every year regardless of how good they are at their job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,321 ✭✭✭The Big Easy


    That can only go so far though. He's making himself bigger than the job he's in.

    If you can't get near starting for your club while they're going through a defensive injury crisis you should be nowhere near the England squad.

    He's coming close to devaluing a call-up and the honour of playing for your country.

    Equally if you choose to effectively leave competitive football you can't continue to play for your country.

    I'm not English nor a fan, but I think it stinks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,998 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    The Henderson one is nuts in any competitive sense alright, I can kinda understand the Maguire one though, particularly with the number of defensive injuries at Utd that will likely see him back in the frame getting game time.

    Though with Hendo it might be case of bringing him back to consciously give him a last game at Wembley before he's phased out. They've a friendly against Australia in this window, probably a decent opportunity to give him his goodbye. He served them well over the years, so could see Southgate repaying that with a swansong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    I actually think Klopp's approach will mean that refs call everything absolutely down the line and do it very clearly over the next few weeks. The scrutiny will be huge so if Liverpool suddenly start getting favourable calls, there will be a lot questions asked and opposition managers sniping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,065 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    You have more faith in PL official's ability than I do so.

    None of the ref's will want to be subject to a post match analysis on their incorrect decision against Liverpool in the wake of this one. Even subconsciously it's going to be there. They will be second guessing calls - I haven't seen anything from any ref in the PL for years to think they will handle this pressure/situation well.

    This isn't something against Liverpool either - Klopp is paid to win matches for them. He's dead right to try every trick he can. In an ideal world we would have a system / officials in place that could handle the pressure but these can't.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Let's come back and revisit in a couple of months and we can bet a pint on it. Maybe I do have too much faith in the officials...



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement