Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

Options
1303304306308309345

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,933 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    there's not much going on on-site, they've dumped a load of gravel either side of the track which is possibly a base for the platforms but I haven't seen much else happening.

    The adjacent big housing development is shooting up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,654 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    The DLR site seems to imply planning was granded.




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,057 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    (Mods can delete posts for you. Looks like someone already did.)



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    If the loads of gravel are present on either side of the station. Does it give us a clue as to when this work on the new station will start at Woodbrook? Would it right to say that it could take place either before or after Christmas or something unless they are going to be built as separate projects.



  • Registered Users Posts: 79 ✭✭lateconnection


    Any idea when the Coastal South route is going out for public consultation?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,525 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The oral hearing for DART+ West is underway from today and should last at least 2 more weeks. Nothing earth shattering on the first day, only issues are some belly aching from politicians. Katherine Murphy was particularly obstructive, in favour of the project but blithering on about a patch of green space being used for a temporary construction compound. As if it could be built by magic over night. Some nobody councilors whinging into their cornflakes over construction noise and traffic, despite the extensive traffic modelling carried out and printed in black and white on front of them.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,350 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Thanks for the update! How are you following it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,525 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Its not available on line, in person only



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,525 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    East wall residents want smart noise cancelling and window blacking out devices for privacy and quiet as in Tokyo. But beside a railway that's been there for 150 years. Similar to people who buy houses next to an airport imo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Can we buy a few of their houses and create an interchange with Connolly?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,525 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Would be great but we'll outside scope for the present project



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I know, was tongue in cheek in response to their complaints.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Does anyone know how the oral hearing is going?

    Doesn't seem to be attracting much in the way of media coverage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,184 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    These hearings are rather dry procedural events, normally last 3-5 days. First day is usually quite funny as no one in the room has ever been to one (hasn't been a railway works order oral hearing in +10 years) so working out how it works procedurally is fun.

    The only entertainment is typically a local politician who goes off on a rant and makes themselves look foolish.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,525 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    As described mostly a dry affair. I havent sat through the whole thing, just snippets. First few days were lengthy speeches from 70+ year olds about their childhoods and how they don't fancy a change, despite the fact they won't survive to see project completion and by n large the project won't impact them in any real sense. Fascinating from a psychological point of view given that their lives include the second half of the 20th century, arguably the most change inducing 50 year period since humanity began but sure look.


    There were some submissions from people who bought houses next to a 160 year old active railway and are unhappy with noise.


    A tiny number of people have submitted that they are genuinely impacted by cpo


    It'll run for another week at least, finishing Friday 13th



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,350 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,525 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    In person only



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,706 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    So 65 new battery-electric trains will be based in Drogheda as of next year and are due into service in 2025. What will this mean for service patterns on the northern line and are any existing dart or commuter fleet going to be retired as a result?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,184 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    They will be based at Fairview initially

    Its 37 trains, 6 of which do not have a battery fitted so those won't be going to Drogheda until 2030+?

    Good chance the first batch will never get to Drogheda as the original DART fleet is falling apart (rust, breakdowns etc) and the order was sized to replace them 1:1



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭Thrashssacre


    With the new commuter arrangement for dart South West how do Irish rail plan to avoid conflicts for portlaois commuter trains presumably they'll use to fast line post dart expansion and stop at hazelhatch first then all stations to portlaois surely this will cause huge problems for existing Intercity train who previously could overtake them on the 4 track section before the merge.



  • Registered Users Posts: 563 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Good timetabling would help, but I struggle to see that working in reality. Do any stations have more than 4 platforms / lines? Perhaps some stations between PortLaoise and HH would need a 3rd (or 3rd and 4th) passing loop. Of course there are no plans for passing loops west of HH so it doesn't answer your question.



  • Registered Users Posts: 133 ✭✭DoctorPan




  • Registered Users Posts: 17,720 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    You’re talking about one train per hour off-peak here, with another to Newbridge or potentially Kildare.

    That’s perfectly manageable to fit in with an hourly path to Cork, Galway and Waterford.

    In the peaks, some of the Limerick, Galway and Waterford line Intercity services double up as commuters so again they will cope with that too.

    The timetable will presumably be recast to deal with the revised service patterns.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,525 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Don't think it'll be a major issue for the timetabling. The rail strategy proposes a new intercity line from Hazelhatch to Portarlington so I guess that's the long term solution. Presumably by then the intercity trains will be much more frequent



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,874 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Not DART+ itself but Kishoge Station has been brought up here before so thought I'd put this here. SDCC have a consultation running to add bus lanes and cycle lanes to R136 Grange Castle Road out side the eventually to open Kishoge Station. Presumably this is to facilitate interchange between rail and bus once the station finally opens.

    While it is good intentioned the the bus + cycle lanes, adding a heap of parking spaces to the side of the road is a complete waste of space. There is a large car park there already plus lots of space to expand it if desired. The extra space should be used to plant schrubs and trees to remove the motorway feel from that road. They also want to add a forest of bollards to prevent cars parking where they shouldn't! I'd also have bi-directional cycle lanes on each side of the road to facilitate cycling to and from the station.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,057 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I am opposed to this, they are removing a traffic lane each way. Yes the road has a motorway feel because that is the idea. Some routes actually need motorways, they are not some inconvenience to be removed just because there's a train station there. Most of the space freed up by removing a lane each way will be wasted as they are just going to hatch it off and festoon it with bollards.

    If they want space for bidirectional bike lanes they could remove the central barrier (which makes it harder to cross the road).



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,720 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The R136 is not a motorway, full stop.

    When Kishogue station opens there will have to be a pedestrian crossing installed at the station.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,807 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Woodbrook tender awarded

    Estimated cost €5m - somehow we build train stations vastly cheaper here than in the UK even taking in to account how barren the designs can be.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Our tendering process isn't based on giving the job to a party donor or a chap you were at Eton with... the UK has become a very corrupt country in the last decade or so, while we have largely cleaned up our act.



Advertisement