Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rugby world cup post mortem

1679111221

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,483 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    I'm still too deflated for post mortems.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,737 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    To be fair, this:

    Perhaps? Like maybe drop him down to 3rd choice?

    Is a perfectly reasonable reading of this:

    Crowley should have been number 1 out half in my view with Sexton backing him up perhaps.

    There's a heavy suggestion of what Podge was asking there. If that's not what you intended, why not try to clarify?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    In what specific way do you think not rotating the squad caused the problems that resulted in the loss on Saturday?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭Field east


    In ,circa, the last 10 min of the match and especially in those 28 odd passes before the final whistle most / all of the Irish players were ‘ on their last legs’ - but most especially was Sexton. He was basically just standing in the line and just passed the ball as soon as he received it and then just stood there again to repeat same. Looked like as if he was bereft of ideas, looked like as if he had given up , was going through the motions , etc, etc. I reckon that he was totally, totally exhausted , was probably carrying some physical pain. It was not like him at all. Management should have SPOTTED it and replaced him. It’s not up to the players to tell management that they need to be replaced.

    maybe management felt that Sexton ‘s rugby brain was reason enough to leave him on for the full 80 min? We are all experts in hindsight



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,640 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Fair enough if the manager didn’t think he was ready to be first choice but as you say he should at least have been on for the last 15 to 20 minutes and should have started a game or two earlier in the group stage so that he would be match fit to come in when needed when Sexton was goosed which he was before the end on Saturday night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Yet plenty of people have mentioned the advantage the SH teams have.

    World Rugby is looking at a global season. Plus at the moment SA are nearly playing a full 12 month season, it's not sustainable.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He was perfectly match fit, that was not the reason he was not brought on. He was not brought on because Sexton is a significantly better player, even when goosed. Would it have been better to have Crowley on? maybe, it's a pretty marginal call to me. But that is entirely about in game decisions and nothing to do with the Scotland game or the 6N.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,640 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    With his age profile they should have been expecting to need to take him off. I think they were slow with necessary in game management in both the big games v South Africa and New Zealand.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,640 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    I can’t agree with that, not at this stage of his career when he’s out on his feet, Sexton is not a significantly better player in those circumstances. That’s the criticism many have of the manager’s decision making in that regard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,744 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    We lost structure when Crowley came on against Scotland.

    Ultimately, it is still irrelevant to whether or not Crowley should have started against Scotland or in the 6N. He wasn't brought on because Farrell thought leaving Sexton on gave us a better chance of winning. We did make 50/60m up the pitch in that period after all, so it's not a ridiculous assertion.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,737 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    We lost structure when Crowley came on against Scotland.

    Fwiw, I disagree with that tbh, Podge. Crowley did perfectly well in his time on the pitch. Any problems we had in that 30 odd minutes on the pitch had little to do with Crowley.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I've not watched it back and it's not always easy to judge these things in the stadium (especially at stupid 9 o clock games with a full day of boozing), so I will defer on this one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    We did not win the game did we. It was a crazy decision to leave Sexton on for the full match he is 38 years old he is a shadow of the player he was last year not to mind 5+ years ago.

    O'Gara WA right on one thing Johnny wound not play second fiddle to another player. He was never redl team player. On more than O E occasion he threw a wobbly over being taken off.

    If Farrell had no confidence in Crowley or banned him for the late concessions against Scotland he should have Ross Byrne on the bench.

    NZ knew with 10+ minutes to go that JS would not be making any serious runs and would be passing out along the line or kicking so they did not need to actively mark or shadow him.

    It was a serious error letting him on.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,442 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Just watched the end there on Against The Head, Sexton was running into the ruck (twice) trying to get the ball in the final play.

    Tired, but hardly out on his feet and useless.

    A lot of exaggeration going on today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,274 ✭✭✭threeball


    He brought a squad but gave them very little time, even against the minnows. Beating 3rd rate teams by 70pts was of no use to us when our back up players weren't getting up to speed and taking the workload off the first 15.

    Jimmy O Brien was excellent for the 20mins we saw him for. Had he been given his chance against Scotland we would have had a fully fit Lowe or Hansen in the QF.

    The Scotland game wasn't overly physical but we lost some key players and preparation time due to fielding the same 15 yet again.

    I cant see how anyone could argue that we should have been going full strength or close to it for Tonga and Romania.

    I can almost guarantee that if you look back through world Cup winners or finalists of the last 3 or 4 tournaments you will find no teams that rotate their players as little as we did.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1 Eam.o.


    Mad how no one is calling these frauds out. When it comes to the crunch, Ireland rugby has won 0 games. Forget the 5 nations, when it comes to the supposed big deal of the 9 nations cup, 8 teams have won a quarter finals match when the fodder have been eliminated. Our heros / warriors haven’t won a bean.

    it’s now successful to get within a score of a team ranked 3 places below them with NZ playing with a man less f-r how long?


    the narrative needs to be challenged #Loserd

    Mod: Trolling. Two week rugby forum ban.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,512 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    Honestly why are people acting like this was a shock result. FFS they haven't lost to Samoa in the QF. What I thought was obvious before the tournament began was 4 teams were ahead of the rest and 2 of them would be gone at the QF. The tournament so far has shown the gap between the top 4 and the rest. 4 years ago was an embarrassing disaster beaten by Japan and hammered by NZ. This time we hammered the 5th ranked team beat SA and lost a close game to NZ.

    Both QF have shown there's a score between those 4 teams and on the day small margins will win it either way. In the series we beat them 2 1 but again the games were seriously competitive. Yes Ireland's scrum and lineout were poor but to suggest Ireland completely flopped is ridiculously negative. Yes it's very disappointing but Irish rugby is clearly in excellent condition and plenty of talent coming through still.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    no previous tournament has had a rest week though, id agree it probably wasnt the best use of the squad overall but i can also 100% understand why the teams were picked as they were given how the fixtures worked



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,442 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Who said it was a WC success? we lost the match.

    Rugby is as successful as soccer over the timespan of the respective WC’s. Irish rugby has won everything available to win bar a WC.

    It really doesn’t require the affirmation of all. If it doesn’t rock your boat, find something that does. My partner hates it and manages to avoid it in a rugby mad house. Enjoys soccer and enjoys it in a soccer mad house, ditto GAA

    I don’t know why you think you are being defrauded, what have you invested and why did you do it, thinking what you do. Sounds a bit deranged to me TBH



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,512 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    Also I saw someone mention it's an opportunity missed because other teams will be better in 4 years. There's really no evidence for that. Welsh rugby is bankrupt and in serious trouble. Scotland appear to have very little coming through. Australia how will they be much better when interest and participation keeps declining in favor of Aussie Rules. I actually expect in 4 years time for the top 4 or 5 teams being the same as they are now. Even the club game in England is facing serious issues although I expect they will remain a top side through sheer weight of numbers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin




  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin


    Well said and needs to be said. WE are a joke when it comes to the greatest stage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,744 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    The fact you straight away are calling them frauds kind of bars the rest of the nonsense you have written. Just shows you are delighted with the loss, which allows you to have a rant.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,640 ✭✭✭TheCitizen




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,442 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Go watch it.

    He was active around the ruck for the very last play trying to keep the ball moving.

    He was not 'standing still' in the middle unable to move for that entire last play as stated.

    I.E. 'he was out on his feet' is a totally wrong take.

    Like everyone else on the field he was tired.

    After that, second guessing the decision a coach is paid to make, because you have the benefit of hindsight and a bee in your bonnet about one player is wrong. Or pointless. Take your pick.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14 mascher8933


    In the final Phase Ireland were trying to engineer a penalty that would enable a kick to the corner and a maul which would have most likely got over for a try. Sexton was experienced to know this and not risk anything loose. Prior to that Ireland went 40/50 metres up the field to get into that position, with Sexton marhsalling. Unfortunately it did not materialise but I (and the obviously Andy Farrell) trusts Sexton in that position to organise and keep the structure. The move ended due to a bad clearout from McCarthy. Not a Sexton issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,442 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Totally agree here. I posted that exact same take earlier. Except I think Barnes was extremely harsh on the team going forward when ignoring multiple infringements and particularly Whitelock not releasing in the final play.

    Sexton, the player 'out on his feet' was buzzing around that final ruck doing the marshalling as you say. I too believe he was trying to engineer a penalty, based on previous success with the lineout maul and the phenomenal NZ defensive line that was proving difficult to breach late in a gruelling game. The correct play in my opinion.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Aside from Hansen potentially being not 100% I'm not sure how any of this impacted the QF.

    If the matches had fallen differently we would have planned differently. As it is he basically used Tonga/Romania as warm up games for the first team. People love to moan about squad depth, but I can't see what impact it had here. We had quite a good injury slate compared to everyone else tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,640 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Nah.


    They’re a great team and an excellent manager but they were favourites in that game with the bookies in New Zealand and elsewhere and with the pundits. So when they come up short there were a few things that were part of that on Ireland’s part. Among those the line out, the scrum and the difficult one for you Johnny Sexton playing the full 80.

    In my view I think it’d have been great to bring someone like Sexton with his experience on in the last 10 to 20 minutes in a situation like that but I’ve read elsewhere that he wouldn’t be up for that kind of role? Seeing as he started I’m of the view that fresh legs at 10 could have been crucial at that point. Might be a slight minority view? but I’m certainly not the only one that thinks that. That view and others of what might have been will prevail until the next time Ireland get to a quarter final.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,442 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    When you are paid to make the in-game calls, get back to us.

    When you are getting paid I will make sure to challenge those exaggerating the effects of your decision making just to have a go at a player they clearly don't like.

    How's that?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    but I’ve read elsewhere that he wouldn’t be up for that kind of role?

    I'd suggest you stop reading whatever establishment came out with that claptrap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,640 ✭✭✭TheCitizen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,442 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,640 ✭✭✭TheCitizen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,172 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Still bleating on about Sexton. Unhealthy.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,737 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    a maul which would have most likely got over for a try.

    It'd have given us a shot at it, but I certainly wouldn't have it in the "most likely got over for a try" category. That's far too strong imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,442 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Well they had done it twice. And would have learned from the held up one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 831 ✭✭✭hahashake


    Side note: Rugby League is the biggest rival to Rugby Union in Australia. AFL is more of an indirect rival. Geographically RL & RU are popular in the same regions. RU is more of a private school sport with some suburban & rural community + immigrant support, whereas RL has much wider appeal. The silver-lining for Australia is that you can transfer players fairly easily between codes depending on the position, and some kids grow up playing both. AFL regions have always been relatively untapped but you would think there would be plenty of potential RU backs going by skillset and body-type.

    Lions tour + next RWC should hopefully give them enough of a boost to at least not go backwards.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,737 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    They also would've had to win the lineout tho. It'd have given us a great shot at it, but I think "most likely" is just too strong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14 mascher8933


    The Lions tour, especially to Australia is embarrassing and should be scrapped but thats another thread entirely



  • Registered Users Posts: 14 mascher8933


    NZ would not have competed if it was a line out and would have prepared to defend the maul

    But our actual forward substitutions were on top and we had the better of NZ in that dept will never know



  • Registered Users Posts: 831 ✭✭✭hahashake


    Perhaps but it's a money-spinner for all sides so won't be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,206 ✭✭✭jiltloop


    I'm still absolutely gutted about that exit. The most frustrating thing is that Ireland didn't play at their best, it was there for the taking if they had got the performance right but they didn't. Despite the shambles of a draw, we still should have been in the final.


    I would be very hopeful that given a more sensible draw in the future we will break the QF curse. Also I think the acheivements and performances of this team have been incredible and there is a lot to be hopeful for in the future.


    As someone else stated, we should prepare for the next WC. Not just the 6N and the test series/tours. We need to do a full squad review and focus on geting the next generation of players up to speed for 4 years time. If can be competitive and maintain our high rankings in the interim (which we absolutely should be able to do) then great. But there should be a long term plan for the next WC. And I think Andy Farrell is the right guy to keep at the helm for the foreseeable future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭Field east


    After every defeat the losing team mentions about lessons learned - said in a kind of standard/throw away remark / just to be saying something

    well , after this WC , this LESSONS LEARNED comment is definately relevant. Ireland has come a long,long way in skills, etc, over the last , circa , 20 years. There was a time when we were very competitive for the first 60 to 70 minutes and then fell away because opposition being much fitter / more stamina . That day is gone now.

    BUT lessons need to be learned now after this WC Eg

    (1) We need to start the scrum straight , keep it straight and keep it up . Porter , I think, was pushing the wrong way- ref pointed it out but he persisted and fave back possession to NZ. We need to have a range of strategies when we lose the ball in the scrum

    (2) in mauling near/ on the oppositions try line we need to MAKE SURE that the ball is in the possession of a player at the back of the maul. I could not believe what happened in the NZ match

    (3) we need to ‘ play ‘ the ref’. If he has no problem with some of the NZ players being off their’lines’ at the throw ins then we should reciprocate at the oppositions throw ins. I wonder was it pointed out enough to the ref in the NZ match. The ref in the NZ match seem to have been prickly aboutt some of the play and blowing the whistle while letting other things go

    (4) irl is at a disadvantage because of its relatively small pop and rugby still in the Cinderella bracket when compared to UK, France, NZ, Australia, South Africa so it is more challenging to amass a good number of Very skilled players and with the appropriate ‘bulk’ where required. This probably has a bearing on Irelands ability to rotate players in a tournament such as the WC. BUT it HAS to be done - otherwise players get exhausted, not rested up enough between matches and there is a higher risk of injury



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭Unflushable Turd


    A question I’ve not seen posed, or maybe I have missed it, is how is a player still playing top class rugby at 38?

    is player management, in that clubs like Leinster only play the top players in European matches and they can therefore play for longer, a good thing, or should they be playing week in week out and therefore the clubs are forced to look at younger replacements earlier?

    Ireland looked jaded in that game, was it because they just can’t handle a game per week like that?

    I am only throwing this out as a suggestion.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    is player management, in that clubs like Leinster only play the top players in European matches and they can therefore play for longer, a good thing, or should they be playing week in week out and therefore the clubs are forced to look at younger replacements earlier?

    Sexton has played 22 times for Leinster over the past 3 years, including missing many big games. Lots of replacements have been looked at.

    Why was Sexton able to play at such a high level at 38? Cause he's not normal. He is a terrible example of anything really as he is a generational if not more talent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    Ur right, was porter trying to win an early scrum penalty, just keep it up and keep square for first one anyway and see, also the all blacks were definitely encroaching on our line out but we didn't on theirs, if the referee isn't reffing it then work away but no point being the good boys, we just seem to try to be the non sinners but other teams push every limit. We need to wise up, and kelleher should have scored 100%, no excuse if in doubt stay in maul until he has more protection and then drop, very bad mistake to make that cost us the game and the opposition getting a drop out is a ridiculous reward.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭riddles


    needing a trying at that stage was also a factor - given we had three points on offer at the start and a kickable penalty in the second half.

    We saw in the France and SA the value of taking points on offer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,442 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    We also saw the value of not doing it and going for the max.



Advertisement