Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"I started a joke, that started the whole world ......" | Ireland v New Zealand.

1686971737490

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Now they want names of the sports psychologists!! Sorts Psychology has been around a long time, and it's been known for a long time that you can't completely control someone's mental state.

    Regardless of all the 'walking through' each match situation, visualisation, affirmations, meditation etc a sports psychologist does with a player you don't know how they'll react come match time.

    Do posters want to get Keith Barry in and have them going around in a trance🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭downtheroad


    We had Scotland beaten by half time. That was nor a tough test. It wasn't as easy as NZ's runout against a putrid Italy, but a tough game it was not.

    NZ would have qualified from our pool, we'd have qualified from theirs.

    You can't seriously be using the pool draws as an excuse for Ireland losing to NZ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    I just saw this , if accurate, if we slip outside the top four by the time the next draw is made, Our chances of progressing to a semi final at the next world cup are seriously reduced. Likely by the next world cup things will have changed again, i.e England and Wales won't be as poor. but at the moment ; outside the four top sides , there is a serious drop off in quality... Australia will have probably gotten their act together too...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,685 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    FFS, you clearly didn’t watch. It was a hard physical game from a team who didn’t lie down despite the score.

    Hansen and Lowe got injured in it. Hansen having to have a HIA too.

    It was so intense at a point it boiled over into a shamoozle.

    Much more sapping than anything NZ went through.

    I am no more using it as an excuse. We lost because on the day NZ were better.

    Before the day if you thought we were a better team that guaranteed us the win, that is your issue.

    I certainly took nothing fir granted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,900 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    How do people come up with this crap. Did you ever play sports?

    The only thing you concentrate on is doing your job. It's about what's happening right now.

    It's not about five minutes time or winning the match. If you do that stuff you aren't going to be successful.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever



    Are you saying that the occasion got to the players early doors which is why they didn't do their job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,900 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The start looked a little nervy. They got it together then and worked very hard for the rest of the game.

    Lineouts have been a problem since before the world cup and that should have been rectified before our first game in the tournament. We did well at shorter lineouts and I'd have stuck with them outside of attacking five metre ones. The opposing teams were putting up two pods against our lineout.

    It appeared the whole team got tired late in the game. I blame that on having our two most difficult fixtures at the end of the pool stage. We were the only team in the knockout stages who had a schedule like that.

    Even then they fought very hard right up until the end of the game.



  • Registered Users Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever


    Tiredness was possibly a factor. I Think using the first 15 throughout the pool was a mistake myself and will be a lesson learned.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,685 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin




  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin


    Major difference was that Ireland played an occasion and NZ played a match...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,685 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You don’t repel a 2o phase onslaught by running around like ‘headless chickens’. You have to be organised, accurate and decisive or they score a try.

    That happened in the period you are waffling and exaggerating about.

    Honestly, of all the posters arriving to demean you are the one I think hasn’t watched the match or if you did you haven’t the foggiest what you were looking at. From the minute by account of the Guardian

    5 mins. The latest penalty lineout is tidier from NZ and they are in the Irish 22 and working repeat phases . It’s nearly 20 phases in total, but is being well contained by Ireland, with credit to both sides for their breakdown discipline.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,534 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Even the claim that we **** the bed in the first 20 is crap. We had two attacks where we had them under massive pressure, the one where a poor pass from Keenan went into touch, and JGP lost the ball forward under their posts. Right after that Barrett has his chip that leads to the try. It was a very even period, a couple of moments came off for them and didn't for us



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,685 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes.

    Because NZ are a class top team and took their chances. Did somebody convince you they were not capable of scoring? We were a point behind them at halftime anyway.

    Also not achieveable by headless chickens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin


    Were we not supposed to be a class top team as well in fact the best in the world? I said they were headless chickens in the first quarter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,685 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They weren’t.

    It has been proven to you they couldn’t possibly have done what they did if they were but still you insist with a lie.


    FFS Two other top teams went toe to toe and scored sgainst each other in the Fra v SA game. Where the hell did you get the notion NZ were not likely to score. Preposterous bullshit.

    Goodnight



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin


    Overly emotional...understandable after the loss. Sadly that Irish side choked by definition. I think it was our best ever chance to at least get to a semi-final but anyways



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,534 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Watching the match back, we were far better with ball in hand than NZ for the majority of the game. They struggled to make any ground against our defense, whereas we managed multiple times to make inroads into their 22 from deep. Such narrow margins.

    JGP made some poor decisions at key times when we were pressing unfortunately.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I watched some but it’s a hard watch, very unlucky even with a few mistakes that cost us. ABs made very few and no handling errors which is an incredible stat. Shows they needed a near perfect game to beat us even when we weren’t playing at our very best. Hats off to a truly great Irish team heading into the sun.


    2 moments stuck out from the game and I’m still feeling them, the.2nd last pass to Ioane for the first try was well forward, and Whitelock never released for the turnover that ended the game!


    definitely not a choke on Saturday. Irish teams of old would have folded up their tents at 13-0 to the all blacks, we did even in 2019, but not this team. They fought back twice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭Greengrass53


    The amount of forward passes not pinged is off the scale. It's a bit of a joke at this stage just like a lot of rugby laws. Every ref has his own set of rules afaics.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,787 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    So why focus on the outhalf who had the easiest ride of the lot of them. Our 12 had played every single minute in the competition, why aren't you clamering that he should have been replaced??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,599 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Waste a time. There are posters who will pin choker/bottler based off even one criterion: we lost.. many who probably didn’t even watch the match..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,685 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    😁😁 You have been busted lad.

    Not a leg to stand on. Making stuff up and for what?

    To feed nothing but your bitterness.

    Those who follow the rugby threads here predicted you and others would arrive on thread if we happened to lose, you didn't disappoint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    The david Beckham documentary on Netflix. Real Madrid started having bad run of results, the manager said it was the other sides raising their game against the favourites ...

    I've just seen the new rankings, Ireland 3rd. Behind nz and sa. If we just adopt the " throw the baby out with the bathwater " approach its risky. We really want to be in the top seeds or the challenge becomes much bigger...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,685 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Agree...Barnes had opportunities to put his arm out several times in the last phase including the blatant last no release. Contrary to the exaggerated talk by the 'bottling gang' Sexton was running into the rucks trying to keep the ball moving and was tired not 'out on feet'. I think he would have kicked to the corner and then it would have come down to the team with momentum trying to maul over a lineout against a team desperately defending for the previous 10 minutes.

    Such a finely balanced outcome. NZ instantly knew what they had just pulled off and fair play to them, we'd be still celebrating after that titanic struggle had we come out on top



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭crusd


    Heard an experienced front rower (James Tracey) go through this one. In his view Porter was 100% legal. His view was the NZ loose head was stepping out a little with the aim to cause Porter to angle in on the opposite side. Furlong held square however and did not fall for it and Ireland got the shove on. NZ knew however that Porter's bind looks odd even when its legal. So they painted a picture for Barnes and he fell for it. Probably teed up with a dossier sent in during the week. It was planted in Barnes head that Porter could be illegal in the scrum and when a picture was presented that looked a bit odd up goes the arm.

    That first penalty was crucial. Correct decision there was penalty to Ireland and we would have been 3-0 up.

    Here is analysis from a retired International LH Prop. He would have said the second one was a penalty to NZ though. Picture was already painted from the first though. Ireland knew they have to change the picture from the first one so were probably thinking what they needed to do differently and the NZ LH got the push on Furlong. Porter was still legal though.




  • Administrators Posts: 54,059 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This post is incredibly defeatist. Talking about the Test Series after we've just been dumped out of the World Cup again, good grief. Yea a test series isn't a bunch of friendlies but it's still absolutely nothing relative to a World Cup, and this is 100% just lowering expectations to avoid having to be critical.

    Honestly lines like this, writing it off as "that's sport" are infuriating:

    We fought back well from 0-13. We had a chance to win it, we were held up over the line. We lost that's sport.

    The most frustrating thing about this tournament is not that we lost yet another quarter final, it's that we failed to take what was the biggest opportunity in our history. We could have 100% won that competition outright.

    Ireland had to get out of their pool and then win 3 games. If Ireland had played to their ability for those 3 games they would have won it. This is not like pervious tournaments where we would have needed monumental fortune to go the distance, this was a tournament where the outcome was entirely within our own hands, we were more than good enough to get the job done.

    And we didn't. We didn't play to the best of our ability in the biggest game of our history. We coughed up cheap points. We let in soft tries. We missed absolute gimme kicks. Writing this off as "just sport" is 100% nonsense IMO, waffling about a series win last year, as if that's supposed to take the edge off, is incredibly small time. I would bet you not a single NZ player or fan would swap Saturday night for that test series, they know what really matters. We were very sure of ourselves after that series win, they gave us a big dose of reality on Saturday night cause they are the ones that got the job done when it really, really mattered.

    I guess people who can so easily write this off and just move on, or talk about series wins, or talk about six nations, weren't as invested in the outcome of this tournament as I was.

    We are definitely the best nation in the world at finding excuses when our team doesn't deliver, perhaps our willingness to keep making excuses and avoid saying anything too negative plays a part in why Irish Rugby persistently fails to break this glass ceiling.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    'I guess people who can do this weren't as invested in the outcome of this tournament as I was.'

    Expected better. Childish argument, I care more than you, because I'm obviously feeling the pain more. How do you know?

    Seems to be an agenda here.



Advertisement