Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Rugby world cup post mortem

1121315171835

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,459 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    Also I saw someone mention it's an opportunity missed because other teams will be better in 4 years. There's really no evidence for that. Welsh rugby is bankrupt and in serious trouble. Scotland appear to have very little coming through. Australia how will they be much better when interest and participation keeps declining in favor of Aussie Rules. I actually expect in 4 years time for the top 4 or 5 teams being the same as they are now. Even the club game in England is facing serious issues although I expect they will remain a top side through sheer weight of numbers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin




  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Piskin


    Well said and needs to be said. WE are a joke when it comes to the greatest stage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,600 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    The fact you straight away are calling them frauds kind of bars the rest of the nonsense you have written. Just shows you are delighted with the loss, which allows you to have a rant.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,583 ✭✭✭TheCitizen




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,700 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Go watch it.

    He was active around the ruck for the very last play trying to keep the ball moving.

    He was not 'standing still' in the middle unable to move for that entire last play as stated.

    I.E. 'he was out on his feet' is a totally wrong take.

    Like everyone else on the field he was tired.

    After that, second guessing the decision a coach is paid to make, because you have the benefit of hindsight and a bee in your bonnet about one player is wrong. Or pointless. Take your pick.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14 mascher8933


    In the final Phase Ireland were trying to engineer a penalty that would enable a kick to the corner and a maul which would have most likely got over for a try. Sexton was experienced to know this and not risk anything loose. Prior to that Ireland went 40/50 metres up the field to get into that position, with Sexton marhsalling. Unfortunately it did not materialise but I (and the obviously Andy Farrell) trusts Sexton in that position to organise and keep the structure. The move ended due to a bad clearout from McCarthy. Not a Sexton issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,700 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Totally agree here. I posted that exact same take earlier. Except I think Barnes was extremely harsh on the team going forward when ignoring multiple infringements and particularly Whitelock not releasing in the final play.

    Sexton, the player 'out on his feet' was buzzing around that final ruck doing the marshalling as you say. I too believe he was trying to engineer a penalty, based on previous success with the lineout maul and the phenomenal NZ defensive line that was proving difficult to breach late in a gruelling game. The correct play in my opinion.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,188 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Aside from Hansen potentially being not 100% I'm not sure how any of this impacted the QF.

    If the matches had fallen differently we would have planned differently. As it is he basically used Tonga/Romania as warm up games for the first team. People love to moan about squad depth, but I can't see what impact it had here. We had quite a good injury slate compared to everyone else tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,583 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Nah.


    They’re a great team and an excellent manager but they were favourites in that game with the bookies in New Zealand and elsewhere and with the pundits. So when they come up short there were a few things that were part of that on Ireland’s part. Among those the line out, the scrum and the difficult one for you Johnny Sexton playing the full 80.

    In my view I think it’d have been great to bring someone like Sexton with his experience on in the last 10 to 20 minutes in a situation like that but I’ve read elsewhere that he wouldn’t be up for that kind of role? Seeing as he started I’m of the view that fresh legs at 10 could have been crucial at that point. Might be a slight minority view? but I’m certainly not the only one that thinks that. That view and others of what might have been will prevail until the next time Ireland get to a quarter final.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,700 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    When you are paid to make the in-game calls, get back to us.

    When you are getting paid I will make sure to challenge those exaggerating the effects of your decision making just to have a go at a player they clearly don't like.

    How's that?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,188 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    but I’ve read elsewhere that he wouldn’t be up for that kind of role?

    I'd suggest you stop reading whatever establishment came out with that claptrap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,583 ✭✭✭TheCitizen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,700 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,583 ✭✭✭TheCitizen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,128 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Still bleating on about Sexton. Unhealthy.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,603 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    a maul which would have most likely got over for a try.

    It'd have given us a shot at it, but I certainly wouldn't have it in the "most likely got over for a try" category. That's far too strong imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,700 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Well they had done it twice. And would have learned from the held up one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 831 ✭✭✭hahashake


    Side note: Rugby League is the biggest rival to Rugby Union in Australia. AFL is more of an indirect rival. Geographically RL & RU are popular in the same regions. RU is more of a private school sport with some suburban & rural community + immigrant support, whereas RL has much wider appeal. The silver-lining for Australia is that you can transfer players fairly easily between codes depending on the position, and some kids grow up playing both. AFL regions have always been relatively untapped but you would think there would be plenty of potential RU backs going by skillset and body-type.

    Lions tour + next RWC should hopefully give them enough of a boost to at least not go backwards.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,603 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    They also would've had to win the lineout tho. It'd have given us a great shot at it, but I think "most likely" is just too strong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14 mascher8933


    The Lions tour, especially to Australia is embarrassing and should be scrapped but thats another thread entirely



  • Registered Users Posts: 14 mascher8933


    NZ would not have competed if it was a line out and would have prepared to defend the maul

    But our actual forward substitutions were on top and we had the better of NZ in that dept will never know



  • Registered Users Posts: 831 ✭✭✭hahashake


    Perhaps but it's a money-spinner for all sides so won't be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭jiltloop


    I'm still absolutely gutted about that exit. The most frustrating thing is that Ireland didn't play at their best, it was there for the taking if they had got the performance right but they didn't. Despite the shambles of a draw, we still should have been in the final.


    I would be very hopeful that given a more sensible draw in the future we will break the QF curse. Also I think the acheivements and performances of this team have been incredible and there is a lot to be hopeful for in the future.


    As someone else stated, we should prepare for the next WC. Not just the 6N and the test series/tours. We need to do a full squad review and focus on geting the next generation of players up to speed for 4 years time. If can be competitive and maintain our high rankings in the interim (which we absolutely should be able to do) then great. But there should be a long term plan for the next WC. And I think Andy Farrell is the right guy to keep at the helm for the foreseeable future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,675 ✭✭✭Field east


    After every defeat the losing team mentions about lessons learned - said in a kind of standard/throw away remark / just to be saying something

    well , after this WC , this LESSONS LEARNED comment is definately relevant. Ireland has come a long,long way in skills, etc, over the last , circa , 20 years. There was a time when we were very competitive for the first 60 to 70 minutes and then fell away because opposition being much fitter / more stamina . That day is gone now.

    BUT lessons need to be learned now after this WC Eg

    (1) We need to start the scrum straight , keep it straight and keep it up . Porter , I think, was pushing the wrong way- ref pointed it out but he persisted and fave back possession to NZ. We need to have a range of strategies when we lose the ball in the scrum

    (2) in mauling near/ on the oppositions try line we need to MAKE SURE that the ball is in the possession of a player at the back of the maul. I could not believe what happened in the NZ match

    (3) we need to ‘ play ‘ the ref’. If he has no problem with some of the NZ players being off their’lines’ at the throw ins then we should reciprocate at the oppositions throw ins. I wonder was it pointed out enough to the ref in the NZ match. The ref in the NZ match seem to have been prickly aboutt some of the play and blowing the whistle while letting other things go

    (4) irl is at a disadvantage because of its relatively small pop and rugby still in the Cinderella bracket when compared to UK, France, NZ, Australia, South Africa so it is more challenging to amass a good number of Very skilled players and with the appropriate ‘bulk’ where required. This probably has a bearing on Irelands ability to rotate players in a tournament such as the WC. BUT it HAS to be done - otherwise players get exhausted, not rested up enough between matches and there is a higher risk of injury



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭Unflushable Turd


    A question I’ve not seen posed, or maybe I have missed it, is how is a player still playing top class rugby at 38?

    is player management, in that clubs like Leinster only play the top players in European matches and they can therefore play for longer, a good thing, or should they be playing week in week out and therefore the clubs are forced to look at younger replacements earlier?

    Ireland looked jaded in that game, was it because they just can’t handle a game per week like that?

    I am only throwing this out as a suggestion.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,188 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    is player management, in that clubs like Leinster only play the top players in European matches and they can therefore play for longer, a good thing, or should they be playing week in week out and therefore the clubs are forced to look at younger replacements earlier?

    Sexton has played 22 times for Leinster over the past 3 years, including missing many big games. Lots of replacements have been looked at.

    Why was Sexton able to play at such a high level at 38? Cause he's not normal. He is a terrible example of anything really as he is a generational if not more talent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    Ur right, was porter trying to win an early scrum penalty, just keep it up and keep square for first one anyway and see, also the all blacks were definitely encroaching on our line out but we didn't on theirs, if the referee isn't reffing it then work away but no point being the good boys, we just seem to try to be the non sinners but other teams push every limit. We need to wise up, and kelleher should have scored 100%, no excuse if in doubt stay in maul until he has more protection and then drop, very bad mistake to make that cost us the game and the opposition getting a drop out is a ridiculous reward.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭riddles


    needing a trying at that stage was also a factor - given we had three points on offer at the start and a kickable penalty in the second half.

    We saw in the France and SA the value of taking points on offer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,700 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    We also saw the value of not doing it and going for the max.



Advertisement