Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1329330332334335851

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 28,839 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Put simply, our main parties are completely beholden to their EU masters.


    Leo has no particular political principles and will do or say whatever he thinks will boost his personal profile and loves to be among the other "leaders" for a photo op any chance he gets.


    Coveney is even more beholden to the Great Experiment being a former student of the late Peter Sutherland. It was Coveney who was one of the first to talk about the plan to increase the population of the country by an extra million in the Ireland 2040 plan:

    Those obviously aren't going to be from a boom in the birth rate from the squeezed middle anyway!


    McEntee I've already covered above. One of the most dangerous Ministers we've seen in recent memory. Someone who had zero relevant experience or qualifications beyond working for her FG dad and taking "his" seat in a sympathy vote, but who has presided over the surge in immigration and handing out citizenship like sweets while the crime rates likewise surge and the Gardai quit in disgust over the lack of resourcing and futility of trying to bring prosecutions against people with dozens or hundreds of convictions already.


    Martin is on his way out and his only goal anyway was not to be the only FF leader who wasn't Taoiseach. Mission accomplished! Even if it did cause huge issues by handing over the running of the country to NPHET and Holohan.


    The media. We already know RTE are, let's call it "selective" in what they report on and how it's covered - particularly when it comes to the new arrivals, unless they are browbeaten into it by coverage on social media etc.

    Where the rest of the press is concerned it's not much different with a lot of the "journalists" either related to or married into political families, or aspiring to becoming staffers for them down the line. The result is again selective reporting or the recent trend of denouncing anything not "on message" as far-right - a nonsense argument in what is one of the most open, and easy-going cultures in Europe if not the world. Too open and easy-going as it's turned out as we're being exploited and treated like fools by ideologues, NGOs, our European "friends", and any opportunist with a sad story who makes it this far.


    It's not really surprising. We've always been a nation that swings between begrudgery and envy of what our neighbours have. We also have a precedent of "needing" to be told what to do - by the Church, by the EU, by NPHET... Anytime we've had an opportunity to make our own choices, we've given them up - or been told to vote again and give the right answer this time!

    Contrast that to the eastern European countries that DO value their sovereignty, their culture and their borders, and who aren't afraid to push back against our EU "friends" and you'll see why we've been overrun with people we can't support, while they're restricting access or actively sending them home.


    We need to decide what's more important. Our country and it's future, or letting a bunch of me-feiner politicians and EU sycophants sell the place off piece by piece.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Looks like a scenario that could easily become reality .



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,997 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    In fairness we have been sustaining Ukranian immigration for 18 months now without any major changes to our daily life. The only people who think it's unsustainable seem to be the far-right who do tend to bend the truth to suit their own agenda



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    baiting some of the more right wing movements seen around the globe in the last 10 years to set up shop here.

    There is definitely a gap in the market for this type of carry on


    But we already have 'indigenous' groups of this type

    Only they have up to now failed to attract any electoral support...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    That’s a liberal bubble mindset speaking, most European countries governments are far less ideological than that



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    We’ve spent (and will continue to spend) billions on them - I’d like to see this spending largely curtailed.

    We’re currently seeing a recruitment freeze in the HSE despite the country being awash with tax revenues.

    Those revenues should be improving our country, not putting thousands of people up in hotels indefinitely and throwing ridiculous levels of free money at them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,474 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    There are not many 'anti-immigration' parties in power in Europe - probably Italy and Hungary only, but it's difficult to see which one of FF, FG, SF, Greens, Lab and SDs would be okay with doing business with such a party in Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    You conveniently forget the cost of accommodating Ukranian refugees 5.5 Billion allocated this year . The highest welfare rates in the EU . We also had a record number of asylum seekers last year which adds to the cost and to August the the number is 7657. There will be Palestinian refugees coming soon . Do we just continue taking in refugees until it becomes unsustainable . The money spent could have been used for Irish citizens. The only logic to not providing social houses to Irish citizens is that many are in rent arrears . I doubt migrant refugees will be any better .

    Post edited by rgossip30 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Towns population quadruples overnight - no consultation with local representatives etc

    Sure why would the locals be involved, I’m sure this will have no effect on their ability to access their GP or any other local amenities



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    id be interested in seeing where he said this???

    like many, mcwilliams has continuously lambasted government policy for the serious fcuk up that is our property markets, the fact that its been their main objective to do whatever it takes to keep property and land prices elevated, via polices such as first time buyers grants etc, the implementation of such polices globally is known to further increase property prices....

    ...other criticisms for mcwilliams would be the serious lack of will by governments to implement other policies such as lvt's(land value taxes), to try reduce land hoarding of which is near epidemic proportions here....

    ...mcwilliams has spent much of his career heavily criticizing other policies such as the financialisation of our property markets, whos main aim is simply to extract as much wealth from our property markets, by any means possible, in particular my maintaining inflated property markets...

    ...mcwilliams has in fact always been very pro immigration, for various different reasons, including in trying to resolve our property problems....

    his latest take on our property markets, and other matters....

    https://player.fm/series/the-david-mcwilliams-podcast/when-mantras-replace-hard-thinking-the-case-of-the-irish-budget



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    “ anti immigration “ is a subjective soundbite

    by you’re definition, most Irish people are “ anti immigration “ as the majority of people believe we have taken in too many



  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭highpressisbest


    Ultimately if such a party ever got sufficient votes and seats, other parties will do business with them in some shape or form. No party would countenance doing business with Sinn Féin twenty years ago, but now there’s a good chance they will be in the next government. In Sweden, the Sweden Democrats now prop up the government.

    There is no appetite in Ireland for a party that is xenophobic or racist but perhaps there is for one that seeks a more sensible approach to immigration. Obviously, if the majority of people are happy with our current policies, such a party will go nowhere. As it is, the only parties offering a different approach to immigration are ones that also espouse views on abortion and LGBT issues that don’t sit well with the majority living in Ireland. A party would need to emerge that was at least moderate on social issues and opposed to our current immigration regime. That’s probably unlikely to happen. What has happened in other European countries is that establishment parties only harden their immigration stance in response to electoral gains from immigration sceptic parties. With no electoral threat, the establishment parties have no reason to change course. So we are probably still a long way from Denmark, where the consensus now seems to be quite immigration sceptic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,010 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    And when has that ever stopped a u-turn in the past? Of course say FF could seize the initiative - they only have to shift their position to that of more regulation and control of immigration. When asked to justify, they can just quote the changing circumstances of world affairs. Look at the tacit support that Peter Casey received from many voters in last presidential. There are a lot of Irish citizens & voters increasingly affected by the influx and when it starts to affect the 'middle classes', attitudes change.

    I say FF as I think FG are too long in government to credibly change on this. Labour and SDs unlikely due to own internal thinking. SF could very easily given their core belief in nationalism but seem afraid to go there publicly. They are afraid of anything that might rock the boat in terms of the perception of their vote in next election - it's steady as she goes and say nothing. They wouldn't be in step though with their core vote on this. If their ratings change though I think this would be an obvious policy strategy for them. Just too risky at the moment.

    But FF are on a hiding to nothing anyway, they should grab their opportunity while they can and harvest a sizable vote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    FF could seize the initiative - they only have to shift their position to that of more regulation and control of immigration.

    Do you think this is actually going to happen between now and the general election? Because there hasn't been a whisper of it yet, as far as I'm aware...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭thinkabouit


    ..

    Post edited by thinkabouit on


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,454 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Where are they working and are they trades people ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    There was a clip going around a while ago from his show over a decade ago.

    Can't find it now, but you'll have to take my word for it (hard in this day and age I know. 😃)



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    fair enough, but ive been following him for years, and ive never heard him say that, hes clearly very pro immigration nowadays, and id have to agree with him, theres no way we can resolve our major problems ourselves, we just dont have the people or resources to do so....



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    I was surprised too to be honest. Found the link but blocked by Xs Robots 😃. I'll DM



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    thanks for that, but thats not my interpretation from that clip at all, he was clearly saying thinking that continual immigration would not create any social problems, would simply not happen, and he was right, i.e. you cant keep loading your social services, especially without increasing the resources to do so, will cause problems, and it has, i think we d all need to see the large part of that clip, as i suspect its been taken out of context, to suit more anti-immigration sentiments! i suspect in that program what he was getting at was, start investing in critical social services, i.e. housing, health care, our major infrastructure etc etc, or you ll end up in deep trouble, and we are!



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,474 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    No evidence that the six main parties are out of step on immigration and refugees with the general population. A relatively small number of people making a lot of noise on social media about this is no 'silent majority'.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    And the associated blog posts?

    I'm not saying he's anti immigration, but he acknowledged there are down sides, downsides we have failed to deal with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    yea as much as possible, so we can all make a proper judgment on the clip, but again, ive been following him for years now, i have a fairly good idea of his work....

    i wouldnt necessarily say he was pointing out downsides, but probably more so, if you dont invest, you eventually get fcuked, as we currently are, i suspect this is what he was truly getting to in that show, i suspect he realised this many years, he could see we werent advancing our infrastructure, failing to invest, and now we are where we are, i.e. fcuked property markets, fcuked health care system, fcuked transport infrastructure, etc etc etc. you cant keep doing that, and get away with it, it ll eventually all catch up with you, as it is right now...



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,474 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    There are downsides to no net immigration also (serious labour shortages for example). It's not as if there is any clear cut right or wrong angle on this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    yup, we re at full employment so theres simply no humans to start resolving our most critical issues, therefore we gotta import them to do so, or else...



  • Registered Users Posts: 679 ✭✭✭US3


    What about the polls on RTÉ, Neestalk and virgin media.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Yes there is lots of evidence.

    The Irish public are not die-hard xenophiles and not delighted with immigration especially at such a large scale - but nor are they willing to switch from the main parties to be led by a procession of unknowns and weirdos like Irish Freedom Party, National Party.

    A political realignment is desperately trying to take form and being successfully being blocked from taking shape by the main parties. But if the main parties simply ignore the issue and pretend it doesn't exist then I agree with marno upthread that we are launching ourselves into a realm of the unknown.

    The stubborn commitment of the mainstream center-left to mass immigration all over Europe and the Western world despite what disaffected native populations want is driving strange changes and surprises all over and I doubt we have seen the last of these surprises.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ffg are a primarily center - center right parties, so.....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭growleaves


    They are, although FG are more of a synthesis lately (in some respects, not economic obviously).

    My post is all over the place so sorry for the confusion but I meant that in contradistinction to the Danish left-wing (where immigration is discussed and opposed on labour protectionist justifications) the mainstream Euro centre-left will not budge on this issue.

    On this understanding, the centre-right is the natural home of immigration as the immigrant and capital are the beneficiaries and Bernie Sanders maintained this as a position for years. I think, but I'm not certain, Jeremy Corbyn may have also been opposed or at least had mixed feelings about immigration also.



Advertisement