Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"I started a joke, that started the whole world ......" | Ireland v New Zealand.

1464749515255

Comments

  • Administrators Posts: 54,168 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Furlong has been off it for a while now, it is a bit concerning.

    I think he had a relatively young start to his career for a prop, it's potentially just miles on the clock that's affecting him at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Yeah I've heard from a few different people about Sexton v Ioane and POM v Rettallick. Definitely a bit of animosity between the teams or at least some players. But that only comes about when you're equals. If that makes sense.

    @awec Ireland definitely didn't play as well as they can but I think a lot of credit for that has to go to the ABs. I felt that Ireland had the ABs under pressure at times with their maul, their phase play, their defence and some line breaks. One issue Ireland has with linebreaks is the general lack of pace in the Irish team. And the ABs scramble really well. I think it the first try the Italians scored against us in the pool match, as Ange was going for the corner there were at least 5 ABs corner flagging.

    I've been thinking about it and do wonder if the IRFU needs a new mental skills coach. Now hear me out. A lot of players do seem to make uncharacteristic errors in big games where they are favourites (even just slight favourites). I'm thinking England for the GS, Saturdays QF and Leinster in recent finals. Now obviously the opposition gets a say in those matches but I do wonder if its something to be looked at. I hope it is part of the review.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Answer my question. If NZ got eliminated in the quarter finals, would they be welcomed home like heroes?

    It's what we do

    Yeah and that's the problem. We celebrate failure, which is why we always fail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,438 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    😁 FFS. yeh we always fail.

    We have won everything available to win in rugby (country and province) several times, except a WC.

    Yeh we always fail.

    Away outta that! 😁



  • Administrators Posts: 54,168 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The last paragraph is a fair question, and there may be something to it.

    I also wonder if we need to add someone to the coaching ticket who has relatively recent experience of winning these games. I know Mike Catt literally has a winners medal, but that was 20 years ago.

    You look at the rest of our coaching ticket, they're all former Irish internationals and one Rugby League player. None of them have any experience of getting it done. I do sometimes wonder if our approach is a bit too insular, using what we know didn't work for us before to guess what we need to do better, rather than getting a fresh, outside perspective on it from someone who has been there and done it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    The problem with being mouthy on the field is you like a right tool when u lose. Cane had plenty of reasons to give out verbally but instead just went out and played the house down. Some segments (a small number) of Irish fans and media have morphed into exactly the thing they profess to dislike about kiwis. Here’s a nice little clip of some guy called Derek McNamara. Comes across as a sanctimonious git. Respect opposition teams and do talking on the field.




  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I think Gary Keegan has done a superb job in terms of mental skills with the squad. Look at what they've achieved in the past 3 years since he joined. He transformed Irish boxing into an Olympic force winning multiple medals. He linked up with the Dublin GAA team and was their mental skills coach from 2015-2019 (the 5 in a row).

    I don't think a different coach in that area is going to transform them to ensure they have ice in their veins in such a game. Look at NZ. They sh*t the bed repeatedly in the RWC and were blessed to win it when they finally did in 2011 despite having a far superior team than France with a mighty 8-7 win at home. They didn't get it done for six RWC tournaments in a row, losing games they were strongly tipped to win every time. When they finally did, the referee gifted them it.

    It's human nature for players to make errors in that environment. Unfortunately, Ireland so rarely get to play in games of that level to become comfortable whilst NZ face SA 2-3 times every season and get far more used to that sort of intensity. We did let the occasion get to us, undoubtedly....but I don't think a different mental skills coach will be a magical cure for that.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,168 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I don't mean a mental coach for the players to help them cope with the occasions.

    I mean someone who can provide their experience on how best to approach these tournaments to maximise the chances of the team peaking at the right time. Tips on how to prepare for big pool games, knowing that there will be bigger games to come later. Things like knowing when to pile on the players and when to just leave them off to reduce mental fatigue.

    Doesn't even have to be a coach, just get someone in on a consulting gig nearer the time, but I do think someone who has been there and done it recently would provide valuable info to our setup, particularly when you consider that experience in winning these games within our wider panel is very, very thin on the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    One area I'm excited for in this post WC transition is the chance to get some pace into the team. I was very disappointed that Baloucoune wasn't given more opportunities in the system, I think having Stockdale and even Earls in the squad over him was a waste ultimately. Speed at 10 is an area we've been lacking for a long time, there's few 10s in Ireland who could make a break like Mo'unga did. Having that ability would massively enhance our attacking structure and pose more of a challenge to defenses.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Some segments (a small number) of Irish fans and media have morphed into exactly the thing they profess to dislike about kiwis.

    To be fair, if the team morph into being like the All Blacks I'll get over it. They have made strides in that direction already.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    My criticism of your viewpoint is that you are taking viewing the failure to score as indicative of the team not performing. We made a number of mistakes that cost us points, but we created multiple opportunities, which to me shows that the team did perform to the standards they've shown themselves capable of.

    The stats posted above show that Ireland largely outplayed NZ, and broke their defense systems more effectively than they did ours. Ultimately two missed tackles, one my Ringrose on Fainga'anuku, and Belaham or Sheehan on Mo'unga being the only times I'd point to as NZ breaching ours. In contrast, we went the length of the field multiple times, and put ourselves in positions to score. Bad decision making cost us, but that's different for me from the team failing to perform. The way we struggled against England in the 6Ns would be an example of that imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    You're being a bit revisionist there. It was 5 tournaments they failed at not 6. And there is no way you can say they were massive favourites in 1995, 99 or 2003 when you look at their results the previous year or even the same year. They shat the bed in the games against France in 99 (but Aus were favourites) and 2007. Maybe the semi in 2003 (Eddie Jones masterclass) but England were favourites.

    Anyway, those failures were the reason why they got Gilbert Enoka involved. It took time but it did make a difference in the end.

    I don't anything about Keegan or how long he has been involved but I would hope that what he is doing is part of the review and that he is taking a lot of learnings from this match if he is going to stay involved. I assume, based on what you have said about him, that he will. And he will improve.

    Awec's suggestion might have some merit. Hiring a recent winner as a consultant of some sort. Obvious choice would be Felix Jones.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,735 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Obvious choice would be Felix Jones.

    I think I read recently he was joining the England coaching ticket for next year. Potentially building a very nice CV for himself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,466 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    One look at the sport nerd\anoraks from Off The Ball and you'd know they never participated in any sport in their lives.

    Fair play to Sam Cane. I'm not a fan of sledging opponents, it puts a lot of fire in their bellies and is serious motivation. No rugby player is in a position to put down another, it comes back to bite them in the arse.

    This 'you're a sh*t Richie McCaw' was glorified in certain sections here and put up as the ultimate put down. The Anthony Foleys, Josh Van der Fliers and countless others don't have to resort to that rubbish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I really don't understand the Cane hate. He was off his game for a while coming back from injury but he's consistently been one of the best performers for NZ in this competition and he put Ireland's back row down on Saturday. More than that he's been consistently selected and given the arm band by NZ even when there were phenomenal alternatives available, people are crazy to think the ABs are selecting him on reputation or sentiment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭Madeoface


    Just about over my depression of losing to the most ungracious rugby nation on the globe. Good thread.

    Fair play Sam Kane and Ardie Savea. Monsters.

    Jonny should have come off with Furlong.

    Never ever thought I'd cheer SA but go the Boks.... Smash Ioane please...


    Long term having the staffers in the urc can only help us and weaken NZ.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    Have to say the NZ players were gracious in victory overall, but I would enjoy seeing the smugness wiped off Ioane's face. I was in the crowd right where he directed his taunt at the end of the game, and all it elicited was a "**** you".

    As I said, nothing against NZ in general - love their rugby, most of the players seem like decent people (seeing Bundee being consoled by Jordie Barrett was a nice image), but that guy shows that the 'no **** heads' policy isn't really enforced anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I didn't like POM slagging Cane last time out, felt cheap and ungracious. One thing to give it back to a dose like Coles, but to be a **** in general is lame



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    In fairness the no dickhead thing was always PR, they've never had a problem selecting guys who've beaten up their partners for example. By most measures that would qualify someone for the dickhead category. For me Ioane has always been their poorest back, he can run with the ball and is a very good winger but at 13 we have always taken advantage of him, see Bundie's try on Saturday for another example.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭TheRona


    In my eyes, if Irish rugby supporters who love to "Shhhhh" everyone in the crowd out of 'respect' for a kicker, but can't afford such respect for the Haka, then Reiko is well within his rights to ask where their voices have gone. I find it amusing.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Coaching ticket. It must be one of the worst rugby phrases, and there are plenty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    I also think it's one thing to have words between players, during a game, but in Ioane's case it was after the whistle, and directed at the crowd. It wasn't on TV but the the touch judge even ran over to stop him as he started strutting towards the crowd with his arms open and chest puffed up (before the 'shushing').

    Sam Cane made his statement through his actions on the pitch this weekend, and you have to respect that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    That's fair enough, but most Kiwis I saw say anything about that before the game seemed to say that it wasn't considered disrespectful and that it was just a response to the challenge. Afterwards more people seem to be raising it as an issue in the context of Reiko's actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I know a lot of Kiwi rugby people and absolutely nobody feels like this. It's not a religious ceremony, it's a sports event ffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭TheRona


    Oh, I agree. People can do what they want, including making noise when someone is kicking. It doesn't bother me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,978 ✭✭✭standardg60


    I'm ok with it, to the victors go the spoils and the bragging rights, we bragged last year and bragging will always come back to haunt you. It's another instalment in the developing rivalry between the teams, NZ having lost the last two probably had more incentive to win the current, it's going to ebb and flow. I know Johnny said this defeat made the series win irrelevant but it really doesn't, that accomplishment and the hurt it caused will always stand, and vice versa for this one. Some will say this is the one that matters but on a personal level for the players i would count them equal.

    Watching the rugby pod earlier i thought the point made about NZ being fresher for this match was telling, we were out on our feet for the last 20, the circumstance of the draw and the fixtures had an affect no matter how you look at it. Now it's worth wondering whether both the Saffers and to a lesser extent NZ are going to be gassed against English and Argentinian teams who have had an easy ride.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,438 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think ‘rotation’ might be the biggest takeaway lesson for us at this WC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    This video analyst guy is a major bluffer, I don't believe Ive ever heard anything form him that stacks up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    Most ungracious? LOL. Aside from Jacovs, all other SA fans seem to do is come and take a dump on this forum. Rugbymad and company. Kiwis on this forum are few and far between but we do try and contribute. As an aside, would people generally describe Irish fans as gracious losers? At the Paris pub on Saturday I presented my genuine commiserations to an Irish lady in her sixties. Thought she might shoot me, the look I got. The lippy NZ players would be Coles and Ioane. But Ireland can really have no complaints. Sexton is never short of something to say and POM has his moments too. My favourite Irish players are ringrose and Keenan - really intelligent footballers. Cant really understand kiwis with no family ties such as Irish parents or grandparents signing up to play their country of birth. Especially 2 lads with Māori blood given a section of Irish fans never stop giving out about the haka. But there we go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,978 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Completely agree, many capable and fit players were underused against the weaker teams.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I find the SA crew grand and the rest of the Kiwis. The only Kiwi who ever made a cheap shot at me was you, and the reason seemed to be I wasn't concerned enough about the demise of Australian rugby😅Your concern for my mental health was touching. I was new to the forum and you seemed to feel you could throw your weight around a bit. You needn't worry I'm well balanced😂




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,438 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    As the days go on the more I think it was critical.

    And I was ok with Farrell sending out the full team for the pool games.

    Faith in our squads ability rather than the A team might be the key we are looking for.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Personally, I think I'm a delight. But yeah SA fans have the top step of the pedestal all on their own.

    I'm absolutely here for the spite from NZ, as far as I'm concerned it just means we have properly made it on the international stage. They just don't care about Wales/Scotland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,978 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Me too, in the heat of the moment i was one of the first to call it a bottling, but looking back to Beirne running the length of the field to score a last minute meaningless try against Romania in that heat and contrasting him to receiving the ball from Murray in what the 32nd phase late on against NZ and just standing still only able to raise an arm to absorb the tackle has made me think again.

    Seemingly two Irish players played every minute of every game, Keenan was one, was Beirne the other? That is just too much.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    South Africa played scrum halves on the wings against Romania. They got the job done.

    We played pretty much a full strength team against the same useless opposition.

    Very very foolish by the management.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    South Africa had just played the ruqby championship. we were coming in from the off season with players having played only 2 or 3 games before the worqld cups started.

    It wasnt foolish. would it have been better to have more players going in cold with having played even less before the biggest game of pool stage?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    The reactions from some posters are a bit over the top. Just read through last 10 pages or so. Ireland had a good tournament, didn't put a foot wrong until Saturday when unfortunately there are no 2nd chances.

    Personally, I think the vast majority of people I talked to underestimated NZ hugely, mainly because of their performance v SA in Twickenham, for which they apparently only landed in England the day before. They beat SA convincingly in rugby championship like only they can. Yes, they lost 1st match v France but were in a group where they scored 96 pts against the 3rd placed team so were always getting out of that group.

    And remember our series win, they scored 40+ pts in opening test in Auckland against us. So they can turn it on for sure.

    The current NZ 23, if they get their act together, have a higher ceiling than any other in the tournament IMO. They may not win it, but I make them favourites. If it comes to pass, I hope they force SA to play rugby like France did by scoring early.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yes very foolish. Look at the end result, an absolutely shattered team knocked out in the quarter finals.

    There is a squad for a reason. Across the Romania and Tonga games it could have been arranged for every player to play and also therefore rest.

    These guys play together so frequently they didn't need glorified run outs against 2 filler teams to knit as a unit.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think Farrell will learn a lot for 2027 if he's around. But the question arises whether we have the depth to do what South Africa did.

    We ended up having to play the full team v the Scots because we thought they were better than they were.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Would we have done better with players not having the game time built up needed to peak in a 1/4?

    We primarily needed our main players to get game time to be best prepped for the bigger games. The players didnt need game time to get together as a unit but to get minutes in the legs. in any other year bar a world cup year we would be aiming to peak for games far later than September/October.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,168 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Scotland game wasn't really the issue. We would have played the full team against Scotland no matter what, they're a tier 1 team.

    We probably could have rotated more for the Tonga / Romania games.

    Things were complicated a bit though by Sexton's ban meaning he really had to play those games, O'Brien being injured for the early games, and Conan being injured for the early games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,421 ✭✭✭Cill94


    I don't personally subscribe to this fatigue theory. Keenan had a good game on Saturday. Aki also had started every game, and was probably our standout player. We are also probably the luckiest team so far with injuries, which is a major indicator of our fatigue being low.

    Saturday's game was just an exhausting affair, that had both teams out on their feet by the end. If Barrett isn't under that ball and we don't have to go 37 phases, nobody is talking about fatigue. It had the most ball in play time of any RWC game this tournament, and chasing a game is particularly exhausting.

    Bottom line is we got a nasty QF draw and NZ just performed better on the day. One of their best performances in years. It's the fact this team deserved more than a quarter final that makes it sting so much. France were in the same boat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    We definitely could have started lads like McCarthy, Baird, McCloskey, O'Toole and others in those 1st 2 games. Bringing Earls, McCloskey and Kilcoyne was also a mistake imo, another backrow forward, and utility back would've allowed for better rotation.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,168 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I think you can argue that bringing Conan was a mistake too. I'm not sure he'd have been brought if they'd known he'd be unavailable for 4/5 pool games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Agree on that, he was very good on the weekend, but can't honestly say it was worth the extra minutes it forced on Doris etc, when Prendergast or someone could've been playing instead



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,093 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    What was the reason for not playing the fringe players in the other games against Tonga and Romania ? Was Farrell afraid that momentum would be lost if they had poor performances against the so-called minnows? Perhaps Farrell didn't really believe he had the strength in depth to rest key players against the weaker teams.

    One other question, was Kelleher being held up by Barrett purely a question of lacking the necessary strength to ground the ball? Would the likes of Furlong and Porter have had the power to get the ball down in that position?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    From rewatching, it looked like Kelleher allowed himself to get unbound from his blockers as they drove for the line. Just poorly done on his part. I'd wager Herring would've scored that tbh.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think they were used as warm ups to get the first team up to speed.

    No just bad timing, use of his body. Use of your blockers. It's a skill timing when to go and spotting the gap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    Scotland one of the few (the only?) major nation to still not have beaten NZ. There, that’s my Kiwi arrogance shining through 😛

    The vast majority of us are happy there’s another major rivalry now. Especially given how Australia have fallen away.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement