Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Rugby world cup post mortem

1151618202135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,803 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Ireland played dreadful im the quarter final ,

    Go watch us leaving the tunnel at the start you can clearly see the nerves, Sexton missed the most important penalty kick of his career & it was one of the easiest, We got off the hook with Barret missing a penalty & within a couple of minutes gave him an easier one, Lowe was awful

    Total bottle job when to came to the crunch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,803 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    What use is being called e number 1 team in the world if you lose your first knockout game,

    Our best team ever got beat by New Zeelands worst ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,534 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Wish we had played France now, would have at least guaranteed a NH team in the final



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,696 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Played quite well after a shaky start. Nz were nervous too, ballooned a few kicks and threw haphazard passes.

    They both recovered, and NZ got ahead. We had to chase a good team and narrowly lost the game.

    That’s a fairer assessment than the ‘we played dreadful’ one.

    BTW Johnny has also kicked many many important kicks in his time and many many great players have missed kicks. It’s sport, it happens, NZ could by a whisker be sitting today rueing the one they missed in the s/h.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,696 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Because being NO 1 doesn’t entitle you to diddly squat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭dublin49


    We have come along way when that Irish QF performance is considered a bottle performance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 831 ✭✭✭hahashake


    Disagree they played dreadful but couldn't resist posting this:

    Edit: gif doesn't work but the link does



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,696 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It’s sickening to read entitled posters who didn’t run the simple risks when equally matched teams play each other disrespect the effort made.

    It laziness and an inability to bring some perspective into it.

    It’s great when we are winning but how quickly the worm will turn nasty if we lose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,694 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    I think a lot of people who dont like anything about Ireland, also dont like this team.

    People who want to see Ireland fail, in any walk of life, and then say 'I told you so'.

    Here's the thing - winning the World Cup isnt the be all and end all. England won the World Cup in 2003. Ireland has been a consistently better team since, and that's over a twenty year period, during which England made two world cup finals.

    I would much rather see Ireland lose this quarterfinal, and maintain a high standard at a national level for the next twenty years, than win the world cup and then fall away.

    The 6 nations starts in four months. Lets go again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    But its a major and justifiable criticism of irish rugby that we've never done much in a world cup bar a few big pool game performances.

    Winning a world cup isnt the be all and end all but never once winning a knock out game and in most of those games we werent near winning is horrific.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,696 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    But the perspective you need to bring is the nature of the losses.

    The most recent one was in a game that could just as easily have been a final. Two of the best teams in the world ATM. One of them producing a game a way ahead of their current form.

    I'm not sure what the ask is. Nobody left anything behind them IMO and they deserve at least not to be called bottlers.

    By all means criticise the mistakes etc. But there is a line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    that's an interesting one, would i swap ireland's record post rwc 2003 with england's record? 3 grand slams and 2 6Ns against 1 grand slam, 3 6Ns and 2 RWC finals (quite possibly a 3rd one), tbh as much as ireland have been a more consistent team in that timeframe id still probably take england's record



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,696 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yeh but you’d have to have Eddie Jones. Careful what you wish for or on us! 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,098 ✭✭✭Augme



    The reality is that over the last twenty years Ireland haven't really come away with that much more success compared to England. One additional 6 nations title and one additional grand slam vs two world cup finals and another semi final. I think the fact that people look at the last twenty years as being great for Ireland and terrible for England more highlights the poor standards and quality that Irish rugby is normally accustomed to.


    Also, over the last twenty years Wales have won six 6N's, 4 Grand Slams, and been to a semi final twice. Much more impressive than Ireland.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,188 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    They basically have one more GS than us and two semi-finals. It's not "much more impressive", it's marginally better and it comes with years of underperformance and a complete inability to win against SH teams.

    It's the classic question as to which you would prefer - boom and bust or consistency. But it was a better question a number of years ago before Ireland had more success. I'm not really sure why you'd prefer to be a Wales fan over the last 20 years at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,098 ✭✭✭Augme



    At this point I'd prefer to have Wales' record because its better than Ireland in terms of titles won and performances at the world cup.


    In relation to boom or bust vs consistency, I'd argue that focusing on consistency is one of the reasons why we don't do well at World Cups. We don't build towards World cups, we build towards consistently doing well at 6 nations and we then hope to do well at World Cups. Other teams build for world cups and are willing to sacrifice performances at the six nations to do so. Trying to do both is very very difficult.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,188 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The irritating QF record aside, I couldn't care less about whether someone made a semi or quarter final. This year alone is enough to see that it is as much about chance as anything else. Wales have never beaten a SH team in a knockout for example.

    They have one more 6N yes. I'm fairly confident we'll close that gap before Wales stop being a complete basketcase.

    The only NH team to win the World Cup did so off the back of consistent 6N wins and NZ are consistently successful at the RC. That argument makes zero sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,098 ✭✭✭Augme



    Even ignoring the world cups then they have won more titles the Ireland over the last 20 years so it's fairly obvious why anyone would take Wales record since 2003. Whether their record is better after 25 years is a different matter.


    NZ are a different beast. The NH teams just aren't that good and don't consistently produce world class players. There's a reason they have only won one world cup. Having all the 6 nations teams playing all their best players every single game for the 6 nations isn't going to increase their chances of winning a world cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,459 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Absolutely.

    England have been far more successful during that timeframe than Ireland IMO.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,188 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    One more title and years of mediocrity and despair interspersed and I think incredibly poorly set up for the next decade. Those things are not unrelated.

    SH teams don't play their best players less frequently than NH teams do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,098 ✭✭✭Augme



    They are unrelated in the context of who record is better over the past twenty years.


    They do compared to Ireland, especially at world cups. You don't see NZ and SA playing their same best players in every single match at a world cup. You don't see any other NH teams do it either tbf to them.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,188 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    They don't compared to Ireland which is how NZ have 2 of the top 3 most capped players of all time.

    You don't normally see Ireland do it either in World Cups. They also played them less in the warm ups than other teams. It was a deliberate strategy given how the fixtures fell.

    It's also not why we lost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The job of the national coach is to "win today, win tomorrow". The 6 nations keeps Irish rugby afloat, not the World Cup.

    Ireland have been the most competitive ever in a World Cup and we should not forget that. Looking at the performance so far of Argie would give an indication of how much of a f**k up World Rugby made of this competition

    Hat trick in a World Cup semi final? this is just about worth a group game not a semi



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    The southern hemisphere sides in some ways cant be compared to the Northern sides for how they rotate players in pool stages because of the timing of the world cup. the timing of world cup suits southern hemisphere sides far more than norqthern hemisphere sides

    You do see some northern hem sides do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,098 ✭✭✭Augme



    We lost because we weren't good enough.



    That's the job of the Irish national coach. Other national coaches arent the same. As I said, Irish rugby doesn't view World Cups as being a priority.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    This defensive nonsense is pathetic. Can't be hurting the feelings of the rich sportsmen! You're so great goys!

    Look on the bright side, 8 quarter finals added together makes two whole finals!

    Muppet.

    Mod: Abuse.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,928 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Ireland is the Mayo of Rugby.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    We view keep rugby alive in Ireland. That means been competitive in the 6 nations. A competition which if you put NZ and SA into tomorrow morning I would like to see what their focus is like on the World Cup.

    Even if we won a World Cup this year it wouldn't keep Irish rugby afloat without the 6 nations and the money it brings in every years.

    FYI we lost to the best team on the day, the top 4 teams in the World, which includes Ireland can win or lose based on the bounce of the ball which is what happened on both qtr finals. That's sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Mayo loses finals.

    If we could get to a final we would be happy. The comparison doesn't make sense?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,098 ✭✭✭Augme



    I don't why you're talking as if Ireland prioritising the world cup means they'll be finishing last in the 6 nations and they'll be palying their matches in empty stadiums. Doesnt say much for the Irish fans if that's the case.



Advertisement