Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2023 RWC Buildup, Squads, Fixtures 'etc'

1262263265267268306

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,587 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    I did post a message that Ireland wouldn't hack it when push comes to shove. There's no shame in that, the southern hemisphere teams are just a different beast when it matters, will generally just about do what they need to do.

    New Zealand are the weakest of the Tri Nations in that sense though, the Boks and Wallabies loved playing them when it really mattered, and would generally beat them in World Cups. The form was 2 World Cups for the Boks and Wallabies against 1 for the All Blacks, who hadn't won since 85, in a Mickey Mouse version of the tournament.

    The All Blacks only really caught up in World Cups the last decade, as the Wallabies fell off a cliff which is only getting worse, and South Africa weren't at the races.

    Also of note, the Boks had a winning hth against the All Blacks up to apartheid, but internal josling in society in general since sent them back, only in the last 6 or 7 years they're finding general consistency.

    People think New Zealand are rugby's traditional superpower, it's not, it's the Boks. When it matters most, they'll always do a job on the All Blacks, put your life savings on them turning the All Blacks over.

    New Zealand can win all the Tri Nations and Rugby Championships they want, since 95, the Boks and Wallabies couldn't care less about it, it was always about peaking for the World Cup. The Wallabies are gone, but up until the country lost general interest were the best of the 3, but grinding these games out is what the Boks do. They're going to run over and batter the All Black's.

    The All Blacks have always feared Australia and South Africa in a way neither both feared the All Blacks. It's why they've always placed so much emphasis on beating both when both never really cared, insecurity complex.

    But when it matters most in World Cups, the Wallabies in the past, and the Boks now, are a different animal, and All Blacks have a terrible record against both. The Boks are going to steam roll them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭Enzokk



    There is way too much emphasis on the world cup and what it says about you as a team. Take 2004-2011, New Zealand wins 85% of their matches in that span and South Africa 65%, but looking at the world cups you would have to say they were equal in that time. But New Zealand wins 12 of the 20 matches between the 2 teams in that time. South Africa win the 2007 world cup by beating England in the group, Fiji in the QF, Argentina (before Rugby Championship and Super Rugby) in the SF and England again in the final. That is England that lost by 30 to Ireland earlier in the year. That was the Wayne Barnes forward pass that he missed in the QF against France for New Zealand. The year before South Africa lost 49-0 to Australia as well. They were not close to being the best team in the world, but the world cup tells you differently.


    I also don't understand how you can say Australia and South Africa has New Zealand good record* against New Zealand at World Cups. I think you are remembering the SF loss to Australia in 1991 and 2003 and the final loss to South Africa in 1995 to come to that conclusion. Talk about looking at the past to predict future events, nothing that happened in 1995 or 1991 will have any impact on matches now.


    *I know you didn't sayi they have a good record, but you said New Zealand has a terrible record against those 2, the opposite of terrible is good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,926 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I said all week that being much fresher, as England were, is a big leveller. I still fancied South Africa to win it by about six or seven but it was very close.

    Pollard to me looked a much better fit than Libbok.

    I'm not criticising Libbok, just the way the game was played made Pollard the better option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,855 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Said it after the game last night, will say it again now;

    Fuck



    Me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    I wouldnt be so sure.

    SA have been rattled by that win over England. Libbok is a huge call he shouldnt start because he was terrible against england in every aspect and cant be trusted off the bench. The rest of the side look very tired.

    Rassie will have to rotate for next week.

    If SA perform like that again NZ will score trys, and they will go back to the template they used in july to best SA.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,140 ✭✭✭OldRio


    One of my takes from this WC is that teams find it difficult to put in good performances back to back in high intensity games. Which in turn makes squad rotation and substitutes more and more important.

    Both finalist came from the same side of the draw. Both have been beaten. England absolutely threw a golden opportunity away. The stars aligned for them this WC and they blew it.

    I'd put NZ as favourites because of the ease of their semi final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,399 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    In that regard, Rassie hooking his 10 after 30 minutes and going to the bench very early in the 2nd half was fantastic coaching. SA were off, and he didn’t wait too long to bring on fresher replacements and change things. He’s such an incredible coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,884 ✭✭✭TheRona


    It worked out for them in the end, more through mistakes from England than anything. If he was such an incredible coach, he would have seen exactly how England were going to play, and select for it. It's almost he was taken by surprise by the way England were playing. Bizarre.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭thinkabouit


    Absolutely ruthless from Rassie.

    I think that’s what Ireland were/are lacking.

    A few player’s last week that were out on their feet & stayed on the pitch.

    The Springboks have the stones to make those calls.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,817 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,185 ✭✭✭McFly85


    He probably knew how they were going to play, but not how well they were going to play. England and the conditions made it a kicking game so made the call early to switch. Ruthless but the correct call.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,486 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Robertson will have some kind of job. Taking over from the 'worst coach NZ have ever had' who won the 'most competitive world cup in history'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,718 ✭✭✭Seadin


    Typical Irish response. Remember in 1972 Ireland were on for a Grand Slam and they didn't get it because Wales and Scotland refused to come to Dublin because of the troubles. Wales have been a horrible team to us look at it when we were going for the 2009 Slam they did everything in their power to make sure Ireland couldn't make History. A horrible team that I always enjoy seeing getting beat. Scotland are no better and showee their colours in this WC. They deserve a few more wooden spoons so that we can all beat them with.


    The one thing England ever did wrong was in 2003 when they were going for the Slam and Johnston decided to line out in the wrong side but this was actually brilliant as it gave England the mental edge over Ireland and Ireland reacted. If Ireland were mentally strong back then they should have just lined up on the other side and play them at their own game. Ireland too focused on this and got hammered then in the actual game. England had failed on few attempts to win the GS but this was a genius strategy to get over the line. Ireland never had this close to the edge mentality when it really mattered in games. That's the truth and the truth hurts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,706 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I think there should be big questions asked of Rassie. They just about squeaked over the line so he’ll avoid it, but that was definitely not a masterclass.

    Why repeatedly kick high to Steward? He’s world class at that single aspect of the game. It gave England an easy in to the game. If you want to play a tactical kicking game, why not start Pollard? Why not target Daly? Why not alter your starting 15 6 days after that incredibly high intensity game with France?

    For a man who was happy to throw out the line that certain teams had clocked up too many minutes, he made the exact same error and was lucky to get away with it. On another note, how much does Mbonambi have left in the tank? Reckon next week could be a game too far for him.

    I can’t see beyond a NZ win next week unless he changes up his team and gets some fresh legs and minds out there. Will Libbock make the 23? You wonder how his confidence is after that. Expect Pollard will start at 10. Might see LeRoux come in at 15, Wilhemse to the bench covering 10 with someone like Am or Moodie getting the 23 shirt.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,817 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Yeah Ireland were never mentally strong enough to win a grand slam since 2003...


    you tell them!!

    The truth hurts guys, get over it!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,842 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Genuinely not sure who will win this thing.

    Very much depends on which SA team shows up. If the same SA team that started and played most of that game last night, turn up, NZ will be out of sight unlike England were able to do. If the one that turned up to play France arrive then we are in for a great final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    Ireland don't have it in games that matter?

    A drop goal after 41 phases of play and the clock red in Paris.

    Winning the slam at Twickenham on Patrick's weekend.

    Do people actually read back over what they post!?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Agree with this. Although SA have the advantage of having incredible depth in their pack replacements which takes the edge of a bit.

    But thinking back to 2019 I thought this was a factor in the final as well. SA got to the final after beating Japan and Wales in the knockouts where as England had to play Australia (I think) and NZ, was it therefore really a surprise that SA pulled away a bit in the final 20 minutes of that match.

    With that in mind it's definitely advantage NZ in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,614 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Ah yes. Predictable analysis from some folks when we do really well. Explain our win with excuses



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,614 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Overall I thought England were bit better and stronger, but to only score 3 points in the second half, SA probably deserving winners. They got their try



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,614 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,966 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    My predictions so far :

    South Africa not to score in the last 20 minutes yesterday.

    PP northern hemisphere treble in the quarter final.

    Oh well.

    As for the final I believe.... 😁😁😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,140 ✭✭✭OldRio


    “O’Keeffe is going to be the talking point as he’s won them the game - not South Africa,” said Dallaglio on ITV

    Everytime this guy opens his mouth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I just want to say that Ox Nché is the most underrated player in rugby. His performances too often get lumped in together with the overall impact of the bomb squad, when in reality his destructive scrummaging makes the bomb squad what it is. Best scrummaging loose-head in the world for me.

    He just looks so friendly, nobody considers him the true force he his.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    always liked Dallagio, on another note Curry is accusing Mbonambi of a racial slur is the rugby headline ?

    confused, without knowing the details, dont think it is being taken further



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭thebaz




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I actually see the merit in Kitsoff starting, for his all-round contributions in the loose. Just wish Ox could get a mean haircut or something. So people notice him!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,140 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Last season when Premiership clubs were going bust. Dallaglio said Wasps should be treated differently to Worcester, because they were a bigger club and should escape relegation.

    Not a good take to be honest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 632 ✭✭✭squidgainz


    I think people are a bit sick of the six nations, the repeated world cup failures have may it so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    Shame we couldn't find a place for Felix Jones somewhere in Ireland. He must be doing something well.

    Would be annoying if he somehow managed to revitalise England's game 😂



Advertisement