Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
18878888908928931067

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 12,559 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Yet you feel the need to respond to everything I post? I guess that's why you continually refer to yourself as "trained" rather than qualified or competent. I look for trained nurses, teachers, firefighters, police etc as it means they've been instructed how to do a certain task and achieve repeatable outcomes against a benchmarked standard. I expect scientists to acquire more than just formal training in their development. They should be able to question the world as it is presented to them, gather comprehensive evidence and draw conclusions. You seem to be stuck in a world of only being able to see one outcome. I guess it's not surprising seeing as that is how you were developed. Much like training a machine learning system, it can only respond to what it knows, but it'll always respond and always within defined parameters, unable to see the bigger picture. Worse still, it isn't able to comprehend when it is wrong.

    I'll look forward to your response. I think I can guess how it'll go.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,732 ✭✭✭ginger22


    Don't worry. The government will commission a report on what to do, might be completed by the time this government has run its term and the minister responsible has qualified for his full pension. Let it up to the next crowd to do something.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Hmm, this doesn't seem to align with some of the views in this thread

    In particular that of the most recent climate change denier



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,559 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    The climate is always changing, look at it evolve over the millenia. Going back as far as 1850 is but the blink of an eye.

    Worse still, the climate was different then because the little ice age was ongoing. I'm surprised any academic institute would release such poor research.

    Plus, any report that includes a caveat like "This is a piece of academic work, so it is a technical report, and it is a hard read. But those who struggle through it will be led to one firm conclusion" is clearly a well thought out thesis. It literally begs you not to read it, but if you do, you've only got one conclusion to draw because otherwise you're slated as an idiot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,594 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,406 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Quite a lot of Irish people agree with this point of view too, that climate change will lead to more extreme weather events.

    Quite a lot of Irish people don't agree with the point of view that taking parking away from public servants and reducing speed limits on motorways will make any meaningful contribution to addressing the increasing occurrence of extreme weather events.



  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    It goes like this: they have settled the parameters in their heads in a narrow band. That is the safe zone. Their opinions are derived from keeping within those parameters/ borders and are closely guarded. Anything outside is ( rightly so) considered unsafe including doubts about facts/science as that is the danger zone and they naturally want to avoid that. Makes sense.

    Ok, but the devil's advocate says to you after you pointing this out: ah, but you are doing the same coming from the opposite side! So, alright, let's accept the accusation for a moment. The real difference is that i at least allow a conversation with broader boundaries (which is what a public conversation SHOULD LOOK like) while your side wants to avoid it and is willing to use any weapon to prevent a meaningful discussion, uses media and education manipulation and politics to bias the outcome. They might to a degree not even realise they are doing it as they wrap themselves in their moral highground 'im a good person' selfrighteous dogoodery. That is allowed...if you are below the age of 21. A grownup should know better or at least we should expect them to. That's the feeling i get when i watch the Green Party conference and their leaders. Or the likes of George Lee..



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,554 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    I see one of the authors of the IPCC report has come out to explain that the reduction in livestock methane emissions over the years is due to improved science and learnings since the initial 2006 report.

    It's like the people questions things were right to question it



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭ps200306


    So you believe that Irish emissions cuts can ameliorate global climate change. But you don't have any science to back that up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭ps200306


    Hmm, this doesn't seem to align with some of the views in this thread

    It doesn't align with the report it cites either. That's what happens when you rely on journalists to interpret science they don't understand. Here are a few snippets that are flat out misrepresentations:

    The upshot of this analysis is that climate change is here right now in Ireland, and it looks exactly like the flooding and devastation experienced in Midleton earlier this week...

    It is quite rare, especially in Ireland, for them to produce weather data and results showing definitively that the extreme weather just experienced is actually climate change in action...

    This is a piece of academic work, so it is a technical report, and it is a hard read. But those who struggle through it will be led to one firm conclusion...

    The results show a very striking relationship has now emerged between rising global temperatures and rainfall in Ireland.

    Specifically, it shows that the intensity of rainfall here is going up by 8.2% for every one-degree Celsius rise in global surface temperature...

    All of this serves to say that the flood devastation experienced by the townsfolk of Midleton is unlikely to be an isolated incident.

    George Lee obviously didn't understand the difference between "rainfall instensity" and "intense rainfall", both of which are quite clearly defined in the report:

    For other extreme precipitation indices, we find less evidence for the emergence of a clear climate change signal. While Min et al. (2011) find evidence of increases attributable to human activity in RX1day and RX5day precipitation across many northern hemisphere land areas, no Irish station shows the emergence of a signal for RX1day and only Malin Head and the Island of Ireland composite series show the emergence of unusual climate for RX5day precipitation.

    Of course, those who want Lee's conclusions to be correct will say that this is nitpicking (because they don't care about the science either). So we are left with a journo doling out the standard buzzwords about "the fingerprints of climate change".

    This is the same phenomenon of playing fast and loose with the facts as we have seen for the past decade with the debunked representative concentration pathways. RCP8.5 is still a mainstay of climate research in spite of being known to be utterly implausible. We see climate activists (including activist scientists) and people right here on this thread defending this debunked "science" because "something else we don't know about might make things worse". That, of course, isn't science.



  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    Yes, George Lee at it again. That man is irritatingly stupid and ignorant. No matter where you put him he becomes the worst type of biased agent.Now he is a 'climate correspondent'. It is worth a comedy show. Remember the Covid days? Was there anybody more pathetic? That patronising tone alone, telling the Irish people what to think. He is what they call a useful idiot. The climate alarm mascotte of the state broadcaster.

    You always have to look where a report comes from. If it has 'climate' in the title you should be suspicious. If it is more conventional institution like say NASA or the Met Office you have to look for the red flags to indicate a political position instead of a scientific one. More and more climate alarmists are put into powerful positions in state bodies, like the KNMI in Holland and the Met Office in the UK. Whenever they feel the need to put a 'report' forward you can be certain that it is political in nature. They should be concerned with the weather. If they want to spread alarmism in a private capacity that's ok but grand statements are out of order..



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You'll love this so

    Climatologist Professor John Sweeney has warned that Ireland “will have to get used to” extreme weather events like the flooding experienced in parts of Cork last week.

    Prof. Sweeney told Newstalk Breakfast that all extreme weather events have the “fingerprint, however small” of climate change on them and Storm Babet was no different.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,040 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Global warming was already biasing Irish weather towards extreme events by 2009. We are decades into significant climate change in Ireland with an overall higher rainfall rate leading to more frequent flooding.



  • Registered Users Posts: 47 rdser


    Find it very very hard to take George Lee serious about anything. He was on 6one recently in completely over the top panic mode about the floods in Cork.

    He could be right or wrong, I just cant listen to his hyper-alarmist manner. It doesn't win anyone over imo. It actually turns a lot of people off, and any message is lost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭creedp


    That may well be but the difficult sell for many is that Irelands emissions have cause this change and an even more difficult sell is that investing in bicycles for all will in any way ameliorate it into the future



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,554 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Was anyone linking bad weather or storms to it back then? How about more recently in 2017 with Ophelia? Or in the 80s when Hurricane Charlie blew in.

    Linking one storm with proof positive that it was caused by climate change seems like over egging the problem.

    And remember, there's been a lot of talk both in Ireland and the EU to quit the scare mongering as it's not effective and is only divisive



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,040 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Climate is measured in 30year trends. You look at the trend over a minimum of thirty years and ask has the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events changed.

    The best people to tell you this are the Insurance industry because they keep very close track on this as it determines risk. They have stated on a global level that extreme weather events have increased in both intensity and frequency.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,040 ✭✭✭Shoog


    I dare say that at this stage large parts of Cork city are uninsurable, the shape of things to come I suspect.

    Then we have the socialist nightmare of the government been the insurer of last resort - the recent flood victim supports are just a taste of things to come.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Aye, not an issue now, but good luck when there's a downturn in exchequer receipts



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,040 ✭✭✭Shoog


    I was in clonmel recently and saw the height of the flood defenses in the city. Scary.



  • Registered Users Posts: 562 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Our severe winter storms are getting less severe. Here is a table of major storms and how they'd tally with the yellow, orange and red warning systems in use today:

    Overall mean winter windspeeds are decreasing too...

    Good news overall.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is there a reason you excluded the data from the last 25 years in the first graph?

    Also, if you are going to use sources, you should link to them



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,594 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Cork or "Corcaigh" derived from corcach, meaning "marsh"

    Post-Revolution, the city’s annals have little of significant interest to record. In 1746, the Cork militia comprised 3000 infantry and 200 cavalry, along with a well-equipped company of 100 gentlemen led by Colonel H. Cavendish. In 1787, the future King, then Prince William Henry, visited the city while commanding the ship Pegasus, which was docked at Cove. Two years later, the city faced a severe flood that submerged the streets and caused massive property damage. In 1789, the first mail coach arrived in Cork from Dublin. source

    Middleton, Cork form the 1980s


    Ireland ‘more than any other [country] suffers from storms of wind and rain’: thus wrote Gerald of Wales in his History and topography of Ireland, based upon first-hand observations from his two extended Irish visits in 1183 and 1185. It constitutes what is probably the first reasonably detailed extant account of Ireland’s climate. As a Welshman he does not appear to have been unduly perturbed by these now well-known characteristics of the Irish weather, rather, he comments favourably on the generally temperate nature of the climate and absence of extremes of either summer heat or winter cold. He was struck by the fact that the grass remained green throughout the winter, so that haymaking and the winter housing of livestock were not practised, and noted that snow was seldom seen and rarely lasted long. source


    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,957 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    Farming acording to primetime (the mouthpiece for the government) is the reason for the flooding for the last week,no mention of building on flood plains,no mention of the blocked gully's full of leaves or the matress blocking the culvert .This ff/fg/green shower of fools will get some kick in the hole in the elections coming ,I used have time for m.martin but now realise he was the biggest joke ever of a leader of this country



  • Registered Users Posts: 562 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Is there a reason you excluded the data from the last 25 years in the first graph?

    We didn't really name storms up until a few years ago - and since we did, only Darwin 2014 and at a push Ophelia 2017 really stand out when compared to the low bar named storms of today. Darwin would be the only major storm in the first last 25 years that would compare with the storms of latter part of the 1900s...

    Also, if you are going to use sources, you should link to them

    All the data is from Met Eireann, look 'em up: Historical Data - Met Éireann - The Irish Meteorological Service and presented by sryanbruen.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,554 ✭✭✭roosterman71




Advertisement