Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
13873883903923931266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The Egyptian town of taba which is on the border with Gaza was struck by a munitions last night damaging a building and several vehicles



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,447 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Videos from Hamas GoPro's published; Hamas wanted to kill everyone, not just military like they're claiming. War crimes galore:




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In other words, you're saying that Israel shouldn't retaliate against Hamas militarily.

    Utterly absurd.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭brickster69


    EU final text. Looks like they are sticking to the script given to them.



    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,520 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Retaliate against Hamas all day every day, don't drop 500lb bombs on civilian infrastructure killing innocent men, women, children.


    It's not that hard to understand.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,473 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    "then I would suggest calibrating your blame"

    I didn't assign blame, I just questioned quantifying the response as moderate when 3,000 children have died.

    If you look at your post, it is you who are assigning blame. Actually, you're assigning 100% blame for everything on Hamas.

    For any 2 state peaceful solution the 2 sides need to get away from the blame game and accept that both sides are both the persecutor and the persecuted.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭seanin4711


    land grab yet again - pure and simple



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,053 ✭✭✭McFly85


    If you are despaired by the Israeli civilian casualties on October 7, despaired further by the ongoing war ensued between Israel and Hamas, then I would suggest calibrating your blame - all of it, less none - against the proximate cause for both, namely Hamas. They are the absolute cancer at the heart of today's conflict.

    Can’t agree with this. Ultimately it gives the Israel government carte Blanche to retaliate however they see fit, because of the opinion of “they started it”(I’m not going to go near who started what tbh, it’s a hugely complex subject that anyone can argue their side for and get nowhere).

    I said it yesterday but people are perfectly entitled to criticise how Israel have acted in the aftermath, and how they continue to act. Hundreds of dead Palestinian civilians is as much a tragedy as Israeli ones - you might like to call one side an act of brutal savagery and the other the unfortunate cost of war but it’s all horrific really.

    Israel have total military superiority and the ability get assistance from much of the western world in terms of funding and intelligence. They are the ones with the real ability to choose how to proceed. They are the ones we are repeatedly told are the more progressive, enlightened side - if that is really the case, they should be seriously taking into account the human cost of their actions.

    And trying to project the number of dead Israeli as a percentage of population in comparison to the US is pure sensationalism, nothing more.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Israel withdrew its settlements and military from Gaza in 2005. Hardly the actions of a state that wants to "land grab".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 824 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    Thats not accurate. In 1967, UN Resolution 242, full Israeli withdrawal in exchange for agreement to le Israel exist at peace with its neighbours.

    At the start of the 70's, the PLO i think it was at the time, acquiesced in those terms to resolve the conflict in what became known as the two state solution/settlement. The PLO accepted it. I've posted this before and shall post again. Hamas are extremist and terrorists, however the current situation we are in is largely due to Israels occupation & treatment of Palestinians, and also frankly disregard for international law and to think otherwise is folly.

    I honestly believe that if the International community and by and large Israel, supported the Palestinian civilians, respected the agreed borders, assisted them with aid, education, opportunity etc Hamas would never have the foothold they have now.

    https://time.com/6324221/hamas-origins-history/



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,091 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    The number of troops and logistics required to maintain the Gaza settlements was deemed to be unsustainable. The resources were redirected to the West Bank, along with the 'setllers'. It also wrongfooted the Palestinians.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3720176.stm



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You're choosing to start the clock at 1967, whereas we know perfectly well the fons et origo of the conflict emerged from Arab rejection of the original two-state solution in 1947. But even on Resolution 242, the resolution does not explicitly refer to withdrawal from all territories. It's a subtle point that often gets missed.

    As British foreign secretary George Brown confirmed:

    I have been asked over and over again to clarify, modify or improve the wording, but I do not intend to do that. The phrasing of the Resolution was very carefully worked out, and it was a difficult and complicated exercise to get it accepted by the UN Security Council. I formulated the Security Council Resolution. Before we submitted it to the Council, we showed it to Arab leaders. The proposal said 'Israel will withdraw from territories that were occupied', and not from 'the' territories, which means that Israel will not withdraw from all the territories.

    You said, "the PLO accepted it". This is slightly misleading because Israel accepted the resolution when it was first drafted but the PLO actually rejected it.

    It wasn't until 1988 that the PLO accepted Resolution 242.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,792 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Add in the increasing trade, the increasing work permits, Hamas lulled Israel Into a false sense of security, that they wanted normality, a better economic future.


    They should have know better, Hamas think in terms of eternity, not life times.


    When Israel withdrew from Gaza they left lots of turnkey agri businesses, massive glass houses and irrigation systems, highly profitable businesses, all destroyed as they had been built by Jewish hands and that was enough taint in Palestinian eyes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,792 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    If Israel wrong footed the Palestinians, it would have just meant they did it before the Palestinians wrong footed themselves.

    The quote about them never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity always rings in the ear.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,680 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That is so utterly naive that it defies comprehension.

    1. Sanctions? How the hell will sanctions work? You are one of the ones complaining that Israel is blocking fuel and water supplies to Gaza. That is a sanction, and so far Hamas haven't surrendered, so any sanctions would have to be more severe than the ones you are complaining about!!!
    2. Mossad? Do you understand how the tunnel system works. Designed and set up to use civilians as shields. Hamas leaders cower in the tunnels, knowing that an awful lot of civilians will need to be killed to get to them, no matter who goes in. Israel, by demanding civilians leave northern Gaza, took a route to remove the civilian shields that Hamas hide behind and minimise civilian casualties.
    3. This does not make any sense. The Palestinians want the elimination of Israel and all the Jews, they have consistently voted for that ideology. Hamas is their chosen way, they voted for them. So the only way that Israel shows the Palestinians they don't need Hamas, is by going away.

    No, the route to peace is simple. Release all the hostages without conditions. Hand over Hamas leadership and those involved in 7/10 to the International Criminal Court for trial. Recognise Israel's right to exist.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,680 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Hamas routinely use innocent men, women and children as human shields, a war crime by the way, so there is no way to retaliate against Hamas without killing innocents, but that is on Hamas, not on Israel. That so many fail to understand the depths of depravity that Hamas operate at is baffling.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,598 ✭✭✭quokula


    "if the International community and by and large Israel, supported the Palestinian civilians, respected the agreed borders, assisted them with aid, education, opportunity etc Hamas would never have the foothold they have now."

    Surely that's blindingly obvious to anyone capable of rational thought.

    If you stop oppressing people, if you stop brutalising them, if you stop violently taking their homes and forcing them into what everyone openly describes as an "open air prison" despite the fact they committed no crime other than being the wrong ethnicity and being indigenous to the land you've decided to steal, if you stop murdering their friends and family routinely because they dared step too close to a fence you erected to pen them in or dared to peacefully protest against their treatment, if you stop describing them as "animals" and deliberately dehumanising them at every turn, if you stop creating massive bureaucratic systems specifically designed to segregate them, to stop them from moving freely or working freely or even having the freedom to supply their own running water, then those people will be less likely in their desperation to turn to extremists as their only possible option to try to change something for the better. If you'd even just stop murdering defenceless innocent children in their thousands that would be a start.

    With our own history in Ireland and how peace was achieved we can see this. The IRA would be stronger than ever right now had the UK acted with the sort of barbaric brutality that Israel routinely does.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    istael have treated the Palestinians terribly for many decades and killed thousands of them ….is it any wonder Hamas and others were created to fight back against Istael who stole their lands ?

    Israel not Russia will be the cause of World War 3 !



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,367 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Russia is effectively an ally of Hamas and Iran. It all comes back to Russia, including the events in the Middle East. Russian involvement with Syria. Russian involvement with Iran and proxies such as Hamas. The risk of a wider conflict comes from Russia and Iran, not Israel. That is why the US has sent forces to the Middle East to deter that.

    They are meeting in Moscow at the moment.

    https://www.barrons.com/news/hamas-iran-officials-in-moscow-for-talks-301d7d6a

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 557 ✭✭✭scottser


    hamas exists because the palestinian people have no rights. ergo, give palestinians their own state with secure and proper elections and hamas would become irrelevant. israel doubling down on their ethnic cleansing agenda is going to drag the whole of the middle east into the conflict. you think it's bad now, wait until they clear gaza totally and watch the west bank erupt.



  • Registered Users Posts: 557 ✭✭✭scottser


    see your third point? there haven't been elections in gaza since 2006.

    as for the way to peace, what you've just described is a surrender, and a surrender is no basis for peace.



  • Registered Users Posts: 824 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    Actually offically it was signed in 1993 after the Oslo records - however again, do your research. The PLO’s made the decision to support a January 1976 draft United Nations [UN] Security Council resolution explicitly calling for a two-state settlement along June 1967 borders, an initiative ultimately killed by an American veto.

    Dont put words in my mouth - I didnt say or insinuate all territories, the resolution was to move the border back to '1967 borders'. Its actually very clear.



  • Registered Users Posts: 962 ✭✭✭Burty330


    I would be very interested in hearing your strategic approach to eliminating Hamas with minimal civilian casualties??

    I already explained a better approach implemened many times in the past by both trump and Obama. But this isn't a classroom and im not your teacher. Answer your own questions. So how do you think it should be done, I'm listening?



  • Registered Users Posts: 824 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    You would think - yet it would seem don't agree...



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭brickster69


    250 lawyers submit legal advice to UK government that they must act or they will be in breach of the Geneva conventions.


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,187 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat


    The land gaza occupies should be considered war reparations from palestinians to the Jews for what they've subjected them to 3 weeks ago.

    🇮🇱



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Letter in full. KC is a King's counsellor


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,084 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    They withdrew 8,000 settlers in Gaza. Since 2005 the population of illegal settlements in the west bank has increased by 150k. They are Grabbing land in the West Bank and Jerusalem as it is easy to keep.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Anyone revolted against Hamas? No.

    If there are such fierce resistance fighters why they didn't revolt against Hamas? Why they didn't reach out to the other side for negotiations? They agree with Hamas and they celebrate their terrorism.

    Hamas/Gaza had plenty of opportunities to find a solution since 2006, didn't they? They rejected all of them. They chose a coup, violence, war and terror repeatedly (see the stats below). They want to destroy Israel as an entity, they don't want to negotiate, they don't want to compromise on a two-state solution. OK, but then if you repeatedly attack a neighbouring soveign state and maintain that the state should cease to exist what do you expect the state will do? Thank you for that? Everything is of their own making. If a two-state solution not acceptable - they will get nothing in the end. They overplayed their hand hugely and all of the people of Gaza will suffer because of it.




Advertisement