Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

EV battery degradation over time

  • 03-11-2023 6:16am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭


    A hotly debated and argued item is battery degradation on EVs are rightly so if you're spending a lot of money on a car it would be nice to know it's not useless out of warranty!

    With that in mind I was close to zero getting home last night so I decided to squeeze out an additional few KMs around my road until getting back to the house at 1% 0km according my display, it didn't come to a halt so I could probably have squeezed out another few Km, but close enough.



    I then plugged it into my Zappi and charged it overnight, looking at the kws it consumed to get to 100% it reports 58.45 kW.


    This is on my 2.5 year old 70,000km ID3 58KW.

    So the ID3 physically has 62kw of batteries with 58kw usable, I unfortunately don't have the same data from new for my car to see how much would be consumed when fully charged at new, I wish I did.

    But I'm happy to see it pulling in 58.5 kWh, it looks my degradation has been very minimal if anything at all thus far.

    This is with 2.5 years daily use and zero mammying of the battery in terms of charging, so we'll fill when we can from a mix of different charge points, but rapid would be rare maybe once a month, it's typically 7kw/h


    Thoughts? And have you ever attempted a similar experiment?



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,176 ✭✭✭spakman


    Sorry to go slightly off topic, but what app are you using to view zappi stats?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭SteelyDanJalapeno


    Myenergi app and that's using a CT clamp to measure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,872 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Are you accounting for 10% charging losses?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭SteelyDanJalapeno




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    I doubt they are. If the car is given 58kwh with only a 10% loss the car is only getting 52kwh into the battery.

    More like 15% loss for me though when charging when i tried to measure the loss.

    Good explanation here where they say the losses are somewhere between 10 and 25% when charging. If its 25% the OP will be unhappy to hear that his battery has only taken 43kwh on that charge.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭SteelyDanJalapeno


    If I run back down to zero now and see the power consumed since last charge, that should measure the charge lose? Being the difference of today's value vs what it uses to drain from 100% to zero?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So you reckon we lost 15 kWh as heat on that session? Something in his setup must have been running red hot for those 8 hours the charge took.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭SteelyDanJalapeno


    I wouldn't be too unhappy! VW warranty on the battery is 8 years or 160,000km, so a free replacement if it falls below 70% in that period



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,053 ✭✭✭Casati


    How do you prove to the dealer it has fallen below 70%? Also do they have to provide a complete new battery or just bring it back up to over 70%?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This is not totally relevant, but on my home battery system which is LFP based the charging losses have been approx. 5% per cycle based on the 1623.7 kWh charged vs. 1543.6 kWh the inverter reports since the battery was installed in April this year.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭SteelyDanJalapeno


    Any VW EV servicing centre will have the ODIS tool to check battery health so I can request that.

    The warranty will replace or repair back to between 70-78% depending on mileage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,053 ✭✭✭Casati


    Great article on charging losses - something to be taken into account when working out the total cost to fuel an ev. Good tips there re thicker/ shorter cables



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Would the fact that VW recommend charging to 70%, affect our warranty if we charge to 100%?

    Its only my hunch but I think fast charging regularly might have a negative effect on the battery, longer term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 313 ✭✭D_D


    But also to note, that when the system says you have 0% battery, there is in fact some held back kWh to allow you to keep going for a few additional km/miles. So charging from 0% doesn't take this hidden capacity into account, so I would say it is probably closer to the 10% losses, no way it'll be 25%.

    In the article you linked, it seems the higher % charging losses are for cars with very large batteries (>100kWh).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    I dont know tbh. No idea where the power is lost. Im not a scientist who has investigated this with the proper equipment, but im sure if you look for it you can find it from properly tested and calibrated setups. I will tell you for sure that its not zero loss though.

    Even sitting in my car the other day I glanced at the 2 readouts for the fun of it. Zappi says its giving 7. Car says its charging at 6.2. If i looked at it 5 minutes later both would probably be different again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭SteelyDanJalapeno


    Again thou wouldn't this be a close enough measure? If I consume let's say 53kws now to get back down to zero, safe enough to assume my battery usable capacity is down about 10% (hypothetical, I think my capacity is higher based on range I'm getting, but then that would mean your article is wrong in my case)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,971 ✭✭✭kanuseeme


    This is interesting, I would have assumed 10% loss, I checked my app, 10.95 kwh, for 4% to 100%, usable battery 8.8 kwh out of 10 kwh,

    Slow charging on lowest setting took 5 hours 50 minutes, loss was around 19%

    in my case around 2 kwh lost, hardly notice that amount of heat over 6 hours , 15 kWh spread over how many hours spread over how many meters of cable inside/outside the car, the volume of the battery and inverters, solenoids etc. would that be even noticeable ?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You'd notice if 15 kWh of heat escaped in 8 hours. That's enough heat to boil about 60 litres of water.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭SteelyDanJalapeno


    Yeah I can't take my 120 litre water tank up to 60c with about 5kw!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 252 ✭✭Ev fan


    My understanding is that the 3 main factors for battery degradation are

    1. Normal ageing of the battery 2. No. Of charging/discharge cycles completed (directly related to mileage) 3. No. Of fast charging cycles done/ other potential detrimental incidences such as longer durations at 0/100% high/low temperature environmental impacts etc.

    The truth is that real time data for battery degradation is only building up now with perhaps 3 years worth of data with the exception of Tesla (10 years data with Model S.The Tesla data suggests that degradation is generally highest in year 1 with much smaller degradation from years 2 onwards- assuming average mileage and normal driving patterns every year. As I understand it degradation is built-in and guaranteed based on the prevailing factors- however you can help to avoid excessive degradation by of course taking care not to abuse the car/battery in any way.

    I think best guess for a cared for EV with proper bms after 3 years of average mileage would be somewhere in the (5 - 10%) range. Anything north of that would suggest some detrimental factor is in play. Of course real time data should be available soon- at least for 3 year old EVs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,971 ✭✭✭kanuseeme


    A quick calculation puts the id3 pack at around 300 litres in volume, its designed for liquid cooling, so its not insulated , I would imagine 15kwh spread over 8 hours would not be noticeable and thats assuming all that loss is just in the pack, spread that energy over every component and wire not in the pack.

    As for degradation, a better assumption might be nearer 20% for charging loss instead of my initial 10%,

    Your inverter is only 5%, is it because the solar is DC and charges the battery? Can you charge it from AC and see what the loss is?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I've measure losses into my Tesla on a few previous occasions, around 8%. 20% losses and there is something wrong



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I've Tessie monitoring my charging sessions, it records energy in vs energy added. Obviously it won't track any losses in cable running to the car.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    3.5 year old 64 kW Kia E-Niro here 98,000km on the clock. Battery health 98.7%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭SteelyDanJalapeno


    The thread has been somewhat derailed by charge loss psuedoscience, a poorly written article with no data and a negative undertone on guessing degradation based on no real information on my car, I presume it's somewhat chomp fishing on a Friday.

    Based on my range I'm still up around 95% or so, nowhere near 80%.


    Anyway thread was more so to get other experiences in real degradation they have measured like yours! So thank you for bringing us back on topic!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    It's unfortunately par for the course with trying to guestimate your battery state of health. In theory it should get better under the Euro 7 regulations which will require manufacturers to provide standardised battery reporting via OBD devices.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Kind of interesting according to the Tessie stats my car has gone through 37.1 charging cycles with it's current mileage 11,407km. If the 3000 claimed cycle life for LFP chemistry holds up I've only got another 922,000km left of usable life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭TheAnalyst_


    Wow thats a lot. Tesla would never lie so we can accept that value without question. How is the FSD working?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    It's a function of the battery chemistry not a claim by Tesla. LFP batteries are generally expected to maintain approx. 3000 cycles.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭Dave_D_Rave


    Sorry to hijack


    I also have a SunSynk Inverter and battery



    Where in the menu can you get the above info ?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The inverter actually does AC to DC conversion when topping up the battery from the wall which is the case most of the time. Having your estimated 20/25% losses one way when charging the battery (remember it's just one way in OP's case) is probably about 5-10 times the actual value.

    Edit: Well maybe not that much. We'll say 2-3 times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,081 ✭✭✭BKtje


    I don't have a BEV but a PHEV with a 15.6kw/h battery (10.6 usable). I mainly used public chargers and I even have DC charging (up to 21kw) which was used daily for the first year.

    The all electric range is more or less the same as when I bought it 3 years ago and for the first 2 years of life the battery was fully charged twice a day. This is backed up by the amount put into the battery as per my app logs (between 12 and 12.5kw/h as measured by charger) per full charge. The battery degradation seems minimal though I don't know if the Mercedes software eats into the unusable space a little to keep the range "stable".

    The lease is up next year and I plan to request the battery health at that point (should have asked at the service last week to be honest). I've been incredibly happy with its performance and gives a lot of weight toward getting a Mercedes BEV when I eventually switch.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's from home assistant, sunsynk add-on, via the RS485 port. Renewables forum probably have more details.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I know the OP has an ID.x but here is a blog I came across on the wall to battery charging efficiency. His results indicate losses of 1.8 to 4.7% on various charging sessions at home including the cable run from the meter. So he loses on average 2 kWh when charging 60 kWh. A far cry from 15 kWh lost suggested here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I think what the OP is at, is how to empirically/ independently check battery degradation. Be unwise to rely on what any particular car manufacturers software reports etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,971 ✭✭✭kanuseeme


    you said 15kwh,

    SharkMX7:37 am

    '' https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/121318299#Comment_121318299

    I doubt they are. If the car is given 58kwh with only a 10% loss the car is only getting 52kwh into the battery.

    More like 15% loss for me though when charging when i tried to measure the loss.

    Good explanation here where they say the losses are somewhere between 10 and 25% when charging. If its 25% the OP will be unhappy to hear that his battery has only taken 43kwh on that charge.

    https://go-e.com/en/magazine/ev-charging-losses

    So you reckon we lost 15 kWh as heat on that session? Something in his setup must have been running red hot for those 8 hours the charge took''


    I said 19% from my experience with a BMW, others have tesla at 6 and 8%, the Merc is at 20%, I would tend to believe those tesla figures, as tesla cars are efficient,

    The question is for VW and its loses while charging, the OP had no clue on allowing even for 10% which I had accepted as standard till I checked my own app.

    I highly doubt its as good as a Tesla and would believe its closer to BMW or Mercedes in efficiency.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What I said was that charging losses of up to 25%, which in case of 58 kWh battery is approx 15 kWh, is ridiculous and I asked SharkMX if in his opinion this makes sense.

    You then said: "A quick calculation puts the id3 pack at around 300 litres in volume, its designed for liquid cooling, so its not insulated , I would imagine 15kwh spread over 8 hours would not be noticeable".

    In my opinion it would be very noticeable compared to the real loss of about 3% which is a small handful of kWh based on the blog post I posted.

    Do you still think that upwards of 15 kWh lost in charging process of a 58 kWh battery is not a totally ridiculous amount of energy that would not noticeably heat up the equipment over a 8 hours charging session? 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 252 ✭✭Ev fan


    Only 1.3% degradation on that mileage/ age is exceptional- sounds like you have an excellent battery and BMS. Did the SOH reading come directly from the car or other measurement means?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 252 ✭✭Ev fan


    You make a very interesting point about the buffer (non usable) energy- 5 kWh in your case which is very sizeable. At what point might it be released to compensate for some degradation in the usable part of the battery. Looking at the VW situation- 58kWh with 62kWh gross- at some point the battery will degrade to below 70% SOH. Knowing VW I think this won't happen in the vast majority of cases to well over 160000 kms mileage. My question is will they simply unlock the buffer at that stage to bring the battery above 70% rather than repairing/ replacing expensive modules?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Rusky rusky


    The charging losses should be around 10% on AC. Below an example of charging losses for my MY. Wallbox reported 32.59kWh, Tessie shows 30.54kWh used and 29.52kWh charged. So 29.52/32.59 = 90.6% or 9.4% losses.


    Also, I had 6.3% degradation with ab 40k km when the ID.3 1 ed was 2.5yo. This was measured by VW when they replaced 2 battery modules (that was a year ago). Chris from Battery Life reported ab 9% degradation after 3 years. And VW was cheeky to advertise as 58kWh usable while.in reality no one ever saw more than 54kWh due to hidden buffers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 195 ✭✭Jackben75


    is that not a serious bump for resale value though?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,030 ✭✭✭zg3409


    For the average enthusiast querying the battery management system (BMS) for state of health (SOH) using an odb dongle and a phone app will get quite close to the true value and will be very closely related to manufacturer warranty.


    Next Eco car/ Aviloo offer and indepedent test but it takes multiple full charge discharge cycles and it's probably relatively expensive and it's likely manufacturers may not believe their result for warranty.

    These DIY charge discharge tests are not really scientific enough. You cannot see hidden buffers, and hidden buffers may be released as car ages, again masking degredation, so it's hard to know until significant degredation exists. I think most modem EVs will see little noticeable degredation up to 200,000km so it will not be an issue for most. Larger batteries also mean the number of full discharge cycles are likely to be less compared to older EVs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,971 ✭✭✭kanuseeme


    ID3 inverter, those cooling pipes are on it for a reason, its not the only component in the car, I imagine the battery also, its 15kwh over 8 hours so a little under 2 per hour, its not an insulated domestic water tank, its designed to dissipate heat, I would believe that it could lose heat just as fast gain it, so while its a ridiculous amount of heat or wastage, I believe its possible, I believe VW just stuck any inverter in, just to start producing the ID range,

    Another thing is efficiency at charging speed, I was looking at pc power supply units, more efficient at higher loads, up to 90% while idling its 80%, maybe the car would be more efficient charging at 11kwh,

    my own case 19% it was charging at 1.6 kw or so, I will ramp it up to 3.7 kwh and see if it makes a difference.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Most manufacturers will only replace with a remanufactured battery that will get you over the 70% mark, unlikely you would get a brand new battery.

    Tesla deffo replace battery failures with remanufactured and it's a lottery, plenty of 2015/2016 Model S cars with 2014 batteries in them and also those lucky ba$tard$ with a brand new 90battery fitted to 85 models, the so called lottery winners



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    It was in for service last week so I asked for a battery health report. Thats the print out from the garage.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    It's pretty normal for Hyundai/Kia cars. They've generally over provisioned batteries to allow for minimal degradation during warranty periods. The first example was with the Kia Soul, you started at 110% battery health which dropped over time. Later they capped the system to report a max value of 100%. There reasoning seemed to be if I sell you 50kWh of usable battery and you can still use 50kWh then your at 100% of what you were sold. The customer doesn't need to know they were originally provided with a 55kWh battery. I don't know if they still do this with the newer models such as Ioniq 5 and EV6.

    Other manufacturers took a different approach where they said the consumer should be able to use the "full" capacity of the battery from day 1, but will have an apparent reduction in capacity pretty quickly. Personally I prefer the Hyundai/Kia approach as I think it's easier for the average consumer to understand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    No, you are assuming people said 15kwh. You made that up yourself. Read the thread again.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    An up to 25% charging loss on a 58kWh pack is 14.5kWh, close enough that enough for it to not be unreasonable for someone to ask you where do you think the 15kWh is going and why isn't it noticeable.

    You introduced the possibility based on your linked article.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    Not reading the posts correctly and assuming people are telling you a figure. Thats what someone else pointed out to him earlier in the thread. Then he goes and says that they are choosing a specific figure that they didnt either.

    This is the problem with threads on these things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    The battery of the Kia e-Niro 64 kWh has an estimated total capacity of 67.5 kWh. Given that, the reduction would be approx 6.4% which is not to shabby for my milage to date .



  • Advertisement
Advertisement