Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Weird, Wacky and Awesome World of the NFL - General Banter thread V3

1148149151153154156

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Sam Darnold gets the backup job in San Fran. I'm not surprised, I'd imagine they'll be shopping Lance now. Bears might be interested in him as a backup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,446 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    I don't see that happening but the Vikings make sense with Cousins possibly leaving next year. I don't even know what value he has. 3rd or 4th rounder?

    That pick was such a massive gamble. Playing where he played and how little he actually played through college I thought he was a day 2 pick, but the Niners became obsessed with him and gave up 3 first rounders to get him. Obviously if it worked out nobody cares as any team would trade 3 firsts for a franchise QB, but for various reasons (injuries, inexperience) it has failed spectacularly. At 23 and only a handful of games played it is far too soon to write him off, but he's just lost a camp battle to Sam Darnold so the signs aren't great. If it doesn't work out for him on his next team he'll have to go down as the biggest draft bust of the rookie salary cap era.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    They've been shopping him all offseason. The timeline to get Lance reps just doesn't align to their window now that hit on a cheap option like Purdy. His injuries over his first two seasons were so unfortunate, especially last year when they'd signed up for growing pains with him.

    Don't see them moving him for pennies though and no chance they release him, even though it would be the best thing for Lance. Given the cap impact and the injury record with Kyle's QBs, Lance has more value to them as QB3 then a late round pick this season. It will likely be the same scenario as Jimmy last offseason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Yeah, for sure it's not going to hurt them cap-wise to hold onto him.

    I'd imagine he wants out now though. You don't want somebody whose not happy in the locker room.

    If he gets to a team that has a running QB there's a big chance he gets time on the field. He's just not a good enough passer to make it in my opinion.

    No chance he goes to an NFC West team. If they want rid of him it's likely they'd prefer an AFC team take him. I'd imagine they'd let him go cheaper to an AFC team.

    I can't see anyone parting with anything more than a fifth round pick for him unless some coach thinks he can make something of him in which case it might go as high as a third.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    I think SF would only move him via a trade, $10m cap hit if he is released. I'd say and 5th round pick would get it done to be honest. I'd be happy enough for him to stay as we saw last year the 49ers tend to go through a few QB's each year, but for his own sake he needs to be somewhere that can offer him either a shot at starting or at the very least the QB2 role.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    From all the sources I've heard that isn't an accurate timeline for how they ended up moving up. The move up when they did is by far my biggest issue with the whole scenario.

    When they moved it wasn't for Lance. They'd scouted a few of the QBs at a high level and were happy to move up and take at least 2 of the likely ones available at that stage (seems to be Jones and Lance). At that stage, especially coming out of a COVID year, there is no way they had enough information to make such a costly move, nor the intel on when players would likely to be picked to know how far they'd need to move up.

    If they liked so many QBs it was a much easier scenario to let them fall on the day and see who got to their pick or they could have made a cheaper move up a fewer spots. It wasn't as if they were screwed without a QB if they got jumped - they still had Jimmy who had just guided them to an NFC championship game and they were willing to keep him on the roster despite his cost even when a player was drafted.

    Once they made the move I still have no problem with the decision they made to take a big swing, even knowing how it played out. If you're giving up that much to move to 3 you want superstar potential, which to me was either Lance or Fields and not Jones. While still having been fine if they'd stayed at 12 and taken Jones then, as he is a solid player that fits Kyles system, like Purdy who we found with the last pick of the draft.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭boccy23


    Isaiah Simmons is being traded from the Cardinals to the NY Giants for a seventh-round pick in 2024.

    Worth the punt by the Giants for Simmons who never lived up to the athletic hype in the desert.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,446 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    Lance traded to the Cowboys overnight for a 4th round pick.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    Looks like Daniel Whelan is going to win the punting job at Green Bay after veteran Pat O'Donnell was waived today.

    Would become the first Irish player in the NFL since Neil O'Donoghue in the late 70's and early 80's.

    Whelan is from Enniskerry in Wicklow and moved 10 years ago with his family to California when he was 13.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,532 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Arryn siposs the eagles punter has been released.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,532 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Jasper Fit Pedestrian




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Just reading there that they wanted the Jets guy from last year but the Steelers grabbed him off the waiver wire. They apparently were hoping to get a draft pick from the Eagles for him but just cut him and the Eagles worked him out yesterday.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭phatkev


    If its Braden Mann they were hoping to sign, they dodged a bullet! You'd be better off ignoring punts altogether😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,576 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Now that he has been cleared of any potential charges, seems surprising that Matt Araiza isn't being given a punting try-out.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Nick Bosa finally signed a contract with the 49ers so should be good to go Sunday. 5 years $170m. No contract details yet.

    https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38340390/source-49ers-nick-bosa-highest-paid-defensive-player



  • Registered Users Posts: 320 ✭✭myate


    50 mil signing bonus. The back room guys are doing good things with that deal, very sustainable - might have took time but its a good deal. And on the same day the Niners restructured two big deals, saving over 23 million in cap space!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,576 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Don't think I've seen David Squires do an NFL cartoon before. Whilst it has Squires usual attention to detail, its the sad story of Eric Smith so not particularly an easy read.

    David Squires on … Eric Smith and the NFL’s toll on one player’s mind and body | NFL | The Guardian



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It's an awful story and the NFL not looking after him and others is disgraceful.

    I remember reading a lengthy interview with Andrew Luck and he shed some light on what he went through and he played the best protected position in the game, outside of kickers.

    I hope Eric and others like him win their case. I hope at some stage soon that CTE can be identified in living people and treated.

    I have a lot of friends who played rugby and suffered multiple concussions. One of them is very worried about his future.

    I'm not a medical person, no clue about it at all, but I recommended he use a brain trainer every day and read books on multiple subjects in the evening. I don't know if it'll help him but you are better doing something I think. He told me his mood has picked up after a couple of months doing it. It might have nothing to do with what I suggested but hopefully it does and he can pass that onto other friends of his.

    I played rugby and I had two concussions over my time which isn't much. I never have had memory loss or anything like that thankfully. I did suffer from stress at one stage though or at least I thought it was stress. What I recommended to my friend is what I did and I've never had any headaches or stress since.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    It is a scary subject. Something I have thought about since some of my most watched sports are American football and rugby (though I would die on either pitch).


    I also wonder about the game going forward and how parents will react. Certainly if I was a parent I would at least be encouraging other sports first. There is danger in any sport but some are definitely more dangerous than others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I love physically tough sports but there's no excuse for head hits. I once saw a player kick a player on the ground in the head. I was playing and I ended up with a three month ban for what I did to him. He got no punishment for kicking my teammate's head.

    That's the way things were back then.

    I coach mini-rugby now and you have to do a lot of work to qualify as a kids coach.

    HIA is a big part of it.

    I got one question wrong and it wrecked my head until I finally realised my mistake. The question was how high you can tackle a player and I said waist, the answer is below the waist.

    I think that's where rugby is heading in the next decade at senior level.

    The NFL needs to look at Rugby Union and take on board what they are doing. Disqualification from the game and a huge fine is how they stop it. And nobody wants it, not the players or the fans.

    I do some work with the seniors in tackling. I always tell them that you wrap your arms around and under the opponents armpits.

    Head should always be to the side you are pushing from no matter the height of the tackle, that avoids head hits and keeps the tackling player safe as well. Cheek to cheek in low tackles and cheek to armpit in higher tackles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,532 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,668 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    So because of the clocks changes being out of synch between here and the States, just watch out games \ coverage will be an hour earlier for the Sunday games until things realign Saturday week.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,532 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Josh McDaniels and the GM have been fired by the raiders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,434 ✭✭✭Jolly Red Giant


    McDisaster f*cks up another HC job - big surprise.

    I am sure BB will bring him back as OC with the Pats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    If he's signed as OC then it lets Vegas off the hook with McDaniels salary so watch out for him to come back as some "assistant" role like Patricia did



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm surprised to see a coach with a 3-5 record fired so early in the season.

    There's no sign or even indication that Jonathan Gannon, Frank Reich, Matt Eberflus or Brian Daboll are on the chopping block.

    Sean Payton in the same division has the same record as the Raiders and not a mention of him being on a hot seat.

    I wonder what nickname JRG has for Payton. Paythetic maybe?

    McDaniels hasn't done a good job. I'm just surprised at the timing of the firing. I don't think anybody should be fired before it's pretty certain your season is over.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    He hasn't looked good as a head coach but he's went to two disastrous franchises.



  • Registered Users Posts: 127 ✭✭FantasyFool


    I would have sacked McDaniels after Week 4! Aidan O'Connell nearly gets killed by Khalil Mack all day but somehow manages to get them within 7pts and on the 4 yard line. McDaniels calls a throw on first down and it gets intercepted. Jacobs looking on. It wasn't like he was OC on a team who were handed a Super Bowl with the same kind of head scratching play calling!



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    None of the coaches of those teams and their handpicked GM took a playoff side, spent a ton of money, and drove it into the toilet. The only coach who isn't in their first year and didn't make the playoffs last year, Eberflus, is absolutely starting to feel his seat get warm.

    Every big bet McDaniels made looks absolutely terrible, aside from Adams who they cant get the ball to due to one of their other big bets (though I do appreciate the 3rd round comp pick).

    I understand how the Hoyer decision sent Davis over the edge, McDaniels was clearly doing what he thought was best for him rather than the long term of the team. When you add to it how the locker room was so clearly lost this was one of the few good decisions Davis has made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm not saying it's what anybody with the Raiders wants but the best thing for the future of that franchise is a very early pick in the draft with so much QB talent coming out in '24.

    O'Connell isn't going to be the guy.

    I think signing Hoyer was a mistake, his time in the league, as a backup, is done in my opinion.

    To make sure things are clear, I'm not saying McDaniels is a great or even good head coach.

    I'm simply saying that at 3-5 their season wasn't done and I don't think he should be sacked this early.

    I expect things to get even worse for the Raiders now.

    As you know I'm a Patriots fan and over the years it's been mentioned many times that he'd end up taking the reins from Belichick and I never liked hearing it and that's before he went to Denver. I just don't think he has the personality and leadership qualities required to be a successful head coach.

    He did go into two bad situations though.

    Have to say though I was very surprised that he let Derek Carr walk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Raiders weren't that bad a situation - far better than most jobs coaches take on. They'd punched above their weight the year before and made the playoffs but had plenty of decent pieces to work with. McDaniels however either completely misjudged where the Raiders were or overestimated his capabilities and then oversold it to Davis to get his big contract. Their actions the last two off seasons werent of a team that was rebuilding or even retooling and then they made nearly every decision poorly.

    Come on, forget about McDaniels not being 'a great or even good head coach' - he is somewhere between poor and absolutely dire. He learned nothing since his last opportunity. I'd said earlier in the week that he'd clearly lost the locker room and then this comes out today to add to all the other on and off the record comments from the building:

    https://x.com/JayGlazer/status/1721217664390140012?s=20



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm not disagreeing with you on McDaniels. I wasn't suggesting he was average by saying he's not great or good.

    I don't agree that the Raiders had a good roster.

    Derek Carr wasn't doing anything special and mostly because he had an awful set of wide receivers.

    Their offensive line was poor and their defensive secondary was bad.

    They made the playoffs but that had a lot to do with a very friendly schedule.

    I'm not defending McDaniels here. I'm just saying it as I see it.

    And McDaniels was head hunted. He couldn't turn down a head coaching job again. He did it a few seasons ago because of his family situation.

    Anyway, for the most part we are in agreement I think.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    BoB is the only successful coach from the Brady tree. Who knew when you take away the GOAT that so many coaches would look poor?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    We made the playoffs with McDaniels in 2021.

    Or are you talking about in head coach positions?

    If so there was Charlie Weis who had a couple of good seasons with Notre Dame.

    Eric Mangini had a couple of winning seasons with the Jets.

    And then there was Romeo Crennell who did the impossible by guiding the Cleveland Browns to a winning season in 2007. Their first since 2002 and last until 2020.

    So there was four in total who were successful as head coaches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    They all have losing records lol. BoB the only one who has a playoff win iirc, pretty terrible ones too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    They may have overall losing records but they all had winning seasons.

    Like Romeo was over the Browns, how in earth can you come out of there after a couple of seasons with a winning record.

    Same applies with Mangini, he was with the Jets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Their records are losing ones, particularly where it matters, in the rare playoff appearances. You can try to polish a turd, but it still stinks



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The fact they had winning seasons means they had success.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    When are you going to give up? Any coach who had a winning season had success. Nobody mentioned hanging banners, that's done when you win titles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Success is measured in the post season. None of those coaches outside of BoB did anything of note there. Hence the reason they were all short lived. I don't know what you're arguing against, the record is pretty stark on that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Well you have a bit of a warped sense of succes for a coach. Would you fire every coach who didn't make the playoffs?

    If a team goes 11-6 in the regular season in the NFL and doesn't make the playoffs does that mean the coach didn't have a successful season?

    If you win more than you lose that's a successful season in my opinion. It's not a great season but you've had success.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Yes , I would absolutely fire a coach who doesn't get to the playoffs, in a couple of seasons. It's the whole point of the game. Jaysus wept.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    McDaniels could absolutely turn down whatever HC role he wanted - he wasn't forced into taking this job, just like he wasn't forced to string along a team and coaches the last time. After taking this job he also wasn't forced to completely misjudge the roster, if what you say is true. Rather than trying to rebuild he made big splashy moves. The guy simply is a disaster as a head coach.

    What you're saying makes no sense though when you look at the context. What was the benefit of keeping him on? He'd made mistake after mistake during his tenure and the majority of the team clearly hated him. Why would an owner not pull the trigger in that situation? Even if they strung a few wins together there was no way he getting that locker room back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Well this post is a bit late. We all seen how the Raiders players reacted and it spells out clearly how unhappy everybody was with McDaniels.

    So you are now using new information we didn't have when we were conversing about it.

    As regards taking the job in the first place. He went back to being an offensive co-ordinator for a long time after his previous foray into coaching. I'm sure all those around him told him that he was unfortunate to have taken the job with a bad franchise and even if his confidence was low you'd imagine between his success again as an OC and those around him insisting he was better than what happened previously that he believed he could make a go of it. He turned down the Colts a couple of years ago for family reasons.

    He then got headhunted by Davis for the Raiders job. I don't think anybody can blame him for taking the opportunity knowing he had the full confidence of the owner.

    Obviously he doesn't have what it takes to be a head coach. That's very clear now.

    Prior to viewing the Raiders reaction to his sacking we didn't know or in my case expect this to happen.

    My point was simply that their season wasn't over and besides that you are paying him to do a job and personnel decisions will not be made before the end of the season.

    Of course we now know that he, to put it mildly, was not liked by the players which we didn't know at the time and it's very understandable that he was fired now that we know that.

    As I said previously we were very much in agreement on most of it. Just thinking differently about things from a business sense and I didn't think their season was over.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Him losing the locker room isn't new information, I said it in my initial response to your original post on the subject:

    When you add to it how the locker room was so clearly lost this was one of the few good decisions Davis has made.

    If you listened to the comments of the Raiders players in the week or two before the firing, it was clear they had enough of him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,212 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    But you didn't know how bad things were. You were just surmising.

    And if that stuff about the players was on social media I wouldn't know about it. I don't do social media sites, they are full of lies.

    If you believe everything you read on those sites you will be wrong a lot more than you are right.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement