Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Marvel Cinematic Universe general stuff

1707173757689

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,270 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    On a comical note I've seen elsewhere fans criticising unfair reviews....same fans absolutely shitted on people for saying that about the DCEU.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Their flavour of vanilla is only a hurdle because the majority of fans don't want different. Every movie that has veered even slightly away from the core approach has received blowback from fans and critics.

    I also don't think you can look at any of the recent live action successes in film because they aren't comparable to what the MCU are doing. Barbie and Oppenheimer are the first movies and then Maverick and Avatar had huge gaps since the originals. For all of those it is much easier to build up an 'event' experience. We'll see how Avatar holds up when they get to the 5th movie, though even then it will be nowhere near the quantity and complexity of the MCU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,753 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Watching the news about the direction large entertainment companies are taking is sort of interesting as if they keep putting out subpar material they will eventually go bankrupt if they dont change course, predicting certain movies will flop is not having an axe to grind, surely it would only count as an "axe to grind" if they were wildly successful and still had a problem with them?

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,553 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    Agents of Shield gave up on the interconnection by the end going movies to TV, and TV to movies never really happened.

    The only thing that came from agents of shield was the new helicarrier in age of ultron which didn't have any plot you just had Coulson show it at one point and then age of ultron happens and it shows up.

    If you'd never watched AOS you'd not have missed anything for the movies. They may as well have been fan made shows.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I still chuckle at how the end(?) season coincided with Infinity War and the sum total of connection with that that Agents of SHIELD managed was a lackey on an alien vessel noting that "Thanos was attacking earth". That was it! And needless to say the Snap never featured.

    Great show though and still salty that the MCU brain trust never gave any cameos or nods to Melinda May, Daisy or those who could stand toe to toe. They deserved more than being forgotten. Also salty the budget got slashed such that the last two seasons took place entirely in the same, constantly redressed box set.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    If anything though, and as we've seen with some of the Disney shows, being freed of having to connect to the films allowed AoS to do some really funky sh*t. They really took the chance to do some huge stories, have a lot of fun, and develop and evolve their own characters without having to really worry about a new MCU film announced which might not be out for another 3 years.

    Would have loved to see Daisy come through to the main MCU given her powers & history. May and Mac were two of my favourite characters, but they'd get lost in the MCU, and I was fully sure they were going to claim Mac was actually Nick Fury's son but they didn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,187 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    The fact Marvel are trying to bury any and all references to to the Inhumans experiment really killed off any hope of any of the characters ever appearing again.

    Damn shame.

    Mac, Robbie, Daisy and Fitz were awesome.

    J August Richards Deathlok was brilliant in his too infrequent small cameo's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,187 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    For sure and I agree but given Fury hasn't really gone away it's a damn shame his various side hustles couldn't have involved SHIELD in some capacity; feels like Secret Invasion might have been the best lay up to do just that given the plot, and clearly Marvel have been trying to bring random edge cases back into the fold (like Anson Mount in Dr. Strange 2). SHIELD remains the best MCU TV show so far, by some distance with seasons 3 and 4 the pinnacle, yet it's a great pity the show has been effectively nuked from canon.

    It's a good idea, Season 1 was sloppy as fúck til the HYDRA reveal and as I said 3 and 4, the fourth especially, were legitimately great bits of telly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Season 3 is also responsible for one of my favourite lines of dialogue in any Marvel project

    "Why do you think this Lash can defeat Hive? And who in tarnation names these things?!"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,187 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Coulson and Mac are insanely quotable.

    and I think in S2 Coulson tells Trip and Daisy to "prepare for a big file transfer" and Daisy asks "how big" literally seconds before an entire filing cabinet crashes down infront of them from the top of the building and Coulson looking down from the smashed window.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The show found the right balance with the MCU's Whedon originating snark, among its many strengths. Though being a. long form TV show it probably has more emotional runway for snark & drama than the movies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,259 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Basically, once Joss Whedon left the Marvel top table, Jed and Marissa, AOS show runners lost contact with where the movies were going and therefore lost the ability to keep the party connection. Truth be told I kind of preferred Skye the hacktivist to Daisy/Quake the not mutant Inhuman.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I'm sure Jed and Marissa would have had other connections to the producers without Joss. They would have had to get approval for use of characters, stories etc from Marvel comics and the film producers like Feige for everything they did. I always saw it more as a case that because the Inhumans show failed, and because AoS had so much time to fill between movies, constantly having to tie back to the movies became more of a burden than anything else. Particularly with how network TV and movies are made at such a different pace. Splitting from the movies just allowed them to run their own stories at their own pace with stuff the movies weren't using (though the Darkhold appeared in AoS long before it showed up again in Wandavision).



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Wasn't there also a big internal politics battle between Feige and Perlmutter? Think there were a bunch of rumours that it drove a split between TV and movies.

    Think it ended up for the best in the end, they had some interesting impact early but were then able to go their own way.

    Presume at this stage it is retconned into being another universe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    *i am moving this comment from the Marvels thread..


    I think the X-Men scenario will be huge.. I was 28 when Iron Man came out, and a total comic nerd. I can't wait to see what happens with the MCU in control.

    the first x-men movie and days of future past, were brilliant. but i am definitely looking forward to this.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    What I will say about MCU X-Men is that the one thing the MCU hasn't been great at, is world building. It's often really surface level if remembered at all and I've never got a sense anything really changed in this world ... which is something I believe you can't do with X-Men. The Fox movies were great cos they really ran with the prejudicial angle to its fullest. In a world of The Snap, talking trees and literal gods living in Norway, so what if Mutants start appearing? I've always felt the comics are just a little too full and inconsistent - Spider-Man is a hero but the X-Men to be suspected? - and the film's keeping a separation would be a good idea imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,937 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    I think the main issue with the MCU X-Men will come to recasting them now instead of going with the 20 year old cast from the first X-Men movies just to placate the fans of the first movies.

    They can easily recast the Fantastic 4 as none of those movies were really any good

    The cast of the original X-Men were well cast and well received by fans and they did a good job with the material they were given however they are all to old to lead a decade or more MCU Phase now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Yeah, they're really in a strange spot with it.

    I felt they were always best to start fresh with it within the MCU rather than using the multiverse. They could have easily built a story where the snaps cause mutants to start appearing at a much higher rate than the past - meaning there were always mutants but they kept below the radar.

    Having the old actors in seems like a short term decision that will hurt the MCU in the long term, unless they can find a way to wipe everything clean. Even then, I think the public is open to new actors when they are clear, like Holland, but when you start intro the old ones it'll be tough to go back to new ones (especially as the younger versions are already done).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,187 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Thats only really an issue for Wolverine/Magneto/Xavier as Jackman, Stewart and McKellen really as they immediately became iconic. I doubt anyone is too bothered about Jansen/Cumming/Park/Ashmore/Page/Marsden/Berry/Paquin returning.

    Hell theres already been 2 versions of most of the original characters to varying success.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,187 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Thats why the Krakoa theory of mutants entering the MCU became so popular.

    Just need to pick a trigger (Hope Summers is a popular one - she was the mutant messiah that triggered the 1st renaissance of mutants post decimation and could complete the 5 needed for ressurection so doubly handy to use her) to cause their reveal.

    Saves a lot of awkwardness and repetition of already multiple seen origins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,399 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I always felt x men should have been an alt universe, and they could have used multi verse story lines to bring them together for a big end game type crossover.

    I just can't see how you can logically bring in wolverine or magneto or Xavier into the MCU. Not even an actor issue, just from the pov those characters need to be older, imo, so where have they been?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,187 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Thats where the Krakoa theory comes in. They were present in universe but not interfering in matters until the time suited them.

    Anything else is a massive plot hole that utterly breaks the universe.


    There has to have been a hidden group of senior mutants to kick things off right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I think a small group of mutants who have kept themselves mostly below the radar among the people is very doable. They've made plenty of things work that were going on behind the scenes, that none of the current MCU characters were aware of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,052 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Given the existential threats that Earth has faced over the past while in-universe, it begins to feel really weird if yet another gang of ultra-powerful heroes were just hanging out ignoring it, with The Eternals doing the same. It felt a big stretch to use that story beat once - using it twice feels like way too much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭FortuneChip


    Blah blah blah, Cerebro, blah blah blah, Prof X incapacitated, blah blah blah, blocking all people's awareness of mutant powers...


    Or there's one mega universe crossover event towards the end of this phase that merges the Marvel world we know with a world where mutants have existed already.


    It's messy as f*ck either way, but they'll be able to fluff it a bit if the other elements are right.

    Not overly excited by it anyway, but still interested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Yeah this phase is literally the Multiverse Saga, and we're seeing how Prof.X has already been included, and Deadpool will have Wolverine and probably other X-Men. We're also seeing how in Doctor Strange, his actions have helped cause Incursions, which is where two different realities clash with each other. So chances are by the end of this Phase they'll all be rolled into one and the MCU can just decide who/what to keep and re-cast anyone else they need to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Slowly watching Loki and I'm really not gonna miss Kang, the overacting is bordering on annoying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    He can be hit and miss. Some of his Variants like Victor Timely, yeah his performance isn't great and he goes overboard in trying to make each variant feel/sound different and unique. Some Variants like the exile in Quantumania and even most of his performance as He Who Remains, I thought was excellent.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Yep, I loved him in Creed 3 but he sounds like a terrible person so not gonna miss him in scheme of things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,259 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    The Marvels, a nice piece of harmless fun although I'm surprised that the 10 Rings story didn't come into it more, considering some of the hints in Shang Chi post credits and Ms Marvel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,132 ✭✭✭EoinMcLovin


    I think alot of these teases have been forgotten about by Marvel. The large gaps between films and tv shows doesn't help either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,160 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    I'm REALLY struggling with Loki season 2. It took me about 3 sittings to get through I think episode 4 maybe? The one with Victor Timely (really??!!) and miss whatshername, the AI.

    And, as has been mentioned by so many, the fact that you almost HAVE to watch each and every even tangentially-related series or show to get the "most" out of each movie is draining. It's the same with the Star Wars stuff.

    For ne, I enjoyed Hawkeye for the lighthearted nature in general of it and the excellent comic timing for Steinfeld.

    I enjoyed Falcon and The Winter Soldier (Seems so long ago).

    Wandavision? Meh. But you had to watch it to know what was going on with Dr. Strange 2.

    In Star Wars, Asohka, you needed to have watched all the CG Clone Wars series to get who ANY of them were.

    Andor barely touched on Star Wars (You might know he's in "Rogue One" later, you might not) and it's FANTASTIC


    So I think the financial disappointment of Marvels is not down to people not willing to watch a female-led superhero movie but REALLY the final proof of superhero fatigue. And lack of focus and weak antagonists. I mean compare how heavily they are pushing Kang. Compared to Thanos. And does anybody else think that basically "Multiverse" is just an easy way of undoing whatever they want or bringing in whoever they want?

    Tony Stark is dead. Ah, but here's Tony Stark from universe ZZ9-Plural Z-Alpha (Assuming they offer DJ a metric tonne of money or they recast for the hottest young thing).

    Now here's the X-men!!!!!

    We all want to see the X-men again but in the MCU but will we be knackered by the time they come?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I would definitely say the first three episodes of S2 of Loki are rough enough, episode 4 is okay, but episodes 5 and 6 are terrific and make the whole thing worth it. It's really well worth sticking with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    who will be knackered?

    a leopard doesn't change etc etc...

    I can't wait.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,160 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,358 ✭✭✭Cotts72


    Watched the marvels yesterday...decent movie but the main villain was poor...never felt like she was a big bad or would defeat the heroes...it all just felt a bit rushed

    The main problem with the MCU now is the multiverse saga has failed...people aren't interested in most of these new characters...they want the iron man's and the Captain America's. We haven't seen nor heard Sam as captain mentioned in over 2 years

    What I enjoyed about the end credit scenes was you could see the direction they were going in and it hyped the next movie...instead now we get characters that some don't know or scenes that hint at nothing

    MCU has to nail the X-Men and cast them properly as otherwise all signs point to iron man being brought back whether it be RDJ or someone younger to fill the void



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,587 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    Given the cast of characters and nature of the storylines, I would love to see X-Men tackled as a sprawling TV series a la Game of Thrones, rather than a movie. Bin off the CGI set pieces and let the characters and story come to the fore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,160 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    It is a bit telling that the bit that everyone remembers the most from Dr Strange two was

    Reed Richards, Prof X, Peggy Carter as Captain America, Pike as Black Bolt etc and them instantly getting killed off. But it's OK, she HAD lost her imaginary kids, right? :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,259 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Reddit Rumour.

    Kevin Feige set to resign as head of Marvel with Victoria Alonso tipped to replace him in the interim.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Victoria Alonso was fired from Marvel in March, and there was a pretty big sigh of relief following it, especially from the VFX departments. I can't see there being any truth to this. Maybe Feige will leave, but I doubt it'd be Alonso who comes back to replace him.

    It'd be a huge step for Feige to resign though. As bad as the performance and quality of MCU projects have been of late, they also haven't bombed horrifically enough to warrant stepping down. If anything, that would cause far more chaos behind the scenes, and less faith by fans that they could right the ship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,259 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Yeah, I'm not sure about the rumours myself but in terms of the right time to shake up the top, very sparse calendar for 2024 because of the strikes gives the studio plenty of time to transition ready to relaunch in 2025.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    How do ye folks know so much?

    Do ye work in the industry?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,321 ✭✭✭✭Penn




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Cos internet? Rumours, reports etc. it's not hard to track 'cos like most corporations they're leaky sieves. The strikes required studios to publicly move productions and schedules therein.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,259 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    I don't claim to know anything, I just picked up an interesting rumour, which reddit mods have deleted so it might come to nothing, and opened it to speculation. I thought the timing made some sense given the (unfair IMO) drubbing The Marvels is getting and saw where the logic was going. Kevin had a good run of it up to Endgame and probably should have went out then. Next best time to go is probably now while things are slowed down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,753 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    The audience breakdown for The Marvels was 65% male and 35% female, going by past films if you want a bigger female audience you put a shirtless Jason Momoa and Chris Evans in a movie ;-)

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,753 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Yikes that sounds expensive, it was already meant to be a $350 cost & Marketing , 5 months is essentially a full reshoot



    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,324 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    So you're saying if the main actresses did the same, the film would've done better? 😃

    I'm sure plenty of people would've complained.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,753 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    arent there porn versions of Marvel movies to cater to that? 😃 though if you want to Venn diagram a movie that pleases everyone aesthetic-wise Wonder Woman probably fits the bill , 52% female audience

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
Advertisement