"Green" policies are destroying this country

Yes, alright. Small k . I was just highlighting the letter by making it a capital as i did the G in Giga. A bit sloppy of course..😏

"The kilowatt-hour is a composite unit of energy equal to one kilowatt (kW) sustained for (multiplied by) one hour".(end of quote).

K as in Kelvin is a measurement of temperature. It is used in physics io using degree Celsius or Fahrenheit. 0 degree Kelvin is the absolute zero point.

Using the word 'kilo' is an odd one if used in conjunction with energy io say a kilogram which is 1000 gram or kilobyte etc. KiloJoule is also a strange one. But i know the equations involved as im used to make them tinkering w amplifiers. W= A* V.

Amperes, voltages, resistance, Ohmage, the familiar stuff..

Again the h in kWh refers to hour. It is important because unlike say a ton of coal, a watt is simply a unit of energy just like a joule. It makes the difference as with wind and solar we do not have a volume as such that stores the energy unless a battery is used which is secundary.

THe E.U. has just awarded Ireland a Protected Geographic Indicator for grass-fed Irish beef.

While the Irish Green Party was threatening to bring down the government if the didn`t get their way on culling a million cattle to save the planet, Brazil, Argentina and Australia were announcing plans to increase their herds to take advantage of the growing demand for beef.

There really are times you need to laugh at some of the insanity rather than attempting to make sense of it

"Guardian is about solid fuel and not wood pellet" What do you think wood pellets are made from ?

Tell me you don't know what you are talking about without telling me you don't know what you are talking about.

You claimed to have a study to show a room heater was worse for the environment. You don't. You took a number of other articles and added them together thinking 2+2 must equal 5 and it doesn't,

Probably the reason you didn't share the study in the first place because you knew it was nonsense(see I can use bold as well but i choose not to because Im an adult)

I gave you the stats from Ember, I showed you the study from The Natural Resource Defence Council, I showed you the article from The Guardian that backed up its claim with link to studies from Sweden, Finland, France, Denmark and Australia where each found that burning wood was not carbon neutral. None of these studies were from anti greens. They were all from green advocacy groups or think tanks. If you wish to ignore what they had to say on wood burning by attempting to shoot the messengar then that is up tp you.

The facts are simple, If you are burning wood in whatever form, be it in a wood pellet stove or in a power plant, then you are emiting CO2 and there is no such thing as being a little bit pregnant.

I really do not care what you burn to provide heat. In fact to me it make perfect sense. Even more so than economic reasons to do so rather than being totally dependent on electricity for everything. At least during power cuts or outages you will have heat. Something that for the elderly is even more important.

I was not pointing the finger at you saying I believed you were wrong to burn wood. More at some here who tell us the only energy we should be using is that provided by carbon neutral renewables, but then are happy to burn wood themselves. Even encouraging others to do the same. To me, other than finding it a bit amusing, I found it self contradictory.

Yet here we are again after the last two COP beanfeasts back on the merry-go-round throwing more billions in the same direction this time on climate change and somehow expecting a different outcome.

Albert Einstein had an opinion on that. Short version. Insanity.