Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
16856866886906911266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Are you going to qualify that. Once this batch of hostages have been released or all hostages including bodies of hostages who have been killed?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,638 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Yeah that act of theirs was rumbled a long time ago.

    Deny Hamas do any wrong because they didnt see it. I've never seen an ostrich therefore ostriches arent real.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The poster may well have seen raw footage on social media before it was taken down, which is worse than what has been released. There is sufficient evidence in what has been provided to determine that Hamas committed atrocities against civilians, including beheadings, maiming and burning, as well as executions. Gleefully so, as the celebratory footage attests.

    And quotes were not 'unlinked'. They were from the articles linked above, in a direct reply to your post. Demonstrates you don't even look at the evidence provided. At any point, you are free to look for some of this yourself online but nope... Any excuse to post defending Hamas.

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/121390564/#Comment_121390564

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,023 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    That's rather fanciful , oct 7th gifted Israel the chance to make a fairly large point in gaza and they are not even half finished yet



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,958 ✭✭✭circadian


    Whatever about the semantics of my post, the fact that you're openly throwing out massive stereotypes is the problem.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Nobody has ever denied that the atrocities and barbarism of October 7th happened - it's not as if there is some counter narrative that that awful day and the numerous murders of innocent civilians didn't happen.

    But that does not give Israel the right either to go into Gaza on a mission of genocidal revenge (and trying to dress it up as doing it for 'security' reasons).



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,715 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Not only did Richard Boyd Barrett describe the man screaming Allahu Akbar at the top of his lungs as a bit of "verbal argy bargy" he refused to condemn the October 7th terrorist attack despite being prompted to do so.

    The man is an utter cretin like his fellow cretins in the Dáil.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Yes, it is being denied, on this thread via "just asking questions" tactics and by conspiracy theory trolls elsewhere on social media.

    There were posts on this thread insinuating the whole operation was a false flag attack by Israel.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    If there are people doing it here, they must be a tiny minority. From what I can see, even most strong critics of Israel admit that the October 7th terrorist attacks happened and are no fans at all of Hamas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    Hamas also need to be clear to the world on their future intent though- it works both ways - I see a lot of finger pointing at Israel and rightfully so over the last couple of weeks- but Hamas can’t go back to their terrorist ways either



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    If your bar for facts and “evidence” is “the poster may have seen” then that’s fine.

    I have condemned the heinous, barbaric attack by Hamas many times. In a thread in which Palestinian numbers of dead are constantly questioned, dead Palestinian children are dismissed as “dolls” by both official IDF sources and posters here. Why are some claims which are clearly untrue accepted as fact, defended and if questioned, those questioning them labeled as Hamas supporters, conspiracy theorists etc?

    Many claims have been made by the IDF and Israeli bombing apologists which have turned out to be completely false. The claim that there is a video of Hamas terrorists burning people to death is false. They may well have done so, but a poster claiming to have seen them doing so is not true.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,119 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Palestinians in Gaza would be better off defending themselves against their so called leaders, Hamas, who couldn't care less about them.

    How do Israelis, search people inside Gaza? How do they imprison people inside Gaza?

    It's important to be accurate, not exaggerate. There are wrongs on both sides, but the terrorist attack on Oct 7th cannot be justified.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The condemnations that had to be dragged out of you, always with reservations and whataboutery and ifs and buts and maybes?

    Nope, you never trot this line of questioning out for claims of atrocities alleged against Israel, so the "bar of evidence" angle won't wash.

    There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Hamas burned civilians, from the footage and other evidence available. Similarly, there is sufficient evidence to conclude they celebrated such acts.

    That is the truth. Do you deny it?

    So why muddy that with "just asking questions" about the ghoulish specifics of the atrocities and exactly what horrific acts were directly witnessed? Why someone would take such issue with the claim someone actually saw it plainly speaks to a different agenda.

    And don't pretend this is done in some neutral stance, setting some bar for evidence, because it is just your posts defending Hamas in a way your posts never defend Israel.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Don't have an issue with anything he said.

    I have been saying the same thing since the start.

    Hamas actions: Clear unequivocal evidence that they have committed war crimes. There is no reasonable doubt.

    Israeli actions: Clouded by the principles of self-defence and the rules of war, mean that their actions need investigation before being adjudicated on. There is considerable doubt about whether they have committed war crimes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,967 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Or maybe the real problem is what makes me throw out these stereotypes?



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    International law allows for just wars, there are principles. Responding to clear war crimes such as the actions of 7/10 by Hamas are allowed. If all of the hostages are released, and any bodies returned, there is no justification for Israel to prolong the war. They could try and use the objective of bringing those responsible to justice to continue actions, but I don't think that would be sufficient to meet the test of a just war. So yes, as I said from the start of this thread, if Hamas release the hostages and hand over those responsible for 7/10 to the ICC, there is absolutely no justification for Israel to continue attacking Gaza. If Hamas only release the hostages, that is enough in my opinion, but not sure that the Israelis would see it that way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is not fanciful, releasing the hostages ends Israel's justifications. That is why the EU have called for the unconditional release of the hostages from the very start. They know that if the hostages are released, that they can make Israel stop.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Regime change in Gaza and Israel will follow the ending of this war.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,632 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It should be long evident to you that Israel has used the Oct 7th attacks by Hamas as a means to justify its genocidal intent.

    It has killed hostages held by Hamas (and also Israeli citizens during its response on Oct 7th) and has repeatedly shown little or no interest in entertaining the offers for hostage exchanges that Hamas has proposed.

    Israel has no justification for much of its actions over the last 6 weeks, full stop and if and when this does come to an end, it should face charges for its actions in the same way Hamas participants should be held accountable for theirs.

    I have close to no expectation that this will happen with respect to Israel and that is of course something they've known all along. They are a rogue state which is carrying out a genocide.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,759 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    The point about Boyd- Barrett equviocating in that debate is correct. I am not someone with an axe to grind against all things left wing, but it's a bit rich of him to call Ursula out for double standards, yet he can't give a simple yes or no answer to a straight forward question.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,565 ✭✭✭Hoboo


    And there are others who throw the fog of October 7th over the decades of atrocities carried out by Israel. This didn’t start on October 7th, the most surprising thing is that anyone is surprised it happened.

    Mass murdering civilians in revenge isn’t war either, it’s a holocaust.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    (1) Israel does not have genocidal intent, however, Hamas does, and you are willing to excuse that.

    (2) There is no clear evidence that Israel have killed hostages held by Hamas, but even if there were, the onus under international law to protect the hostages and return them is on Hamas. A failure to do so would add to the lengthy list of Hamas war crimes, which you refuse to acknowledge.

    (3) The unconditional release of the hostages is something that the EU have called for from the start, it is the only way for Hamas to redeem their war crime. Calling for hostage exchange is an endorsement of Hamas war crimes.

    (4) There is a possibility that Israel have committed war crimes, that will need adjudication at the proper times, there is an absolute certainty that Hamas have committed war crimes. It appears that you are unable to comprehend the difference.

    (5) Hamas lead a rogue state that launches terrorist attacks as seen on 7/10



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I condemned Hamas, without reservation, without qualification, without equivocation, multiple times. So at least be honest.

    You speak of muddying the waters. The claim was that a poster had seen a video, that no one else has ever claimed existed or to have claimed to have seen. That’s evidence enough for you. Fine.

    The principle of what can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence only applies to posters you disagree with. Fine.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    I hope you’re equally strong in your view that Hamas too need to be held to equal account - it works both ways you know



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,632 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    You won't find a single post of mine excusing Hamas' behaviour. You know this, stop pretending I have done so. I have made posts saying that it is reasonable for Israel to pursue them in various ways including using Mossad to 'neutralise' its leaders. How much more acknowedlgement do you want from me beyond what I've said about Hamas's actions being horrific, and unacceptable?

    There absolutely is clear evidence of Israel committing war crimes. But you can relax, they will not be held accountable. And Israel's PM shown a map at the UN of the 'new middle east region' with Palestine completely removed, he has since spoken of bibilical guidance to justify the killing of all Palestinians. These are facts.

    I presume when you talk about the unconditional release of hostages, you are including the thousands of Palestinians held without charge in Israeli prisons?

    I see Hamas as a terrorist organization, I have been clear about this since I first posted. You will have to construct a different strawman if you think you can challenge any support for them coming from my direction.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,632 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    See previous post. I don't need you to tell me how accountability works.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,023 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    If oct 7 happened here I would wish the purps to suffer greatly



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,119 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    There absolutely is clear evidence of Israel committing war crimes. 

    You know.this how exactly?

    Most people would wait until the investigators have done their job



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Do Palestinians have the right to self defense under international law ?

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Pssible but that is solely up to the people of both to decide who they want, no one else. The right to self determination you see.

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



Advertisement