Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
16866876896916921266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 21,632 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Link

    [p.225] Article 33 is derived from Article 50 of the Hague Regulations: "No general penalty, pecuniary or otherwise, shall be inflicted upon the population on account of the acts of individuals for which they can not be regarded as jointly and severally responsible".

    Or maybe you can tell us how telling the entire population of an area to move, or turning off power/water/internet to them, or targeting water supply lines, bakeries etc doesn't constitute this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,418 ✭✭✭Rosahane


    It might have helped your comprehension if you had actually bothered to read all of the article rather than the first line which mentioned another, now redacted study!



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,632 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,239 ✭✭✭crusd


    A factor not included in comparative studies of IQ tests is the actual exposure to doing the tests. Kids and adults in countries with regular standardised testing tend to score higher than those in countries that dont. One of the reasons Ireland are relatively low on the IQ tables is because we do relatively little standardised testing compared to other developed countries. In this scenario results tend lower as there is an element of learning how to take the test. There is obviously a limit to how much learning to take a test will improve the result.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    That would at least be something positive to come out of all the death and suffering.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    The problem with that is the actions were those of Hamas, the elected government of Gaza.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Should be easy to find such posts then. I only recall ones couched in reservation and whataboutery or vagueness, without accepting their atrocities as a fact.

    Similarly, should be easy to find the posts where you challenged with "dismissed without evidence" for an accusation against Israel. Because when you only bring it out for claims against Hamas, you can see why is creates the impression you are here as a Hamas defender and tacit supporter.

    "At least be honest"? Those are your words not mine, so maybe take your own advice.

    There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Hamas burned civilians, from the footage and other evidence available. Similarly, there is sufficient evidence to conclude they celebrated such acts.

    Do you deny it?

    You were asked that as a simple question in previous post and no answer was given.

    So if you don't deny it - do you accept Hamas carried out such atrocities and do you condemn Hamas for it, without reservation, without ifs?

    And if you accept it happened, why would you take such issue with the possibility that somewhere online such footage was actually seen?

    And why does that seem to matter more to you than the fact of what Hamas actually did?

    Given that we know Hamas carried out atrocities against civilians, and we know from body cam footage they recorded atrocities and shared them online before being taken down, and what has been shared in mainstream media is redacted.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Look Odyssey, you are making claims. It is up to you to prove them.

    Of course we all know that Hamas committed horrific atrocities against civilians on October 7th. What we also know is that there were also claims made of atrocities, alleged by Israeli sources which did not happen, were exaggerated, unverified and subsequently retracted.

    I accept that Hamas committed atrocities including even burning civilians but what you won’t accept for some reason is that no video of Hamas burning civilians exists or is claimed to exist by anyone except the poster you are defending who has claimed it.

    Do you accept that the video doesn’t exist?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,407 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    They shot dead in cold blood a son who was leaving his house with his father. Back of the head. They were not resisting. There was no suggestion he was a militant. Just bang.


    Shot dead a kid with for throwing stones.


    No justification for either of those.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, it's widely accepted that around 800 Israeli civilians were murdered by Hamas on October 7th, mostly as a result of being shot dead. However, many of the more lurid and horrific claims of how some of them were killed which emerged in the following two or three days do not appear to have been substantiated or proven (so far).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,519 ✭✭✭jmreire


    One of the memories that I can't unsee is when ISI paraded their prisoners, handcuffed and dressed in vivid orange jumpsuits (Guantanamo style) before executing them by beheading them, except for the Jordanian Pilot who they burnt alive. For me, Hamas and ISIS are one and the same thing. There is no difference in either their methods of terror or global aims of an Islamic Caliphate. The Palestinians are just a means to an end for them, nothing more.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,618 ✭✭✭quokula


    You might think that, but you are completely and totally wrong. There is no relationship between them, Islamic State considered Hamas an enemy as Hamas' goal is a free and self governed Palestinian nation state (yes, a Muslim one, in much the same way as Israel is a Jewish one) while ISIS were opposed to nation states and instead wanted a caliphate.

    And if you're talking in terms of pure brutality, the IDF is surely the organisation most similar to ISIS in terms of the atrocities they've actually committed. They've even copied another element of the IS playbook in tearing down monuments in the West Bank to try and destroy their culture.

    It says a lot that the method of justifying warcrimes against Palestinian civilians has moved on from collective punishment of Palestinians for the actions of a few Hamas terrorists, as any concept of proportionality has long gone out the window there, so you're now trying to justify the ongoing mass murder of innocent Palestinian children as some kind of retribution for any crime committed by any muslim anywhere in the world even if those people were directly opposed to the cause of Palestinian freedom.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,239 ✭✭✭crusd


    The last election in Gaza was in 2006. Its pretty obvious most of the population had no part in electing Hamas.

    An lest we forget, one of the reasons Hamas got elected and maintained power was Netanyahu's policies of undermining the PLO and allowing money be funnelled into Gaza to Hamas to further undermine the chances of a unified Palestinian regime.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    No, Hamas do not want a free and self governing nation for Palestinian Arabs. They want an Islamic State governed by Sharia law. That required massive restrictions on freedom and completely precludes self governance. Both ISIS and Hamas are Sunni, both want to ethnically cleans the regions they control of all non Sunni Muslims. Both see the deaths of their own civilians are a worthwhile endeavour as the dead are martyrs and any amount of blood spilled is justified in pursuit of their mandate from heaven.


    Suggesting that the IDF are most similar to ISIS and the implicit suggestion that their actions are worse than those of Hamas is disgusting and is beneath contempt.

    Ignoring that Hamas is the elected government of Gaza and that their actions enjoy broad support amongst the Gazan population is deserving of the same contempt.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I don't accept that the video doesn't exist or never existed. You state that you accept they burned civilians.

    We have abundant evidence also that they streamed horrific footage of their the attacks, footage which was then taken down by responsible media outlets. Therefore it is plausible than someone saw footage of one of these horrific acts. It is baffling therefore why you would go to such lengths to dispute it.

    "I accept that Hamas committed atrocities?"

    Do you miss the step where you were asked to condemn them also? Why are you incapable of giving a straight answer to this question?

    And as has been pointed out to you multiple times, and you have offered zero defence, you never post the line "you are making claims, it is up to you to prove them" to anyone making such claims about alleged Israeli atrocities. Only ever Hamas ones.

    Therefore your posts here are not to advance the truth or set some bar for evidence, they serve the purpose of muddying the waters of atrocities you accept Hamas committed. If your posts are not intended to act in defence or support of Hamas, that is not the way to go about it because that is the impression they create.

    The truth is that Hamas committed atrocities, including deliberate targeting and brutalisation of civilians, including burning of them. That is the truth we must not lose sight of.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,023 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    I personally don't believe the babies were beheaded but I've seen enough of the reality for me to form an opinion that Israel should continue their campaign until hamas are dead and cannot regroup



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Yep Netanyahu and his government of extremists did indeed do what they could to undermine Fata (formerly the PLO) but Fata were monumentally corrupt and inept so it was an easy task.


    Hamas enjoyed broad support in Gaza in 2021 when 53% of the population approved of their leadership (only 14% supported Fata). Recent poles showing a large increase in that support seem to have been conducted over a very small population sample so I don't consider them to be as reliable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Ok, so you are willing to believe someone who says they have seen something that nobody else has seen. That’s fine but then don’t dismiss others as conspiracy theorists if that is your standard for evidence of truth.

    You say I don’t hold those condemning the killing of Palestinian civilians to the same standard. There seems to be an ample number of people on this thread dismissing dead Palestinian children as dolls, denying the shooting of unarmed civilians by Israeli soldiers etc.

    Also only one side in the conflict is targeting those reporting on atrocities, killing them and their families.

    Only one side is seeking to reduce the punishment for those who have burnt children to death.



    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    No ok. Not going to fall for your attempted distraction. You are the one inserting yourself into the debate questioning claims about atrocities.

    You were asked a simple question:

    "I accept that Hamas committed atrocities?"

    Do you miss the step where you were asked to condemn them also? Why are you incapable of giving a straight answer to this question?

    And your response is whataboutery and deflection and paragraphs of text... anything but come out and condemn without reservation Hamas for the atrocities you accept they committed.

    And yet you have never questioned similar claims about Israel, proof positive it is not done with regard to establishing some bar for evidence - so no you do not hold them to the same standard. Exactly what we would expect from a Hamas defender and supporter. And that's exactly what we get.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I’ll make it very simple for you so there is no confusion.

    I completely, totally, unreservedly, without equivocation condemn the Hamas attacks on October 7th in which Israeli civilians were killed.

    Feel free to quote this anytime.

    My condemning of the atrocities committed by Hamas, deplorable as they were, does not automatically convince me that a poster has seen a video which no one else has seen, which wasn’t included in the IDF presentation of Hamas atrocities, the existence of which hasn’t been alluded to by the IDF or anyone else.

    Which specific Israeli atrocities that have been alleged are you asking me to question?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Under international law, there was a ceasefire on October 6th, then on October 7th, Hamas were the aggressor, giving Israel the right to self-defence under international law. You cannot have a right to self-defence under international law unless you are attacked by an aggressor who is not acting under their right to self-defence. So, unless and until Israel overstep the mark e.g. keep attacking Hamas after the hostages taken on 7/10 have been released, then the answer to your question is no.

    This has been explained to you multiple times.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There is no obligation on a nation such as Israel, subject to attack, and acting in self-defence, to continue supplying food, water and power to the enemy who have attacked them. There is an obligation on Hamas, the Palestinian government, to look after the welfare of their own civilians by ensuring nothing they do endangers the supply of food, water and power to their own civilian population.

    Telling the civilian population to move is appropriate in war if you intend to attack military targets where they are. There is a question about the adequacy of the warnings and the effectiveness of the warnings given by Israel, but that is a matter of degree. Nothing per se about giving a warning is a war crime.

    Finally, as I understand it, you are referencing the regulations pertaining to Occupying Powers, they didn't apply to Israel. Can you clarify which regulations you are relying on?



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    You haven't condemned Hamas for the specific atrocity you were asked to, the atrocity you were happy to post paragraphs about discussing earlier. Strange that.

    You stated earlier that you accept Hamas burned civilians, you accept that Hamas inflicted atrocities on civilians - this is all in the content of your posts from today. I haven't picked some random atrocity out of the blue.

    And yet instead of just accepting and then condemning Hamas for those atrocities against Israeli civilians, instead we get post after post dodging the question, whataboutery or vague indirect responses, and now attacking the poster querying why you can't give a straight answer. Anything but just bloody condemn Hamas for atrocities against civilians. So your continued refusals to condemn Hamas for atrocities against civilians is revealing.

    Case in point for those who somehow think there are no Hamas supporters on the thread, when someone is unable to bring themselves to condemn Hamas for atrocities they accept they committed, that is a Hamas supporter and defender.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭brickster69


    LOL. What about the right to self determination, do Palestinians have that right ?

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Another group stepping up to the plate. that's a big one isn't it lads ?


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Remind us how many elections have been permitted by Hamas since they came to power?

    It isn’t Israel preventing votes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Isn't it incredible that this conflict gets so much attention when other more bloody conflicts in which more children are dying are ignored.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,901 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    One of the requirements to exercise the right to self-determination is that you extend that right to others. Given that the Palestinians have elected and maintained in place a regime that seeks the genocidal elimination of the Jews, the answer is that the Palestinians currently don't have the right to self-determination.



Advertisement