Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

If Metrolink was scrapped, what are the alternatives?

  • 18-11-2023 6:42pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I dont want to keep bringing the metrolink thread off topic. There are two sides, those with a crystal ball, saying it will be built and those not too confident, based on many very valid reasons and experience, disappointment over decades on the governments total lack of will and spending on public transport and rail in particular.

    What are the options, if metrolink is scrapped on cost grounds, you cant say a high capacity metro is needed, then ditch it and say "ah shure buses will do it" HOWEVER! This is ireland and that is a totally plausible outcome.

    In terms of a rail connection, are there options, that could connect the northern line to swords, to the airport and city centre, without the same spend? But actually be a realistic alternative. Not some luas finglas to the airport extension farce...

    Post edited by spacetweek on


«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Consonata


    This is ridiculous, there is zero indication that Metrolink is going to be scrapped. I do not understand why you are so determined to be cynical on this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Seriously? no irish government has ever delivered a rail project of any significant scale, the luas lines are mickey mouse, low hanging fruit, small sum projects, thats the reality... Thats one reason...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    As much as a cynic as the next person, but MN barring an epic change in landscape, can’t be scrapped.

    If it is scrapped, the country is finished.

    Bad and all as the most of the current crop of government are (I know MM still lingering from a previous attempt to destroy the country), but compared to what went before them, I think they get how important this is.

    The population is growing so rapidly, Dublin will not be able to continue to function at some stage in the future without MN.

    There is no alternative.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The Luas lines are absolutely not Mickey Mouse and beyond that are a beacon of good infrastructure construction compared to e.g. the Edinburgh tram.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I believe 18,500 units are currently under construction in Dublin, population increasing by over 30,000 a year. It would seem beyond belief that it could be scrapped, I agree with you. But I am not that old, yet I know this country too well at this stage...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Right. The only rail have built in the last twenty years, in a city of 1.5 million , a European capital. With more money than they know what to do with... lines that in the city centre crawl along at walking speed, thats your idea of impressive is it ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,278 ✭✭✭gjim


    I don't get the claim that cynicism about project delivery is due to experience. The only big rail cancellations were those of MN and DU and that was due to the fact that the state was not even in a position to pay salaries of teachers, guards and nurses in the largest economic crisis since the 1930s. The GFC was a once in a lifetime (or more) event - but it's as if people have already forgotten its impact or the state of the country in 2009 to 2013.

    Ireland has been poor since the foundation of the state (at least - arguably it was Act of Union) and has only been in a position to spend anything on infrastructure since the 1990s. Initially that spending was focused on roads - not an unreasonable strategic decision given the state of the country at the time. This spending resulted in an incredible transformation - from the most dangerous roads in western Europe (in terms of fatalities) with barely 10km of actual motorway to nearly the safest roads in Europe and with 1000km of high quality modern spec motorway. Two years ago, government strategy officially switched to allocate the majority of the transport capital budget to public transport infrastructure when previously PT spending was little more than 10%. The complete transformation of the road network in the space of 25 years shows what consistent annual capital spending can do. If the current strategy of spending most of the money on PT is maintained for 20 or 30 years, then the same is absolutely sure to happen for public transport.

    The biggest risk to this is a complete change of government and/or the endless cynicism, negativity and denigration when it comes to developing PT especially when no account is given to history or fair comparison with other countries.

    Also denigrating the Luas makes no sense either from a historical perspective - it represents the largest amount of new rail infrastructure built since the state gained independence.

    This "Ireland is **** at everything" and mantra is both tedious and ignorant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Clonsilla-M3 Parkway was also built during this time.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I said they were not "mickey mouse" because they are not (unless you mean to refer to the 100B$ global corporation). Other cities have struggled to build far less extensive systems during the same period. They were also pushed through against significant media pressure from the usual sectors who then pretended otherwise afterwards when it was wildly successful.

    The Luas is great and was a big capital investment. MN would have been built absent the worst economic crisis the country has faced since independence. ML will be built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    The Luas is a mixed bag.

    Too slow in the city centre for the most part.

    A shambles with regard to connecting Tallaght to the city centre.

    Grand along previous rail alignments and the Naas Road.

    Reminds me a lot of our cycle paths/lanes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,559 ✭✭✭plodder


    The multinational I work for had a large team of international sales people working in Dublin a number of years ago, but moved the whole lot to the south of Spain since then. If a city doesn't have an effective transport system where people can live in one side but easily work in another side, then it's not really functioning like a city - more like separate neighbouring independent towns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,272 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    OP good thread and thanks for starting as it’s a fair point.

    I believe ultimately metrolink will be built and must be built if Dublin and hence Ireland, is to progress however it will (continue to) drag on in the planning stages due to the lack of capacity in ABP and then be referred to a JR- so we are looking at a Railway order from ABP, at the very best case of late 2024 I believe? Then a JR which could take 3 years so possibly late 2027 before we know if it’s going ahead?

    It will then hopelessly run over budget in construction due to the lack of PM oversight on the states behalf- private contract PMs plus private construction contractors will do well off the back of it.

    As a result any talk of a second metro line will be immediately shot down leaving the likes of tallaght, Rathfarnham, rathmines, terenure- absolutely gridlocked for years to come.

    This is all based on an FFG and other government being returned as opposed to a SF government who would drive FMN away from Ireland due to their high wealth tax policies and as a result kill MN and blame it on an economic downturn.

    This is also based on trump (if he gets in) not pushing his isolation policies to the max and demanding all FMN profits are returned to the US of A and thus crashing our economy in one foul stroke by removing the €37 Bn in wages that the FNMs pay in wages here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 681 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Bit of doomsday for Monday.

    SF are not so stupid to drive away the money. They know where it comes from. They know they'll never get into government again if they drive it away and they know Ireland will never be a single united jurisdiction if we can't afford it. Why would anyone in NI give up a privileged position between UK and EU if SF have taxed all the jobs and FMN away.

    #eyerollemojii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    How long has it been on the go now in some form or another?

    There has to be a point when you come to the realization that its never going to happen, as much as you close your eyes and wish for it as hard as you can.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    tram speeds in city centres arent any faster anywhere else. But yes as you said on street trams shouldn't be the main connection to distant suburbs, luas is over relied upon becasue it's all we have, it should not have been extended so far from the centre, this is a job for heavy rail or metro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    MNCs arent going to up sticks and leave here unless we decide to invade the UK. Thats what it took for MNCs to leave Russia, despite all the other shenanigans and corruption and mad economic policy, it took a war and massive sanctions from multiple fronts for them to leave.

    They will not leave Ireland except for downsizing when they are in dire straits themselves.

    As for the second metro, I would not be surprised if a second metro line begins preparatory work before the 1st is even finished. The demand from neighbourhoods is clearly there for more lines, and once ML opens the demands for new lines will be monstrous. Everyone will want one for themselves. And its important that we keep a pipeline of both heavy rail and metro projects going for the next 50 years, else we risk losing that expertise. So ML-2 is fairly likely IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,136 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    Titles this clickbait-y should be bannable imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    The path the MN "Needs" to take is a bit of a pain. I passes through many areas that are medium density and not ultra high density residential zones.

    Yes it will serve the airport (and that's very important), but the bulk of the passengers will be people commuting from Swords (Ireland's next City) to Dublin.

    The busiest stops are going to be 2/3 in Swords Northwood, Ballymun, Dublin Airport and 2/3 in Dublin City. The rest of the stops are in either where no one actually lives: (Dardiston, Estuary) or are surrounded by 3 bed semi-D's. Its difficult to justify running rail under Semi-D's.

    I think the planning system is as fault here as a combination of and underground rail and elevated rail is clearly the answer. But we're stuck with underground for most of the way which means its going to be extremely expensive. (The Stations are going to be the most expensive bit I think, Dublin has a lot of hills so they need to go deep with goosing the gradient).

    DAA are also being an absolute pain in the hole with planning for this project.

    Personally I REALLY hope it's built, but I think it'll be canned or kicked down the road.

    EDIT:

    Just to add, what's happening with the NCH is a real indicator of what "Could" happen with Metro. the NCH should have been a Huge win for the government, but poor decision making, design and possibly cronyism have seen that win turn into an absolute disaster with the possibility of Sinn Fein Taoiseach cutting the ribbon on it in 2025



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,272 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    It’s clear as day to all of us that a second line needs to be built- however I wouldn’t share your optimism saying it’s fairly likley.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The current planning process black hole will eventually be rectified. And TII will not rest of their laurels - as soon as most of their work on ML starts to wind down, I can assure you they will already be ramping up proposals and feasibility for line number 2.

    The whole point of these agencies is to always be working on projects - and politically after people see the success of ML it will be a no brainer for any govt to throw money at TII for line 2 or 3 etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 681 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    All of the stops will be extremely busy except for Daridstown - is that still a planned future station or part of the current plans? Estuary has P&R, then you have the Dart interchange at Cross Guns. DCU. The Mater. And don't forget all the bus routes that will feed passengers into every stop from every direction.

    I think most cities are stuck with underground in the central areas, it's not unique to Dublin. And yeah let's hope lessons have been learned from NCH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    According to the latest map here: https://www.metrolink.ie/media/1zydyzmd/a4_metrolinkmap_railwayorder.pdf Daridstown is still planned (It's the depot). Estuary is marked Park & Ride so potentially it could be extremely busy now that I think about it.

    Having looked at Swords, The line is on the wrong side of the town (Probably for convivence using the same route as the swords by pass, but no it's on the commercial/industrial side as opposed to the residential side)

    Best job I could do overlaying Stops/Route with a map that shoes the type of buildings it passes under.

    I think given the price it's going to be very hard to justify. As far as I can see they've put the stops in sites where there is nothing already built. (Makes sense seeing how deep they're going to have to dig.)

    There's a good video on the armchair urbanist about costs rising exponentially the deeper you go.


    EDIT wasted my time with the Map 🤣

    Better one here:

    https://tii-gis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/basic/index.html?appid=f87ac761c533446b8ddb554ce00fb921

    Points above still remain valid. I think CBA will come along and state this is way to expensive.

    Similar project in the San Jose been kicked down the road too:

    https://www.vta.org/projects/bart-sv/phase-ii

    Unless you can cut and cover, the cost are just prohibitively expensive

    Post edited by Beta Ray Bill on


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,226 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Thread title updated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Consonata


    IMHO there is little point in trying to draw comparison with the NCH. They are distinct projects with distinct priorities and different supply chains and constraints. The same team that constructs a hospital doesn't construct a railway. If you are looking for analogues, look to BXD, a line which was built on time and under budget.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,272 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Doomposting should be this countries national past time. We have a pretty good track record of delivering transport infrastructure on time and under budget once they get through the planning system. That's the bottleneck most of the time. There is no indication that TIIs costings aren't accurate (they usually are).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,272 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Yes I know ABP is the bottleneck which is what I posted.

    It’s also very likely that whenever it gets through ABP it’ll face a JR.

    It’s not “doomposting” it’s realism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Consonata


    It's not realism when it's not borne out by evidence of the current process however. Like when you actually interrogate peoples cynicism surrounding the project, we get the usual about the NCH, how Metro North got a railway order and never built, how this country is hopeless at building core infrastructure, when this couldn't be further from the truth?

    I will happily criticise the NTA and TII in certain regards, but to say that they cannot design, plan and build infrastructure with relative efficiency isn't true. They're probably one of the few organisations in the state which can claim that title. This rubbish about FDI fleeing when Trump gets in/SF start taxing us all, is just irrelevant to whether we have the capacity to build ML or not



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,272 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Ok so I never criticised TII.

    Ive criticised ABP and by extension on other threads- Darragh o brien as he’s the minister responsible for ABP.

    When/if metrolink gets referred for a JR that’s another 3 years onto the planning process.

    In 2020 €1 out of every €5 was generated by a FMN amounting to 11bn and of that 56% was generated by 10 companies.

    So yes an isolationist government in America coupled with a pro wealth tax SF would not be great for us and metrolink.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The path the MN "Needs" to take is a bit of a pain. I passes through many areas that are medium density and not ultra high density residential zones

    The areas it passes through in north Dublin are actually some of the most densely populated areas in Ireland!

    Sure they aren’t “ultra high density” compared to the likes of Tokyo, etc. but they have a similar population density to where Metro lines pass through in Copenhagen and Amsterdam.

    Also each of the stops has major traffic generators outside of residential, either Hospitals or universities near by.

    • Mater - it is in the name, next to the Mater Hospital
    • Glasnevin - going to become one of the most important and busiest transport interchange in the country.
    • Griffith Park - Bon Secours hospital and DCU Alpha Campus on one side and a few minutes easy walk to the DCU St Pats campus on the other side
    • Collins Avenue - Right next to the DCU Glasnevin Campus (actually now that I think of this, ML is going to be a major benefit for DCU linking up all their Campus).
    • Ballymun - Right in the heart of Ballymun which is actually surrounded by pretty high density apartments now, along with the health center/civic center, etc.
    • Northwood, close to IKEA, Decathlon and the Northwood business park and retail park. I do think this location is ripe for denser development.

    Dardistown is obviously more about a park and ride for the M50, will likely be extraordinarily busy if they price it right. Also interchange for future Finglas Luas extension and Metro West.

    Having looked at Swords, The line is on the wrong side of the town (Probably for convivence using the same route as the swords by pass, but no it's on the commercial/industrial side as opposed to the residential side)

    The advantage of this is that these commercial/industrial will be redeveloped into high density residential (with some mixed used). Once the Metro stations are built the areas around the stations will become some of the most valuable land in the country. There is no way they will remain low density cheap warehouse, the land is far too valuable for that.

    You see it is a lot easier to bulldoze a crappy warehouse and replace it with big apartment buildings, then it is to CPO peoples existing homes to do the same. So the location is a good choice here.

    There is already extensive plans to build thousands of high density apartments next to these stops.

    Go read up on the Swords Masterplan, in particular the plans for Barrysparks and Crowcastle and the Fosterstown master plans. Homes for an extra 5,000 people in these plans right next to the Metro stations in the areas you are talking about here.

    And this is just the start, there will be a lot more redevelopment happening along the Metro line in Swords. It is a golden opportunity for proper densification around a Metro line.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It is absolutely not a "when" it gets referred. JRs were attempted to be brought against various aspects of the Luas and were not allowed. One of the points of the onerous consultation and review process is to leave no grounds for a JR.

    Even if one does arise, there is no reason to suggest it is a 3 year delay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Its the gobshites in the dail, they are the ones we need to be worried about...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    No we don't! Not in comparison to our piers in the EU. I do agree with you though that the planning process is absolutely f**ked and needs major over haul.

    I think BXD is completely different, half the line was a repurposed rail line and the other half is on roads that were already there. Very little in the way of large complex structures had to be built (no tunnels, cuttings, bridges etc). It's laying tracks on roads.

    Very similar to the Green line south, from Harcourt street all it was, was reopening a closed rail line. It's not a new project with 0 pre-existing infra

    Post edited by Beta Ray Bill on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 681 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Sure we've been building roads since the famine, and always under budget. How hard can a rail line be? Rhetorical. Easy, obviously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    @bk

    but they have a similar population density to where Metro lines pass through in Copenhagen and Amsterdam.

    Were they not all cut and cover designs/implementations? They're significantly cheaper. Those places are also quite flat which helps with depth.

    Go read up on the Swords Masterplan, in particular the plans for Barrysparks and Crowcastle and the Fosterstown master plans. Homes for an extra 5,000 people in these plans right next to the Metro stations in the areas you are talking about here.

    So I've friends living in Fosterstown and since Runway Two has opened they're looking to move, as are a great many others. I cannot see them building futher south to be honest. Plus they're also blocked by a golf course that's unwilling to sell up

    Most of the area on the East of Swords is Commercial business park type places. That I cannot see them moving any time soon.

    Fingal country council is notorious for planning permission/rezoning. They've earmarked the North West of Swords for residential development, and that's where nearly all the work is going on (Rathbeale Rd).

    There's a stack of Polytent and Greenhouse farms to the east / south east of Swords that are 100% unwilling to move as they've invested millions in those sites.

    Rest of your points are all 100% valid. And I would love a metro, the city 100% needs it. but €23 Billion worst case scenario.... who's signing off on that? 🙄

    A far cheaper, faster and scalable option is elevated rail. But as has been posted many times on this and other threads on Boards... the planning process is absolutely goosed (Unless you're building cycle lanes that is)

    Post edited by Beta Ray Bill on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I would also predict a similar outcome, metrolink 1 won't be open a full day before every former nimby cries rivers about their area having no metro, we seen this with luas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I think they'll start planning for line 2, once construction for line 1 begins.

    I'd like Line 2 to be from Poolbeg Peninsula to Tallaght.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    but €23 Billion worst case scenario.... who's signing off on that? 

    A) that number was plucked out of basically nowhere

    B) it has literally been signed off on


    I really don't see how elevated rail is a better solution??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Really?

    Leo Varadkar said it himself on Newstalks a few months back

    Why would he say something like that on Live Radio given the ongoing mess a NCH?

    I don't think any contractor has been formally signed on to start the work on date "X"



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yes, in an extreme case where multiple "unknown unknowns" kick in. It is a ludicrously inflated figure over the actual projected cost. The very basis for calculating it (things we have no idea about at the moment that might happen) means its plucked essentially out of nowhere.

    There is cabinet approval for the Metrolink, which came after the "extreme case 23B" figure was first discussed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I really don't see how elevated rail is a better solution??

    Rough Maths, and knowns costs of building X

    For 4 tracks you need 16 Metres wide.

    The Track is going to be roughly 15,000 metres long

    So that's 240,000 Metre Sq

    The average price of a house in North Dublin is €405k with an average area of 175 metres Sq

    That means a MAX of 1400 houses would be need be CPO'd if there was absolutely no flexibility around the lines route. (give it would cross roads, campuses, fields, industrial estates and business parks, it would probably be less than half of that number)

    In any case, that means the total price of buying the Land would be €555m then another €1b for four track elevated rail.

    Twice the capacity in terms of rails, less than a 10th of the price (€23b) and constructed in less than a quarter of the time.

    Now I know you're going to say CPOing 1400 properties is beyond pie in the sky and you're 100% correct. 

    I'm just trying to demonstrate the cost 30 years worth of poor planning and the P!$$ take of a planning system that we have.

    Interestingly, if you're out in the country and a government want to run a motorway through you're home or property... that's not an issue (And there have been may hundreds of homes/properties than have had to make way for motorways over the last few years) CPO'ing doesn't really happen in Dublin though, which is strange to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I get what you're saying.

    Underground costs can very wildly from €100m/km to €300m/km You could be talking €4.5B for just the track in the pipes not including the stations or rolling stock.

    I think there will be many unknown unknowns



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Where does 1bn for entire course of elevated rail come from?

    What about demolition costs of 1400 houses? And you havent budgeted any area for stations either.

    Also much of the houses that would need CPOd would be in the city center and south, with massively more expensive property costs than your north dublin figure. Easily into 1-2bn of CPOs alone, maybe more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    2 track elevated rail costs between €25m/km and €30m/km, 4 track will be double that.

    You're correct about the City Centre and there is case to be made for running it underground south of Grangegorman.

    Demolition would be a cost too, but more so in rerouting pipes, wires, etc. again, it's elevated, with the idea being to avoid that as much as possible. (Note that this is going be even more expensive for underground)

    Clongriffin cost €22m (it's equipped for 4 track), Fairview cost around £2m in 1996 and it's elevated. Pelletstown cost €10m to build, even quadrupling that for 4 track elevated you're still only at €400m for 10 stations. (the overhead bridges are the expensive bit for these stations)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    The Luas system is mickey mouse considering in such a big capital city, how little of the population it actually directly and conveniently serves.

    I live in a busy, highly enough populated north Dublin suburb. The nearest Luas stop is a 15 - 20 minute drive away depending on traffic. I just confirmed that with google maps. That’s Mickey Mouse.

    Of the 69 Luas stops. Around 50 ( quick count ) are on the Southside of the city, 19 on the North…. As a system that’s very much Mickey Mouse BS….

    how many stops are interconnecting the lines like most credible, well thought out and intelligent public transport services ? A couple only.

    Take Santry for example, it’s highly populated with both residential and businesses…residential population of or approaching 20,000 people…. and hundreds of businesses and workplaces…numerous business parks on that stretch, hotels, car hire, retail and banks….

    yet you’d be over an hour walking to your nearest Luas stop. Same for a Dart.

    the population is growing exponentially yet the pace in improving our infrastructure and services is at a fûcking snails pace in comparison.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    By that definition the Metro will be "Mickey Mouse".

    Networks don't happen all at once.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 681 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    16m only for four tracks? Get real. You'd need a buffer of 4metres each side, at least, to give space for access to the lines plus side roads etc. You'd also be cutting across numerous plots at angles cutting off more houses that you'd Ideally need.

    In any case, good luck CPOing 1500houses. Wow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    thats entirely up to our politicians.

    they don’t happen at once but in other countries they happen comparatively quickly and efficiently… so why does that not happen here..? Decades to start and then finally finish, just the first line of a metro… not a network, just a single metro line. 😅

    go to Lisbon, Madrid, Copenhagen etc and just coming back with such an immense appreciation of how nice, easy and effectively effortlessly efficient great public transport is…. All integrated, reliable, safe and quick.

    we are still waiting to start digging, we can’t integrate jack…

    No Metro ? There really isn’t a plan B… too much cash has been spent now not to mention too many people here is Dublin for it ever to be considered getting canned… the result would probably be violence if that ever happened…

    look at Lisbon, every year or two they are adding stations, upgrading lines, improving, working, bettering… the people need it ? they DO it.

    we can’t get a single piece of track down yet. or a station built… Decades later and …





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    For the Dart it's between 6.5m and 7m wide platform to platform in most straight stations. The Dart itself is 2.9M wide. 16m is more than enough. to accommodate 4 tracks

    Remember you're effectively building a bridge. Kinda like the Noda line (and indeed many other lines in in the satellite cities around Tokyo):

    And I'm not gonna go counting, but it would likely be significantly less than 1400 houses



  • Advertisement
Advertisement