Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

If Metrolink was scrapped, what are the alternatives?

245

Comments

  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Beau Happy Stoplight


    There are no alternatives, OP.

    We need the Metro.

    Our great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandchildren will be paying for it though when the cost spirals to €40billion and it bankrupts the country and we go cap in hand to the IMF again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,964 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    €40bn?

    Is it not gonna cost €100bn and all citizens will be forced to sell their kidneys? 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme



    The costing is pretty accurate.

    I think it's going out to tender soon so when that happens, they'll have a revised estimate.

    The supply chain crisis is over and inflation is dropping, so that estimate will be pretty accurate.

    Who knows, by then maybe the Ukraine war will be over, Putin resigns, sanctions are lifted and prices actually drop.



  • Registered Users Posts: 638 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    You just need to add in the dense estates of SemiDs to that pic, instead of green fields. Great example....



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk



    Were they not all cut and cover designs/implementations? They're significantly cheaper. Those places are also quite flat which helps with depth

    No the metro lines in Copenhagen and Amsterdam are bored tunnels. Of course some above ground where it makes sense, but the city center sections are fully bored and there is an absolutely massive train station built under Schiphol airport.

    One of the Copenhagen lines is 100% underground and was bored out by two TBM's.

    Both cities are actually quiet challenging to tunnel under. Amsterdam being built on lose soil (you know lots of land reclaimed from the sea) and required 4 new specially designed TBM's. And Copenhagen being built across two islands.

    By comparison Dublin is far more straight forward, see the Dublin Port Tunnel.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I have limited interest in rehashing this all over again, but the reason the Metro was not built in 2010 was because of the GFC and there is nothing anybody could have done about that.

    Yes, there are problems with planning in Ireland (and UK and most common law jurisdictions it seems), and the, what some would call, excessive levels of consultations are to pre-empt legal shenanigans. That is deeply unfortunate but an incredible difficult, if not intractable, problem.

    The Metrolink will also be incredibly well integrated with multiple other forms of transport.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I am far from an expert on such things, but I presume there is a reason almost nowhere in Europe does transport this way?



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Beau Happy Stoplight


    There is no such thing as an accurate cost in Irish construction.

    Luas - three times over cost.

    National Children's Hospital - at least four times.

    M50 upgrade - 3 times.

    Micheal Martin has already ADMITTED the extreme end is 23 billion. Therefore 23 billion is the bare minimum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Lots of projects come in at predicted cost and timeline.

    Luas Cross City for example.

    I don't think it'll be built by Irish anyway.

    The Copenhagen Metro was done by Italians amongst others.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,949 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    It’s barely even integrating with itself…. Seeing as only 1 line is going ahead for now. How many stations will integrate / connect with the Luas on the metros completion ? How many stations will integrate / connect to the Dart and or intercity rail on the Metros completion ?

    Look at or experience using the metros in Paris, Rome, Lisbon, Madrid, Barcelona and experience, truly world class, comfortable, connected, integrated and fast metro services. They connect you, the passenger. Looks like any connecting for the mess in Dublin will see a lot more effort being done by the passengers as opposed to the service doing it for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Charlemont Green Luas, Tara St Dart and train, O'Connell Street Luas, Glasnevin Dart and Train.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The answers to all your questions are readily available and the ease with which they are found make it look like you have no idea what you are talking about.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Plus once complete, it will almost certainly be extended North to integrate with the Northern Dart line and the Finglas Luas will likely be extended to Dardistown and would be the beginning of Metro West.

    Metrolink is absolutely key to integrating most of Dublins different lines and services to create a proper integrated network.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Yeah it's a no brainer to connect it with the train line at Donabate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    By comparison Dublin is far more straight forward, see the Dublin Port Tunnel.

    Dublin port tunnel was the first sign our water infra might not be all it's cracked up to be (No pun intended). I had a few mates working in it (electricians) and they said the water leaks were crazy. For a while they couldn't figure out where the water was coming from.

    I take you're point though, each project presents different challenges, in our case it's going to be gradient, water and planning (I would guess)

    I am far from an expert on such things, but I presume there is a reason almost nowhere in Europe does transport this way?

    Correct. But Dublin is very different from most EU cities. In most EU cities, people are living in apartments. In Dublin it's houses. (Specifically 3-Bed Semi-D's). This creates a problem with the economics of scale. Obviously we would like to look to see what the EU is doing and try and copy the bits that work but that doesn't mean things that work there will work here.

    A better example of would be one of the satellite cities around Tokyo that have a similar setup to Dublin (Hilly, high density housing but not apartments, Large amount of people moving about for their daily commute)

    Look at Funabashi for example:

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/JvvSnm1WDNQZvS296

    Similar size, similar Density, Similar layout (Port City), most of the population living in houses and it's hilly.

    There are no subways there, (I don't think). It's all elevated rail, or rail in the process of being upgraded to elevated rail)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I've heard rumours that some prospector in the know that's more than friendly with a few political parties has already bought all or most of the fields between Swords and Donabate in the hope of holding the government over a barrel when it comes to CPO time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,964 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    I don’t think it works that way. Especially with open fields.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I hope you're right.

    It's already been rezoned as Metro Economic Corridor

    The Person that allegedly bought it did so when it was still classed as Green Belt 🙄

    Cronyism... love it!



  • Registered Users Posts: 157 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    The interchange at Glasnevin should be built anyway. That would be useful to start with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,170 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    It does not work that way. You cannot buy land speculatively to hope to play hardball with government on CPOs.

    Hint: Its not a voluntary purchase order



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    If they extended the Metro through those green fields to Donabate, it would be a lovely place to live.

    30 minutes from town, overlooking the bay. Best of everything really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    100%

    But it is already serviced by rail and the DART will be extended out that way soon.

    Linking the two up is a no brainer as it's just fields between them. But need to be done before someone comes along and backs in as many 4 and 3 bed semi-D's as they can.

    Like now is the time to do that stuff before all the buildings block any potential route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I think they're aware of that.

    Like the land kept for the Eastern Bypass in South Dublin.

    You can see it on Google maps from Monkstown to Goatstown.

    Prime land that's kept from development.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    The Dart+ North project will increase frequency in a few years hopefully.

    If they extended the Metro to Donabate, then you'd have a sort of Circle line from Tara St to the airport, to Swords, to Donabate, then back down through Malahide into town.

    The more interconnectivity, the better.

    So people from Malahide going to the airport can loop around counter clockwise.

    Someone from Ballymun could commute to Drogheda or vice versa.

    Someone in Clongriffin could commute to Swords.

    Loads of other examples but you get the idea.

    It's such a no brainer, I assume they're planning for it.

    Just get the first line through planning and start construction and then plan for extensions and other lines.

    I'm hoping they could also open the Metro line partially before it's completed fully - from O'Connell Street to the Airport for example.

    Could they open it a few years before the rest is complete?

    I'm not an engineer so maybe it's not possible.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,175 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Since OCS-Airport will be almost entirely underground, it’s unlikely that could open first.

    Swords-Airport is easier to build and a lot of people who work in the airport live in swords so that would be the better option for an initial operating section. It should be possible to open Swords-Airport 1-2 years before full opening in 2035 (I still don’t find that date believable, I think it will be sooner).



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,175 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Look at Funabashi for example:


    Wow, that is the highest density single family homes I’ve ever seen. They managed to provide almost no roads at all here!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,964 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Surely, what can be opened first will depend on that part of the finished route being accessible from the depot?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    The OCS to Airport section will be the busiest section so that's why I'd like it open early.

    Well maybe Charlemont to OCS will be busiest but it already has a Luas and the Charlemont part looks tricky.

    But I'm not an engineer so haven't a clue what's possible in terms of opening early. I think it's something they should consider. It would be a real feel good story. I'd ride it just for fun.

    I've heard other people say they could open 7 years after construction begins, so if it started in 2025, it could open 2032.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,854 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    If they could open it to OCS, sure then you have multiple green line stops in the immediate vicinity, sure the current plan is that you're going to have to change at Charlemont anyway, if you want to go further south or north, another total farce..



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,175 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Not a farce at all. It’s a stroke of genius. The slowest part of Luas green line is Grangegorman to Charlemont. By ending at charlemont, metrolink bypasses the whole slow section, getting you to the start of the fast section. So you go on fast metrolink, alight and get on fast Luas.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Is there any argument to be made for pulling up the Luas tracks between OCS and Charlemont.

    The Metro covers the same route.

    The Luas gets in the way of buses and blocks the Quays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,949 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    I know what I’m talking about alright ….. I’m here for a civilized discussion…. I’ve experienced some of the best metro properly integrated with suburban rail and trams, all efficient, integrated and reliable…. Numerous countries, Including having lived and worked in Paris for a time and relied on their metro & RER to get me to work and back daily and to all other trips around the city..… so I’d suggest I know a little more then your snarky reply wants you to believe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,854 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I Agree, my point was, its a joke that as per current plans, that you will have to change from a metro to luas to go further south than Charlemont. Upgrade the green line to metro



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    If you are aware of the level of integration, then why ask questions in bad faith.

    It "barely integrates with itself" is nonsensical, but even taken at what I assume is your meaning of poor integration then you are incorrect. It connects directly with LUAS, DART and Rail and via the Red Line it connects with every intercity rail line.

    They will upgrade the green line to metro eventually. There are various logistical and political elements that weren't worth waiting to solve to get the rest of it moving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,949 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    At how many points does it integrate ? “ barely “ was the word I used, I never said it didn’t. My comparison is based on various other systems I’ve used across the continent.

    im not asking questions in bad faith, you on the other hand by suggesting so are being accusatory and disingenuous in bad faith, im just here for a civilised discussion….if you disagree, or think I’m wrong, want to debate chat about it ? Grand….I’m open to that… Why not do that instead of the personal attack ?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You are complaining about the lack of integration of a line that allows connections to every single light and heavy rail line in Dublin.

    What exactly is it you think should be done differently?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Including all of the Busconnects spines and each Northside orbital



  • Registered Users Posts: 638 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    You really don't have a leg to stand on here. Via Dart+ West and Dart+ SW, the airport and Swords will have direct connection to all of West Dublin, Meath, Kildare and Laois commuter services. Not to forget all the intermediary stations on Dart W and SW and Dart Coastal at Tara.

    The Luas Red integration at OCS is v.poor, no question, but trams will become secondary once the full Dart network and Metro are up and running.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Connectivity is key, there is no alternative to a metro being built.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,858 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    No, but sort of.

    Aircraft do pass over Donabate after take off, but by that point there are already at an altitude of over 10,000 feet, so no major issues with noise, etc. So no real issues.

    It is the area directly East and West of the runways where aircraft are at a low level approach that is an issue. That is why the idea of extending DART from Portmarnock has such a poor value proposition. That area is directly under the flight path and has very limited if any development potential.

    Donabate or Rush and Lusk have incredible development potential by comparison, which would make for an easy CBA.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    As others have mentioned CPO's don't work that way.

    It is most likely the developer is hoping to profit by building massive amount of apartments, etc. next to these Metrolink stations. That is where the money is to be made.

    In fact the developer would probably want to do everything in their power to encourage the Metrolink to come to this area. After all if it doesn't this land is relatively worthless, it is only worth big money with the presence of ML.

    Also keep in mind that in the past with big developments like this the government has actually required the developers help pay for stations, etc. along the line. For instance this was the case for Luas extension south of Sandyford. The developers paid the government a fixed amount for each unit they built near the line.

    This would all help make such an extension quiet affordable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,038 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    I'd hope they came up with a better way to quantify payment values for metrolink than that method. Maybe a fairly steep payment based on plot size, that would thus incentivise maximising units per plot to get value back, rather than per unit.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Well a developer is already incentivsed to build as many units in a given plot of land anyway. The more units you can squeeze into a plot profitably, the more money you can make on the purchase price of that land.

    That is why developers always put in planning applications for taller buildings then they know planners will allow.

    Developers asking for high density is almost never the issue, NIMBY neighbours and what planners will allow are usually the constraint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,746 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Every tunnel below the water table has leaks. What's that got to do with our water infrastructure exactly?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I imagine the point was that the tunnel engineers had predicted a certain amount of water in the soil above, but due to the very high number of damaged water mains leaking into the ground, the amount was much higher than predicted.

    But yes, all tunnels leak, by design...it's safer to give the water a controlled path through the structure rather than have it find its own way, with possibly catastrophic results.



  • Registered Users Posts: 157 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    I recall the Irish Times claiming that the Dublin Port Tunnel - a few weeks before opening - would have to be never opened because it leaked. Demonstrates the exrtremely low levels of intelligence and general unworldly nature of Irish journalists. But nothing beats the Sunday Business Post calling the Luas Green Line the worst train in the world 'according to an unnamed rail expert' because it did not have toilets and a bar car.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I remember a boss of mine telling me if some piece of equipment was likely to get wet then either make it absolutely waterproof or leave a drain hole at the bottom to let the water out.

    I would imagine the same applies to tunnels - expect to pump it out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    No way. Firstly for the people travelling from the southside, I doubt they will change at Charlemount if their ultimate destination is on the southside. Working on Harcourt Street? Stay on the LUAS. If going to SSG or Dawson Street I’d say you’d still be better off staying on the LUAS. There will be some question once you get to College Green. It may be useful to switch to Metrolink and get off at Tara. I reckon there’ll be YouTube videos of people testing that out…

    Same from the Northside Green Line.

    Moreover, having a tram line in the city opens up more possibilities for new lines down the line. Why not put one up Dame Street that splices off the existing one and could allow you to get from OCS to Christchurch or SSG to Christchurch on shorter trams?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Had a look at some YT videos and it is c. 6.5 mins from Charlemount to SSG and 9 mins to Dawson at relatively quiet times. Maybe add two mins at peak times.

    Switching at Charlemount will vary in times you would think. Probably vary from 3-6 mins at peak depending on luck and then say another 2 mins to SSG (with increased time exiting the station vs. a LUAS).

    When you consider the jigs and reels of changing, I can see only people who want to be over the other side of SSG (say walking to Merrion Square) bothering to switch.

    Westmoreland Street is 14 mins so absolutely worth switching to Metrolink and going by Tara.

    Be interesting to see how far north up the line people from the southside go from Charlemount. I can see maybe 1 in 3 changing to Metrolink at peak? You’ll also have people who would get on at say Harcourt heading back to the Northside that will just take Metrolink.

    Hard to know on the northside heading the other way.

    All in all, it should free up a lot of capacity on the LUAS Green Line within the city centre. The issue will remain as it goes further south from Charlemount in the evening.

    Post edited by spillit67 on


  • Advertisement
Advertisement