Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bad Golf Holes

  • 17-11-2023 1:07pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 63 ✭✭


    I haven’t been able to get out for 5 weeks due to weather and other commitments. In my boredom, I was thinking about bad golf holes. What makes a bad hole? Is it, one that’s too easy, one that’s bland?

    And also, what are your worst holes in Ireland and why?



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭thewobbler


    it’s probably easier to pick out poor holes on a good course.

    Concra Wood’s final par 3 (14th) is the most extraordinarily banal (I know that’s a juxtaposition lol) of golf holes. A dunt of 150-180 yards along flattish ground that all feeds towards the hole, to an oversized and flat green, with minimal bunker protection. It’s a one -shot hole that doesn’t even require one good shot to make par; Indeed on dry ground I expect you could comfortably take it out with 3 putts. The oddest thing about this hole is that the opportunity exists (just look 30 yards right, the whole way) to make a semi- island green, or failing that, a hole-from-hell for slicers. Instead it’s just a fillet of an index 18.

    17 at RCD is tedious. The lack of framing of the tee or green, and the driving range appearing alongside, do not help.

    12 at Lough Erne serves little purpose other than to take you from one lake view to another.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    I think holes where you're forced to do one thing and can't play it multiple ways are poor. For example the 13th in Ballykisteen (parallel to the road). I think it's an unacceptable hole personally. Unless you can manouvre a massive slice with your Driver, you simply can't use it if you're a long hitter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,927 ✭✭✭Russman


    12 & 13 in Druids Heath IMHO have to be up there. Hard to really quantify why, I just think they're terrible golf holes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 302 ✭✭george67


    i can understand your view on the 12th but the 13th is a real golf hole one you habve to think about and it looks stunning



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Great idea for a thread, any hole where you walk excessively backwards in transition, especially uphill as I hate waste and it's a waste of my time and energy e.g. couple of holes in Delgany



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,727 ✭✭✭dan_ep82


    Severely side sloped fairways. Bellewstown front 9 has some of these.

    Holes that force a short carry off the tee and a long carry to the green.

    Blind shots into greens. Boring and just dangerous. I know some people like them but I’ve never liked them

    Shared fairways

    Tee off over a green, looking at you greenore



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I think the first three on that list are course attributes, I don't think it's makes them bad per se

    Bellewstown front 9 does wear you out, I agree with that!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,727 ✭✭✭dan_ep82


    Think of your favourite hole, then slope the fairway, make it so you can only hit a 9i off the tee and then put the green behind a hill. I doubt it would stay a good hole



  • Registered Users Posts: 348 ✭✭frink


    Any par 3 over 200 yards is nearly a bad hole in my eyes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Agreed. Unless it’s severely below you.

    Any distance beyond probably 190 is cruel and goes beyond being a ‘challenge’ and starts to bring luck into things, especially since shorter hitters are forced to hit long woods etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 476 ✭✭flugel


    New Forest, 12th hole

    Don't think anyone who's played it could think it's anything other than terrible



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Exactly right on the severe downhill, there's the one in Esker Hills, Hermitage and Macreddin but they are not that long, the one in Bellwestown is however and water LHS OOB long, a great hole



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Was a member there for a few years, a joke of a hole, how they thought that diagonal water would work? Almost always 2+ shots over par in comps. This is also the course with the outrageous 2+shots over par 4th and lets not mention the ridiculous par "3" 16th, try playing that in the monthly medal into the prevailing wind



  • Administrators Posts: 54,168 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I was playing East Clare at the weekend and the 10th hole there sounds similar, I thought at the time it was a bit of a bullshit hole.

    It's >= 90 degree dog leg to the right but with tall trees and a big lake at the corner that will stop all but the most confident drivers of the ball going for distance off the tee. Because of where the green is located, you are slightly playing back on yourself once you get to the bend.

    Have to take a high iron off the tee to lay up, but then there's a massive tall tree smack bang in the middle of the fairway that you need to avoid on your second shot. And because you've laid up, the second shot is a long one, and to make it worse the green is up at the top of a slope.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,605 ✭✭✭blue note


    Are boring holes bad or just boring? For me, I'd want something to annoy me about a hole to call it bad. For me an awful lot comes down to context. I want variety on a course, so I wouldn't hold it against any hole if it's straight or flat or extremely hard / easy. If it's offering something new to me in that round there's merit to it.


    Even giving players options on a hole isn't always what I want. Generally speaking I love options, I want to have to make decisions on what to do as opposed to being given one way to play it. However, giving people an out on every hole is poor design for me. Once or twice in a round being forced to take on water or bunkers or whatever is a good thing. A course should test a golfers repertoire of shots and you shouldn't be able to get away with playing every hole one way. Now I'm not thinking of 180 yard carries over water that a significant amount of people would struggle with in good conditions and simply not be able to do into a moderate breeze. But something like an island green is a good example of it. The 17th at sawgrass is a dream hole to play for every golfers, because they relish the fact that they have to take on the shot.


    Conditioning is one thing that can make a hole bad. If you have a hole that doesn't get any light so you've no growth in a key area on a hole - that's a real design flaw. Or an overused area for collecting tee shots. The 11th in Corballis would be an example of this.


    The risk / reward options being the wrong way around can make me dislike a hole too. Sitting on the tee on a par 5 and thinking a driver here will take the danger out of play is okay on it's own, but not ideal. If that's coupled with a second shot where going for the green with your second will take danger out of play then that's a stupid hole. Similarly, a par 4 where going for the green from the tee will very possibly leave you an easier second if you don't pull it off is a similar problem. The 11th in Corballis would be an example of this.


    Blind shots can be another problem. They have their place, but what I hate them being coupled with is an abundance of places to lose your ball. If you've a blind shot, you should still be able to pick out a line, where if you get the line and distance roughly right you'll be able to find your ball. A blind shot where you've big run offs to trouble or a random tuft of thick rough where you can lose a ball in the middle of the fairway are definitely bad holes. The 11th in Corballis would be an example of this.


    But overall, I want something stupid on a hole for me to regard it as bad. I was struggling to think of holes I really dislike, but someone mentioned the 12th in New Forest and I wholeheartedly agree. On a course I love it's an awful hole. There's a big stupid tree in the middle of a drain halfway up the hole that there's pretty much no way to avoid. As I say, being given one way to play a hole can be good. Being given pretty much no way to play a hole definitely qualifies something as a bad hole for me. There are a few other examples of how this can happen too - a green that is virtually impossible to hit would be one. In particular in summertime where the ground is hard and the greens fast. If the best players in a club can't keep the ball on a green, then the design is at fault. If the penalty for not keeping it on the green is severe then it's even worse.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,605 ✭✭✭blue note


    I'm not familiar with the hole, but I'm pretty sure I understand what you're describing. I absolutely disagree. I would really struggle to play a draw to the point that I'll virtually never take on that shot and I think courses are 100% right to expose that limitation in my game. Macreddin has at least one hole that does this, possibly two. Par 5 13 - if you can draw it and choose to take on that risk then you can give yourself a very reasonable second shot to the green. A fair reward in my view. And the par 4 16th - if you can draw it and take on the shot it's not a bad par 4. If not, it's a long tough hole.


    In 18 holes I want to be given the opportunity to hit the shots I'm best at, but I also want the course to put it to me that I can either try the shot I'm uncomfortable with or play within myself and take my medicine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭IAmTitleist


    10th hole at ConcraWood is the first one that springs to mind for me. Punt out a hybrid about 220 yards and then its down a ski slope to the green.



  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭Skyfloater


    The 16th at Hermitage. The second shot for an average driver of the ball like myself means you have a completely blind shot over a hill to the green. You don't even have the top of a tree as a guide, so have to aim at a passing cloud.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    No - this is a joke that forces a slice with a driver. Not a controlled fade etc. It’s a very bad golf hole. A decision being completely taken out of your hands is not a good golf hole.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    sometimes the land presented forces this onto the course layout, that is forgivable IMHO but not if there was an alternative



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭patsat


    I wouldn't say it forces a slice with a driver. Because laying up with a 4/5 iron can leave you with an 8/9 iron into the green.

    Unfortunately the hole has to be that way because of balls going out on the road. So it's out of their hands.

    But what does ruin that hole, is the fact that nearly everyone hits irons off the tee, and naturally tee it up over on the left side of the tee box to give themselves the best line possible. The tee box is ruined as there is a build up of divot repair mix on the left side of the tee box making it all uneven. Fix that issue and the hole isn't too bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,377 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Probably more in line with @thewobbler s thinking of bad holes on good courses but I've always thought that the opening few holes in Ballybunion are very poor (relative to the rest of the course).

    The first hole is grand, when the rough isn't up, you can just bomb it down without much strategy. The views of the graveyard and holiday homes isn't a nice backdrop. The second involves a crazy approach. The third is an OK long par 3 but you're then teeing off over that green on the 4th. The 4th and 5th are just holes to get through, both quite similar.

    That start is long forgotten by the time you've finished though.

    I struggle to remember bad holes on lesser courses as they tend to be forgotten about quickly.

    Our course was redesigned lately and they added a tee to the par 3 10th. The tee is about 30 yards to the right of the original tee. A huge tree to the right of the green makes it a really daft hole. Most of the small tricky green is blocked out. The new tee was built and used twice I think.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    yeah, relativeness creeps in, it's not as if the front 9 in Tralee or the back 9 in RCD are "bad" but they pale compare to their opposing 9's. Imagine RCD front 9 with Tralee back 9!!!!!!! And Tralee front 9 with RCD back 9 would still make a great course



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭thewobbler


    There’s a blind par 3 at Royal Belfast (maybe hole 11 or 12) which is just an absurd hole. Even moreso because it is framed nicely at tee and green, and a skilled digger driver could make it a very decent hole for an afternoon’s work.

    As a rule of thumb I have no time for uphill par 3s.

    Unnecessary water hazards would be a bug bear too. Lisburn’s index 1 would be a wonderful hole had it stuck to a natural run off in front of the green, instead there’s a ball magnet pond. Similar story on Kilkeel’s index 2, when an ugly pond changes what otherwise could a strategic hole. Seapoint’s index 1 (5th) tries its best to undo its claims to be a links course. And I really like those 3 courses.

    someone above mentioned 12 at Druid’s Heath. I believe it’s been remodelled since I played it, but it would definitively have made my worst holes list as it just struck me as a hole where a good score was 50%+ dependent on luck. Actually, most of Druids Heath would qualify.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I thought that Royal Belfast blind par 3 was lovely, okay, the first time it’s hard but once you have your distance you should be okay, sounds like The Dell in Lahinch would be considered bad whereas I think it’s excellent. Whilst not in most new golf courses blind holes were normal “back then”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    You wouldn't be a fan of The Old Course I take it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    any hole with an internal out of bounds



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,727 ✭✭✭dan_ep82


    I presume you mean headfort ? I like it for what it is,a solid if in exciting parkland , but I don’t like the approach on 11 or the tee off on 16.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭willabur


    agreed on the second hole in BallyB, its a nice tee shot to be fair. But the approach is a ridiculous shot to ask of a golfer. 4 and 5 are okay holes, tbh I find it hard to tell them apart and I've played the course plenty



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 602 ✭✭✭CSWS101


    6th @ Carne WAD - even if you get a good drive off, all ends up in the same place. Blind uphill approach to a flat benign green. I don't care much for 18 either, cool 2nd shot but if you can't reach it all ends up in same place, blind uphill wedge shot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭willabur


    can't say I agree with your take on 6th. First of all the scenery is amazing on it. The green has plenty of undulation on it, its 100% not benign. The fairway also has a few bunkers on it also.

    I do get what you are saying on 18 - but two good shots gets you home and one of the best pints of Guinness going



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    Ballykisteen is a very different problem to the one in East Clare.

    In Ballykisteen the hole is along the road, theres huge nets down the right but also a net coming right across the front of the tee box forcing you to aim way left.

    It's so bad it used be the first hole but they changed it so people have settled down a bit by the time they get there.

    I agree on the 10th in East Clare. You can clip a nice shot across the first lake and then be stuck behind a big tree, having to negotiate another lake to get to an elevated green. They could really cut down the tree.



  • Registered Users Posts: 602 ✭✭✭CSWS101


    Could have remembered that green incorrectly, just remember it all being flat at the top and sneaky bunker at the back. Love the course those two holes just don't do it for me.

    Another one for me is Castleknock 1st - been a while since last played it but balls going into house on the left meant the water was OB when I was there, so stupid 2yards off the fairway = re-tee



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,438 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    Any hole with pointless internal out of bounds gets my downvote immediately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Deporhostia


    Not sure I agree about hole 6. I've played it maybe 6 times and have ended up in different places every time, including 3 on the fairway but very different.


    But I totally agree with hole 18. I might as well prod an iron tee shot somewhere safe because I know my second is gonna be at the bottom of that hill regardless


    I've played BallyB 3 times maybe and I thought the last 2 times that my second shot on 2 was difficult but not ridiculous. My aim is to make sure I get it up there but not too far over the back, and hope for 2 putts/chip and putt. Which is different to my normal aim of getting it close to the flag, but that doesn't mean it makes the hole worse for me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭almostover


    It's a dogsh*t tee shot on what is otherwise a nice course. The approach shot on that hole is good too. I play there a couple of times a year in opens and really like the course there but that tee shot is silly. Apparently that tee box is about 5 years old and had to be built as such due to golfers slicing the ball onto the road on the right and into properties at the other side of the road. The old tee box can still be seen nearer the previous green. Honestly it should be made into a par 3, just put a tee box at the corner of the dogleg about 175yd out and drive on with a par 71 course. It's such a mad tee shot that if you hit the protective net you get to re-tee without penalty as many times as you want. Can wreck a good round as it requires about a 220yd drive with a 50 yd slice to get in position for the approach shot. Most tee shots end up running straight through the dogleg into the trees. It's silly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭callaway92




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭patsat



    A driver definitely isn't needed.

    Long iron to the fairway leaves a short iron in.

    If you can hit a long 3 wood or Driver with a slightly ce it gives an advantage but not worth it.


    Again, if the tee box was flat and well maintained, it would be a fine hole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭almostover


    Interesting to get the birds eye view on that - thanks! Biggest issue I always have there is the tee box isn't wide enough. The right hand side of the tee box points you into the left trees and the left hand side is uneven and full of divots, as you've pointed out. I'm guessing they won't extend the tee box leftward as it would likely have more golfers reaching for the big timber off the tee and it's back to square one then with balls landing on the road. It must be a nightmare altogether for lefties. There's hardly room on that tee box to accommodate both sided players. I think it would still be a fine hole with the tee box where I have the red square. Maybe a 170-180yd shot with the drain short and water left. Takes their tiny tee box out of the equation for the sacrifice of one stroke off the par of the course.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,600 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Bellewstown is a bloody commando course. I played it only once and was completely drained. Golf should be enjoyed and not an energy sapping trawl up and down steep hills. There's mountain walks for that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 602 ✭✭✭CSWS101


    Agree that place is for the bin, it's also been a swamp almost every time i've played it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Uhm - that doesn’t show the net that’s there right in front of the tee box though, which makes what you’re suggesting impossible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭patsat


    I play that hole every week, that's 100% percent a possible line with a straight shot.

    Start it any bit right and you'll hit the net tho but that line is possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    I play it a hell of a lot too, probably once a month but don’t particularly care how much either of us play it - that line you’ve given is just not feasible unless you’re a very short hitter (not you personally) with the way it hangs.

    As the other poster said, the tee box just isn’t wide enough for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭patsat


    From my shotscope, and that doesn't require a fade off the tee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Clearly you’re a decent level player to be able to go 4 iron, 7 iron into that hole but for the unfortunate players who aren’t long hitters, that positioning of the net kills the hole. I know my father needs driver there and you are forced to start well on the left side of the fairway. On a dry day the ball is gone into the left rough.

    I’ve never seen a first-timer play the hole who didn’t completely laugh at it. Couldn’t chat arsed ruining the thread talking about it any more now because clearly it’s struck a cord with you as a member there.

    Post edited by callaway92 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Ronney


    One that comes to mind is the old uphill par 3 1st at the Grange, Probably 10 years since I played that loop but feel it played the equivalent of 200yds with a tight OB to the Right. Awful first hole



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    That was brutal, first shot of the round and scratch looming, Greystones first not as bad but you still need a solid strike and carry



  • Registered Users Posts: 258 ✭✭Pigeon Chaser


    13 @Strandhill is just a silly hole that ruins the round imo.

    It's too blind, even if you play conservative with a 7 iron you can lose your tee shot.

    The framing of the green is nice I will admit.

    I just think it's not a proper golf hole and let's down what is a great back 9 imo...



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    There's actually a fair bit of room over that hill (on the right) but it severely punishes your approach shot between two high hills into a narrow green, I do agree though it stands out as a card destroyer.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement