Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Missed collecting a JA payment due to a covid infection, now I'm being denied access to the payment

  • 28-11-2023 5:11pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 JDFAS


    I was unable to present myself at the Post Office to collect my jobseeker's allowance due to being sick with covid-19. The payment expired as I was testing positive for an entire week and still had to avoid going out in public for a further few days after recovering (HSE says up to 5).

    I have been denied being awarded the payment retroactively, as the clerk in my local Intreo office decided I was unfit to search for work during this time and therefore don't deserve the payment. This is NOT correct as I was still actively searching online, and is solely up to the speculation of this person I spoke to for 2 minutes. I asked if calling them while still ill and explaining the situation would have prevented this but was shortly told it makes no difference to their decision.

    Is there a way to appeal this decision or take it to someone else? I am quite distressed as I was made redundant at a point where I was already worried about my finances.

    Thanks for any advice

    Post edited by mp22 on


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 366 ✭✭Madd002


    unfortunately in this country the ones that have paid their taxes are the ones they don't like helping and they make it very hard for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I do sympathise, but Technically as you where Sick for an entire week the DSP are correct. It's also the fact you were unable to work. It is a very Harsh decision & you could appeal but I'd be skeptical you'd succeed.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    You used to be able to appoint an Agent to collect your payment if you were ill - people who are sick in hospital and can't get to a post office to collect their payments don't get their benefits cut off due to illness.

    People who were paid "by book" - the agent form used to be on the back of the dated payment page.

    I'd appeal this.

    (Edit)

    Looks like you still can, but you should have informed Intero in advance. The form is available from the post office.

    Appointment of Temporary Agent Form (opens as PDF)

    I'd definitely appeal this.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 Starbucks Toilet Code 2846


    There should be information (e.g. a circular) provided by these centres, to explain the grounds on which such a decision has been made, and upon what grounds you might challenge that decision, depending on what proofs you might have.

    I mean, you need to survive on something. If you're not entitled to this jobseekers' payment, there must be something else which could 'plug the gap' in your income, due to being ill. We aren't living in the days of Charles Dickens, God be good to us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭Xander10




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,730 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    The welfare lifers don't appear to have these issues.

    If not entitled to your payment, are you.then entitled to.a.disability payment or something.

    I recall court cases where judges refused to fine welfare recipients as they believed their payment was the minimum amount they could live on so how does this tie in with taking complete payment from someone who was ill for a week?

    This country appear to favour the workshy in all situations. At least now they are bringing in raised payments based on previous income for a period for people made redundant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I'm afraid not relevant in thus case, appointing an agent would be in relation to someone on a Disability or Pension payment & a long term arrangement, not just for a week sickness & not for a Jobseekers payment

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    There is and very clear rules laid out with regard to collection of payments, some people on here claim folks have days to collect, they absolutely do not. A claim can and are suspended if payment is not collected on the day its Due to be collected

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    People get sick, even those on JS payments. Illness is not a reason to suspend payment. The error the OP made, was not informing Intreo in advance that they couldnt collect payment.

    If you look at the temporary agent form I linked to, it actually specifies Covid19 as a reason for being unable to attend the post office in person.

    I think someone in Intreo has made an error of judgement here, that I think has a good chance of being overturned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Those days of Judges not fining people on welfare long gone. 15% of a person's payment can be clawed back for an over payment &I presume the same applies for court fines

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I'm afraid you are incorrect. If a person is sick, they claim illness benefit, even if it for a week.

    Perhaps you've not noticed , the pandemic is over and all and any arrangements during the pandemic have long since been ended.

    There is no error of judgement, by your own admission you were sick for an entire week & technically not entitled to a Jobseekers payment during this time.

    I do believe decision was Harsh .

    Appeal by all means

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 Starbucks Toilet Code 2846


    Where are those rules laid out? Is there a more up-to-date department circular than that which I have been able to find (2020)?

    Either way, my point is the OP ought to have been able to come away with a view of the same guidelines from which the department's staff are working from, so they're all on the same sheet, so to speak. That way s/he won't be out of pocket due to a communicable illness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Fine, I'm not going to argue over it.

    People don't get their JS Payments stopped because they are ill or DSP would need to double the size of their administation to deal with it.

    Illness benefit also only applies to those with contributions.

    OP, the form is still available, so I believe you should appeal and I think you've a good chance of getting it overturned.

    Best of luck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    You clearly had contributions as you mentioned you were made redundant. You may not like the rules & are free to appeal.

    Best of luck with that

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    A. When claim is awarded

    B On DSP Website

    C. On citizens information

    B. Common sense .

    The OP clearly laid out what's occurred, there is little point in sugar coating their options . By their own admission, through sickness they were not available for work ,frankly I'd have said my car had broke down.

    There's 3 issues, failure to collect payment & payment suspended & an admission of temp illness.

    As I've explained OP said they were made redundant so clearly had contributions.

    The decision was admittedly harsh and they can appeal but unlikely to have the decision over turned .

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    You're.

    And apologies, but so are you. Social Welfare have always made provisions for when claimants could not get to the post office for some reason, illness being one of them.

    As I said, anyone who is an inpatient in hospital does not have their payments stopped because they are ill, and the last thing they need to be dealing with, is DSP.

    And while the OP may have made contributions in the past, not everyone has contributions to fall back on.

    The only thing the OP did incorrectly here, was not advise INTREO that they couldn't make it to the post office before they were due to collect their payment. And they probably didn't know they had to do that.

    It's gas, someone on JSA can go on holidays out of the country for two weeks and still get their JSA when they come back, but you're implying someone is not allowed get sick for a few days without losing their payment.

    OP, appeal. It sounds to me like you encountered a jobsworth who jumped on your admission of illness as their excuse to suspend your payment because they probably didn't actually know how to deal with it properly.

    And thats coming from someone (me) who has been a civil servant for over 30 years, so no bias against civil servants here.

    Best of luck.





  • Oh my god Ezeoul you are wrong and that’s the end of it. If you are claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance you MUST be available AND seeking to participate in full time employment.

    The fact is you are not doing that if you’ve got COVID. You WILL lose your payment if you don’t collect it and COVID or the hospital or any other illness isn’t an excuse.

    Thems the breaks for JSA. Would you claim it’s unfair an employer doesn’t pay you if you don’t go to work for a week?

    Also the DEASP has nothing but “I had covid” as a reason, no proof beyond an antigen test I’m sure, so who’s to say the OP is lying to them?

    Im not saying they are but you obviously don’t have a clue how strict JSA can be. Besides that being sick is one thing not collecting your payment is probably very unlikely as even when sick most people still have basic needs to be met..

    You’re also 100% dead wrong about an agent collecting a JSA payment. But anyway.





  • Also just because it is worth the OP not being led astray here

    And illness benefit requires a GP cert for COVID now.

    So regardless OP without a GP cert you’ve no case here tbh. The rules on JSA are clear— you are either available to begin work immediately or you are not eligible.

    You seem to possess great knowledge of DA and related payments Ezoule but JSA is a law unto its own. They certainly will cut your payment if you are not fit to begin work straight away. The reason is irrelevant. It’s exactly like a real job if you are not available to work you do not get paid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Well, I wouldn't expect someone in the catering industry to know much about how social welfare operates as explained in my last post.

    Leaving the thread now, as not going to get dragged any further into a back and forth about it.

    My advice to the OP is appeal. I'm very confident they will have their payment reinstated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,689 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Seems pretty obvious that the clerk doesn't believe a word of the OP.

    Having Covid doesn't stop you from contacting them to say you can't collect, and most people don't give a toss about self isolating now anyway so the clerk probably thinks the OP was up to something else and is just using covid as a convenient excuse after the fact.

    It just isn't plausible that somebody genuinely thinks that you can skip signing on day and just rock up later on whenever it suits.

    OP may not like that, but what else would prompt the clerk to start being a jobsworth? The point is that there will be little use trying to convince them to change their mind unless you address why they likely made that decision in the first place.





  • So you’re working for the DEASP or something? I see you also like to point out spelling and grammar mistakes how very mature.

    I also find it hilarious when you’re proven to be 100% dead wrong you’ve nothing but silly quips and running away.

    Oh & I don’t work in the catering industry either I work in the hotel & restaurant industry. But regardless I showed you what citizens advice has on their website. You are saying that as if I made it up myself 😅

    Very strange you can’t seem to admit you’re dead wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭TooTired123


    That temporary agent form doesn’t, and never did, apply to Jobseekers payments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭TooTired123


    During the Covid crisis all the usual rules were suspended but as Covid is over now it is back to the usual rules.

    A temporary agent can be appointed, indeed a permanent agent can be appointed, to collect some SW from the post office. However Jobseekers isn’t one of them.

    Presenting yourself in the PO in a pre appointed 24 hour time frame goes some way to demonstrating that the claimant is available for full time work ( in other words, not employed).

    If you can’t be there, for any reason, then it’s simply a matter of notifying your local SW office as soon as possible after you realise you won’t be there.

    “I have a job interview”

    ”There’s a family emergency”

    If you become ill/injured then that’s different.

    For the period of time you are ill or injured you no longer meet the terms and conditions for Jobseekers :

    in that you are not capable of work.

    So technically you can’t get Jobseekers.

    If it’s just for a couple of days/48 hours then you simply contact the SW office and they’ll hold it over for you but any more then that and they’ll suspend your entitlement and you’ll get SWA until you are better.

    The key here is communicating with the SW office as soon as you encounter a “change in circumstances” in order to avoid ending up totally without any income.

    You’ve got to look at it as if you were still in employment and struck down with the flu. You wouldn’t just not turn up, no phone call/text/email. You’d need proof you were sick too. SW operate on the same basic principle.

    This is easily resolved now with an admission to SW that the OP simply didn’t understand the terms and conditions attached to jobseekers (very few do), but they do now, and would like to be returned to their payment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    You are quite deliberately being rather petulant and referring to those on long term illness, disability or pension payments.

    ÓP Was sick for a week, didn't collect their payment which was then suspended. They went on to admit they were sick and by default not available for or looking for work & lost Jobseekers payment for that week.

    You've clearly not a clue what the eligibility criteria is to recieve a Jobseekers payment.

    To suggest an agent can be nominated to collect someone's Jobseekers payment is preposterous.

    DSP have made a decision, harsh it may be but correct.

    Now move on 🙄

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Correct, my word I'm exhausted trying to explain this

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Thank you, I'm exhausted dealing with the shocking lack or basic understanding of how DSP operate, it's extraordinary.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭TooTired123


    If you were employed and you were too sick for work today nearly the first thing you do is contact your employer.

    Imagine having been given 7 days out sick by the GP, not contacting your employer, showing up next Monday, expecting to be on the rota and expecting to be paid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I was attempting to be direct in my initial response to OP as opposed to offering ridiculous suggestions & makey uppy nonsense.

    Such an exhausting back & fourth with a poster, so abjectly wrong & petulant.

    Thankfully you & others clarified matters 😉

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,752 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    What would stop you being able to work remotely (available for work) and searching for jobs (seeking work) online, whilst having Covid?

    If someone broke their leg and was in hospital for 4 weeks, they wouldnt be able to claim JA?

    Is there something else they could claim instead?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Sonic the Shaghog


    Appeal it if you can and what's more go to your local FF or FG TD (do not waste your time on a Green, SF, etc. Most departments are stacked with FF or FG over the decades) and tell them what happened and to champion the appeal for you and how you haven't two Penny's to rub together.

    Not even joking, if you can turn on the waterworks it will benefit you a lot too. Also throw in how you always voted him/her and they are the only ones you can turn to, especially with polls at the moment they are nervous.

    A quiet word from whatever TDs contact in the department will straighten it out I'll guarantee that. Just make sure to drop in a tub of sweets to the TDs secretary if it gets sorted, keep her sweet if you pardon the pun, as it will be most likely her sorting it. Plus you never know might need their help in future.

    You can also go down the local welfare community officer and explain your situation, you had COVID and were trying to do the right thing and not infect anyone especially elderly who would use the PO more and again I stress, the waterworks. They might cut you cheque for something at the very least to keep you going.

    Also SVDP would be very helpful if you worried about food, it would be something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,752 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It does seem harsh that you cant claim it if you were ill with covid and are told by the govt to self isolate.

    Yet other people spend a life time claiming money for nothing.

    Its a strange old country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,399 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    OP has nothing to loose by appealing. It they had signed on, got the payment a, then got covid or other illness the following day , and he unable to look for work or work, there is no way to clawback. So it is possible to be on JSA and not capable of work (due to illness) and not loose the payment



  • Posts: 133 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You're wrong. Inpatients do have their jobseekers stopped.

    They are in hospital and not available for work. The op can claim illness benefit and it refused, can claim supplementary welfare.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭TooTired123




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,752 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Thanks.

    Could the OP not claim SWA in this instance?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭TooTired123


    Anyone can apply for SWA if they have applied for another payment, (JSA/JSB for example), while they are waiting for that application to be heard. It’s heavily means tested.

    In this case it’s not clear if the OP has reapplied for Jobseekers B/A (they mention that their interaction with the local SW lasted “2 minutes”) so it wouldn’t seem that they have applied for anything or sought to resolve the situation.

    They can return to the office at any time and seek to resolve the application, but only if they do that could they then apply for SWA.

    Someone mentions “ Appealing” the refusal of Jobseekers.

    You could do that but you’d need a letter of refusal of jobseekers from the local office (they might have got that in the post afterwards), a completed appeals form and you’d need to have a grounds for appeal, (“I don’t think the rules are fair” isn’t grounds BTW). Appeals are taking 6 months. You can apply for SWA while you are appealing but only if you meet the conditions for JS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Oh for god's sake some of the "exhausted" over dramatics of posters on this thread need to calm tf down, or go have a nap or something.

    They also need to stop behavng as if this board is their personal domain.

    The fact is, the OP was denied their payment by an incompetent Officer whom they spoke to for "two minutes". That shouldn't have happened.

    Whereas if they had informed INTREO in advance that they could not collect, that would not have happened.

    An accommodation would have been made - it would have been held over for a few days at the post office. No changing to another payment. A deciding officer could have authorised this.

    Now, funnily enough, when someone else pointed this out, and that post was liked by the very poster who is "so exhausted" at jumping all over me.

    And I'm the one being called "petulant"? Talk about dramatics. No matter, it's water off a ducks back to me.

    Now, back to the real world.

    Oh and one final point - the temporary agent form WAS available for Covid19. Its literally printed on the form I linked too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    If someone broke their leg or was Hospitalised they apply for illness benefit or if not enough contributions, SWA. The rules may be harsh but are very clear, if incapable of work, they are not entitled to a Jobseekes payment

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,065 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    You've been handed your Arse & still at this absurd nonsense.

    You may disagree with facts but offering factually incorrect information doesn't help the OP.

    You claim to have been a Civil servant for 30 years to somehow justify your petulance. Everything with DSP is black & white, a person is entitled to a payment or not.

    I've checked my spelling & hope it's up to "you're" exacting standards.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,689 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    The fact is, the OP was denied their payment by an incompetent Officer whom they spoke to for "two minutes". That shouldn't have happened.

    Yes it should have happened.

    The OP didn't attend for his collection, didn't bother notifying anybody and afterwards told the clerk that he had been unavailable for work.

    It was 100% factually correct to deny jobseekers benefit for that week.





  • Maybe you should’ve just stayed away instead of coming back to make more of a show of yourself…

    OP, please understand that your JSA will be cut off if you miss payments without notifying the DEASP first. It doesn’t matter why you MUST tell them.

    You might be currently unemployed but you treat JSA the same as though you were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭TooTired123


    On what grounds are you alleging that the SW staff member is incompetent?!? What in how he dealt with the customer demonstrated incompetence?

    The customer presented in the office not meeting the terms and conditions for jobseekers on at least two grounds (failed to collect his payment in the required date, failed to notify the department of a change in circumstances) and was refused as per the law.

    How is that incompetence?

    You need to forget about that agent form. That agent form no longer applies. It was applying during the lockdown but that’s over now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Actual experience. Something you don't have.

    Goodbye.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    The OP didn't inform anyone or collect their payment because they were following HSE guidelines and most likely they were in the (commonly held) belief that their payment would be available in the post office for a few days.

    Happens all the time, and it should not have resulted in a complete loss of their payment for a week - especially if this was the first time something like this had happened. Denying them their payment was someone making an (imo) poor judgement call.

    And yes, deciding officers can make judgement calls.

    And that's my final say on the matter.





  • No it should have though that’s what you’re not getting. If they didn’t go to work for a week would you expect their employer still process their wages??

    You’re trying to blame the DEASP when the OP demonstrated the incompetence or lack of respect and decency to lift the phone and call them.

    This is entirely their own fault and your refusal to accept that is bordering on dangerous misinformation. You are telling JSA claimants they can do what they like which will end with people losing money.

    easy for you when your income isn’t affected to come in here belligerent and rude and acting like a know it all. You’ve been proven 110% wrong numerous times and yet here you still are banging the same drum.

    You’re wrong. Just get over it and stop telling OP he has impunity to break the rules without incident. You’re just screwing with their income at this stage and I will be reporting you for that. You’d want to have a shake of the head and think what’s more important, being right on boards or someone’s income they depend on…

    will you be paying them the money they stand to lose taking your advice in future??





  • Also how the heck is covid an excuse to not contact the DEASP??

    When you’re self isolating I didn’t see the part you can’t make phone calls or send emails….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,611 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...system goes duh! again....

    ...best of luck op....



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement