JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years

Sure, out of 1400 some would pass away statistically in car crashes or naturally over 14 years. 70 ‘dying’ (many suspiciously) or being executed is the 1 in 167 trillion odds (..odds experts can quibble with this number- it just means this is highly unlikely to be chance).

Fine if you want neat & tidy answers first; personally, I think the name of the person who took the fatal headshot is not that interesting because its likely to be a hired hand & not a federal employee. LHO is not a suspect of any kind outside the lone gunman community. I don’t think patsies are told by their handlers they are going to be killed if they are used in an operation. Not many people would sign up for intrigue & foreign travel to get that as a payoff. Also patsies are generally very young (LHO), chosen because they’re easy to manipulate or not the full schilling.

So I’ve made my few observations about the JFK case, I don’t have any further contributions to make. What I’ve learnt here is-

• The professional execution of Mary Meyer had nothing to with the assassination of JFK
• The assassination of LHO was not a cause for suspicion of conspiracy. Just a sad event.
• The death of 69 other witnesses/central characters is not a red flag, just life.
• The prevention of a full autopsy in Dallas was not suspicious. Things just happen the way they happen.
• The prevention of a Dallas police investigation of JFK’s murder is not a red flag anomaly. Its not even suspicious.
• All the other formalities in murder cases that were prevented: It was the murder of a president, people were excitable that day.
• Some of the people who conspired to kill JFK investigated the case and found themselves not charged or not guilty of his murder. This is perfectly sane. Nothing to see here!
• No evidence in this case was kept out of the public record by authorities. Authorities work for USians under control of their elected representatives, so that could not happen.
• Critical thinking (which nobody in the West is educated in) is of no value in this case. The only currency is hard evidence.
• The lack of hard evidence like a signed confession from either Allen Dulles or from various guilty US Oligarchs is the clincher that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that a lone Marxist/anti-marxist/pro-Castro/anti-Castro-ist who thought he was a patsy after the event (who had no connections to the CIA) killed Kennedy.

The latest episode the Patsy. The podcast delved into the intriguing theory that Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of President John F. Kennedy, was actually recruited by the CIA at a young age and used as an asset in various operations, including recruiting Soviet spies. 

The podcast suggests that Oswald was recruited while he attended reform schools, where he was exposed to intelligence agents and indoctrination.

There was this strange call on a podcast that someone from the show had with Oswald doctor from reform school. During the call, the person from the show asked if he knew the famous doctor involved in the MK ultra program. Oswald's doctor denied having any knowledge of this doctor, but his denial did not seem genuine.

The narrative in this podcast is exceptionally well done.

Yes listened to it today - found this episode very interesting and well researched.

Hi. do you mind me asking what book that is from. Cheers.

Looking for a good book on the topic.

Clemons may have mistook another witness for an assailant, big deal. The description she gave - a short, heavy gunman- is clear.

So this Nash couple get to decide years later what witness testimony is valid and which is invalid. How does that work?

Clemons says she was threatened by Police or FBI but you don’t believe that because this Nash couple think it rings false!

How does Clemons being a diabetic invalidate her testimony.

Am I to take it you don’t believe any witness intimidation by police took place against the 3 Tippit witnesses I mentioned and

you don’t believe of the attempted murder of Reynolds or the actual murder of Benavides brother?

Edit:- Domingo's father-in-law, J.W. Jackson, was so unimpressed with the police investigation of Eddy's death that he launched a little inquiry of his own. Two weeks later Jackson was shot at in his home…but survived.

Too busy reading about the (‘under democratic control’) CIA’s Project Artichoke (for which the permitted exposure of MKULTRA helped keep hidden for longer). Who would object to having mind control experiments done on them, without their knowledge, that drive them insane & cause some to commit suicide. Same barbaric biochemistry still going on in Camp Detrick. Democratic countries are fascinating don’t you think?

What I have found out is that Mary Meyer may represent one of the invisible borders of the lone gunman theory that its defenders treat as a no-mans land for some reason. 

What stops Oswald from being one of the assassins and getting caught? The question about whether they could have made Oswald the fall guy remains unanswered.

By killing Oswald, Ruby ensured that there would not be a trial, which would have allowed Oswald to defend himself and potentially reveal any truths regarding his involvement in the assassination.

Regardless of the specific details surrounding the events that took place or how the route may have influenced the situation, it is evident that the forensic analysis has unequivocally established the presence of multiple shooters.

There is no way a bullet that comes down from an elevated height can strike Kennedy in the back and suddenly do a turn upwards out the throat, then go on another journey and hit Connelly's right shoulder, breaking his rib and tissue, coming out again, hitting the wrist, doing more damage, and then landing on the thigh, causing more damage. This sequence of events is physically impossible, as the bullet's trajectory and shape would not allow for such a complex path. Additionally, there is a lack of chain of custody for the bullet that was found in Parkland, with some edges and grain particles missing. This raises questions about the authenticity of the bullet and whether it was tampered with or compromised in some way.

A police officer encountered an individual up in the grassy knoll. and attempted to approach them. Debunkers claim there was nobody up there is false. However, the individual flashed a badge and intimidated the officer, causing them to back off. Reasonably inferred that the individual's actions were not completely innocent. They likely remained in the area with the intention of cleaning up the scene and ensuring everything was good.

Then, the man disappeared without a trace, leaving everyone wondering what became of him. I have a feeling he was somehow involved, and it is unfortunate the police officer was not wise enough to detain him for questioning. The entire story could have ended differently.

Yes, some think he fired a shot that day, others think he didn’t, its not known for sure. I’d be in the latter group. The trial of LHO would have been interesting for the citizens- maybe leading to the end of the US /as a constitutional republic, which is probably why it was prevented. He'd have been Epsteined or fallen out a 5th floor window etc. if Ruby screwed it up.

An observation on the MB by someone else: “There was a piece in JFK Revisited showing edits made by Gerald Ford's pen, altering the Warren report's description of the location of a wound in Kennedy's back, falsely claiming it was in his neck to keep things consistent with the Magic Bullet (they assumed images wouldn't be released)”.

I agree, Dealey Plaza was a shooting gallery that day, where the chance of missing was virtually ruled out. Around 30 people or more instinctively ran up the grassy knoll after the shooting.

Not CIA this time 😶 but the US Dept of Defence (what’s the difference- all US agencies spread endless human suffering around the world for the same gangsters in charge) planning on faking evidence in ‘62 of Cuban responsibility if John Glenn died during the first American space mission (Operation Dirty Trick). In March 1963, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor, asked for a report on what could be done "to plan and incite a revolt in Cuba." Because of past difficulties in contriving "a timed uprising," he said consideration should be given to "engineering an incident as a cause for invasion."

archive.ph/vlt5H#selection-927.0-934.0

This is a regime mouthpiece, the WP, giving one of countless examples of what the US is and people say “No, the good guys would never -not find- other rifle bullets in Dealey Plaza, that is outside the range of what is possible”.

Right!

Debunkers will claim that, because he was allegedly involved in shooting at General Walker's house and killing Tippet, he must be a killer. However, it is important to understand that even if he had done those actions, his background suggests that he was controlled by the CIA

In the period of the cold War, the idea of defecting to the Soviet Union and sharing secrets with the KGB was certainly not taken lightly. In fact, anyone who did so would be placed under close surveillance.

What likely happened is that Oswald was recruited to be some sort of spy, he liked it, and then got an offer to play a role. The process of recruitment may have been gradual, starting with an initial exposure to espionage activities. Oswald may have found the role intriguing and engaging, leading to his acceptance of the opportunity.

Marina Oswald actually mentioned in her earliest writings that her husband, Lee Harvey Oswald, had expressed admiration for President John F. Kennedy. While theories abound, one fact remains clear: the Oswald's decision to kill Kennedy does not make a lot of sense. Kennedy's actions during his short presidency suggest that he was committed to avoiding unnecessary conflict and working toward peace. One of his key initiatives was to pull the United States out of the Vietnam War and form closer ties with the Soviet Union. This shift in foreign policy was seen as a major step away from the Cold War mentality that had dominated the previous administration.

The decision to target Kennedy and assassinate him only served the interests of warhawks in Washington, the CIA, and other factions with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. By removing Kennedy, these forces were able to prevent any further progress toward peace, ensuring that the United States remained entangled in Vietnam. Oswald shooting Kennedy really didn't help his cause at all.

It will remain a mystery if the job at TSBD as a stockboy was actually a frame job or was he part of a larger conspiracy.

The Tippet murder: What many people do not know about this case is that a classified memo released by the FBI claimed that Tippet was a leader of the John Birch Society in Dallas. This revelation adds a new dimension to the investigation of Kennedy's murder, as it highlights the involvement of individuals who were connected to the John Birch Society, known to have harbored deep suspicion and hostility towards the president. Tippet murder that warrants further scrutiny is the fact he was the only police officer assigned to the area where Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin, resided. Was he sent there to kill him, and Oswald reacted first, or did Oswald just kill an innocent police officer?The involvement of individuals with intelligence and big business connections in the John Birch Society raises further suspicions.

I’ve fallen into a common error. The official US narrative since the 1979 HSCA, is not the lone gunman theory but that it WAS a conspiracy of two (?) lone gunmen acting together but tied to no other organisations.

Nothing about the Tippit murder makes sense in terms of a two lone gunman conspiracy, where afterwards the ‘killer’ casually walks into a cinema and just chills out. As others have pointed out in the sixties, it is a known phenomenon that a policeman being killed riles up the blood of other police who then will naturally become more trigger happy during the pursuit- at least that explanation has the advantage of some logic.

Have you seen any effort by ‘debunkers’ to explain Oswald learning Russian (he took the Russian examination on February 25, 1959, while stationed at El Toro Marine Base in California), non-binding defection to the USSR and effortless return to US life that doesn’t involve ignoring it?

I’d agree with your explanation of why JFK was killed. Two further ways of describing that rationale - my words mixed with others:-

Btw, I don’t see JFK as some kind of knight on a white horse or Camelot figure. He was an American exceptionalist & imperialist (this alone makes him a fascist)- he wouldn’t be allowed near the Presidency if he wasn’t of that basic mindset. Even though he was unquestionably both these things, he still represented a threat deemed real enough to a powerful subset of the ruling class that they launched a soft coup by having his head blown off during a parade.

JFK was assassinated by the dominant faction of the US govt for refusing to flex the full might of empire. Look up the secret calls he was making to Castro and Khrushchev during the crisis. It was also a clear message to future presidents that they better do what they’re told (the role of US president is a front desk face which by all appearances has all the power but in reality, is proximate to real power) – the memo has been understood by all office-holders since.

I am agreeing with this paragraph.

"The decision to target Kennedy and assassinate him only served the interests of warhawks..."

i.e. that Oswald didn't shoot JFK.

No, I think all official narratives correct home is a rubbish bin.

What was Ford’s explanation in later years for conspiratorial fabrication and perjury regarding moving the shoulder entrance wound up 4 inches, when he assumed the photos wouldn’t be released to the public?