Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
17377387407427431266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    You misunderstand. When Mandated Palestine was divided into Arab and Jewish States the Jews in the Arab part had to leave as too.

    Between 1948 and 1970 approximately 900,000 Jews were expelled from or fled Muslim majority countries in Asia and Africa. Most of them resettled in Israel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes




  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Do you think the absence of a Bond Villain type Layer means that there was no command centre there? You do know that computers and guns and all that stuff can be carried, right?



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,930 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    They did find it, but because it had been cleared out, we were told it wasn't a command centre. If forensic evidence points to its use as a command centre, the story will shift again. Remember, from the start, we were told by the doctors, no Hamas, no tunnels in the hospital. That was the first lie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Carried away??? In full view of all the IDF and their helicopters eye in the sky etc??



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,930 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    A war is a war.

    However, I wouldn't advocate nuking anywhere, regardless of context.

    Hiroshima happened, and it was required. More citizens were killed than in Gaza. Remember by then, Japan was the only one left in the war and it was no longer a world war as most of the other protagonists had surrendered.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,930 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That would mean kinship with Jews though, wouldn't it? They were gassed rather than gaslit by their oppressors though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    You do know that, despite what the Doctors said, there were tunnels under the hospital, right? They are big but I don't think you'd fit a helicopter into one... but you'd fit a few chaps with AK47's over their shoulders and a laptop under their arms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    It is not possible that there was no command centre there?? It it not possible that this was just an excuse for the IDF to fire on the hospital, prevent people from going there for treatment and causing as much disruption as possible to the people of Gaza??

    The onus is on the IDF to prove it was there and they haven't done that. They cannot justify their attacks on the hospital.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    It would also mean ignoring that the Jews were forcibly removed from their land first... oops!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    According to some of the posters here there's hundreds of miles of tunnels under Gaza so there should be no problem for the IDF to find them and go in and rid out Hamas from them. Have they done that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,930 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There is a huge credibility issue for those who defend Hamas on here. There were no tunnels, they said, there were no Hamas in hospitals they said, there were no tunnels under hospitals they said, there were only tunnels but not rooms under hospitals they said, all of that was wrong, all of that was lies.

    Now we are told that the rooms in tunnels under the hospitals (remember these didn't exist two weeks ago) were not used as command centres, and we are all supposed to still believe that? Balance of probabilities, given the experience of the last two weeks, is that those who defend Hamas are lying again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,930 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Do you have any clue about the use of tunnels in warfare? How they are defended, how they are attacked?



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,637 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Talking about stories shifting, Ros Atkins showing the inconsistencies in Israel's story around the command center narrative.

    Note the difference between the CGI that Nethanyahu himself broadcast as evidence before the entered the hospital versus what was actually found.




  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    And according to CNN and the USA and Israel and Hamas themselves... but I'm sure you're right, whatever it is you're actually saying.

    What do you think the IDF are doing in Gaza if they aren't looing for tunnels and Hamas infrastructure. Have aa good think about that now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Yes and apparently its very scary and much more difficult than bombing the hospital.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,526 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    But, every Easter the Irish were reminded how awful the Jews were. Wasn't till John Paul II put a stop to the official RCC blessing of that nonsense.

    Old habits die hard, Jews are the villains in the fundamental event of Christianity as chronicled by the RCC (and others.) It's easy to develop 'kinship' with people perceived to be oppressed by a group you're taught from birth to hate.

    Irish have no special victimhood when it comes to being expelled. Every religious group has been expelled - Jews, Catholics by Protestants, Protestants by Catholic, Hindus by Moslems, Moslems by Hindus, and on and on. But, in Ireland, we're 'one with Palestine' but not one with, say, Moslems in India or Hindus in Pakistan, even Afghans in Pakistan.

    Because we're taught to hate Jews.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,646 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Its not up to me to prove a negative.

    That is not how this works.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,930 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    So there are tunnels under the hospital? Weren't you telling us 100 pages ago that there wasn't because the doctors said so?



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    What was the motive for the IDF to attack the hospital if there was no Hamas presence there? Was it just because the evil Jew does that sort of thing? Did those nasty hook-nosed Jews decide that they would just attack a hospital and risk have a PR disaster because their evilness overrode their conniving nature? Are Jews, sorry, "The Jew" really that nasty? Thank goodness there's not a whiff of anti-Semitism framing this discussion!!

    Oh, and who was shooing back at them? Was that the same doctors who said there were no tunnels or were they shooting at themselves? Was it the same IDF members that shot the kids at the Rave? Maybe it was Bill Gates or the Illuminate. Are the Lizard People in on this as well?!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    "We're taught to hate Jews."

    This is complete balderdash.

    The far right who were out causing chaos the other night in East Wall and Clondalkin were screaming "Fcuk Palestine".

    Perhaps these racists are actually the true anti-racists...



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,637 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Did you ever find evidence of people changing their profiles, posting in support of Hamas as you claim in the days before Israel started attacking Gaza civilians.

    You made this claim several weeks ago and were asked to show people supporting Hamas on the day of the attack and to my knowledge, you never showed evidence of what it is you were claiming.

    You asked me to produce evidence to support my comment last nigh about conversations in the days after Oct 7tht, which I did, so maybe you can show the same.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    It is not a good lesson though I think to deal with any conflict, people would not advocate a destruction of a city in most modern wars. Time has moved on from the 1940s.

    If a war is just a war then why do people judge Russians for their actions more than say Israels. We do that because there are expectations on how wars are fought.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,637 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I'll take that of confirmation of my point that you saw no such evidence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,277 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Just go back to the start of this thread to see posts supporting Hamas from October 7th? It's not that hard



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,930 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Russia and Hamas are the aggressors under international law.

    Ukraine and Israel are acting in self-defence under international law.

    That is why Russia is judged differently to Israel. There are different aspects to international law, depending on whether you are aggressor or acting in self-defence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    Nice attempt at history, but a lot of info/context missing. By 1900 the population was about 500,000 Arab and 22,000 Jews in the area that was Palestine. The Zionist movement had already been established by 1900 with the aim of creating a Jewish state in that area and they encouraged Jew to emigrate to that area. What evidence is there that the population increase was down to Zionist money? Regardless, by the time the British mandate was introduced, Jews still made up less than 10% of the population.

    During WW1 the British made promises to 3 different groups based on the fall of the Ottoman empire, 1. They promised the Arabs an independent state of their own. 2. They signed the Sykes-Picot agreement with the French to carve up the Arab lands between themselves. 3 They introduced the Balfour declaration which promised the Zionists their own state in the area. As can be seen, these promises were contradictory and not realistic.

    Much of the post WW1 peace treaty was about self-determination and the rights of ethnic/national groups to form their own countries....as long as they did not interfere with British/French or Italian interests too much. So in Europe, we seen the creation of countries that never existed before like Czechslovakia/Yugoslavia and the re-emergence of countries that had not existed for over 100 years, Poland/Lithuania etc. As part of this nation building, there was a commission of enquiry into the claims for a new state with representatives sent to establish the potential of any new state, this was led by Woodrow Wilson, the US President who was kind of a referee between all the major nations, Britain, France, Italy.

    During the discussions at the conference, the British were bullish about having Palestine as a mandate as Balfour had promised it to the Zionists. The following extract is take from a book Paris 1919, by Margaret MacMillan about the Paris Peace conference.

    "And Zionism" said Balfour "be it right or wrong, good or bad is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs or in future hopes of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit the land"

    Wilson nevertheless insisted that his Commission of Inquiry into the Middle-East include Palestine. The two American Commissioners, reported back at the end of the summer of 1919 that the Arabs in Palestine were "emphatically" against the entire Zionist program and recommended that the Peace conference limit Jewish immigration and give up the idea of making Palestine a Jewish homeland. Nobody paid the slightest attention.

    During the Paris Peace conference, Faisal who represented the Arabs was under the impression that any independent Arab state would consist of modern day Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan, but due to the self-interests of the British/French and the Sykes-Picot agreement, no independent state was forthcoming with the French being given the mandate for Syria/Lebanon with Faisal as nominal king of Syria and the British convinced him to give up any claim on Palestine which they had ear-marked for the Zionists. So off the 3 agreements made during the war, the only one not kept was that to the Arabs. Britain/France put their own interests ahead of the Arabs.

    Jewish emigration to Palestine continued as promised under the British mandate until the point that conflicts broke out, and then the British realising the problems they had created tried to stop Jewish arrivals in Palestine and were reluctant to see the creation of Israel at the end of the mandate as they knew it would be a mess. The UN went ahead and recognised Israel despite every other country in the region being opposed with the Palestinian Arabs again having no input and here we are still wondering how this is still a mess.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,634 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,930 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yawn, been there, done that, plenty of times, see my much much earlier posts on this thread.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I don't believe that the concept of rules of engagement are any different to aggressors or defenders. If you are defending for example it doesn't allow you to kill prisoners of war no different if you were the aggressor.



Advertisement