Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

If Metrolink was scrapped, what are the alternatives?

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    It's just an idea. It'll never happen.

    The Luas is slow as **** in the city center so you're better off changing to Metro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Nope. I just pointed out the times.

    You are likely better if you go beyond 2/3 stops. It will remain a busy transit form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭plodder


    Interesting given the week we've just had, that one of the few international showcases for Dublin city (the Dublin Marathon) is under threat. Not sure how serious it really is, but lots of people are asking how do other city centres manage it. The answer is obviously with an underground public transport network. Even the single line of Metro link would take a lot of pressure off public transport on the one day a year widespread street closures are needed, and might even create scope for more public events on the city centre streets.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Plenty of cities without an Underground host marathons as well. Metrolink will help, but people need to just accept the reality of inconveniences that come from living in a city that will have events that are not always centred on them. Its a few hours on a Bank Holiday Sunday morning - plan around it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Mr_Messy


    Metrolink will cost anywhere from €12billion to €22billion according to reports. I can't see it being built, particularly with a recession being overdue.

    Things that can be done now:

    • You could easily cut the journey times of Dublin Airpot to City Centre by investing in Passport Control. More border guards, passportless CTA travel for UK-Ireland passengers. Saving 10min queing at Passport control is the same 10mins that would be saved on a billion euro metro.
    • Send more busses down the Port Tunnel. Increase the toll on car journeys. Look at the timetables of Swords Express, 142, 33X, 41X - it is vastly underutilised.

    Things we should build:

    • Extend the Green Luas Line to the airport
    • Build a spur off the Dart line to the airport and on to Swords.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,964 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    First day of Q2?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭Consonata


    The current cost estimates are 7.15 to 12.26bn euro. No reason yet to believe they're going to go 100% over the top end of their Budget.

    If you read through the thread, you will see why Luas to Airport is inappropriate and misses the main function of the project (to connect Swords to the city and open up more green+brownfield sites for development)



  • Registered Users Posts: 266 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    Amen to that. And can we stop the ‘busses’ nonsense? The plural of ‘Bus’ is ‘Buses’.



  • Registered Users Posts: 638 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    More passport control guards instead of Metro....😂😂😂😂😂😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭plodder


    I hear you, but this is coming from the National Transport Authority, not a bunch of old folks needing to get to mass, which was the long stated reason why the marathon used to be held on the Monday. It's just a small element of the reason why the lack of a decent, fast underground public transport system, degrades life in a multitude of small ways, which are mostly imperceptible to people unless they have lived in other cities abroad, because this is the way it's always been. And the way out of it, is that as soon as you can afford to do it, you buy a car for commuting.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    It is "busses" in American English. I've caught my spell checker trying to change it to busses in the past.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yeah, but its the bunch of old folks needing to get to mass who are complaining to the NTA I'm sure! I don't really understand why a bank holiday Monday would require less transport than a Sunday either tbh.

    I think a metro would obviously help a bit - however it won't do much for the traffic closures and much of the area it serves wouldn't even be impacted. But I think the complaints around the Dublin Marathon are mostly just people moaning cause they love a good moan.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    This is a perfect example of the problem with this entire thread, people who don't understand what the purpose of Metrolink is and that there simply is no alternative to it.

    Metrolink is NOT about linking to the airport, the primary purpose of Metrolink is to link Swords to the city. Swords the 5th largest Urban area in Ireland (and well on the way to 4th) and obviously a major commuter town of Dublin.

    Metrolink is primarily about bringing the people of Swords quickly and easily to the city.

    It will also allow Metrolink to be extended North of Swords where you could build dense commuter towns around Metro stops, where you could house the next 100,000 people.

    It is also about creating a sold North-South transport axis, taking the strain off the Luas Green line and connecting up all the major Luas and DART+ lines to create a proper network effect.

    Stopping at the Airport is WAY down the list of the purposes of Metrolink, it is nice that it will stop at the airport, it certainly makes sense to do that, but it certainly isn't the main purpose of Metrolink.



  • Registered Users Posts: 266 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    Totally correct. It is remarkable how many don't grasp that. Over one hundred years ago the Metropolitan Railway and the Charing Cross Euston and Hampstead Railway built railways into green fields, and made money out of developing suburbs around their stations. Dublin is well beyond the point where infrastructure needs to be put in place before development and not afterwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I see your point, but that land has good road access & proximity to M1 also.

    So its far from worthless as residential development land, even if metrolink never sees the light of day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭plodder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Why would people on the Green Luas change at Charlemont to MetroLink, if they are going to Stephens Green/Dawson/Westmoreland?

    Its only 4 or 5 mins to Dawson from Charlemont on the Luas, so it would take longer on Metrolink.

    Same if you were heading to Merrion Square, in your example.

    You would stay on the LUAS and be at Dawson in 5. Metrolink would be slower.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The M1 is irrelevant if all that traffic ends up trying to squeeze into the Swords Road. The corridor is already well over capacity and there is no way you could build homes for another 100,000 people there and have them try and drive in.

    The Port Tunnel is also irrelevant given the high toll charge and it dumping people into the already overcapacity quays.

    Of course you can build some extra homes, but nowhere near the numbers that ML will enable.

    Yep, look at Tokyo, the private rail company owns all the land where they build rail stations. Almost all the stations have massive shopping centers and apartment/office buildings built directly above the stations.

    It actually makes the railway company there highly profitable and drives them to want to expand the rail network to more and more locations as easch new line and station makes them lots of money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Not irrelavant though, because you can still build homes there, whether they get tail backs on the M1 or not.

    But it isnt optimised without a rail link. Thats the difference.

    My concern is that the govt have a habit of not choosing the optimal option and I predict there will be homes built there way before ML is built.

    (if it ever is built)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭Consonata


    It wouldn't pass planning permission if there isn't transport capacity. It's one of the areas which ABP look at.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yep, I’m not saying there would be zero homes built, a couple here or there sure. But there is no way massive developments of thousands of homes would be granted by ABP.

    Also that land North of Swords isn’t currently zoned for housing and thus the reason why it hasn’t already been built on. It will only get rezoned if ML comes.

    Just go take a look at Fingal County Councils Swords development plans, it is all largely built around ML.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    There is car capacity to a degree though. We cant not build houses because we dont have ML.

    Otherwise we would barely build homes anywhere.

    Build them with the plans for ML in mind, sure. But realistically, how long will it take for ML to be operational?

    We shouldnt be waiting a decade plus to build homes so close to the city centre.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭Consonata


    We build on the basis of future transport capacity. And there isn't car capacity, the M1 is clogged in the mornings already at the best of times, driving more people into using tunnel, for a purpose it was never designed for (getting cargo and lorries off ships and onto the motorway network reasonably quickly.)

    Most housing plans take 4-5 years when you factor in planning, financing etc. Metrolink will be operational likely before 2035, but possibly parts of it sooner than that. That is the time frame we operate on when we are rezoning large parts of Fingal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I’ve already run the times. All off peak so add another couple of mins on at heavy commute time.

    6.5 mins to SSG

    9.5 mins to Dawson

    13.5 mins to Westmoreland St

    I don’t expect people who normally go to SSG or Dawson to switch. Perhaps if someone is going east of Merrion Row they may feel it is natural to switch to save a perceived walk.

    Westmoreland Street is trickier.

    Switch from LUAS to Metro: 3 to 5 mins

    Metro to SSG: 2 mins

    Dwell time: 60 seconds

    Metro to Tara Street: 2 mins

    Station exit: 2 mins (LUAS is quicker)

    So 10 to 12 mins.

    That works out quicker. If going east of Westmoreland I would say Tara 100%. Lots of people who will head down to GCD too who might switch to the DART from there. If going to Trinity I would also say Tara as there is the new entrance there and it’s more accessible.

    That said, the time benefit may not be viewed as so great to justify a switch for many. I would say peak times could be interesting though. You’d probably need a perceived benefit of 5 mins to justify it for many. I’d also say the opportunity to get off packed trams would be another one.

    I can see people who normally getting on at Charlemount still opting for the Green Line if going to Harcourt Street (though they’re very close and given how packed the Green Line can be at commuter times I’m not sure why you’d put yourself through that to save a few mins) or beyond O’Connell Street. Doesn’t make a huge amount of sense to get on the Green otherwise.

    This scenario thinking can be switched if you think of the northside Green Line. There’s probably going to be less incentive to switch overall because the station integration won’t be as good at O’Connell Street.

    My overall point is that digging up the tracks in the city is a mental idea. They will still provide a utility to many normal Green Line users and it opens up other opportunities in the future



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Why would anyone even suggest digging up tram lines in Dublin?

    Did they not remove one of the Best tram systems in the 1930s and replace them with buses that were not nearly as good but were nice and shiny. So why make the same mistake twice?

    Now, I would expect the Metrolink will go to Sandyford, which will be planned during the first short while following the first TBM starting its journey underground. The timing should allow the TBM to complete the connection to the Green Line south of Charlemont.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Would we really not build homes for 12 years, just because ML wasnt up and running?

    We could run express bus services into town from there. Build cycle lanes etc. I am not saying it is car or nothing, but we need homes now.

    Space that close to the centre should build around the ML line, but it should not wait until 2035, when lets be honest, that deadline will probably get kicled down the road anyway.

    We cant wait forever for a train that may never arrive.

    And it if does arrive, we can be ready for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    They arent planning to dig up the LUAS lines for ML are they?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The CSO.

    All of the red area in the below map (click to enlarge) is the highest density areas in Ireland. You can easily see all the areas of North Dublin City are high density.

    The density only falls off after the M50, you are then into the area of Dublin Airport. Obviously the housing density around the airport falls way off, but the airport will obviously be a massive journey generator in it's own right.

    You can then see the density of Swords beyond the airport. You can also see the fantastic opportunity for new very dense development North of Swords.




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    No, of course not!

    Again, ABP would simply deny any major developments. It really is as simple as that. Again, some small developments sure, but not large scale development.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭gjim


    Once ML is up and running, they should split the current Green line - and terminate the southern section at Charlemont.

    The northern section should then be extended from Harcourt either south through Rathmine/Terenure or else east via Adelaide Road and on to Irishtown and the new Glass Bottle site development.

    This would have the satisfying upside of being very annoying for the Ranelagh/south suburban NIMBY's - who scuppered the original ML plan because of "disruption" and I'd imagine that they would would soon be marching with pitch-forks demanding that the link-up with ML.

    It would also provide a rail/tram option for a large area of the city currently without one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67




  • Registered Users Posts: 266 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    Part of the problem though when much of Official Ireland constantly looks for cheapo permanent alternatives for rail, and then wring their hands when the buses don't get people out of cars



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I agree, buses wont get people out of their cars.

    We do need an underground network, but we need to build houses now & with metro in mind.

    Build in alignment with it, but dont wait for it....we will be waiting a long time for ML to be operational.

    We dont have time to wait for housing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 157 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    excellent and senisible idea - which is why it won't happen.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I won’t really say that about buses. I live in an apartment building and pretty much every one here leaves their car at home and takes the bus into work!

    But that is because we live by one of the core bus corridors, half a dozen busy routes pass, so bus every 2 or 3 minutes and pretty good bus corridor all the way in makes it much faster then by car. Plus the expensive of parking in the city.

    I know not everyone has such a good service, but it does show me that buses can be popular if the level of service and speed is high enough.

    But yes, we certainly shouldn’t be so reliant on buses. And realistically we are approaching the practical limits of the road and bus network. Bus Onnects will help a little, but we desperately need ML to help take the pressure off the bus network.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Aye. Buses work if youre on a straight line to your destinaton and frequency is high.

    If not, forget it.

    Most of us forget it.

    Was chatting to a young someone that commutes to TCD from South Dublin.

    They get the bus, but once they pass their driving test, its car all the way.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭G_R


    Driving to TCD would be insanity.

    Doesn't TCD have something like 99% of it's students/staff arriving by active travel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭gjim




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    It was cancelled in 2011 or rather I should say the planning stage was cancelled, Varadkar announced it, bad mistake they should have kept it limping along for a couple of years in the planning stage. Yes would have cost a bit of money but should not have bottled it .



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The Luas Cross City line was built over it. Where some of the stations were meant to go.

    Plus it was designed to integrate with Dart Underground which has also largely been cancelled.

    It was a very over complicated and complex design, the Metrolink is a far more realistic and achievable design with nice integration with the new DART+ project.

    Of course I would have loved if MetroNorth went ahead, specially as unlike ML it had a stop near my home. But ML is a better design now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Mr_Messy


    There is a tunnel already there that can get people from Swords to the City Centre in less than 30mins. If the primary purpose of Metrolink is to service Swords than it should be built elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,746 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    🙄🙄

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,854 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    s

    no, but you would wonder if ML is built, would they reduce the tram length to stop the OCB blockages with the current super long trams...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,854 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Yeah and to the south city sandyford, leopardstown, cherry wood? They decided not to build the few km tunnel that would have enabled even quicker access to there than metrolink.... and taken off 30 stops...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,746 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The answer to that is not shorter trams, it's fewer cars

    (not sure if sarcastic)

    Scrap the cap!



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,175 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    A road tunnel from Coolock to congested Docklands with no intermediate access is no substitute for a rail tunnel for the whole northside with frequent stops. And they aren't going to be digging an Luas up for Metro, not sure where that came from.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    Right, they're more Daffy Duck. The luas is a very a limited system that was passed off as a cheap metro alternative, rather than conceived of as a genuine continental style tram network with multiple services criss-crossing the city.

    Its still thought of that way, as a bargain basement metro, with only two over-long lines, over-long vehicles and no plans for a large web-like network like Prague or Amsterdam or Brussels.

    The luas is an exceptionally poor return on a massive economic boom. Your views are sadly typical of the low standards we accept as a country.



Advertisement