Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
17477487507527531266

Comments

  • Posts: 0 Nola Scary Hair


    Lenny Murphy was an out of control psychotic lunatic who cared little if he was caught or not. He would have risen rapidly through the ranks of Hamas....

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,637 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    More evidence that Israel has no interest in peace.

    Israel is a genocidal rogue state.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,637 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    More than 1 journalist a day has been killed in the conflict by Israel.

    There were videos last week of Palestinan journalists receding calls telling them the IDF knew where their houses were.




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭KilOit


    It was very sad to see the Israeli who helped at the bus stop get executed by the IDF



  • Registered Users Posts: 41 weary1


    Sad but very predictable, the Israeli guy, Yuval Doron Castleman, was kneeling with his hands up when the IDF riddled him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    There is a strong suspicion that some journalists have been deliberately assassinated by the regime : the death toll of journalists has surely been way too high to be accidental (perhaps Israel attempting to control the media narrative in the region). By contrast, only ten journalists or photographers have been killed in the Russo-Ukrainian conflict in nearly two years of war.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,520 ✭✭✭jmreire


    "The Arab world will stand with us" sure they will, they will do everything for you, except allow you to come to their Country's. Because every Country that accepted Palestinians, in the past, even Muslim Countries paid a very dear price for it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,277 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Yet hamas are the ones who broke the ceasefire early by firing rockets into Israel arent they? If they wanted peace they could have just not done that? But they don't want peace, they say they don't. They said "the carnage in Gaza is needed". But yeah, it's all Israels fault 🙄


    Easy to agree to things you know have no chance of happening



  • Posts: 0 Nola Scary Hair


    "Perhaps he might be more suited to the IDF."

    I doubt it. Murphy's fondness for using knives on his unfortunate victims would have ensured he would have passed Hamas' entrance test with flying colours.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,637 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Yet hamas are the ones who broke the ceasefire early by firing rockets into Israel arent they? 

    I'd say the families of the various people shot and killed by IDF soldiers during the ceasefire would beg to differ, wouldn't you? Some of these included children under the age of ten, and a boy outside an Israeli detention center having gone there to welcome a family member who was being released as part of the hostage swaps.

    Or would you not think that the taking of 160 Palestinians by Israel during the ceasefire would have constituted breaking it no?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,277 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Were those actions against the terms of the ceasefire? If not then they didn't break it. Hamas killed people in Jerusalem and that also wasn't considered breaking it because it didn't apply there. Hamas fired the first rocket and therefore fighting resumed. This is after they violated some of the terms of the hostage release agreements also, and fired rockets just minutes into the start of the ceasefire too, which could have been enough for fighting to resume if Israel decided to do so, but they didnt. But again, yeah, all Israels fault 🙄


    It's a fact that Hamas don't want a truce and they did their best to restart fighting, first by not sticking to the hostage release plan, or the terms, then by claiming an attack in jerusalem and in the end succeeded by firing rockets at israel. Again, they are more than willing to enthusiastically offer up the lives of their fellow Palestinians. No chance of peace while hamas are around.

    Post edited by ceadaoin. on


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,763 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Once again both sides violated the truce.

    Also Bibi was just as keen as Hamas to continue the war. Regev indirectly admitted it in an interview, and Bibi himself has stated it publicly that the war would start again in order to try and complete his goal. I get you are pro Israeli but let's not distort the facts of the situation because it suits your position.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,633 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,633 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,225 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Back to murder & mayhem - I suppose it's what drives Israel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,637 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The act of shooting civilians by IDF soldiers in Gaza absolutely violated the terms of the ceasefire. Or if you think not, you should ask why would such a term not have been included. Who would have rejected it.

    Ceasefire negotiators offered solution options to both sides in the early days of the war. Hamas accepted 3 of the options, Israel accepted none.

    You're pushing a narrative that Hamas is the sole opposition to peace when Israel time and time again has rejected choosing that option and is responsible for the vast amount of deaths in the conflict. For the gazillionth time, I'm not saying Hamas are innocent, but they are at this point most influential in being used by Israel to justify the killing of what is now eight thousand children in less than 8 weeks. Eight thousand!!!

    We've now seen in our own lifetimes how what happened in Nazi Germany happened. Millions of people who buy in to the narrative pushed by the oppressor to justify the oppression and butchering of an entire group of people. Each of us only know ourselves exactly our own position on this matter, and the justification for it. But as billions of people judged Nazi's and the people of Germany for the actions of the Nazi party during WW2, so too are billions of people judging those tacitly or outwardly encouraging Israel to do what it is doing. And that includes everyone from Israeli media, to Israeli's who are having watch parties cheering on the bombs hitting Gaza, to Piers Morgan, to EU and UK politicians, to Joe Biden and the rest of the craven political group in the US who has allowed itself to be co-opted by AIPAC and the likes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    A well known Jewish lawyer in the UK makes the interesting point today that the British right wing press (Andrew Neil etc) claiming that the interests of Jewish people and Israel are the exact same thing and that anyone who criticises Israel is therefore anti-Semitic, is actually extremely dangerous stuff. It means thus that all Jewish people can be directly linked to the numerous war crimes of the regime and held responsible for them - leaving them wide open in fact to anti-Semitic attacks and criticism, rather than protecting them from it.

    He points out too that many of these right wing British rags are traditionally no friends of Jewish people and are merely being highly opportunistic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Here's the red flags to begin with:

    * regime

    * numerous war crimes - accepted a statement of fact

    And even if true - how does that 'directly link' someone to alleged war crimes? Someone can write guff like that but then not join the dots and hope people won't notice. Seems clever but doesn't stand up to any scrutiny.

    I might share in interest in seeing X achieved, that doesn't mean if someone commits a crime to achieve it I am 'directly linked' to the crime. I have no hand or part in the crime. I might want to see X achieved but not by the same means.

    A lawyer should know that would never stand up in court, but knows how to pull the wool over peoples eyes with a clever sounding argument.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,793 ✭✭✭Rezident


    The Palestine protestors in Dublin today are shouting "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free"


    Now that we know that this basically means: 'kill the Jews', I wonder how so many in Ireland have become so radicalised to such hatred. No good will come of this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    If Israel's actions in Gaza and the interests of all Jewish people are the exact same thing, then all Jewish people are responsible for everything that that has happened in Gaza since October 7th, correct?

    That is the point he is making - and as a Jewish man, he is trying to disassociate himself from this very dangerous narrative.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Nope. You just ignored all the points previously put to you and repeated his fallacy.

    This is what I wrote:

    I might share in interest in seeing X achieved, that doesn't mean if someone commits a crime to achieve it I am 'directly linked' to the crime. I have no hand or part in the crime. I might want to see X achieved but not by the same means.

    Where is the connection between the IF... interests and THEN responsible. There isn't one. It isn't there. It isn't explained. There is zero foundation to the claim, it is incoherent.

    It is argument by assertion, attempting a con job.

    It doesn't exist. That lawyer can state it but with absolutely zero attempt to justify it, it is self discrediting.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    You admit then that the Israel and the IDF may be going against the interests of Jewish people by killing civilians in Gaza? Andrew Neil and the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph certainly aren't doing that - they say that anyone who criticises the actions of Israel in Gaza is doing so for anti-Semitic reasons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭NSAman


    You criticise Russia for bombing and invading Ukraine.

    are there any parallels in relation to Israel bombing Gaza? Yes I hate Hamas. What I don’t condone at all is the demolition of homes, as evidenced this morning on TV. Israel can claim that they are “targeting” Hamas, but I don’t think the killing is civilians back this up.

    what is Israel end game?



  • Registered Users Posts: 608 ✭✭✭cheese sandwich


    Are there more marches today supporting the child murderers and mass rapists of Hamas? How lovely



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Nope again.

    Where is that admitted by me?

    Find me that post.

    Because otherwise it comes across as a prejudicial misreprsentation.

    Therefore I am doubtful in what you claim is said by others in the media as accurate. I suspect it to be a lot more nuanced than that.

    For sure some criticism of Israel is motivated by anti semitism. Some criticism of Isrsel is motivated by a different sort of anti Western hate eg the PBP types and Daly Wallace etc. That doesnt mean all criticism is but the above are significant factors.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,827 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    “Between the sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty.”

    Would you say that quote means 'kill the Palestinians'?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    One of the main points the lawyer makes is that the UK right wing press are no friends of Israel. It's all performative put on nonsense for clicks and sales...quite a few of them probably 'are' anti-Semitic or have anti-Semitic friends and privately couldn't give a toss about Israel. Yes, they are that cynical.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Well thats a separate point and difficult to state any thing with certainty.

    For the lawyer to say that it is 'all' performative? Really?

    Then undermine that claim with quite a few... some etc etc etc

    But thats a red flag that those are weasel words which undermine the claim.

    Im sure there are some people in journalism who approach issues purely based on sales. And there could be other reasons why Israels conduct is defended ... out of solidarity for being possible targets of Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. Enemy of my enemy is my friend.

    You could be even more cynical than that, and theorise that it is possible to be pro Israel, approve of a secure homeland for Jews and yet also indulge in a sort of weak snobbish anti semitism based on a superiority complex.

    As opposed to Hamas or SS kill all the Jews levels of anti semitism based on hate.

    This lawyer seems to big on grand declarations and short on specifics.. i would be very doubtful of any such general declarations from that source.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭NSAman


    If every man woman and child in Athlone was killed by another outside state what would be the reaction of Ireland?

    that’s what has happened in Gaza



Advertisement