Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

18283858788250

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,037 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Just watching the Fulham Wolves game as a total neutral observer - and I really have to wonder if they need to give a good revision to the rules and punishments to actually reflect the original intent of those rules?

    Fulham just got and scored a pen - fair pen, there was a foul just inside the corner of the box, no issue. But with the bar for what rightfully earns a penalty being so low, and the impact of its result being so high, does there need to be a rebalance? Should there be tiers of punishment for fouls in the box depending on where it is? Like, should there be a new extra box within the box maybe? So maybe a foul in the 'outer' one results in a penalty-style free shot at goal from the point of the foul, without other players allowed in the box? Meanwhile fouls within the new inner box stay as normal. Then to tidy up the flagrant exceptions, anything that's ruled a denial of clear goalscoring opportunity - as that rule already stands - even in the outer box is a regular pen. For simplicity, it could be done by just slightly expanding the size of the keepers area lines.

    Just a thought, but it seems so weird that so many games turn entirely on really innocuous little moments in positions of little to no danger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,196 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Thought of that before myself - lads getting tripped with their back to goal on the edge of the box getting their team a massive opportunity.

    A penalty should be awarded for denying a clear goalscoring opportunity within the box - there’s already rules for bookings on this so it should in theory be easy to implement. Anything else could result in an indirect free kick which would still be a big opportunity, but a little more balanced to the offence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,037 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    And we just had our 3rd penalty of the game, and it was another one where the attacker (Wilson) hadn't a hope in hell of scoring from where he picked up the ball, running towards the edge of the box away from goal. The punishment is just so high for passages of play that were never likely to result in goals. Whatever the solution, it just feels like the balance is wrong now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,610 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    There’s another one there for Fulham. The player “winning” the penalty by ensuring he makes contact with the defender and then dives. The attacking player in both those incidents are initiating the contact that brings about the penalty.


    Neither should be a penalty but under current culture they are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭omega man


    Shocking pen decision there for Fulham. Wasn’t given on field by ref and surely not an error. Sick of VAR at this point…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,538 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    O'Neil is going to go mental...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,330 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    oneill might muse on his subs ceding territory to Fulham.


    Doyle for cunha didn’t work



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,037 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    So this seems to have been a good game to make this comment on - Fulham win the game thanks to 2 penalties from situations of little to no danger.

    If the above solution was used, Fulham would instead have had 2 free shots at goal, one from the corner of the box, and one from over towards the side of the box, probably reflective of the actual situation denied by the foul. Meanwhile, Wolves would've had one regular penalty for denial of clear goalscoring opportunity, as the Wolves player was at the edge of the box but clean through.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,330 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Yeah it’s a good idea. Handball rule will be changed eventually aswell. I’d suggest

    ball to hand in pen area- indirect free kick

    hand to ball in the pen area - penalty

    any handball stopping a goal- decision ; goal (like a penalty try in rugby)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,295 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Game week 13 Table


    ******



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,037 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Yeah, handball and offside rules both need work I think. Handballs are just a mess and right now nobody knows what is or isn't a handball, while offside currently ignores a fundamental part of how the rule was constructed in the first place - that you can actually see the advantage gained. Sounds like that inverted version of offside is at least being trialed soon though, where the attacker has to be fully beyond the defender to be offside, which feels like a better balance anyway. An attacker still has so much more to do, so it feels wrong to be killing attacks at the earliest opportunity without an advantage you can actually see with the naked eye. Players could then go back to just focusing on being level as the line, the way they'll have played at all levels since they were kids



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,178 ✭✭✭chicorytip




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭crossman47


    I think tonights game reinforces my point. Penalties are being given for nothing and VAR is the primary culprit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,178 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    Two of the softest penalty awards tonight - Fulham v Wolves.

    I think refs, once instructed by VAR to review incidents on the pitchside monitor, feel compelled to reverse their original decisions even when that's clearly the wrong course of action. I've never seen a ref disregard the video replay and stick to his guns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,330 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Thank you, I think that is the most underrated goal in PL history, it doesn’t look as good as Rooney’s or Garnachos but technically it’s more difficult.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Unearthly


    On the topic of bicycle kicks, Rivaldo 87th minute winner to get Barca CL football was a classic as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,502 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    To complete a hattrick as well, that was incredible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,502 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    Wolves are getting absolutely ridden by refs/VAR this season. That first penalty tonight and not sending Vinicius off were a joke.



  • Site Banned Posts: 20,685 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    But most of those fouls are braindead defending. They're very easy to not concede and players know the risks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,037 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Just because the players know that really cheap pens can be given away in areas of minimal danger, doesn't mean the rule and reffing can't be better. Ideally you want your rules to actually reflect the danger of the situation being denied by the foul.

    If for instance there was a rule that any foul right on the centre circle in the middle of the pitch resulted in a penalty, the obvious thing to say is "don't commit any tackles on the centre circle", which would be correct, but wouldn't address the fact that it's a dumb rule.

    We just see games decided by these events so often now as a result of var looking at absolutely every piece of subtle contact in slow motion, that it feels a rebalancing of what they're actually trying to achieve is in order.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,510 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    Wolves robbed again imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,389 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm



    This was one of the penalties.

    Wolves must have had 10 wrong VAR calls against them already this season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,100 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    That penalty decision was terrible. Wolves have had a few very bad calls against them this year. All late in the game to affect the result too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,952 ✭✭✭✭Osmosis Jones


    Chelsea equidistant from Top 4 and from Everton who just received a 10 point deduction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,516 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    42 penalties in 130 games, so 0.32 penalties per game.

    Premier League - Penalties received | Transfermarkt

    Is that unusual?

    Picking some years at random pre-var, maybe someone can do a deeper dive.

    2016/17 Premier League - Penalties received | Transfermarkt 106/380 = 0.28.

    2012/13 Premier League - Penalties received | Transfermarkt 85/380 = 0.22.

    2009/10 Premier League - Penalties received | Transfermarkt 109/380 = 0.29.

    So it looks higher than previous years, but maybe not excessively so and there is still time for it to regress to the long term mean (or to get more out of line).

    One standout is that the current conversion rate appears off the scale compared to those earlier years. Only 3 of this years 42 have been missed (Haaland, Salah (scored rebound) and someone from Chelsea?). So more penalties combined with an unprecedented conversion rate means penalties having a larger influence on results.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭jacool


    FYI - Its on target for 122 by that data, i.e. 13 more than the next closest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,644 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    League (EPL/UEFA/FIFA) want goals.

    Makey up goals are OK, so long as the numbers are up. They can till out stats that player x is the greatest ever because he's scored more goals than player Y back in 1989.

    All built on smoke and mirrors. Teams should be allowed to defend, but that is being banned almost now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,797 ✭✭✭Ottoman_1000


    I would agree with that sentiment, but then we see goals been disallowed every week because someone's big toe is off-side and then I question myself all over again!ha



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,538 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Arsenal playing some serious stuff here



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,363 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    Best team in the league currently.

    Literally the only question about them is whether the backline has too many mistakes in it.

    If they tighten those up, Declan Rice should mean no collapse like last season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    They would want to be showing it with the amount of money they spent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭djan


    Nothing too wild, being the 4th biggest spender over the past 5 years behind Chelsea, United and City with a few million over Spurs who are in 5th.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,979 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Playing Rashford on the right won’t do anything for his confidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,217 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 33,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Off the bar, not sure how Newcastle aren't ahead, battering United.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,979 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Yeah. But when he had it last year, he was flying.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 33,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    He is playing like he doesn't give a shíte. I wouldn't have him in my way.

    Newcastle get their deserved lead.

    I fully expect United to take Rashford off now. He's a passenger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,979 ✭✭✭doc_17


    What the hell did AWB think was gonna happen in the situation? Brutal player.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 33,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Schar really has the freedom of the park.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 33,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Rashford and Martial off, no surprise.

    Hojlund and Antony on.

    Not sure they will make enough of a difference. Newcastle want it more, United look all over the place but it is still only 1-0 and the door is being left open for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,363 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    As one-sided a 1-0 as you'll see so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,217 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    A sorry sight to see a lot of these fellas out there phoning it in and a manager showing no sign of learning and looking more and more lost at sea.

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,363 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    Fernandes, Shaw and Maguire keeping Utd from a shellacking here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,693 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    To be fair to Maguire, he has been giving his all any time I've seen him this season. Solid yellow for his troubles there.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 33,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    That was a very good block in fairness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,363 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    A well coached team versus a not-so-well coached team.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 33,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    If Newcastle get a second, they could easily get 3 or 4. United have shown nothing going forward but at 1-0 they are still only a kick of a ball from an undeserved draw.

    An interesting last 15 to come.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,217 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    We can't get out of our half 😂

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,363 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    There's a reason.

    'Sit back, counter attacking, rely on individual brilliance' football means Maguire has protection. As soon as Utd try to play like a top team, he'll be found out again.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement