Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
19659669689709711067

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 41 notJoeJoe


    In that table, per capita, China emits less than the the US and the EU. Of course one of the largest countries (by land area and population) will emit more CO2! Plus, it's unfair to blame China for all the pollutants, when the factories that pump out all this carbon are owned by the US and the EU. The reason they emit less now is because they exported all their manufacturing overseas because it was cheaper than paying their workers a living wage to stop them from striking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 562 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Per capita is a total red herring. Apparently C02 is bad for the atmosphere. The atmosphere doesn't care where it comes from. China willingly accepted to be the world's factory, their pig, their farm.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,968 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Of course it's worth remembering that China is run by the gangster CCCP.

    Your average citizen (inmate) has zero say in how the country is run.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭ps200306


    Our Irish Energy Bot fans are no longer posting so, in memoriam:

    The entire week doesn't look much better:

    The upward spike toward the end is because of the low pressure system to our south:


    ... but that ridge of high pressure to the south of Iceland will bring slack winds back to us in a couple of days:


    One of the mantras of the wind energy fans is that "the wind is always blowing somewhere". But it's clear that synoptic-scale systems can easily span the British Isles and the near continent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande



    That is true. You can't paint them all with the one brush. I am looking at local eNGOs, getting hold of their accounts takes 18 to 24 months. eNGOs are a cottage industry in this country, that revolve around funding from the Irish taxpayer (IEN), EU and private bundlers such as the European Climate Foundation (ECF). There is a tiered structure in place that dictates industry marketing. On the top tier you will find the multinationals like Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, Oxfam, Climate Action Network, & 350.org. These organizations provide much of the material for the mid-tier level NGOs such as An Taisce, Christian charities (e.g. Trocaire, Christian Aid) and the Irish franchise of Friends of the Earth. The bottom tier are typically facebook groups, local projects, students, Universities (raise their profile types and grants for research), those that offer sustainability training courses and law-fare groups like Friends of the Irish environment. It's at this layer you will find much of the duplication.

    Here is an example of bottom tier grassroots, notice in this example the link to 350.org. That particular link in the facebook page is now 404. During the Thunberg campaign in 2019, this organisation was very active soliciting funds. In fact I have noticed when trawling around through the bottom tier, there are quite a few of these grassroots front pages all with Donate Now, whose business model seems to be to get you to sign up to email or newsletter subscriptions from the top tier eNGOs, the newsletter is used to try convert you into a paying customer. i.e. Donate Now. I would like to know what their conversion rate for paying customers is.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 562 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    The Company That's Turning Old Wind Turbine Blades Into Fuel (businessinsider.com)

    Twenty years life they have and now they're being burnt in Germany's cement kilns.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,968 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Obviously there is a constant drive to raise funds.

    Running an office and paying staff puts a strain on finances.

    Core funding is a difficulty for the smaller groups.

    Most of the funding is project related IE. An Taisce Green Schools.

    From a Government point of view reducing duplication and getting value for taxpayers money should be a priority.

    I'm not familiar with the Donate Now model so I don't know what the conversion rate is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,109 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    China burns more coal than the rest of the world combined. 2021 China`s energy related greenhose gases increased by 6% compared to the previous year. For June 2022 electricity generated by their coal burning plants was 14% higher than for June 2021.

    But when it comes to economies China are not alone in using coal as a cheap source of enrergy. Germany, the green motherland, increased their use of coal by 19% (21 million tonne) in 2021.



    "It`s the economy stupid" James Carville 1992.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,550 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Our local school is a green school. And from what I can see it means no bins and children bring their rubbish home



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,968 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I just used Green Schools as an example of an environmental project.

    If that's what you think it amounts to have a look at this link or maybe ask the teacher or a kid.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    There are various YouTube videos that show cumilative CO2 emissions over time, and one common theme is how China in circa 30 years has gone from almost nowhere to coming close to matching what the US pumped out in 170 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Ours have decided that the children need to bring their own towels in to dry their hands instead of using hand dryers.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant



    Some sense at the COP28. You may not agree with his message but he's not wrong.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 562 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    It roughly translates into alot of schools are penny pinching and looked for a way to cut out down their bin charges. At the same time I noticed the annual begging letters home looking even more money.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,109 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    At least China, India and Japan have been somewhat honest in that they made it clear that for the sake of their economies they were going to keep using coal.

    Unlike the green motherland, Germany, they weren`t preaching to the rest of the world as to how everybody should follow their example to then go full circle on coal when their economy was under threat. Even adding to the hypocrisy of green concerns being emissions by shutting down the last of their nuclear plants while doing it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    No it is not and we absolutely do not need to do this. We are a country of 5 millions of people in case you are struggling with math. Even if we all disappeared overnight effect on climate or whatever carbon nonsense will be zero.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Funny that you talk about EU as a whole when it is a bunch of countries with very different approach to the topic at hand. Why exactly we have to go on a crazy ride when some EU members like Germany and Poland are opening more coal burning plants?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    I can see this in the case of Cristian charities, there will always have been people who need assistance and advertising to remind people that people need assistance costs money as does running staff and office. Trocaire and Cristian Aid are members of the UNs Climate Action Network. The problem with the climate scam is the money gets redirected from helping people to the ruinables industry, as the charities are discovering the shell game, resources are redirected from tackling poverty to tackling climate change.

    Trócaire described the pledge as “robbing Peter to pay Paul”.

    Trócaire is deeply disappointed that the pledge is not additional money to that which was pledged at the Glasgow Cop, three years ago,” said head of policy, Siobhan Curran.

    <snip>

    Mr Varadkar said the world was well past the point of preventing climate change but urgent action could limit its extent and mitigate its worst effects.

    “We have to prioritise investment in energy access and low carbon development for the most vulnerable countries,” he said.

    “This COP must also set us on a clear path to a safe and planned reduction in the use of fossil fuels.” source

    If you look at an eNGO like Greenpeace, the business model has become not to solve problems, but, to create campaigns to drive funding. Greenpeace is nearly ~$350 million per annum multinational NGO. The "solutions" proposed by it's campaigns are never intended to solve the issue.

    Dr. Chris Rose was a strategic advisor to Greenpeace International and is an expert on environmental campaigning. He wrote a book on environmental campaigning called How to Win Campaigns. Dr. Rose’s recommendations can be summarized as follows (after a list from page 7 of the report):


    1. Choose a campaigning issue that you label as catastrophic and urgent.


    2. Choose a villain (enemy agent) who can’t put up much of a defense and a sympathetic victim.


    3. You (the good guy) propose a plausible solution to the campaign issue and accuse the villain (for selfish reasons) of preventing the solution from being implemented.


    4. Issue a call to action and provide a way for people to become engaged (protest marches, face painting, financial contributions, etc.), so that they can become committed to the campaign.


    5. Choose media outlets where you control the narrative. Don’t debate with the bad guys. source

    This is why we see marketing slogan refreshes every few years, global cooling, acid rain, ozone, global warming, climate change, climate emergency, global boiling etc., all to raise money, otherwise the public loses interest, the money goes away. The eNGOs have corrupted science, by explicitly attributing weather events as proof of climate change. They have stated their explicit goal is to collect events as part of a law-fare campaigns against governments (i.e. tax-payers). eNGOs such as Covering Climate Now (RTE is a partner) provide environmental correspondents across the Irish media with an easy living.

    The top tier provide the marketing material for the mid tier, the bottom tier can then apply for government grants for studies, plus raise funds for the top tier. It's the circular economy.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 562 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    The self-styled NGO withdrawing planning appeals for cash (rte.ie)

    Environmental NGOs (eNGO) making up dubious claims about developments in order to get a payout. We've a shortage of housing laced with affordability issues and these eNGOs are stymieing development and increasing prices. What a wonderful country we live in - eh?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭KildareP


    If China's emissions are going to be attributed to us because we're the ultimate end user of the goods they produce, and the burning of Saudi Arabian oil or Colombian coal for energy or heat here has its emissions attributed solely to us, then why are all Irish-based agricultural emissions also attributed solely to us when we ultimately export a large proportion of what we grow and produce to other countries? Either you account for the emissions at source or you account for them at the point of use.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭creedp


    Unbelievable and so cynical stuff really but not really surprising which is why people will start to ignore the pleadings of these ever increasing number of eNGOs. In reality for many its all about devising ways of screwing money from the gullible public for their own largesse.

    TBH are these guys any better than the so called scumbags that ran riot in Dublin recently? Of course there is a long history in this country of treating white collar scumbags in a far more leniant fashion.

    In fairness no need to reinvemt the wheel here. Thers's a tried and trusted model to follow a la the charities who have developed into sophisticated money raising machines adept at using every opportunity to soak cash from donors. More is never enough, you donate for a good cause and next you're pushed to sign up to a DD so you can follow how your few bob is improving the life of some random person in the some far flung location. However, now you're in their system you'll be bombarded for ever more with email and letters looking for more and more cynically lashing on images of poor kids etc to maximise the possibility of repeat donations from a captive audience. How could any decent person say no?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,550 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Thanks. I've kids in the school, and on the board of management. The "green school" thing is a box ticking exercise there and part of that ticking is to bring your rubbish home. The school is being extended and no renewables being put in, just the existing boiler being upgraded. Some of the green areas now built on too making the yard smaller. No school bus, etc. Yet the green flag flies proudly until they have to reapply (which sounds like a scam) in 18 months



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭creedp


    No you see emissions based taxes, levies are just cycical ways to screw the taxpayers on the double while brainwashing them into thinking there is no other way to stop them boiling alive. The good auld polluter pays principle should really be renamed the polluter pays many times over principle😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,968 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Calling those guys an ENGO is like calling the local shebeen a public house.

    They are not a charity and certainly not in receipt of Government funding.

    If you read through the link you will see they are roundly condemned by a representative of the real ENGO sector.

    They are completely irrelevant to the discussion in hand and I don't know why you are using them as an example of an ENGO.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭creedp


    You are correct but they are IMO a pertinent example of how, as the profileration of NGOs increases, this muddying of the waters makes it more difficult to identify the wood from the trees resulting in a when in doubt ignore response.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    At some point climate "science" stopped being scientific. 🌱🐄💨🔄🌱 #... | Farming | TikTok

    How can grass go into an anaerobic digester for biofuels and be classed as "green", yet the same grass through a cow is worse than two return trips to Dubai.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,968 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Thanks for that but surely the pertinent point is that they are not ENGOs at all and therefore not part of any proliferation.

    In the fashion business they would be regarded as counterfeit goods.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,968 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    This discussion arose from a post pointing out that there are more than 32,000 charities/NGOs in Ireland who share €6bn in Government funding annually.

    Obviously the sum given to ENGOs is a tiny fraction of that total.

    I have already stated that there should be scrutiny of all organisations receiving public funds.

    I have also said that duplication should be addressed.

    I'm not here to defend the record of every NGO in the country and certainly not Greenpeace who left Ireland in 1997 and never received Government funding anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,787 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    deleted



  • Advertisement
Advertisement