Immigration to Ireland - policies, challenges, and solutions *Read OP before posting*

This is grasping at straws, you are basically saying AS must claim asylum in the first safe country they arrive, in as many words. Regardless, this particular regulation isn’t worth the paper it’s written on because it’s completely ignored, from looking at the Instagram of many of these poor unfortunate lads who are travelling across Europe on a mighty gaunt, asylum shopping in multiple countries until they will eventually settle in the one with the best welfare entitlements and citizenship requirements. Ireland.

Would you be in favour of enforcing the Dublin regulation as it is or?

OK. That's your issue where you negatively stereotype all non Irish people.

A noticeable shift in policy from the government today - basically telling single male asylum seekers to stay away.

Quite a development. And breaking international law again.

The numbers are down on this time last year, they did decrease for 5 months, but then started to come up again.By the end of the year they will be a bit lower then last year.

I don't think we have to leave the EU to have more sensible migration policies.

I don't think the EU is anything to do with us accepting too many UKR refugees - we choose that ourself.

We are free to remove EU citizens who can't take care of themselves, under current rules - we choose not to do that.

Take Denmark as an example: within the EU, they have policies to severly reduce AS.

Delete, sorry.

Jozef Puska and his family, for example.

Under which piece EU legislation can they be removed? AFAIK he came to Ireland, worked and then was put on disability following accident in the workplace.

What?

Seriously? You think I have comprehension issues?

There is absolutely no international law whatsoever that states they must apply for asylum the first country they reach.

It is a right to apply for asylum in wherever country they wish to.

Dublin regulations are in relation to multiple claimants.

tell me if I can make this clearer for you?

I'm in favour of all laws being enforced.

Do you reckon asylum seekers would be more inclined to head to Denmark with their new 'crackdown' on asylum seekers.

Or do you reckon they'll try their luck in Ireland where the minister whose brief it is still hopes to be able to give them keys to their own pad after 4 months?

Tough one to call, innit?!

But they do deport cut off those who are denied asylum from benefits and the likes,

The Danes had no problem telling their own citizens who married failed asylum seekers to leave too ,many Danes actually ended up moving to Sweden with a foreign partner .

“A rejected asylum seeker has had his application processed by the independent refugee board with a judge at the end of the table. Here, after a thorough individual assessment, it has been concluded that the person does not have a need for protection. Then you have to travel home. This is how it should be in a legal society,” the Minister pointed out.

He emphasized that it is not easy to get rejected asylum seekers deported, adding that; fortunately, the figures reveal that things have gone in the right direction in recent years.

The Immigration and Integration Minister said that it costs Danish society millions when people whose asylum applications have been rejected do not respect the decision that they must leave the country.

We pay more social welfare, housing and medical cards,the Danes don't take crap ,you refuse danish language classes and job training social welfare is cut and you face Deportation.

Unlike here where Deportation is quite rare and no failed asylum seekers don't just leave

They don't need that crap,

It's the model we should be adopting