Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Meghan is about “looks”. The Duke of Westminster and Olivia Henson are about substance. Meghan’s a reminder of the sow’s ear and silk purse metaphor.

Prince Harry agrees as well and he was the one there.

No he doesn't.

The consequences are still the same for victims of racism whether that be described politely as unconscious bigotry or conscious bigotry.

White mansplaining of racism to victims is always a car crash never worth watching.

The man said his wife never called his family racist.

Consequences? What consequences precisely?

You need me to explain to you the consequences of racism?

Really?

Communication is in the interpretation - try harder if you wish to be understood

Maybe by Scabies book but not by Harry it isn’t and besides it was refuted very clearly - you just want it spelt out in big letters and read slowly out loud

There is no racism- again a false narrative from you

..

Endgame not doing at all well thank goodness - I hope everyone lost a whole heap of money on this nonsense

Its an interesting strategy in that it pretty much guarantees it will never be taken seriously in any future thread on any topic.

Very staged and why is she never seen with her children? Are they at home all the time or something?

Exactly. You don't know her. I don't know her. Neither of us were there behind closed doors to know what happened, what was said, how it was said etc yet you seem determined to believe she was subjected to racism. We have no context as outlined earlier but I am more than happy to watch, read and listen to all of these supposed receipts, texts and emails which we were told were readily available but which have never materialised. If I was someone who had it in for royal individuals and their monarchy then I'd be feeling peeved and short changed quite frankly.

I was quite happy to watch their series to find out how she personally felt, I was happy to read his book and maybe glean some information about what happened and get solid proof that someone is a racist and I was happy to listen to any pod cast where she explained her experiences of racism. We got nothing.

You seem bent on suggesting anyone being cynical, disbelieving or skeptical about it all is some kind of royalist whereas in reality it's simply asking where the beef is in what looks to be a nothing burger, one which they've been climbing down on ever since.

Right, right because of kids giving nazi salutes 90 years ago after listening to their balmpot Uncle and hiring policies which ended 50 years ago. Gotcha, very compelling. Speaking of logic how is this for a logical fallacy. In the space of two years, a divorced American actress of mixed race goes from dating to marrying a Prince from a white family where despite his Gan Gan being the head of the Church there is no problem with them marrying. She says she wants to hit the ground running as a working royal so is, despite her husband being 6th in line, given a multi million pound wedding which is broadcast worldwide, property, adulation, support, advice, options, staff, titles, patronages, millions for outfits etc. Is then able to step down and go commercial after only 18 months in the role. Is not given, according to her, anything to sign which would prevent her from speaking about what was a whirlwind and difficult few years for her.

It does not follow, in a family which is trained to be guarded, wary and suspicious of outsiders and agendas, that despite all of the above that some people in "the family she never had" wondered if their prospective niece/nephew/grandson/granddaughter might have a darker complexion via their white/ginger son/brother in law and their mixed race daughter in law/sister in law are racist because if they were they wouldn't even be discussing it in the first place because nobody of mixed race would be allowed or tolerated to marry into that family at all.

White mansplaining 😂😂😂 rabbit hole indeed.

You’re a royalist now if you’ve experienced people in your family smearing your name and character with lies and manipulation and have some empathy for other people (who happen to be royalty) that it is likely happening to in their family? Telpis. You have to admit though that it's quite a logical fallacy for a supposedly racist family to allow someone of mixed race to marry in.

To re-iterate for the umpteenth time she never said she experienced racism - it was the British Press who said that. Remember? It was unconscious bias apparently. Bias about what exactly though we simply don't know because despite a six hour doc, a book and promo interviews Harry never clarified what that bias was. Was it bias because she was American? That she was outspoken about political issues? That she was an actress? Harry should know. He was there. That lack of clarity is deliberate I think and we're supposed to think it was because of her race which is what you've clearly latched onto but, problematically for you, they have never explicitly stated that and they don’t seem to have any receipts either.

supposedly racist family to allow someone of mixed race to marry in.

Had they a Veto how does or would that work exactly?