Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
17677687707727731266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 21,564 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    You've never watched or read British media if you think it is overwhelmingly left wing. It is anything but. And there's a lot more people consuming that than there is watching US media. Which is almost exclusively Pro-Israel to the point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,522 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Dozens of public on the record statements from Israels leaders stating the intent to commit genocide of the Palestinian people, also note that complicity in genocide is a crime also and can be punished. Anyone denying intent has been shown and has been carried out is totally delusional


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,549 ✭✭✭wandererz


    This is some crazy stuff.

    Straight from the BBC.

    Israeli settler violence brings destruction and fear to West Bank as war rages

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67617920



  • Registered Users Posts: 78 ✭✭StarryPlough01


    @Akrasia, ^^^ Brilliant post above (#23125 06-12-2023 10:21pm). Thank you.

    WARNING: DISTRESSING CONTENT

    Watch video here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSocrm2q4zY

    'Phosphorus used in Gaza, British-Palestinian doctor says | Israel-Hamas war’


    MY NOTES:

    Prof Ghassan Abu-Sittah said:

    …. “During my time at Al Shifa hospital, it became apparent that 40-45% of all the wounded were going to be children. ….

    Starry: White phosphorous:

    “As time went (on), we saw the introduction of incendiary bombs where the patients would have over 40% of their total surface body area burnt with no other injury. And by the time Al Shifa collapsed there were over a hundred of these patients at Al Shifa hospital. And we started seeing phosphorous burns. ….

    “…. As a chemical burn, white phosphorous burns right through to the inner core of the body and only stops when they have no exposure to oxygen. …

    [Starry: ^ White phosphorous burns and goes right through you - it won’t stop burning. It was created to burn everything... animals, buildings... everything]

    ...

    Prof Ghassan Abu-Sittah continues:

    “My estimate is that there are between 700-900 children with amputations of limbs. On some of whom there are multiple amputations. …. [Scroll to: 5:45 / 22:36]

    Al Oud Hospital where he moved.  On the third day he witnessed a phone call from the Israeli army to the director of the hospital.  The director was informed that unless he evacuates the hospital within two hours, the hospital was going to be targeted.  Of course that was not going to be possible.  …. There were too many patients that were too difficult to move.


    ‘Gaza’s Indonesian Hospital in ruins after Israeli raid, days-long siege’

    ‘Nurses recall horror of Israeli raid, interrogations, saying troops beat and humiliated them as they refused to leave patients behind.’

    By Al Jazeera Staff

    Published On 25 Nov 202325 Nov 2023

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/25/gazas-indonesian-hospital-in-ruins-after-israeli-raid-days-long-siege

    “We had 25 people with broken pelvises who couldn’t be moved. They blew up this entrance, they shot the patients inside. They searched us one by one and scanned everyone’s faces. I told them I’m a nurse,” the male nurse from the emergency department told Al Jazeera.:

    Prof Ghassan Abu-Sittah moved back to Al Shifa Hospital. I stopped the video around 7:00 / 22:36.

    Post edited by StarryPlough01 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,365 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Non sequitur? Ah you were the one who brought Padraig Pearse into it, and now clinging to some non logic about what language it is chanted in.

    Seriously desperate stuff.

    An obvious deflection and sign you've lost the argument.

    With added whataboutery.

    From the river to the sea is a genocidal chant, because if it was put into practice now it would mean genocide for Jews. Judenrein

    As for your claims about 'deluding' - well it is obviously projection.

    We saw on October 7th what fate would befall Jews left to the tender mercies of a Palestine free "from the River to the Sea" without the protection of the state of Israel. Rape, murder, mutilation, torture, without regard to age, gender, civilian or military.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,375 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You have no "argument" other than head-in-the-sand blindly parroting Zionist propaganda. God knows why. Perhaps you don't like Palestinians or Muslims and you are happy to see another "team" reduce their numbers by whatever means necessary (There are Christian Palestinians too btw)

    You should try reading the post again. I don't know whether it is a lack of comprehension skills or just stubbornness and pretending you don't understand. You tried to claim that the chant (which is in English) is genocide because people chanting it sent others to rape and murder on 7th. I merely called out your lies. The people who sent out the fighters on 7th Oct are not in English speaking countries. Most are in Gaza. If there are people chanting it outside the GPO, then it isn't plausible that any of them sent out anyone else on 7th Oct to do anything other than maybe sending their kid out to get milk in Tesco.

    The attempted gaslighting is mental. Those calling for freedom from oppression for Palestinians are declared to be genocide, and those calling for Israel not to be hitting UN schools full of kids with airstrikes are declared to be anti-semitic and rape deniers. It's mental.

    People calling for the freedom of Palestine are no more genocidal than Patrick Pearse or anyone else calling for the freedom of Ireland. Them's the facts! If pointing that out exposes an uncomfortable hypocrisy for some, then so be it



  • Registered Users Posts: 78 ✭✭StarryPlough01



    Consider how life looks to the plain-bellied sneetchers. I guess that children's story was too deep for you;



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,365 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    They aren't just calling for the freedom of some notional Palestinian state but the destruction of the state of Israel. That means genocide to Jews. A preview of such a fate was given by Hamas on October 7th.

    So does that mean you are here "blindly parroting Hamas propaganda".

    "God knows why. Perhaps you don't like Jews and you are happy to see another "team" reduce their numbers by whatever means necessary."

    The word phrasings above are taken directly from your post - shows how easy it is to make a prejudicial bad faith argument against another poster doesn't it?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,479 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    This academic explains how killing large numbers of civilians and terrorising the Palestinian population is an actual pre-planned military strategy by the IDF and has been for nearly two decades:




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,375 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Since October 7th, I'd say that Israel has killed more "Jews" than Hamas. If that is your concern



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,564 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    From the river to the sea is a genocidal chant, because if it was put into practice now it would mean genocide for Jews. Judenrein

    From NPR

    In fact, a lot depends on context. The Likud Party of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in its original party platform in 1977 that "between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty."

    So the original Likud charter not only referred to the same geographical landmarks, but specifically said that there would be nothing else controlling the region only Israel.

    Why is the phrase genocidal when used by Palestinians, but not an issue when coupled with text literally claiming domain over Palestinian areas when used by the party of the current PM of Israel?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    The far left is not equally dangerous to the far right. It isn't even remotely close. I'm not on the far left by the way.

    What Hamas did on October 7th was an unequivocal evil.

    What Israel has been doing since is an unequivocal evil.

    This conflict didn't start on October 7th. It started in the 1940s.

    As the time has passed since October 7th, what has become more and more and more apparent is that Israel depends on the international far right and its tactics for its propaganda.

    We now have the absurd farce of the alliance of white supremacists and anti-Semites with Israel, and Israel openly embracing the narrative of Holocaust denial - the Holocaust of the Jewish people - in order to justify genocide against somebody else.

    Murdering 1200 people is apparently now worse than the extermination of 6 million.

    Israel is an integral part of the undermining of trust in politics and institutions and facts and context, both through its real world actions, and through its grotesque propaganda campaigns, where anybody who voices the mildest criticism of them is branded as an anti-Semite and piled on.

    Israel says Hamas are worse than the Nazis.

    Well, Israel are acting like the Nazis. Israel says such comparisons are offensive. Well, fcuk that. You don't get to call other people worse than the Nazis, and then act like Nazis yourselves and get to call that "offensive". Boo hoo.

    Israel are acting like the Nazis. Truth is an absolute defence in a statement.

    The Nazis believed they were the master race. Israel believes they are the chosen people. Both absurd ideas which are used to justify any barbarity.

    Israel's genocide is offensive to basic humanity. It is untrammelled evil.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,786 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,786 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    Perhaps one reason might be because Israel has the military might to achieve it but has chosen not to do so over many years unless attacked.

    If the roles were reversed …



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    "The far left is not equally dangerous to the far right. It isn't even remotely close. I'm not on the far left by the way."

    The tens of millions of people killed by Communist regimes in Russia, Cambodia, North Korea, China and Ukraine etc would suggest otherwise. Any fundamentalist belief system that seeks to impose those beliefs through violence and coercion is equally dangerous. In the last few hundred years those belief systems have included Islam, Hinduism, Christianity, National Socialism (right wing totalitarianism) and Communism (left wing totalitarianism). By any measure Communism wins the contest for the highest body count with somewhere between 100 and 150 million deaths caused in the last century.

    The fundamentalists in Israel are indeed as bad as the fundamentalists in Gaza. Both believe that they have a mandate from heaven (from their respective makey-up invisible friends) to exterminate the other. Both of their holy books give licence to commit mass murder. The civil institutions in Israel and a slight minority of the electorate are the only thing holding back the nutters there. Unfortunately what is happening in Gaza is on a smaller scale to what has happened in Sudan, Yemen, Syria and Ethiopia in recent years so it's not unique to this conflict. That's not to say that there isn't a sizable minority in Israel who would like to see the ethnic cleansing of both Gaza and the West Bank. I don't think that's in dispute. I strongly suspect that Netanyahu is part of that group. I think he's a vile human being.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,786 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    If Hamas give up all the hostages a ceasefire becomes only a matter of short time.


    They will not allow that to happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,375 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Not at all. Being fans of "one side" because they murder those on the "other side" is the remit of the zionists and their slavish supporters only.

    Most normal people are against killing regardless of the "side". People who complain about the ongoing murderous rampage are not complaining because they are against "your side" - they are just against the senseless murder, and it just so happens that it is "your side" who is doing it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    The BBC, Channel 4, the Guardian and the Financial Times are all left wing. I don't read the Tabloids but I presume that they are maintaining their usual right wing stance with a strong whiff of xenophobia, racism and imperialism.

    CNN are left wing. Fox is a joke. I honestly thought it was a comedy skit show the first time I saw it. The New York Times is generally strongly left wing but would have strong pro-Jewish leanings.


    The Irish media is very left wing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    I've said many times here that there are nutters in Israel and in the Israeli government who would happily commit genocide. My issue is that the IDF have the means and ability to do it but haven't (yet). Therefore if it is the policy of Israel why isn't it happening?



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    No, I know the story and understood it etc. I just don't see how it furthers your contention.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose



    "The claim was the Israel was formed peacefully."

    Hairsplitting. My claim was all countries have violent roots (or whatever the word was you used, I think 'formed' which is pretty vague.) However, Israel was founded by decree from the UN in 1948. Two things can be true, despite the misrepresentation. The US and Ireland were formed from violence, neither, however, had its statehood recognized by any international body, None existed at the time for the US, I forget what, if anything, the League of Nations would have said about Ireland in 1926, perhaps it was recognized.

    HTH



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    You appear to take your entire worldview from online right wing American sources.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


     I forget what, if anything, the League of Nations would have said about Ireland in 1926, perhaps it was recognized.

    We joined the League of Nations in 1923.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    What leads you to form that opinion?

    Is it my criticism of Israel and intense dislike of their Prime Minister?

    Is it my opinion that what's going on in the West Bank is ethnic cleansing?

    Is it my dislike of and contempt for religion?

    Is it by opinion that the current military campaign by Israel in Gaza will damage Israel's long term security and weaken it politically?

    Is it my dislike of Fox?



    ...or does stating the fact that the vile and evil ideology of Communism has killed well over 100,000,000 people and my view that Hamas are an evil terrorist organisation who would actually commit genocide in a heartbeat if they got the chance make me a supporter of online right wing American sources?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,199 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Why is it hard to understand? Some of the hamas terrorsits stopped to eat and drink from the fridges of those they'd just slaughtered, but raping? No, definitely no time for that 🙄


    What a disgusting piece of rape denial and apology there. Bravo


    40 beheaded babies wasn't a lie btw, because they never said that. They said 40 babies/children were found dead, some beheaded.this is true. I mean, how many times does this need saying before it's acknowledged?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,375 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Yes, it doesn't make any sense. But that is what you said. I'm merely applying the same logic

    You put forward that Padraig Pearse calling for Ireland to be free was not genocidal because he didn't live in a Sharia state. Surely it follows then that a person standing outside the GPO and calling for Palestine to be free is similarly not in a Sharia state and therefore similarly not genocidal? Or is the being in a Sharia state actually irrelevant? If so, then why did you try to use it?


    I don't think either is genocidal. Both are merely expressions of desire that respective peoples are free from oppression.



  • Registered Users Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Ah, okay, I get you now.

    The phrase when used by Hamas is an expression of a desire to murder every Jew in Israel. Hamas are the government of Gaza. When people parrot the same phrase in the context of showing support for Gaza and it's government it is an expression of overt support for Hamas's genocidal objective.

    Leaving spotty bellied imaginary creatures out of it entirely, do you understand that point? You may disagree with it but do you understand it and how the context in which the phrase is used matters?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    That "narrative" as you call it is the very real concern of one of the released hostages. You are just as bad as Netanyahu

    "One woman, who said that she and her husband had been separated days before she was returned to Israel, challenged Netanyahu over reports that Israel is considering using seawater to flood the network of tunnels where Hamas leaders – and the remaining hostages – are believed to be sheltering.


    “He was taken to the tunnels, and you talk about flooding the tunnels with seawater. You prioritise politics over the hostages,” the woman said, according to Haaretz."

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/05/angry-relatives-of-hamas-captives-and-ex-hostages-confront-netanyahu



Advertisement