Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

General chat 23/24

1457910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Remarkable. However, last season he had 20 goals in 14 games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,459 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    Wonder will Haaland get a ban?

    Be ideal if he was banned for the weekend



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,374 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Thoughts on Dubravka (3.9) now that pope is long term gone?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,719 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Will probably get him in for Turner if transfers allow as Johnstone has tricky games coming up so would be good to have a playing alternative



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    Wonder what kind of effort we’ll see from the Sheffield United players now they have a new manager.

    Liverpool may not fill their boots, as assumed, but you’d still expect it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,459 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    He's not gone yet, unlikely they'll have a new manager before the match. Not sure it makes any difference



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    Wow. Grand I was only awake but from the small article I read it definitely looked like he was gone and already replaced by Wilder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,850 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    Wilder has been confirmed now



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,719 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Who to start between Palmer and Lascelles? Currently on Palmer but can see Newcastle keeping a CS



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    After his fantastic season I suggested, pre season, that Rashford may be a trap having signed a new bumper contract. We see it time and again.

    Fair play to ETH for dropping him and United are playing well from the little of the game I’ve seen tonight. McTominay, Anthony, Garnacho and Amrabat all running their socks off.

    If the new part owner can implement changes then United could start coming back as a force. ETH definitely looks the manager to do it if backed properly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,504 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    This isn't a question about FPL but I suspect that there is a cross-over between people who play that and those who play in Last Man Standing competitions.

    I run a LMS with some friends. There are are two different games in parallel right now. Unfortunately in both games someone picked Bournemouth this weekend. We do have a rule for this scenario, that was created a few years ago but hasn't need to be used before - namely that if the match is not replayed or resumed before the next game week that it counts the same as Bournemouth not winning. One of the two players who faces elimination is annoyed about this and has threatened to quit playing entirely. (That's neither here nor there - the rules are the rules. I just include this detail to show that the scenario has left a bad taste in the mouth for some people).

    Anyway the reason I am posting is I am wondering how other LMS competitions are dealing with this scenario. There doesn't appear to be an easy answer. The only alternative I can think of, for future scenarios like this, is that the people get a bye into the next round. Although if you're team were losing at the time then you'd be getting quite lucky. Probably better than the alternative. What do people reckon?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭McBain11


    I think from a fairness perspective you should look at the game in the context of betting - what do the bookies do with a game like that?

    I actually had Bournemouth in an ACCA yesterday, and can confirm Paddy Power voided the Bournemouth part of the bet. So I'd look at it as the same as a complete postponement just like the weather etc.

    Now if the game gets finished out in the next couple of days, obviously that's the easiest thing to happen from a LMS perspective. I would think though that being eliminated over a game that hasn't run its course is much harsher than getting a bye to the next round.

    You are right though, there are no easy answers. I ran a LMS comp for a couple of years up to recently, but I never had a proper plan in place for this. Maybe something like the players who receive a bye due to a postponement have to make 2 correct picks the following week is actually the fairest thing to do? Would really need this rule to be in place come the start of the LMS competition so things don't get messy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,191 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    There's 2 I am in.

    1 is settling people that picked Bournemouth as through to the next round and can't be picked again. Nobody has Luton picked.

    The other competition state the above within the rules, but have yet to apply their rule as I have picked Bournemouth and I'm showing as eliminated at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    Looks like the abandoned game will be replayed from the start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    Why does boards not allow links from Twitter now ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    site’s ‘x.com’ robots.txt did not allow access to the url


    that’s what I get when I try to paste a Twitter link



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,015 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345




  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 10,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭F1ngers


    Do you have anything official?

    Not seeing anything on PL or even bbc site?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    Daily mail sport also tweeted it iirc. (So yeah, not a reliable source)

    I have eventually come round to believing some of the twitter ‘in the knows’.

    They have big followings and one wrong move would hammer their credibility. That’s all they have really.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    I think the game will be rearranged for a date later in the calendar that will be a DGW for both teams and the FPL points scored on Saturday will be wiped from the game and autosubs will come in for Luton and Bournemouth players.

    Can’t see logic in any other decision and I’m assuming that’s what most people think will happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,450 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    Yeah I was quite happy with my Solanke 9 pts but autosubs seems the logical move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,843 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    I'm running a small LMS game and I don't have a rule in place for this; if the game is played before the weekend, the result will stand but if it's postponed until later, I'll probably get anyone who picked Bournemouth to pick two teams in the next gameweek



  • Registered Users Posts: 771 ✭✭✭Lefty2Guns


    Have Cole Palmer waiting in the wings with 14 points.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,719 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    Would it not be the same rule as if they forgot to pick a team before the deadline? EG they get the highest placed team in the league they haven't selected already?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,843 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    That was the other option that I considered but since the result of that is already known, it felt a bit less fair than getting them to select a second team this week



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,315 ✭✭✭✭Father Hernandez


    I am in one where anyone who had Bournemouth goes to the team next alphabetically. Good news for those who had Arsenal/Villa left, not so for Brentford.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,504 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    I have this exact rule in place for people who do not submit their picks in time. I hadn't considered using it for abandoned games but I think after considering all the various option that that's the best way to go. I like the way that the element of chance in the game being abandoned is met with the element of chance in the picking of the alternative choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,459 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    One I'm in has a specific rule. Those on Bournemouth advance to the next round but must pick two teams to win next week and can no longer pick Bournemouth. Seems very fair to me



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,850 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    a win for anyone who went for Luton



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,623 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    It’s mad across the board how much people’s strongly held views around fairness tend to depend on who is in their FPL team



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,459 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,374 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Is there a Fpl team ran by AI? Curious to know how it’s doing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,623 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    They’re gonna wait it out til the Premier League do. Think the idea that the dweebs of a similar ilk to us who run FPL, have a hotline to the top PL brass may be misguided



  • Registered Users Posts: 573 ✭✭✭dasa29


    I think another problem is the Overall Cup

    This is how it stands with my cup game its 59(-8) Vs 44(-4 + 2 off the bench) at present.

    Now I have Solanke (6) so if thing change I have Cunha (2) to come off my bench and the would leave my score 55(-8) with me still wining the cup game. But if things are tighter in other games where taking Bournemouth or Luton players out and adding a sub might change the result completely.

    I just checked the lad I am against and he has Senesi + Tavernier + Neto with a total of 6 points plus he only has one scoring outfield sub on his bench who is already coming on for Haaland with Turner(2) his sub keeper.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,623 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    This will be sorted by the time the next GW starts. Not saying we will like the outcome, but there will be one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,459 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    I was looking for info on why Jose Sa missed the weekend, a shoulder injury apparently, separate to the injury which made him miss the couple of games before that. But a lot of the fans seems to think its an injury to make sure he gets to January and a big money transfer to the Saudi league.

    They also reckon Wolves will buy a goalie in January



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,739 ✭✭✭mobydopy


    Update on the Bournemouth v Luton situation




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,733 ✭✭✭Cartman78


    Zero change for me points wise.... Lascelles first sub



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,850 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    Given Solankes ownership reckon be green arrow for most



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Balls. That costs me big.



  • Registered Users Posts: 696 ✭✭✭Newbie20


    I lost 4 points by losing Solanke but actually gain 4 points on my Mini League rival as a result so happy out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,533 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    I'm losing 18pts here, and yes as it affects me I'm biased and I think this is a terrible decision.


    Points awarded for 59 or 65 mins , goals scored, game plated until it stopped and multiple days after the deadline they remove points they already put in the board


    It dose not affect anyone in any great way, if you don't have players from this game, so why punish the people that brought in players like Solanke, and then cancel points after there own deadline, with their exceptional circumstances clause.


    They don't reverse cards rescinded, goals, assists, awarded to other players after deadlines pass etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,191 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    I own Solanke and had 3 bench players with returns, but I will lose points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,850 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    You only lose 18 points if you don’t have any subs or VC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,533 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    My Vice captain is Mitoma (1pt) and my outfield subs, oh look.... it's Ogbene (LUT), Trippier (SUS) and Branthwaite (SUS).....So it 17pts lost??😫🤨😢


    Solanke, is actually still in my starting 11😕



  • Registered Users Posts: 696 ✭✭✭Newbie20


    I can’t see how they could have done anything else really. If the points were kept that would result in the bizarre situation where points were being handed out twice for the same game, the original game and the replay. There’s 380 games every season for which points are available, if they double counted it would be 381.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,015 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy


    Exactly. The goals, assists, minutes etc won't count towards the season's official stats, so why should they count towards FPL stats?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,533 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    Look I understand their logic, but

    what about red cards rescinded, goals and assists that are relooked at and changed after the deadline...FLP do not update them after deadline has passed.

    I'm sure Kane had a few claimed goals in the past removed?


    What would happen in this hypothetical situation....and I know some of these are unlikely with 25man squads these days....


    A game from last week, that was fully completed and past FLP deadline, is ordered to be voided and replayed due to ineligible player, or Klopp's not happy with VAR.

    What if the game is not replayed but awarded to one team 3-0 (is that still a rule?), due to similar issues?


    What happen if they played the remaining 30mins of the game in 3 weeks time? 1 game less for the season, or 30mins less for the season.


    What would they have done if no decision taken until weekend and new GW started.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,459 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red




  • Advertisement
Advertisement