Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"irregular" couples

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,998 ✭✭✭randd1


    Christmas trees are part of a celebration of the birth of Jesus, not Catholicism. And even that, Christianity adopted the tree tradition from other cultures/religions.

    And even complete atheists, such as myself, can enjoy the festivities, the carols, the pageantry, the goodwiil that are parts of Christmas. You don't have to be religious in any way shape or form to appreciate the good things religion brings.

    So I'll enjoy Christmas thank you very much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,611 ✭✭✭✭Boggles




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭taratee


    A step in the right direction but I suspect that they are just doing it out of necessity. High demand religions like the LDS (Mormons) have really softened their stance on LGBT issues over the last few years. Guessing this is the Catholic churches attempt to keep up with them.

    There are evangelical churches in the US, with millions of members, that openly welcome LGBT people. I think the RCC is at a majors crossroads here in Ireland. Going to be very interesting to see what it looks like in 20 years time. Priests will be very thin on the ground and the older generation, who fund the church, will have passed away. Judging by the census a large chunk of the population still identify as RCC. That number of RCCs can't be down to mammy ticking the box for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭taratee


    Why would they tear down their Christmas tree? It has nothing to do with the Vatican or the Catholic church. Totally agree with you w.r.t. confirmation and communion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,502 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    You'll be glad to know that they haven't moved the goalposts if you actually read the article.

    The article says they can bless same sex couples AND irregular couples. It doesn't specify what irregular means but it probably refers to those living in sin, which would include couples living together out of wedlock etc.

    It says that even those who aren't morally perfect can be blessed, as in, everyone. We are all sinners according to the Bible.

    Next Man City manager: You lot may all be internationals and have won all the domestic honours there are to win under Pep. But as far as I'm concerned, the first thing you can do for me is to chuck all your medals and all your caps and all your pots and all your pans into the biggest **** dustbin you can find, because you've never won any of them fairly. You've done it all by bloody cheating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Looking for other people's hypocrisy is a big part off the Christian tradition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I promise to shut up about the church when:

    • they GTFO of the schools and hospitals we (NOT they) pay for

    and

    • they stop covering up for abusers (and the bishops who shielded them) and compensate their victims as best they can financially.

    Until then...

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    "same sax marriages" - channelling Jeffrey Donaldson??

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The bible forbids Christmas trees.

    Anyway it (like celebrating the solstice) is a tradition of pagan origin long predating any talk of magical middle eastern carpenters.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Referring to people in same sex relationships and or that situation as ‘irregular’ just shows you that the Catholic Church remains absolutely entrenched in the dark ages.

    that nobody in its upper echelons or trained press officers or whatever had the good sense to tap whatever person was responsible for the wording of that and instead go…” you know what, let’s see if that can be worded a bit more diplomatically, more broadly, more accurately, actually more respectfully…..”

    but chronically out of touch, chronic lack of self awareness….basically, dog arrogant, dog ignorant.

    and it will continue….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    They’re referring to the relationship as irregular -

    What the declaration does is say that the church will not treat people in "irregular" situations — like being in a LGBTQ relationship or being divorced and remarried — as if they are beyond the pale. We welcome them into the church. Full stop. We cannot perform a marriage for a relationship that our Catholic tradition does not recognize as a marriage, but that should not be any bar to our welcoming people.

    https://www.ncronline.org/opinion/ncr-voices/how-big-deal-new-vatican-document-same-sex-blessings



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    They’re not referring to people though? They’re referring to those type of relationships, and outside of marriage in the context of how the Catholic Church views marriage and the family and so on - relationships outside of that are irregular.

    Tbh I don’t see it’s use as being particularly egregious or anything, I don’t think it makes any difference one way or the other to people in those situations, bit like the upcoming referendum on gender equality and the family in Ireland - their referring to marriage and ‘other durable relationships’ - it’s neither archaic, out of touch or undiplomatic. It’s just shìt to be drawing attention to the distinction at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭niallpatrick


    How can the bible forbid Christmas trees? Christ Jesu Bin Joseph was born roughly 2024 years ago. There was no Christmas in the new testament



  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭niallpatrick


    It's a Christ-mas tree to celebrate Christmas day the day of Christs Birth where kids are spoiled rotten and everyone wishes for world peace which will never come. The Christmas tree even though it ripped from the pagans and was adopted by the Germans is still a modern symbol of the Christian faith although in the dubious manner of commercialism.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    When teaching religion in schools they should start on day 1 with the history of the catholic church. By day 2 most people would see through them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato



    Have you forgotten there was an Old Testament? Common among cherry-picking Christians.

    Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. Matt. 5:17

    Jeremiah 10:

    Hear the word that the Lord speaks to you, O house of Israel. Thus says the Lord:

    “Learn not the way of the nations,

        nor be dismayed at the signs of the heavens

        because the nations are dismayed at them,

    for the customs of the peoples are vanity.

    A tree from the forest is cut down

        and worked with an axe by the hands of a craftsman.

    They decorate it with silver and gold;

        they fasten it with hammer and nails

        so that it cannot move.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,713 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    If you're going to be a biblical literalist, you have to be a biblical literalist. This passage doesn't forbid Christmas trees, or decorated trees generally. Either Hotblack or the source on which he relies have edited out the business end of this passage, theactual commandment, which comes immediately after the quoted passage. It's:

    Do not fear them; they can do no harm,

    Neither can they do any good.

    (Far be it from me to impugn Hotblack's academic honesty; most likely he's just relying on a dodgy source. But it's a bit ironic that he denounces Christian cherry-pickers by quoting a plainly cherry-picking source himself.)

    Also worth noting that the passage is expressly addressed to the "House of Israel"; i.e. to Jews. So, again, a biblical literalist (and not just a biblical literalist; this question was settled very early in the Christian era) would point out that Christians aren't Jews; Commandments addressed to Jews don't necessarily apply to Christians.

    But, even if this commandment does apply to Christians, it doesn't say "don't have Christmas trees"; it says "don't be afraid of Christmas trees; they are morally neutral".

    Obviously, people wouldn't set up Christmas trees in their own living rooms if they were afraid of them. So, scripture-wise, they're all good. It's the people who run screaming at the sight of a Christmas tree or who denounce them as evil that are on dodgy ground.



  • Registered Users Posts: 449 ✭✭jonnreeks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I don't think Bible Gateway is a dodgy source - I just stopped reading when it started going on about scarecrows in a cucumber field...

    Checked a few websites and it seems the consensus is that it was referring to the carving of idols from wood. You'd think they'd make these sorts of things a bit clearer, wouldn't you 😀

    Scrap the cap!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I've no problem with teaching about religions (plural) in school. It's when the taxpayer-funded teacher starts promoting a particular one as fact that I and many other parents have a problem with it.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude




Advertisement