Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
18568578598618621266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    They should blame Hamas but no one seriously thinks they will. Israel was provoked but they have killed those kids, even if it was not their intent and all the relatives of those kids will blame them. The cycle of violence will continue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Most will live to see another day .Let us hope their reason survives this period and that they draw lessons from their experience.

    And that the wider community also learns.

    Is there any hope that the end of the oil economy will take some of the accelerant from the Middle East situation in the medium term?



  • Registered Users Posts: 862 ✭✭✭lumphammer2


    Netanyahu needs to go ... simple as ... he is a nasty and malign influence .... the mastermind behind withdrawing from the JCPOA Iran deal? Trump? No ... his master Netanyahu ... the biggest arms dealers to Hamas? Netanyahu's pals ... the biggest cheerleader to hardliners in post 2021 Iran? Netanyahu .... the biggest ally of ISIS during the Syrian war ... Netanyahu ... I don't believe for one minute Mossad would not have had pre warning of October 7th either .... this war was well planned and Hamas were allowed to enter Israel for justification purposes ... Netanyahu is a bad man and the Middle East is the mess it currently is because of him and his policies ... I hate Trump but expected more from Biden ... it does not seem to matter who is in power in the US when it comes to Netanyahu ... they will bend over backwards for the little scut ...



  • Registered Users Posts: 824 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    Seems more and more articles coming out regarding Israeli behaviour. Another one here on the Al Shifa hospital

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/12/21/al-shifa-hospital-gaza-hamas-israel/



  • Registered Users Posts: 824 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    Honestly, you show complete lack of awareness. You’ve been provided with excerpts, links to books etc. The issue wasn’t settled at the UN. There are numerous literacy documenting how Palestine et al were opposed to the land split, terms etc. but under pressure after the holocaust and Britain wanting to find a solution pressed ahead and the vote went in. I agree the vote passed but it was evident it wouldn’t be accepted and the war started the next day. It’s more nuanced than to say they attacked Israel. The day before Israel didn’t technically exist. I’m not saying I agree with them attacking but I can rationally understand it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,816 ✭✭✭SeanW


    This "comparison" gets trotted out a lot. There were 2 major differences between the Troubles and the Israeli/Palestine conflict.

    1) No Irish government ever supported terrorism against the UK. Indeed, the Republic was often the victim of the same IRA terrorists, in terms of the killing of Gardai and other forms of organised crime in the Republic carried out by so-called "Republican" terrorists.

    2) The Troubles were never a fight to the death for Britain or anyone else for that matter. The IRA only sought the removal of the British from Northern Ireland. Nobody wanted the destruction of the British state and the killing of all British people.

    Israel faces the exact opposite situation on both counts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Again, there were no "Palestinians" prior to about 1960 as there never was a country called Palestine. This became a concept.

    As for violent mass murder, get up the yard; again, an aggressive war waged by Egypt/Jordan/Syria against the newly established state of Israel (a recognized country by the UN), had casualties. The war of independence death totals:

    "Palestinians:" 1953

    Israelis: 6000

    all from Wikipedia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Rationally? They (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq) disagreed and wanted the land back. That's their 'rationalizing.' So, you disagree with the UN, you're o.k. with resorting to violence? Because if you think that rational, then anytime Israel has flouted a UN resolution and been violent, you're o.k. with it.

    Don't forget - the aggressors in the 1948 war wanted. the land. for themselves. "Palestinians" didn't exist then as far as they were concerned. They became a cause celebre once the aggressors realized after the 6 day war they weren't going to be able to conquer Israel. And the Palestinians became the ultimate useful idiots, willing to hijack planes, massacre atheletes, suicide bombs, etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,739 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    It's fairly clear both sides have committed war crimes over the years. Some might be keen to cast doubt on this due to having skin in the game. They can fall back on if that's the case why has no one ever being prosecuted, well we know the victors, who are backed up by powerful allies, generally don't get held to account for war crimes.

    Do you remember there was the case of an ex IDF general about to be arrested in London on foot of warrant for possible war crimes, but he was mysteriously tipped off by a MOD official to stay on the plane.

    I am sure this incidence was a timely reminder to both Russia and America why they never signed up to the ICC.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,338 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Interesting. Presumably these reparations could be paid with the reparations you also want the Germans, Poles, Ukrainians etc to pay to the Jews they stole from, right?

    Or is that different and if so, why?

    Also, would you have the Turks pay reparations to the Arrmenians, as well as the Jews, they hunted out of Turkey?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,338 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I don't know, maybe they could have given them a US state, but they didn't. I mean, what's your conclusion from that?

    Cos if it's "therefore Israel should not exist, and Palestinians are entitled to try to destroy it by murdering Israeli civilians", well I hope you take the same approach to the USA, to Australia, and probably to other countries including Turkey as well.

    Because that would be hypocritical of you otherwise, wouldn't it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,338 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Were the IRA the actual government in Derry and Belfast?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,338 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    You're missing the point that Israel, as a sovereign country, is entitled to take military action to stop the government of Gaza from future similar incursions onto its territory.

    It's truly sh1t for the ordinary Palestinians, but it's what happens when you vote for a terror group to run your country. It's the old problem of voting for an anti democrat: it may well be the last election you'll ever take part in - but that's really not the fault of the neighbouring countries whose role is to protect their citizens, not those of the neighbouring dictatureship.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Violence in the area between the Arabs and the British was rife as well. And, of course, there were plenty of residents of the area in favor of the UN resolution, but I guess minorities don't matter if they're Jewish.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,338 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Try Turkey and the Kurds?

    Or indeed Turkey and Armenian Christians.

    Or Pakistan and its Christians.

    SO many examples, but you're only interested in the Jewish one. Funny, that.


    Germany has paid a tiny fraction of what was done - they killed millions - how much shoudl they pay? And you haven't mentioned how much Russia, Lithuania, Czechia etc should pay, because they have paid nothing.

    So shouldn't they all pay reparations to the Jews? (And why do you think you get to choose who gets the money? If they live in Israel, that's where it goes.)

    There's a lot more owing than just what Germany paid - right? More than enough to pay off all the Palestinians, in fact. Why should only the Jews pay proper reparations?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    'The German's paid some reparations which sadly went to Zionist Israel."

    Sadly? It's where the dispossessed people whose assets were stolen by Nazis happened to live. What, you regret them that?

    Such blatant anti-semitism.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭amandstu


    "I agree the vote passed but it was evident it wouldn’t be accepted and the war started the next day."

    Simple as that.,If you don't like the international consensus ,stick the boot in and strangle the newborn state.


    Not just that, but 75 years later people will still "understand" why you did it.

    If you want to provide me with references cite me something I can find online and not a book

    I am interested in Parliamentary proceedings at the time but that doesn't mean to say that the British were immune from prejudice towards the Jews then either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    No, its called giving context and background to issues rather than trying to provide a lopsided view on history as many seem to be trying to do so. The issues around Israel/Palestine started long before 1947, all the UN resolution did was solidify the issues that had already been created. The UN are an organisation, they do not get every decision correct. Clearly after WW2, there was a huge amount of guilt over the fate of the Jewish population of Europe, but making decisions based on emotions are not always the most logical. But of course there was a large amount of politicking going on in the UN as well at the time. The Soviets thought that Israel might become a socialist state as some of the communes that had been formed in Israel where on a collective basis, the Soviets also wanted to sow discord between the British and their traditional Arab allies so they saw the creation of Israel as a means to do so. Of course they used their influence on all the satellite Soviet countries to also vote in the same manner. Lets not forget, not a single Middle-Eastern Country supported the resolution.

    Good of you also to at least recognise that Israel is similar to the US, Australia etc in how they were created. I think it is widely recognised nowadays that the people who lived in those places before colonialism got screwed over. Peoples who lose their lands or their rights tend to put up a resistance. That is not a justification, it is just reality. Fact is all these issue were foreseen in the King-Crane commission of 1919 as noted. Poor decisions were made on top of poor decisions and the people of the region have been paying the price ever since.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,364 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Sure there were no Irish people before 1921 either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    By not accepting the decision, the locals sealed their fate. Sorry you're unhappy about it, and your judging the decisions as poor is subjective, not objective.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    So, by not accepting colonialism and being pushed of their lands, locals deserved the fate they received. Got it.

    I think the fact this is going on a 100 years later would back the opinion that poor decisions were made.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,338 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Well this shows the level of your knowledge. If there were no Irish people before 1921, would the Duke of Wellington have felt the need to say he wasn't Irish using the logic that "Being born in a stable does not make one a horse"?

    How could the Irish Republican Brotherhood have been created in 1858, if there was no concept of being Irish before 1921?

    Whereas right up until the late 20th century, many Palestinians were opposed to the idea that they were "less than" "Pan Arabs". They wanted a replacement for the Ottoman empire, not a much smaller and less powerful state called Palestine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    There was a region in the Ottoman Empire known as Palestine, the people who lived there were known as Palestinians. Primarily Arabs. During WW1 the British promised the Arabs a pan-Arab state which the Arabs thought would include modern day Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Paelestine, Jordan and the Western strip of Saudi Arabia, the areas in which they lived. Of course the British reneged on that promise, and along with the French split the region into the various mandates which has led to so much conflict since.

    The whole mantra post WW1 was the right of self-determination for ethnic groups/nationalities, except that right was very much at the whim of the Great Powers. Never at any point were the people who lived in what became Palestine given the right to self-determination. Everything was foisted on to them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,939 ✭✭✭blackcard


    The 1947 UN decision was a truly shocking decision. Jews owned 7% of the land but the newly formed Israel was granted 56% of the territory. It was a land grab aided by bribery, economic threats and expedited by Jewish terrorism against the British. It was predictable that the Arabs would fight for land that was rightfully theirs



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Repeatedly instigating and losing wars sacrificing your own people, committing acts of terrorism, well, yeah, you're making poor decisions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    I forget which account natters on about the 56% business (and again, Jews were 1/3 the population of Palestine), but most of that land was in the Negev desert. I am certain had the Arabs offered, say, Gaza instead of the Negev, confining themselves to the Negev, the Israelis would've been quite happy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    Did the native Americans play stupid games when they tried to resist settlers taking their land? You seem very keen on justifying colonialism?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭amandstu




  • Registered Users Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    You seem very keen on ignoring anything that's shows the people of Palestine were ignored and generally screwed over in the cause of Zionism.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Everyone screws everyone .


    Had the "Palestinians" and the Arabs won(screwed the Jews) in 47/48 I would have been telling the Jews to make the best of the hand they were dealt.

    Israel .The little state that could.



Advertisement