Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
18658668688708711266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,519 ✭✭✭jmreire


    ...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I'll take it you mean who will stop the neighbours in their tracks? For those neighbours who see that engaging in any conflict would be futile and even counterproductive, I'd say hard diplomacy and a couple of aircraft carriers in the Med would keep them out of the picture.

    Houthis - I'd say they are flighty enough but geographically distant so I can't see them directly threatening Israel. Taking out a few tankers would be very disruptive of course but that would economically affect a lot of countries.

    Hezbollah - they seem to have been quiet enough but I don't know what their snapping point would be.

    Iran would probably just keep supporting the terrorists without getting directly involved - but the recent assassination has probably raised their blood pressure a lot.

    Overall, I think any serous escalation would come from Hezbollah in Lebanon before anywhere else. I'd say the UN would do their best and US would support.

    But is there was an escalation, I'd say it could quickly turn into a pile on - and I've no idea who would respond or how. It would be catastrophic for the middle east, Europe and the world.

    I hope cool heads prevail and that it does not materialise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,902 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I really don't care how Israel treats Hamas. What I don't like or agree with is how they treat ordinary Palestinians. It's as if being Palestinian is the same as Hamas. Its wrong and unlawful imo.

    You could be right about the repercussions effecting other areas as Hezbollah seem to have stepped up their attacks but I can't see it rippling around the world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,636 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I wouldn't even describe it as revenge. The height of the Blitz took place in late 1940 and early 1941, a good four years earlier. Dresden was mostly about terrorising the German civilian population.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    I'd a lengthier reply that sort of summised the problems with those bombings and the differnces too.


    For one Hamburg and Dresden were at one point crucial nazi centres of industry for transport, communication and munitions among other things.


    There sever doubts to how much Dresden even actually contributed and some of that infrastructure was left untouched in industrial centres outside of the city while the city itself where most it's people lived was torched.


    The rational behind it was it was the largest unbombed site in the country.


    Even Churchill, not exactly a fanbof peace, love and good for all had his misgivings about it, and you want find many historians saying it was just a cost of war, because it shouldn't have and didn't have to be.


    You also can't compare Hamburg or Dresden to gaza for the simple reason that 2 of those were relatively prosperous regions that did have some sort of significance to both their own people and the allies in terms of being important strategically in a number of ways.


    Gaza has no airport since Israel bombed it. It has little to no industry. It has no rights in its own international waters, it's fishermen routinely shot at by IDF boats.


    More to the point, it is one of the poorest, most densely populated places on earth. Israel should really have been able to take a moment to pause and think about it's bombing campaign and know the devastating impact it was going to have in ordinary people and make them look like a bunch of tossers



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭dmcdona



    "So to me, the dilemma is a simple one - you're either with them, or you're with the people who want to wipe them out."

    To me, the dilemma is also simple one - you either support the wholesale murder of innocent civilians or you don't.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    You might want to tell the un so. Same user (joined October 2023 nicely) has videos of their amazing beaches.. I've no doubt they are, but they're the same beaches that Israel only a number years ago opened fire on a group of children playing football from a gunboat....so yes, they are effectively in an open air prison, and not by their choosing. Israel are the wardens and Hamas are the awful prison gang and the ordinary Palestinians are getting it from both sides



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭dmcdona



    "There's far more blatant 'death to Israel' posted here"

    Notwithstanding those who have been threadbanned, who is posting "death to Israel"?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,519 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Nacho, you may want to refresh your memory about what was posted about the tunnels back to just after 7th of Oct, and when the IDF began their attack on Gaza.

    And I revert to my original opinion on the tunnels ie: Wait and see, I'm sure that there's plenty of tales yet to emerge when the saga finally ends. And for some of the tunnels, especially the flooded ones, it could well be a long time before that story is written.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Sorry what is travelling the world? Islamic terrorism? , which I don't think Hamas is exactly has been around for a while. This is like your tip of the spear comment- I'm genuinely confused by some of your arguments you have put forth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    But do you think the right way to get rid of tunnels do you support bombing form the sky with the associated civilian casualties? For someone who a while back was adamant they were neutral you sure seem to confine your criticisms to one side of this long running conflict.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,825 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I always get confused with the comparison with the blitz and the war on Gaza. Hamas declare war on Israel, Israel launch an attack. People claim what they are doing is self defense. Britain declared war on Germany.... So the blitz was Germany acting in self defense?

    Using the self defense logic all the dead civilians during the blitz was Britain's fault, right?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,519 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I was replying to your post about Isreal bombing Palestinians in areas that the IDF had told them were safe to go to, and then they were bombed, I mentioned one possible explanation as to why Israel would deliberately bomb an area that they had said was safe, was because the IDF had driven Hamas out of the tunnels, and they had mixed with the Palestinian population in the safe areas, and thus, the IDF bombed them. And very unfortunate for the Palestinian civilians who were sheltering there. As for the reverberations around the world Tayto, yes, I think that will happen on a personal level for sure especially anywhere you have Muslims coming into contact Israeli's or perceived Israeli supporters, this can and will happen. Even worse, if it will broaden into a far wider conflict, Country V Country, and no one knows where this could end up. It's not for nothing that the US has sent a huge battle group to the region. Maybe Biden knows something we don't know?



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,754 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    I seem to recall the dispute at the time was not whether Hamas used Tunnels or had operating bases from these tunnels, it was whether Hamas were using tunnels under the Al Shifa Hospital as a main command center. From the evidence presented by the IDF it didn't look like they were. Although perhaps Hamas had time to clear it out , but we may never know. I am in agreement that more stories about the extent of the tunnel network will emerge in the months ahead. I wasn't aware tunnels had been flooded already. If that is the case then many Hamas people along with hostages could be found dead sometime next year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,519 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Revenge or terrorizing......you think that the bombing of British Citys would be forgotten, even in 4 years? I doubt it very much. Not so many, if any, I guess from that time, back in the 1940-45's. But I remember my Parents who were in London during the bombing still talking about it in the late 80's / 90's. So I'm pretty sure that if they could still remember it years later, so could the British people remember it just 4 years later. So, you can take your pick, Terrorizing or Revenge? Or the third option, both? Thats the one I'd be going for.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,519 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, Islamic Jihadi terrorism has been around since the 6th century. It has gone through periods of relative quietness or been dormant on occasions. It's my guess that what's happening now in Palestine will trigger another "active " phase even above and beyond what has been happening elsewhere worldwide. There's a post a few pages back about some Jews in an US institute / college who had to hide in the Library because they were afraid after all the anti-semitic talk that was going on around them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,902 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,519 ✭✭✭jmreire


    You obviously missed my post awhile back, where I stated that I unreservedly condemned anyone at any time or place who killed or hurt in any way, innocent men, women and children. And I have not changed my opinion. As for the tunnels, I believe that the best way to "eliminate" Hamas is in the tunnels, because they themselves have said the protection of the tunnels was only for Hamas and not for ordinary Palestinian's. The downside is of course that these tunnels run underneath practically all of Gaza, and of course require very powerful penetrative bombs to achieve their aims, which unfortunately means the death's / injuries of many Palestinians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You take it wrongly so. Who will stop what is now a terrorist state - Israel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,272 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    So Israel are meant to just sit back and do nothing as they are attacked from pretty much all sides? Again with Israel being held to completely different standards to any other country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,519 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Back at that time, there were lots of "Tunnel Vision" as they say!! And since the capture / surrender of many Palestinians both Hamas and civilians, inc. medical staff it has emerged that Hamas did indeed use the tunnel underneath the hospital, but that all medical staff were forced to deny it during TV interviews. Hamas then did a major clean up job when it was clear that the IDF would soon take control of the Hospital and the tunnels underneath. Yes, flooding the tunnels has started awhile back, but it's estimated that the job to completely flood them all will take several months. Have hostages being killed in the tunnels because of flooding? I'm not too sure at this point, because Hamas would have plenty of escape points built in. But with the bombings? Yes, I'd say that many have been killed in the tunnels by the bombs, Hamas and Hostages alike. Whatever warning they would have with the flooding, there would be no such warnings with the bombs....one minute you are sitting in the tunnel and split seconds later, the whole tunnel collapses around you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    It’s not whataboutery but the highlighting of hypocrisy. Only one conflict matters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,579 ✭✭✭amandstu


    To be fair Israel is in a completely different position to any other country.

    They uniquely represent a people that was practically forced into extinction (in an abhorrent,open ,calculating and recent way that made monsters of all who did not combat it directly)

    I cannot see that they will allow next nor near any repeat of those events without dragging down a multitude of enemies


    If their neighbours cannot see that then I pity them (and us too most likely)

    The quote goes "Do not go gentle into that good night"



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,636 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    If Israel had responded with a one week blitzkrieg against Hamas targets in Gaza, people could have argued that was a proportionate response. We're now up to a three month relentless assault on the civilians of Gaza, with the regime suggesting we could see another three to six months of this ongoing horror show.

    To give some perspective, the invasion of Iraq in 2003 (which shredded Tony Blair's career) lasted five weeks and resulted in about 5k civilian deaths.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,272 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    The point was, countries all around them are threatening Israel and many openly state the country shouldn't even exist. Some are already launching rockets at them. But according to that poster, Israel saying they will retaliate if they are attacked is "terrorist" behaviour and they need to be stopped. What about the ones attacking them being stopped? Nothing about that. What other country is expected to sit there while they are attacked by other governments who want them annihilated and do nothing?



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,902 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    That's rubbish. Do you believe that Israel has killed nearly 22,000 Hamas? Have they even killed 1,000? What we do know is that they have murdered --

    • Dead: At least 21,110, including at least:
      • 8,200 children
      • 6,200 women
    • Injured: More than 55,243, including at least:
      • 8,663 children
      • 6,327 women
    • Missing: More than 7,000




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,579 ✭✭✭amandstu


    "If Israel had responded with a one week blitzkrieg against Hamas targets in Gaza, people could have argued that was a proportionate response"

    Gosh that would have shown them.

    Hamas wouldn't have known what hit them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Yeah, spending months killing now tens of thousands of civilians that Hamas don't care about either is clearly the logical option.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 51,902 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    The Hamas attack is what we're discussing as per the thread title surely.



Advertisement