Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1726727729731732807

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,033 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Poster has given details before and has said it was a house share, the OP moved out but the couple in question remained and then stopped paying - they almost definitely have a part 4 tenancy, and are not licensees.

    The landlord has no recourse other than the lengthy RTB adjudication followed by taking it to court, and only then getting forcible eviction by a sheriff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,385 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    He also said the the owners solicitor told them that it could take years to get them out ........ so it's fairly safe to assume it's not a licensee scenario.



  • Registered Users Posts: 362 ✭✭RobbieV


    Ok fair enough.

    How can it take years to get his house back if they have broken tenancy rules by not paying rent?

    It's grounds for a legal and legitimate eviction I would have thought. Or am I wrong.

    Also selling the house is legitimate reason to end the tenancy. They cannot stay?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Some interesting (if horrifying) figures for the new year. Not good news on the housing completions front from this government, things are only going to get worse for years to come apparently. It can only really be called gross incompetence at this stage, years into the housing crisis:

    "It will be “a number of years” before 40,000 new homes per annum can be delivered, according to Tánaiste Micheál Martin. [1]

    "Two separate pieces of research into required housing targets are currently being conducted by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) and the Housing Commission. Both pieces of research are expected to recommend the state needs at least 50,000 new homes a year, significantly more than the 31,000 expected to be built this year."

    [1]https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2023/12/30/tanaiste-micheal-martin-says-it-will-be-number-of-years-before-40000-homes-per-year-built/

    [2]https://www.businesspost.ie/news/esri-we-need-to-build-50000-homes-per-year-to-meet-demand/



  • Registered Users Posts: 893 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Well strictly speaking we need more rental units, not necessarily more landlords. Not the same thing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 35 Aguce


    I cannot find that video, but I saw one where mom owned house (US) with bad tenants that refused to leave. So son was made a tenant with official rent agreement and moved in. Bad renters soon after left and because tenants are protected so no one can complain about new tenant. I wonder if something like that would work in Ireland and @SharkMX friend could get bad tenants out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,585 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    No, it absolutely and utterly would not work here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,128 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,475 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Yes I would expect where the house was rented by tge room that you could move new tenants in to replace tenants that had left. However you could not use it to change licence/normal tenant rules

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,675 ✭✭✭CorkRed93




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,475 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    If they had left it alone 10+ years ago there would be no need of tax breaks. 30 years ago most LL were paid in cash. Tge great and good on the left side of the political spectrum decided this needed to be regularised and regulated. They also wanted good corporate LL

    Since the RTB came into existence rents have only gone one way. REIT's are probably pushing rents harder and faster than any other entity.

    Long time private LL are exiting the industry. At first the assumption was it was tge accidental LL that were in negative equity. But it seems its also LL's with multiple units.

    Tax treatment of LL's is a significant issue and I do mean income-tax. Those involved as a service provider a have tge income treated as unearned and even though they pay PRSI it not counted towards dental or OAP qualification.

    Wear and tear is treated totally different to any other business sector and can easily be disallowed for tax treatment. The RTB is a disaster for LL. 3-4 changes would make a significant difference but there is political unwillingness to make those changes.

    Finally on exiting any other business sector there is significant capital reliefs, these are not available to sole traders in the rental sector

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,450 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    The Irish House Price Report Q4 2023 was released today by Daft.ie

    " Housing prices are stabilising not because supply has increased to meet demand, but instead because demand has fallen to meet it. Supply of newly built homes for purchase has certainly increased but the second-hand market, which is the larger share of the market, has been working in the other direction ‐ buffeted by changed economic conditions. "



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,128 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I think everyone expected this. Interest rates and the price ceiling have cooled increases, but prices can't fall as there's a huge cohort waiting for houses.


    I predicted ithis time last year that prices would rise by 5-10% in 2023. Daft says it was 3.4%

    My 2024 prediction is not more than a 5% drop in prices nationally.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭Timing belt




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I think wage increases of 2023 will feed into the market more so in 2024 than they did in 23.

    Same with increased borrowing limits and various government schemes designed to drive prices higher

    Buyers need time to adjust to such changes, save deposit etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,650 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Why assume it's incompetence? The state has done everything to fuel price rises and rent increases whilst doing absolutely nothing arrest either. The only "solution" ever offered is more funny money. No one can be that incompetent. This is either sheer indifference or outright malice. I can't comment on the latter as it's opening a rabbit hole, but regarding the former, this is what happens when we have decades of "zero consequences" for acting the maggot.



  • Registered Users Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    You can see the dysfunction in the Donegal market. A 20% increase in the price of a 4 bed detached year on year isn't normal.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Interesting that, contrary to popular conjecture on here, the upper end of the market is powering forward the most with 5 bed detached houses seeing 10-20% yearly growth in the majority of locations.

    1 bed apartments have fallen 10%+ in almost all locations. 2 bed terraces flat and 3 bed semis low to mid single digit growth.

    Assuming activity of funds and people on tighter budgets, both of whom would be very sensitive to interest rates, mean drops at lower end while cash buyers dominate the higher end.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Thats absolutely fair. My take on it being incompetence does assume FF/FG want to fix the housing crisis, but that may well be a charitable assumption given the evidence of the last decade.

    Its just all so very short sighted of them even if its that though - a stablisation of property values, slight lowering of rents, and high property ownership rates would result in pretty much a permanent FF/FG government. Its been known for decades at this stage that once most people own property they start voting for more right-wing parties to defend the status quo. Thatcher wildly successful strategy to expand home ownership in the 1980s proved this very well.

    But in Ireland we instead have continuous upward trends in rent and property values, a steadily declining property ownership rate, and a massive cohort of under 40s locked out of the housing market getting more and more desperate. Its going to lead to the voting out of FF&FG and the voting in of far more radical parties.

    SF polling at double the combined total (!) of FF&FG in the 25-34 age demographic (as is currently the case), and at 30% and climbing in all ranges of the ABC1 demographic, is almost entirely down to the housing crisis. ABC1 voters aren't exactly natural SF supporters.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I think FG are acutely aware that their best path toward more votes is to get more homeowners. Hence shared equity/HTB etc.

    Right now the primary issue in Ireland preventing home ownership is a lack of houses. Not the price of them. Every single new build across the country is snapped up. Second hand supply is at record lows. The market is dominated by FTBs. There’s just not enough houses to go around.

    Whats the best way to get more of something supplied? Higher prices. Once someone buys, whether it cost them 500k or 700k they are more likely to be FG voters.

    Strong confidence from the building/financing sector to try to stimulate more supply is the clear intention. Higher prices is merely the mechanism to deliver that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The fact that they've governed over a continual drop in our home ownership rate since they came into office in 2011 would suggest they're either not acutely aware of it, or are utterly incompetent in their efforts to stem the decline, though. Neither is good.

    Driving up prices to increase supply has been the stated FG plan since as far back as 2013, and to date it has proven consistently ineffective. As well as it having the rather unfortunate side effect of pricing increasingly large numbers of people out of the market.

    Theres not much point in having a housing market where only a minority of earners, or else foreign investors, can afford to buy. And thats what we're heading towards with a median price of €440k now in Dublin, against a median household income of approx €55k.

    FG (and FF) need the majority of the population to be able to become homeowners to protect their support base long term. Which is very much no longer the case. The current ESRI projections are for only 35% of those currently aged 35-44 to be homeowners in their life time (and worse for younger cohorts) - which is going to have an absolutely disastrous effects on our home ownership rate.

    And the thing is this won't just effect people who've been unable to buy - if circa 65% of the population are renters in 30 years time the taxes on landlords, and homeowners, are going to be something else. The tyranny of the majority can get extreme.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,475 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You have a very simplistic way of looking at things. In the same 2011 to niw period we have gone from being bust with a 14% unemployment rate ( and substantial number emigrating) at the same time.

    Last year we created 100k new jobs, the expectation is we will create the same number or more in 2024. We are at full employment so people immigrating into the country are necessary to fill these jobs.

    Housing is the most significant bottleneck but it hard to solve in an economy with full employment. Construction labour and labour costs are now starting to be the biggest factor in housing costs especially in Dublin.

    60-80% of those working in construction in Dublin migrate in and out of Dublin. They demand a premium above working in therebown locality. Just as an example 12-18 months ago blocklayers in Dublin were charging about 2 euro per block, outside Dublin it was about 1.3-1.5/ block.

    At present locally 10 miles from Limerick city rhe rate seems to be heading to slightly above 2/block, there was a significant push before Christmas by some blocklayers to push it to 2.5/ block.

    Where dose that leave Dublin rates.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 74 ✭✭snl rory


    I have a suspicion that the much quoted 'never more first time buyers' are mostly migrant tech workers. Is there any data on this?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Plot house prices on a graph beside numbers of new home completions over the last 25 years and see if you credibly state higher prices doesn’t equate to higher output. It’s nonsensical.

    You also posted data yourself recently showing how the home ownership rate had its biggest declines from the period of 2006-2016. Prices were extremely cheap for most of that period? Could it have been because everyone stopped building?

    Also, on the Tyranny piece.

    Here are the bottom 8 European countries for lowest home ownership rates. All worse than Ireland. Most significantly so.

    1. Switzerland
    2. Germany
    3. Austria
    4. Turkey
    5. Denmark
    6. France
    7. Sweden
    8. Finland

    Most seem to be surviving ok.



  • Registered Users Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    In most of those countries you listed there are stronger tenant protections. If Irish landlords copies their systems by the reaction to tenant rights on here they'd have a collective aneurysm.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The housing data speaks for itself. You can discuss bricklayer rates as much if you like, but the issue in a thread about the Irish Property Market is the home ownership rate dropping consistently over the year last 13 years of FG government, and being projected to drop much much further. Thats a very big sign of bad governance.

    Plot house prices against numbers of new home completitions over the last 25 years and you'll still find the number of housing completions in 2023 are still far below whats required. To the tune of 10,000-20,000 housing units a year by the ESRI and Housing Commission's most recent estimations that I posted on the last page.

    The idea that continually driving the price of houses up will result in a situation where theres a stable property market, accessible to the majority of the population, is whats nonsensensical. And thats not just my opinion - we have the evidence of 2011-2024 to show what happens when this approach is tried - abject failure, in the form of the Irish housing market in 2024.

    I didn't say the country wouldn't survive, it absolutely will. But in an Irish democracy where our political parties are almost all inherently populist, landlords and home owners will get absolutely hosed by taxation and regulation if we reach a situation where only 35% of households are home owners.

    To use comparable EU countries from your very own list - Germany has a home ownership rate of 47%, and has property taxes of up to 1% of gross value a year, Denmark has a home ownership rate of 59% with property taxes ranging up to 1.4% per year, France has a home ownership rate of 63% and property taxes of up to 1.5% per year. The idea that an Irish state with 35% home ownership rate won't have taxes significantly higher than these is very, very naive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,475 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    As I said you look at it simplistically. If blocklayers can up rates by nearly 50% in 18-24 months it tell you we have a significant shortage of them a d of construction trades in general

    Instead of reaming on about data tell us what you think the solution is.

    It's easy to be a whinger and complain about everything show us the solution. If the government are to be blamed for anything its that they got the economy to recover too fast

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Saying they are below where they need to be is very different to saying they don’t increase with prices. I agree they still need to increase (which they will continue to do I suspect).

    Plot prices against completions per capita and I assure you’ll find the same conclusion. Higher prices and more output are almost perfectly correlated. So logically if you wanted to close the gap to the ESRI projections, you would need to push prices higher, not lower.

    You mentioned ‘the Tyranny of the majority can get extreme’ which is very different to some increases to property taxes to more normal international levels (which I personally believe we absolutely 100% should do right now).

    Bizarrely the party that all the non-homeowners seem to vote for, want to abolish property taxes altogether. Go figure

    Agreed, the Irish rental system is broken across the board and needs a radical overhaul. Good tenants have too few protections and bad ones have far far too much. It’s a shambles.



Advertisement