Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
18858868888908911266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 16,220 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Sigh..... (because you seem to like that word)


    Read what I posted. It's well known that many victims were buried without any autopsy. Many of the alleged rape victims were buried without any forensic evidence being taken. I'm not denying that rape/sexual assault occurred. I'm saying that the Israeli government shot themselves in the foot when they allowed victims to be buried before a proper investigation had taken place.

    The vast majority of the evidence that crimes took place are the statements of witnesses who claimed to have seen it take place or the aftermath. But in any criminal care witness statements are the least reliable types of evidence. For anyone to claim that no sexual assaults took place every single one of those witnesses would have to be lying. I think that's highly unlikely, close to impossible because of the volume. But the lack of forensic evidence, autopsies, photographs, DNA swabs etc means that if it were an actual criminal case, it would be thrown out of any court.

    NGO's and groups that deal with violence against women have said that Israel have provided very little evidence to back up the claims of widespread assaults. This just hurts the israeli claims.

    I mentioned Ukraine because there were loads of sexual assaults committed by russian troops. Every single victim is documented. Every bit of forensic evidence that can be gotten is gathered and saved. That's the way this should be done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,513 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    And are you sure that “every piece of forensic evidence” was gathered in the first three days of the Ukraine war?

    Or are you seriously comparing a months-long strategy with what happened in the immediate aftermath of the initial attack?



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,555 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    "NGO's and groups that deal with violence against women have said that Israel have provided very little evidence to back up the claims of widespread assaults. This just hurts the israeli claims."


    Israel have provided very little evidence because Israel has very little evidence.





  • Registered Users Posts: 3,878 ✭✭✭hoodie6029


    Listening to todayfm yesterday in the way to work. The top of the hour news put an an academic about the recent massacre in Iran. He speculated that and paraphrasing here ‘ Israel doesn’t carry out assassinations like this but if they have done this act to target innocent civilians then this will destabilise the whole region’

    I actually shouted at the radio ‘What the actual f…? That is pure speculation.’

    Who put that on the air? You might as well put me on saying Elvis could’ve carried out this attack, it’d be as accurate as what was broadcast. Whatever people think of Israel, it is not on to pin any act against Arabs or Muslims on them with zero evidence. Even worse that a news agency would broadcast this reckless opinion.

    The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,647 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I don't think Elvis would have the same record of either rhetoric, threats, or actual attacks against Iran or Iranians compared to the Israelis record though. So he would probably be further down the list of suspects to be fair.


    It also probably unlikely that other countries base their major policy decisions, or declarations of war, based on interviews on todayfm.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,517 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Again, (sigh...) read the Haaretz article I provided you. Circumstances and laws required swift burials, and the area in question wasn't secured either. There is testimony from witnesses to the rapes, as well as a few survivors. If anything it's better documented than what happened in Russia, especially when the work in Russia to document the events could take place after the occupying force had left.


    The Israeli government did not 'shoot itself in the foot.' The crimes are well documented, Hamas is guilty of horrific sexual violence. Just let it go, take you shots at the Israeli government from other directions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,517 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Aaron Mate of the grayzone. Another Hamasnik.

    Why hasn't the UN started investigations? The Haaretz article I posted explains what happened in great detail, but deny away, send your daughters to the next Rave in Gaza, they'll be fine.

    (https://archive.is/RIfq0)

    Might be hard to find rape victims that are still alive. This was Hamas, after all, and they documented shooting them and their commanders urged them to 'soil them.'



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,517 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Got a question, gave an answer. Get over yourself.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,220 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Every bit of evidence was gathered as soon as they could. That's the point. If they could have gathered it earlier, they would have. They take evidence gathering seriously. The israelis did zero evidence gathering. No autopsies, no documenting of injuries, no dna swabs, nothing. That's shameful.

    You could literally present the men who committed the rapes to the israeli police/military and there's not a scrap of evidence documented to say that they did it or in many cases to document that it even happened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,555 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    So the Haaretz article you post is correct but the Haaretz article anyone else posts is incorrect?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 602 ✭✭✭scottser


    the israelis won't have any problem manufacturing evidence, of that you can be sure.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,764 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    That seems to be more Gallant's suggestion rather than the actual plan but at least it sounds much better than what's been coming out of other prominent ministers recently, let's see what the response to it is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,220 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    That's an eye witness. Read what I said. The israeli government didn't document any physical evidence. That guy could be lying. Like I said, with so many reporting it, I don't believe they could all be lying. Sexual assaults happened but there's no evidence except witnesess and that's the worst kind of evidence.

    I finally got to read the article you provided (Archive wouldn't load yesterday and the other link is paywalled for me)

    “Questions are asked like: Is there or isn’t there semen? Was there or wasn’t there a rape kit? Those same female jurists with international reputations who are conducting this discussion apparently do not have a basic understanding of international law. International law does not talk the language of the individual case. My call to them is to look beyond those denial mechanisms. You are facing a bunch of respected women and telling them that shocking crimes were committed here. Am I the one who needs to provide the evidence for the terrorists’ deeds? What kind of travesty is it that they are imposing the burden of proof on me?

    That's the woman who's leading the collection of evidence about sexual crimes comitted on the day of the attacks. The bold is mine. Yes, she does need to provide evidence. She's standing up and saying that crimes are committed. She does need to present evidence to support her accusations. And the people who she's responding to there are women who work for NGO's that specialize in gender based violence. They know what they're asking for. It's their job to do this. And it should be the job of the woman who's collecting evidence to actually collect evidence, search for more evidence and present it to the world.

    She does say where they're getting their evidence.

    Material is being gathered from a large number of sources. “We are collecting materials of every sort – pictures, audio files, videos, testimonies and newspaper reports,” says Dr. Sarai Aharoni, head of the Gender Studies Program at Ben-Gurion University, who heads the commission’s documentation team. “The aim is to establish a factual infrastructure and also to better understand circumstances of the venues where specific crimes occurred.”

    But at no point does she say she's collecting forensic evidence. She's relying on eyewitness testimony and newspaper reports. I don't know if any of the video/picture evidence shows a crime being committed, because it doesn't say. I don't need to see or hear that evidence, but I do want someone who's seen it to say what they saw. Someone who can say clearly that they've seen a video of the crime being committed and that this evidence exists.

    Now, once again, I'm not saying that it didn't happen. I'm saying it's shoddy work. There wasn't a single rape kit used. Not a single autopsy of any victim. Those things don't have to be done on the battlefield. They can be done before the body is cleaned and prepared for the funeral.

    BTW, there's nothing in that article that stated there's a law that made anyone bury any body. There was nothing that said why a burial couldn't be delayed. There was nothing that said why they didn't conduce a port mortem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,555 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Are all IDF soldiers perverts? Is he admitting to stealing money? Hopefully he gets arrested if he returns to the UK.




  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    was there a poster up the thread a day or two ago basically denying people were questioning the rapes? hopeless really.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    Like the media speculation about who launched the rocket in the hospital carpark which set off mobs all over the ME.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,640 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Aaron Mate from the Greyzone, appeared frequently with Tucker Carlson.



    A perfectly trustworthy source.... NOT!



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,640 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Will be interesting if other parties front up now, post-this war. Especially countries like Egypt.

    Perhaps Ireland can send some of its soldiers to keep the peace? Or is the best we can do is give out?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,764 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Well we are already in UNIFIL which is likely going to become a critical deployment very soon, so I think your 'best we can do is giving out ' remark is unwarranted



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,517 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "BTW, there's nothing in that article that stated there's a law that made anyone bury any body. There was nothing that said why a burial couldn't be delayed. There was nothing that said why they didn't conduce a port mortem."


    The organization that largely does this work for Israel, Zaka, buries victims quickly according to Jewish law. Orthodox Jews are opposed to autopsies as well, I don't think ZAKA does them. So, there are religious laws (at least, as interpreted by Orthodox Jews) that prevent it.




  • Registered Users Posts: 14,640 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Would we be prepared to step into the breach between the IDF and Hamas?



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,220 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    But they're not all orthodox. I understand that maybe some are, but I think it's something like 1/8th of Israel is orthodox. And here's the thing, i don't think they even asked. If they asked and were refused that's one thing, but if they never bothered to ask, than that's bad.

    And BTW, I'm not saying it was a conspiracy to hide stuff. I'm saying it was incompetence. There should have been someone who's job it was to make sure that they gathered as much as they could. maybe there is someone, but they weren't listened to. They should have done better at the time.

    And it's not wrong for people to ask for this information. Or to say that they should have gathered it.

    As I mentioned in a previous post, if you rounded up the rapists and presented them to the Israeli authorities, there's no evidence to confirm that they did it or to even confirm if a particular crime occurred. If I had 10 different people give me 10 wildly different figures about how often it happened, who would I believe? And the problem there is that one person is giving roughly accurate information, the others aren't. So then it's easy for a doubter to point at someone with a ridiculous figure and say that people are lying about it happening.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,764 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    The specifics would matter of course but I think so as part of a UN Mission, like I said we are already a large part of UNIFIL, and have been for about 30 years now



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,513 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    What, they have evidence for rapes that occurred in the first 3 days? That’s not my understanding of things?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,764 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    ZAKA are orthodox or ultra orthodox though, and they were to a large extent the ones responsible and they followed their own customs



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,902 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    How is the investigation into bennys corruption going? 😋



  • Registered Users Posts: 824 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    Thats not whats hes doing. At all... Shame on you. Seems you can't even discuss anything logically and rationally here without being accused of anti-semitism. And his whole posts were logical and rational in the basis re the discussion of evidence. You purposely skipped over where he stated he believed it happened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    It was a war zone.

    If you believed it happened what is the purpose in carrying on down this line? To what end?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,220 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    It wasn't a warzone where the bodies were brought afterwards. It wasn't a warzone in all the morgues. It wasn't a warzone in all the funeral homes. It wasn't a warzone at the burials.

    There was plenty of opportunity to gather forensic evidence in the days afterwards but no autopsies were conducted.

    And as I said at the very beginning and in nearly every post since then, the point of mentioning this is that the Israeli authorities shot themselves in the foot when they didn't document this. They created a situation where people come in and say it never happened. They made a mistake. And they continue to do so when they react aggressively to people who say that they should have this evidence.

    In every post about it I've said I believe it happened. In every post where I mention Hamas I say that they're scum. I do this because if I say something like "Israel should have collect evidence" people will start accusing me of hating jewish people or whatabouttery. I don't and I'm not. I made an observation that the israeli authorities made a mistake and since them I've been compared to holocaust deniers.

    So, is there anything you want to accuse me of? Do you want to hazard a guess on my motives? Because I'm just a guy who pointed out that if they'd actually conducted a proper investigation and gathered evidence, then the people who are denying it happened wouldn't have the ammunition they have. But I'm sure someone will come along and start calling me a nazi any moment now.



Advertisement