Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
18868878898918921266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    ok.

    i just think you are giving yourself a lot of grief about something which you believed happened in any event but sure fill your boots.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭TokTik


    “Collateral damage” nonsense.

    You're trying to make it sound as if Israel is taking out Hamas soldiers and a few innocents are being killed when in reality it’s the exact opposite, Israel are murdering civilian men, women and children and if a Hamas soldier is killed in the strikes then it’s a stroke of luck.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Netanyahu had a large part in not securing the border for 7 11 to happen but he is the exact right person to lead Israel now. He has no quams about killing civilians and the Israel public are supporting his brutal methods. I can't see him ever going to jail now for corruption.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    That is a complete rubbish statement. You can be anti-murder, anti-bombing or anti-war. That does not make you antisemitic at all or even anti-Irsraeli. It makes you human.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,517 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "And as I said at the very beginning and in nearly every post since then, the point of mentioning this is that the Israeli authorities shot themselves in the foot when they didn't document this. They created a situation where people come in and say it never happened. They made a mistake. And they continue to do so when they react aggressively to people who say that they should have this evidence."

    It's Israel: People would have come out and say this never happened. No matter what evidence had been presented. Presuming that type would listen to some higher legal authority is, in my view, naïve. We've seen it here, with at least one user saying it absolutely didn't happen, when I presented the article, they then decried it as 'Israeli government hasbara' or something like that, when we went on further they disappeared as the predominance, of at least testimony, is overwhelming.

    As for what the Israeli government could and couldn't have done, that's a topic for another discussion. The Israeli government shared videos with Journalists who (like that nitwit from Wales) go on to deny what they saw.

    Related, why didn't the UN at least acknowledge the possibility of the events, or even raise the issue until days after the events, after the video leakage and testimonies had come out. One other poster said, "What do you think about the South African accusations of rape.' Not in the motion they've proposed, I searched for the word 'rape', found zero hits. However, there was a tonne of "Israel said this! South Africa says that!" but it's just a proposal to the UN to do something so that standard is probably good enough.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,517 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    If one is looking for Israel "shooting itself in the foot" (nice phrase given the current circumstances,) there's a rumour that Israel will hire Alan Dershowitz to defend it in the Hague against the accusations by South Africa.

    The many ways this is a horrible idea are difficult to enumerate. There are better lawyers out there. Dershowitz's a busted flush, whose name is all over the recent Jeffrey Epstein revelations.

    Gag. Dershowitz. W. T. A. F.


    "Haaretz Today | Does It Have to Be Alan Dershowitz Defending Israel Against Charges of Genocide?"

    (https://archive.is/CODid)



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,513 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I don't really understand why you think it matters so much: there is evidence that at least some of these rapes and murders and kidnappings happened - don't you agree?

    So that being the case, and KNOWING that the Israel-Gaza situation is so polarised that we've seen that there will always be people who will NEVER believe "their" side did anything wrong, no matter what the evidence, then what difference does it make if there is "only" eye-witness and forensic evidence for "a few" of these events?

    It's not as though collecting evidence for 75% of them would have convinced those who will never be convinced anyway - is it?

    So what's your point, exactly? Judaism, like Islam, is not comfortable with a delay before burial, nor with autopsies at all - and many people who do not really practise their religion still want the religious ritual of burial, certainly in my experience of many Irish non-practising Catholics. It's hardly surprising that in the immediate hours after such a catastrophe, autopsies were not people's first thought.

    I don't imagine even the most cynical of them expected to be disbelieved to that extent, TBF.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,277 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Yes of course. I was talking about the specific phrases that seem to frequently be applied to Jews on this thread. Blood thirsty , bloodlust, blood letting, baby killers, satanic etc etc. It reeks of blood libel nonsense. surely it's possible to criticize Israels actions without using anti semitic tropes? Seems for some people, it isn't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Since South Africa has been mentioned as accusing Israel of "Genocide" I have to wonder why a corrupt and incompetent government in charge of a crime-ridden hellhole with very little electricity that can't even keep traffic lights on its roads, has such an interest in a conflict 6000 kilometres away. (For reference, the distance between Church Square in Pretoria and the Great Mosque in Khan Yunis is 6,381.28km

    Why are South Africans Stealing Traffic Lights? (youtube.com)

    I would have thought that the corrupt and incompetent government of South Africa would have priorities closer to home, but I guess crapping on Israel (and the 7+ million Jews who call it home) is more important. Hmm ...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Maybe they think Israel are doing something wrong and going to an authority on war crimes is the right thing to do?

    Why do those on the pro israel side go after those countries critising them rather than argue the points of criticism?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    There are other possibilities. One is that a person could look at the state of South Africa and conclude that their government is not a moral authority on anything. Another is that dunking on Israel might be a good way to distract from their own legendary failures at home.

    But even assuming for the sake of argument that this is not connected to wider far-Left hostility to Israel - which is long standing as the people who chant "From the River to the Sea" can tell you - I still have to wonder why the corrupt and incompetent government of South Africa isn't more concerned about its own sky high murder rate which is the third highest in the world, or the daily rolling blackouts and rampant cable theft, all of threatens to turn SA into even more of a failed state than it is now.

    I guess it's a hallmark of being a corrupt and incompetent government in charge of a failing hellhole that your main priority is to take a politically expedient side in a quarrel 6000 km away.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,513 ✭✭✭volchitsa




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think that most cases in the ICC are initiated by a third country to whatever conflict they are dealing with. Maybe you should start a thread on how corrupt SA is and how far away from Gaza it is located.

    But it will interested to see where this case goes. I see an Irish lawyer is working as external counsel for the SA team, and she has previously with allegations of Serbian atrocities in Croatia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,763 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    It will go nowhere. Even if they do find against Israel, the Israelis and Americans will ignore their decision.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    True though it does upset the Israelis and their die hard supporters here which can be seen in how they post about SA.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    To describe people who criticise the likes of Netanyahu and some of his politicians and ''religious'' friends, who quote ancient Bible passages to try to make slaughter acceptable, as antisemitic is nonsense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Someone else could look at it and think '' Jaysus, even the S. Africans are calling them out ''. How bad is that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,926 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    That's what will probably happen but History will prove that these countries were in fact right to do so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Because there is a legal responsibility for signatories to the Geneva convention to prevent genocide.

    Out of interest, what's the distance between Washington and Tel Aviv?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Except you cannot deny that crapping on Israel is a politically expedient move as animus towards Israel is prevalent in both the Far-Left and Islamic movements.

    And South Africa decided to get involved in all this, so they are now relevant. We're entitled to ask why a corrupt and incompetent government in charge of a dying hellhole seems to regard a politically expedient position on a conflict 6000 kilometres away as one of its top priorities.

    It should also be remembered that South Africa has a ... questionable ... relationship with the ICC as they granted Vladimir Putin diplomatic immunity from arrest on foot of an ICC warrant if he visited South Africa. So it seems that the corrupt and incompetent government of South Africa is ... politically selective in its outrage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    But it's not a "quarrel" is it? SA believe it is genocide by Israel on the Palestinians.

    And they are legally obliged to do what they are doing.

    I'd imagine the Israeli murder rate over the last three months puts the SA murder rate in the ha'penny place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    But again that doesnt make their accusations false. So if it wasnt them, any number of the countries that have publicly come out against the Israeli action in the UN could have initiated this. If Ireland had done this, i m sure you would be crapping all over Ireland as a country in the same way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    It is a quarrel. Israel wants to continue existing and protect it civilians from Hamas, Hezbollah and their foreign sponsors, and the other side wants the Jews dead and Israel wiped off the map. But it's still funny how the ANC of South Africa does not have the same problem with Russia and Vladimir Putin ...

    And it's quite interesting that you compare the Israeli "murder" rate with South Africa considering that South Africa isn't at war.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    You brought up the SA murder rate, I didn't.

    And no, genocide is not a "quarrel".

    Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and SA are taking a case, as required by the Geneva convention, against Israel.

    Why are you getting so excited? Maybe the court will find in favour of Israel? Would that not be a good thing - put the whole genocide fake news thing to bed once and for all?

    Or are you outraged in case the alternative transpires?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Firstly, I think it's a little bit suspect that the ANC which had no problem rolling out the red carpet for actual genocidal dictators like Vladimir Putin, has such a problem with a tiny democracy 6000km away that's been locked in an existential struggle for 75 years. I would have thought stopping their own country from imploding under the weight of their own incompetence, corruption and malevolence would have been higher priorities.

    And I'm dubious about Israel getting a fair trial considering how much of the world is against them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,149 ✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    So we have reached the point where the argument is being made that the majority world is against Israel, but that doesnt suggest Israel is in the wrong just the majority of wolrd is wrong. All independent thought has gone out the window now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Extreme levels of animus towards Israel are long standing and pre-date the 7th of October. And you have to fault the ANC for having such a problem with Israel when they were more than happy to roll out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin. That would seem to be a double-standard, no?



Advertisement