Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1722723725727728804

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    In the area we're looking over half would be like this and they just sit there being renewed in limbo. It's actually the first question my partner asks before anything else and the default is generally "no it isn't done but they're willing to consider it". Or worse "the other houses in the estate sold with negative tests" where we had been sale agreed whilst the test was pending and it turned out to be riddled and was the first in that estate. What's worse is they'll use the phrase passed mica procedures but is riddled with other substances like the new one pyrrhotite.

    ATU have a series of lectures on the topic on YouTube and honestly I sat there watching it fascinated in the lectures on human and social costs so far.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    There's a whole host of checks that vendors expect people to forego. Just another sign of the state of the market.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    It would appear low hanging fruit for any incoming government to sort this out once and for all.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,202 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Government fills hotels.

    Government bans airbnb.


    Sounds like a sound strategy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,690 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Don't worry, for the state has a solution in mind.....more funny money!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Hotels with families

    Homes with tourists

    Sound strategy indeed



  • Registered Users Posts: 627 ✭✭✭lordleitrim


    Dingle town was one of the few towns in Ireland that had its population drop in the 2022 Census. None of the home hunting locals can afford to live there and have to move elsewhere as every second house is airbnb or mostly empty holiday homes. It really does distort the social fabric of a community. Yes, tourism may be boosted but at what cost to local residents and particularly younger generations that can't live near their social network.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,202 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,589 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    I KNEW this was going to happen. NIMBYs are the real problem in all of this.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    This is the thing, the west coast of Ireland and North County Cork were the ghost estate capitals. Surely there was away to balance tourism and local need.

    Air bnb should only be allowed when local need is met. Where air bnb is allowed. Commercial rates and all other business charges should be applied. This will help to ensure max utilisation of said property



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    At least in Dublin AirBNB is supposed to require planning permission but enforcement of that de-facto ban is nonexistent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It's the govt that filled the hotels with families.

    If a town is fortunate enough to deliver a tourist trade and the hotels in that town are taken up with IPAs, AirBnB type lettings are really the only means to enable a tourist sector, no?

    I am not saying it is a perfect situation, but its obvious that the heavy use of AirBnB is, in part, the result of govt policy on removing hotels from public access.

    Banning AirBnB in tourist towns with no hotel accom available to the tourist market is a death knell to those towns, local jobs and future investment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    How do we define local need being met though?

    Not disagreeing with your sentiment, but its a tough one to draw lines around.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I have wondered this also.

    There still sems to be a lot of AirBnB in Dublin, so I assume the regs are not being controlled, but I dont know that for sure.

    That said, AirBnB does have a place in tourist markets, especially when hotels are being taken out of commission to accomodate IPAs or homeless families.

    There is a balance, but its a tough one to strike.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,832 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You don't have rights to breach change of use planning, which is what turning a private house in to a facilitieless hotel via AirBnB needs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,199 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Intentionally provocative/extreme but a good article (and to be fair written by an older gentleman) highlighting some of the age related inequality we seem unwilling to face up to.

    “Unable to afford their own homes or save for a pension, they’ll have to carry the burden of paying for the pensions of the home-owning generation. More must be asked of older people”

    Just such a shame the young people of Ireland are on average so uneducated economically that they are voting for a party that wants to perpetuate this by

    • reducing the pension age

    • eliminating the only (token) wealth tax we have (property tax)

    • increase income taxes (their only hope of ever accumulating some wealth of their own)

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2024/01/05/gerard-howlin-the-young-are-caught-in-a-grotesquely-unfair-trap/

    (no paywall)

    https://archive.ph/AKiOB



  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭factnee


    Thanks for this. How did you remove the paywall for this article?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,531 ✭✭✭✭Dav010




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,199 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Archive.ph

    Just paste paywalled link in. Works reasonably well on most article



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Raising the pension age only works for some white collar workers in non-physical jobs. How well do you think a 67 year old carpenter, or bin man, after 50 years on the job, will be able to do his job? People like that will just end up going on the dole in their early 60s either way (as currently happens in large numbers already - its why the DSP have a policy not to require anyone aged 62 or over to engage in job activation processes, theres no point in even trying to get people that age to work physical jobs) at a cost broadly similar to the state.

    The honest answer that all of our political parties are shying away from mentioning is PRSI rates are going to have to increase substantially as our population ages, almost every year in perpetuity going forward unless our demographics change massively.

    Which is absolutely going to screw young people the most, delaying/preventing them from buying a home even further, meaning for large numbers of them when they reach retirement age and don't own their own home they'll have to be housed by the state, meaning PRSI will have to increase even more to accomodate that...etc.

    The property tax should absolutely be retained (and increased massively), but income taxes are going to have to go up too either way. Housing two thirds of pensioners in social housing in a few decades time won't be cheap.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    They can't say prsi needs to go up now. We've had a year of inflation, mortgages, rent and utility increases. Any more and the mood in the country will get worse.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I can see this coming back to kick the government in the rear end.

    I started working and paying prsi at 15 at a time when half a 150 pound salary would be gone in state deductions.

    Are they going to give a higher pension to people who start work at 22/24 who do a few extra years after 66 compared to those that worked from 15 to 66.

    Legally challenged I suspect



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    It's not so much about banning air bnb, it's about maximising the utility value of the home

    Could we not have a system where your allowed airbnb if you use the home as student accommodation in off season thereby maximising the usage of the home and freeing up supply elsewhere

    In tourist towns, there were loads built during the celtic tiger. Could it not be assessed how much employees are needed to sustain that tourism and keep some of those ghost estates as affordable rentals for people on tourism wages. Air bnb have killed off local hotels and employment and have not enhanced these areas. Many of the homes are then empty 9 months of the year.

    It's all BS and in no way sustainable



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Fair points, but if the hotels essentially dont exist anymore, as they are taken up by IPAs, who will accomodate the tourists, if not AirBnB?

    Ghost estates are an interesting point, but unless they are owned by the state, they can't have capped rent.

    And if they are owned by the state, they will be used to accomodate lots of folks, not just those employed in tourism and including those not employed at all.

    Hotels aren't allowed to be hotels anymore.

    That is a problem for those small towns and will result in further decay to the town's social fabric and economic prospects.

    However much we may choose to ignore it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Ozark707



    “To demolish these structures is now an unacceptable act of carbon profligacy in a climate emergency,” Mr Dobbin said. “We really should have a taxation system that rewards you for keeping the carbon in the building, because that is the way the world is moving.”

    He supported the examination of planning exemptions to avoid lengthy delays in the planning system. “We could give some measure of permitted development, in certain circumstances, for converting office space without having to go through a full planning process,” he said. “Those two things would immediately make converting office spaces to residential spaces viable and attractive.”

    It will be interesting to see if this goes anywhere without huge state provided subsidies.

    https://archive.ph/jLEe3



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    If not PRSI it will be USC. Government knows that very few people will actually emigrate over tax levels.

    Thing to watch is all the new international agreements on corporation tax. That will screw Ireland's finances bigtime in the longer term.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Wishful thinking. Converting office blocks is an issue of viability (plumbing, fire safety, etc. Was discussed here a while back) but if they did actually try it will likely turn into an expensive scandal.



  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭Greengrass53


    Didn't they ban them in certain areas a few years ago. Or has this been implemented at all?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Let commercial property find its natural price floor, this may incentivise existing office space to move to new space. The space they vacate may be converted to residential as in many cases it was originally residential space.

    Cheapest for the taxpayer, but government buddies may not make as much



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Why demolish state of the art assets, with foreign capital baring the risk of a downturn.

    Drive up and down our city centres, full of solicitors, accountants, dentists, doctors, estate agents, financial advisors, banks etc

    All could be moved to an office block and property freed up for residential conversion

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


Advertisement