Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1343334343436343834393691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    So that's another no you can't ,.

    So you cannot counter anything he's said typical low level account stuff



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Not directly as in tanks crossing the border. However a few cables/pipelines mysterious blowing up or being cut. A spate of refugees pushed to the EU borders, hacking state utilities, maybe a few missiles over a NATO country or downing an airliner etc.. there's plenty of ways to indirectly attack countries and cause instability with pretty much zero repercussions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,810 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    This is where I think there's a shift in the German attitude. It looks to me like the serious players in the German economy have moved beyond the question of "what's the cost of having Ukraine as a failed state?" to "how much profit can we make in having Ukraine as a successful European state?"

    This is not something that particularly concerns the USA, so they have no reason to make it happen any faster than might be the "natural" course of events. But if Big Business in Germany (and other parts of the EU) has decided that it is to Europe's advantage to have access to Ukraine's natural, agricultura and human resources, over and above any inconvenience of pissing off the Russians, then Europe still has the clout to make that happen.

    With memories of the Covid disruption to Asian supply chains on the one side, and the threat of Trumpian isolationism on the other side, this is a very good time for Europe to invest in "local" projects. Sure, there's money to be made in producing and selling arms to armies of varying colours, but there's a hell of a lot more money to be made in re-building a country and an economy like Ukraine.

    If that decision has been made, private capital will make it happen faster than any amount of Congress-dependent drip-fed aid packages.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,145 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    the biggest damage long term to Europe is that Germany etc. cant buy energy from Russia or sell all that well crafted German automobiles and other tech to the Russians. The EU has gone from having a successful trading partner to possibly inheriting a rump basket case of a state. The only countries trousering it are the US and China.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Thats an interesting take,,,Russia wants Trump, but the Chinese don't.... fun times ahead !! 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    Oh please Ireland trades more with rest of EU than Russia did

    Time to inject some reality

    Russian imports from EU are possibly larger than above as they launder products via Stans

    The only loser here is Putin destroying his gas exports by trying and failing to freeze Europe and now China and India are paying a fraction of the price for their gas and oil



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Putin has been attacking the West, the US, Australia, in fact anyone or Country he deems an "enemy" for many years ( inc NATO, actually especially NATO) . Not openly though, all deniable stuff. Massive hacking operations worldwide, using submarines to map undersea communications and oil / gas pipes, (and possibly planting remote controlled explosives on them) pumping cash into radical groups to de-stabilize democratic Countries, mass propaganda to interfere wilt elections. It's a long list of possibilities, and Putin ticks all the boxes. He's the original bad apple in the box that rots the rest of them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I think your cynicism is in poor taste to be honest. I kind of doubt any resources Ukraine has that might be exploited post war can offset cost (to Germany/EU) of aiding Ukraine now (incl. shifting their energy use away from Russian fossil fuels much more rapidly than intended) and rearming.

    It's been clear (to "normal" politicians in Germany and in the other EU countries) for well over a year that the old relationship with Russia is dead and previous policy was a total failure. They tried economic engagement, and Russia went to war anyway. There is also a distinctly genocidal character to this war after Putin's dream of decapitating the govt. of Ukraine failed.

    All they can do now is cut their ties with Russia, aid Ukraine as much as possible, and rearm to face a new security reality in Europe. However they are market economies and democracies, and neither the policy change or effect of it is going to be instant. I mean look at how long it can take to change things in this country, even when the politicians/leaders finally understand the policies they had were wrong and are harming them (as well as the country) and they are on the clock and need to do something (!).

    Increasing levels of German military support to Ukraine we are seeing that you commented on are just the working through of this process (that started a long time ago).



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I don't see it now.

    I do see probability of a Russian test of NATO increasing in a situation where you have (post the collapse of US/EU will to support Ukraine + this resulting in some kind of Russian "success" there, I suppose size of this success determines the danger level...):

    • Team MAGA running USA (into the ground)
    • EU hamstrung, members at each others throats (i.e. dumbfuck far right governments in most countries or even just a few key ones) and
    • Key EU member states (and UK I suppose) have also failed to rearm at all (arguments of what-a-bout the budget, what-a-bout spending it on better things than stuff to kill people and blow things up win the day).

    So a fair few stars probably have to align for it, as said a low likelyhood event with a very high cost. Safer to support Ukraine and rearm imo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 557 ✭✭✭scottser


    The US and China are locked in an endgame for the supply of superconductors, which are currently produced in Taiwan. Whether the next US president is Democrat or Republican, the American stance won't change.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    Biden at least has somewhat softened the anti China rhetoric (and conversely China toned down alot of the rhetoric too) and there were several meetings where the end result are both being frenemies of sorts “competing”

    Trump is clearly the worst of two outcomes for China (and US) on so many levels

    anyways speaking of elections

    Putin approves list of who can run against him


    Post edited by drop table Users on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,491 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    You post too much stuff in this thread without checking sources. IMHO. It might be true but most probably isn’t.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,456 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    What do you think he's been doing for the last 10 or more years , assasinations , "accidents", buying politicans and radicals , left and right , destabilizing states, sure its a long game, but you wait for the opportunity,

    2014 crimea and donbass ,was decades of work leading to an opportunity,

    oh but ukraine has a security pact with uk and US,and their neutral , - fat lot of good that did them ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭zv2


    I don't agree. I'm pointing out the fact that the rumor is out there and rumor is important in these matters.

    Post edited by zv2 on

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But he's not going to Chance a NATO state,

    There is one of two weak links in the alliance but the moment Russian forces Cross into NATO territory they will be wiped out in a few days, they don't have either the man power or logistics to attempt it now , even worse they have no air superiority....



  • Registered Users Posts: 677 ✭✭✭farmerval


    Gerasimov killed in a Ukrainian airstrike currently rumoured on Youtube.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Been rumoured since last night still no confirmation from any source we've seen this happen 3/4 times previously where it's been claimed a particular Russian was killed only to turn out to be a false claim



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,742 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    No doubt Russia will release an undated photo or video of him to quell the rumours :)

    Like the last time... its huge news if Ukraine did kill him. Very embarrassing for the Russians. You'd never see it happen to his equivalent in the west .



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,422 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    There's massive bounties available to Russians if they inform the Ukrainian military of gatherings of troops or high ranking officials.

    It's wait and see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 609 ✭✭✭Deregos.


    An 83 year old Russian lady is not afraid to give her honest, angry opinion about Putin and the upcoming election.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    That time Russians were spreading rumours of Zalushnys death




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,038 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Revenge from the grave, the long reaping arm of Prigozhin, if turns out to be true.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,742 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre




  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    You'll have to try just a little harder ...

    No me mention of his death just he hadn't been seen in 8-10 days


    So what was the last accounts on here???

    Post edited by Gatling on


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭jmreire


    No, they don't, but they may have even worse weapons... Propaganda, they have taken this form of warfare to previously unknown heights. Back a few years ago, when propaganda was not considered to be anything like what it is today, Russians were already using it with great effect. Something that they are still doing today.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Propaganda will get them so far but as regularly seen here across especially since covid people will buy into and believe any old nonsense, even to the point of creating multiple accounts to have conversations with themselves to keep posting certain agendas, with propaganda I believe it's down to mental health issues and disorders that allow certain types to be susceptible to it , whether it be putins a refreshing Leader putting his country first over everything,to flat earthers to anti-Semites trying to tell us oh I'm anti Zionist not Antisemite but Israel and the Jews don't belong in Israel..... Or anywhere else,there is no tunnels under Gaza only water tank's 🤣🤣🤣

    But this now the world we live in



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,708 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The genius of the Russian strategy has been to prop up both sides of the political divide, and because freedom of speech is such an enshrined thing in Western democracies and social media companies have seen profits soar due to user engagement, there isn't the political will to stop it.

    There's no quick fix. There needs to be early education on critical thinking, but that'll take time to have a real effect, and some countries are maybe too far gone, like the US, to accept this type of education, regarding it as brainwashing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,339 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They couldn't roll the Ukrainian military that barely existed two years ago,that had no numbers of advanced weapons no advanced radars and intelligence networks ,or and modern aircraft both fighters and helicopters,

    NATO has satellites , intelligence gathering aircraft, naval superiority,air superiority, ground superiority,man power superiority, the ability to mobilize hundreds of thousands of well trained and well equipped professional soldiers in days ,

    Currently Russia has none of the above,

    One or two weak links but they are well covered currently 300,000 NATO troops are already prepared across several Baltic states,

    This might be one of those very few times I'm wrong but I absolutely can't see it ever happening,

    Post edited by Gatling on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Ukrainians are a very tough rugged and determined breed of people who endured years and years of Soviet brutality and are absolutely determined not to return to that world. There is no guarantee that other countries would fight or resist as tenaciously as the Ukrainians.

    In ww2 there was vast differences in the fighting ability and will to resist of different countries. Without strong NATO support it is entirely possible that some countries would give in very easily.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement