Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"average Dublin house prices should fall to ‘the €300,000 mark" according to Many Lou McD.

Options
1444547495077

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 27 ballshyballet


    There is only one way in which the housing crisis is to be solved, and that is to do the opposite of what caused it.

    Namely, a purposeful reduction in population.

    With the right policies I have no doubt that the equivalent of an entire city worth of infrastructure and housing could be freed up within two years.

    But nobody has the brass neck to do that single thing yet.

    A few more years of this increasing insanity will only draw us quicker to the conclusion. Brass necks all around.

    A bit more dancing around the elephant in the room in the meantime.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    We haven't enought people for the jobs we have available at the moment, so reducing the population is not really the answer



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,531 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...it would also lead to a significant fall in economic activities, and possible/probably a recession to....



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,163 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Economics?

    Pft, thats just the reflected sound of underground spirits.

    Post edited by GreeBo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Basically creating an "rte" / 26 counties with top level management with no answer ability only fat pensions leading to the wastage of taxpayers money won't lead to cheaper property, cheaper to get private contractors to build ,this has been proven time and again, from new roads to bridges to houses etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Exactly, plus you would end up with people trying to make their position viable so it would end up with more red tape as people walked around trying to make themselves look busy and important.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Who cares about economics when Sinn Fein have the magic money tree



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,163 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    It's a problem with most government department, you have good staff and then you have staff who in reality are in a position that shouldn't exist. So to make themselves look like they are important etc, they will slow up the work of everyone else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27 ballshyballet


    Pure economic fallacy. A scam, if you will.

    It's a really popular one though.

    To boil it right down to its essential oils, the prevailing idiocy that is modern Western economic theory teeters on "infinite growth". Everything from the oecd to the imf to general stock markets and government policy wobble on the idea of infinite growth. Take that away from them and they collapse.

    We live in a physically finite world, and for that simple law of restriction, the economic policies aren't worth a shyt in the toilet long term.

    Notice, that no matter the dodo-like availability of housing, healthcare, education, childcare, transport, infrastructure in general, that there is always this much touted "but we don't have enough people for the jobs!". Always said from somewhere down the back of the crowd and obscure in origin.

    Here's the thing. There will NEVER be enough people for those who believe in infinite growth. Never. If they could stack people one atop the other in coffins for homes they'd be crying about "not enough people for the jobs".

    Absolute monkey brained stuff.

    As to the oft-quoted yet poorly discussed "demographic timebomb", funnily enough the dependence ratio's are INCREASING as the amount of people increase. Bullshyt, in fewer words.

    Healthcare? Brilliant idea to transform a health system into one reliant on cheaper transient workforces. Brilliant. A real coup. Notwithstanding the fact that, yet again,health system performance, hundred of thousands migrants later is worse than before. The opposite of what you were sold. A Persian flaw, you might call it, if one had the iq of a garden pea.

    And so forth.

    But hey, I'm a crackpot going against the grain. Nobody need pay attention to me, but you'll pay attention as it quickly manifests into reality.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    I found the nurses/doctors etc from overseas in the HSE are excellent in the majority.

    I know from my own companies point of view for years they can't get enough staff in Ireland, they hire people from all over Europe and more recently from outside of Europe. This is similar to other companies.

    But best of luck with your strategy.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    You do realise that this argument was used during by some British politicians to justify their inaction during the Irish famine in the 1800s ie there are too many Irish people to feed/the population is unsustainable and Irelands population need to decline. The results have been likened to genocide and many outright accuse the British of genocide.

    Ireland is the only major landmass which had a higher population in the 1800s than it has today. Had the famine and subsequent waves of emigration not happened Irelands population would be multiples of the present amount.

    The whole let's reduce Irelands population as it's "unsustainable" has already been tried and the results were so catastrophic that we are still living with the results nearly 200 years later.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Cali Screeching Prince


    When oecd tax kicks in should bring down house prices



  • Registered Users Posts: 749 ✭✭✭GSBellew


    Only way this plays out is if it is the average Home, not house, so an apartment would fall into the price mix.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,586 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think that is included. But the average 3 bed apartment is still well above 300k in Dublin.

    2 Beds cost more than that.

    Does anyone have figures on how many social homes the govt actually delivered last year via local authority construction?

    This number would not include private development of social housing - the part 5 social housing stock or social homes bought/rented by local councils from private developers.

    I expect the number delivered directly by Local councils is very small, but it would be useful to see those numbers as it will give insight as to the potential for construction of new social homes delivered by govt.

    If SF really want to hit 300k average for a 3 bed in Dublin, they would need to be delivering thousands of new homes, directly via local councils.

    So what does that local council output look like today?

    What is the size of the local council labour force, dedicated to social home new builds?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    The SF plan is to start by building 4,000 affordable home for sale at close to hard costs of construction.





  • Registered Users Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    2022 data


    10,263 social homes delivered in 2022 with 43% increase in new-build social homes

    From Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage 

    Published on 17 April 2023

    Last updated on 17 April 2023

     

    • highest level of new-build social housing since 1975
    • 10,263 social homes delivered in 2022 through build, acquisition and leasing
    • 7,433 new-build social homes and 1,757 affordable homes delivered in 2022
    • strong pipeline of 19,000 social homes on the way

    The Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Darragh O’Brien, has emphasised that the level of social and affordable housing will continue to grow as he published data today for social and affordable homes delivered in Q4 2022 and 2022 overall. The Minister pointed to a strong pipeline with over 19,000 social homes either onsite or at design and tender stage. 5,500 affordable homes will be delivered in 2023.

    The figures show 10,263 social homes were delivered in 2022 through build, acquisition and leasing. This represents an 11.9% increase on 2021 figures, when 9,169 social homes were provided. The 2022 output represents the highest annual output of social homes in decades.

    Of the 10,263 social homes delivered, 7,433 were new-build, a 43% increase on 2021 figures. This is the highest number of new-build social homes delivered since 1975.

    Affordable housing delivery figures were also published today and show that 1,757 homes were delivered in 2022 through Cost Rental, the First Home Scheme and the Local Authority Affordable Purchase Scheme. Through Housing for All, the government’s housing plan, the government has re-introduced affordable housing opportunities. Housing for All has put affordability at the heart of our housing plans. 2,800 affordable homes have already been approved in respect of 42 specific projects across 15 local authority areas with €210 million committed under the Affordable Housing Fund.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Geuze




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I don't think selling 4,000 new houses to qualified buyers with a subsidy attached, so that the selling price is close to the hard costs of construction, will cause overall house prices to fall sharply.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,843 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    Your comparing apples with oranges, Ireland today is a completely different country with completely different problems



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 901 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Yes, 300k for a house is quite a lot. I fully understand why someone else might think the same figure represents value for money but I think they are confusing the market price of something with the fair value of it. These, of course, are different things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Well if the cost of the house is 280k then is the price of 300k ok?

    i think the question is what margin do people want on top of cost of house



  • Registered Users Posts: 901 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    However this cost of 280k just like the 300k may also be too high. Again, there's the market price of the thing and then the fair value. It may be that government policy is required to bring about appropriate change in the market so that prices become reasonable for all. Or detrimental government policies may have to be removed or modified.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Ok you have cost and you have price.

    The cost is how much is costs to build a house. The price is the price the house is sold at

    So normally the price is based on a margin % based on the cost. So what margin do you want on the house?

    This has nothing to do with the government, this is how houses are built and sold all over the World



  • Registered Users Posts: 901 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    To be honest I don't know what the appropriate margin should be, but things like labour costs, land costs etc. do depend on heavily government policies and the sale price will depend on demand which, again, is affected by government policies.

    The basic point is that the current snapshot market value is only part of the story. Behind that market value is government policy which can change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,586 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Thanks.

    That was the info I was looking for.

    You can see that although over 10k social homes were delivered in 2022, less than 3k were actually built by the state.

    So for SF to deliver 21k new homes in a year, directly via the govt, with the same labour force, is just rubbish.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,586 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Exactly. Even if SF constructed 4000 homes for sale, directly via govt, there would be no material impact on the price of the 2.1 million housing units across the country.

    There would be 4000 lucky buyers, sure.

    But thats always beem the case.

    Its called affordable housing or council tenants being able to buy their property at discounted rates from the council.

    Big wins for a small group, but no impact at the macro level.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    I agree that SF have their heads in the clouds regarding house prices in Dublin. There's 1 possible way to bring prices down with existing capacity to build but even still that probably wouldn't bring them down enough.

    It's make all houses built available for sale. Every unit, every house, every apartment goes on public sale. Let the market decide.

    Now we all know that's never going to happen as there's a large amount going to social and affordable, keeping supply low and demand high relative to supply



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    So you don't know the costs, what the price should be. Just it's the government.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,545 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    That's what was happening and people didn't want that. They wanted the government to block people buying house or companies buying houses.

    In reality what houses/apartments are ready to sell and left without selling?



Advertisement