Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
18948958978999001266

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,827 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    People blindly supporting Israel here will just class that as spoils of war and not looting.

    There's nothing that will make them think less of Israel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Not commenting on posters here but there's a huge amount of Islamophobia on social media. I would guess the vast bulk of racist commentary in Europe is directed at Muslims, even more so than at black people. Black people are not liked by them of course, but Muslims are viewed as some sort of sinister existential threat to their lives and their culture.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    You are correct. It looks like, to summarise, you have two questions:

    1. Why do the Israelis behave as they now do, and:
    2. How come they have so little respect in the international community.

    The answer to the first question, IMHO is simple: absolute necessity.

    The answer to the second question is more complex and I will try to be fair to those I disagree with, to convey their stances as accurately as I can.

    Starting in 1947, it became clear that there were those in the Islamic/Arab worlds who would never accept any kind of Israel in the region, no matter its borders. Originally that was the entire Islamic world, but since then some countries have made peace and normalised relations with Israel (Like Egypt, Jordan etc) But there are still parts, for example Iran, Hamas etc that want to wipe them out. Iran, in particular, I believe, wants to develop nuclear weapons so that they can slaughter the Jews (and maybe also Sunni Muslims) wholesale instead of just in small numbers through proxies as today.

    Another problem for Israel is that Iran has allies across the world, Russia, China, North Korea, Venezuela etc.

    But these problems pale in comparison to its largest and most powerful enemies: the Western Radical Left. This group is happy to collaborate with the others, happy to repeat their genocidal chants like "From the River to the Sea, Palestine (a.k.a. an Arab country) will be free" etc. The modern/radical left has developed entire theories surrounding race, such as Critical Race Theory, which centres around theories of power, oppression and privilege. In a nutshell, it holds white people as oppressors and some others (like the so-called BIPOC in the US) as inherent victims of oppression, based on their theories of power.

    In that respect, they cast the Israelis as "white" (even though that's not true as only a minority of Israeli Jews are full blooded European) and the Palestinians as POCs or People of Colour. To radically over-simplify radical-Leftist thought, it logically follows, from their view, that Israel is the bad guy, and that the Palestinians are helpless victims with absolutely no agency. That's why Israel's actions are presented as though they're happening in a vacuum, as if their enemies literally don't exist.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Ah, The Quds news Network, a Hamas/PIJ propaganda mill. Though I guess a Quds media post is a little bit more current than a re-run of Zahra's Blue Eyes or something from Der Sturmer.

    Tell me, which "Government Media Office" are they quoting?



  • Registered Users Posts: 860 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    That's it in a nutshell. The amount of hoops they go through to defend every single thing Israel has done since Oct the 07th is mind boggling.

    Oh as well I condemn Oct the 07th. Because you HAVE to condemn it in every post you do. Or you're an anti semite. Because not wanting thousands of innocent children to be killed is being anti semite.

    I pointed out weeks ago they were bombing the f**k out of Gaza and was lambasted, saying its targeted blah blah. Its targeted at journalists alright. And over half of all Gaza's houses are now uninhabitable. So that is actually bombing the crap out of the place.

    Now we see Israelis saying Gazans should live elsewhere. Watch the next few weeks and the somersaults that the usual posters will do to justify every single Israeli action of horror. Maybe they just have no empathy. Lastly I know theres wars on in Syria and Yemen. Thats not an argument winner, it's a thread about the Israel/Hamas conflict.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,554 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    1. Why do the Israelis behave as they now do, and:
    2. How come they have so little respect in the international community


    1. Because this is their retribution on people they hate. This is more than being about neutralising Hamas. In doing so, they are committing genocide and committing war crimes
    2. Because of 1

    Schindler's List was on telly on Friday. Its a long time since I last saw it. The parallels with what Israel is doing to Gaza are very disturbing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    So "the Left" are to blame because: Critical Race Theory. You could at least try to be somewhat original and not use conservative American talking points to ascribe motivation to groups of people you don't like, especially blaming Critical Race Theory given that most of them using it as a stick clearly have no idea what it is nor have they ever read any of the literature.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Admittedly I haven't done a 4 year degree in CRT but I am loosely familiar with Radical Leftist thought based around race. Like I said, a full discussion of CRT and the Radical Left's theories on race are beyond the scope of this thread, but I do believe these concepts/theories colour (pun intended) the Radical Left's view of Israel and the Palestinians. In particular, that the Radical Left hate Israel for racial reasons no matter what they do or what their enemies do to them.

    Allusions to racial concepts have been common on this thread with at least poster having brought race into it and you yourself IIRC having brought in "critical" concepts like "Orientalism."



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    I only mentioned Orientalism because arguments you were presenting resembled old orientalist views on the Middle East and Arabs/Muslims. Also theories around race and inequality don't start and end with CRT regardless of wherever you are reading about it states, this is just something American conservatives have latched onto recently.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    But you cannot deny that Israeli Jews are considered to be "white" (even though only a minority of them are full blooded European Jews) and that Palestinians are correctly considered to be brown/Arab. And you cannot deny that the modern Radical Left bases much of their theories based on race, although like I said, a full exploration of their theories, the terms they use etc. are beyond the scope of this thread.

    It's not difficult to conclude thusly that the Left's view of Israel-Palestine is 'coloured' by their perception of the races of the people involved.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    I think it's more around anti-colonialism that racially based theories, again you're making the mistake of viewing this through an American lens where these types of discussions are reduced to race.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    100%. Most leftists simply views Jews as "whites" even though very few Jews consider themselves so regardless of their blood. And of course "whites" must be held to higher standards than brown "people of colour" from Palestine.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Correct, Leftist concepts of "colonialism" are part of it as well. Of course, none of the people accuse Israel of being a colonial venture can explain where the Jewish metropole is. Since a colony, by definition, must have a metropolitan state, i.e. a single homeland for the colonisers, I've yet to see anyone explain which homeland Israel is a colony of. A mixed-race Jew in Tel Aviv most likely only has Israel as their home.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Israel isn't an empire, the metropole is the centre of an empire - it even says that in the Wiki entry to you linked to. They're expanding their territory by conquest/expansion. Colonialism isn't a "leftist concept" either, accusing anyone and everything you don't agree with or like as "leftist" isn't doing what it probably is you think it's doing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Or maybe most "leftists" have a problem with mass murder of civilians, but continue on rehashing American-style identity politics, that'll really put the "leftists" in their place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,921 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    More often than not Israel is the aggressor and only because they can hide behind the US. After this war to try to paint them as the victim is ridiculous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Yet a "colony" by definition requires a Metropol-Colony relationship. At a stretch, you could say that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are colonies with Israel within the '67 borders being the Metropol. However I think many of the people attacking Israel under the rubric of "anti-colonialism" do so on the basis of calling the whole thing a colony. But of what Jewish metropole?

    At any rate, the whole "From the river to the sea" thing makes it very clear and this is a common chant on the Left.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    American style ID pol has been wholly embraced by the Western left, so it's not outrageous to use such framework to analyse how the left may or may not view the conflict.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    It's illegal expansion which now seems to be encompassing ethnic cleansing and possibly genocide but yeah, continue on with your mental gymnastics to excuse all of it because "the left". I've made the mistake before of trying to engage with you in good faith and I remember now why that was a mistake.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Ok, you and Sean can continue on analysing how "the left" view this conflict using vague understandings of various theories, the rest of us will just continue on having a problem with the mass murder of innocent civilians. I don't need a theoretical framework to do this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Israel has been attacked continuously since it was founded. That's why the behave accordingly. Literally starting the day after it was founded, through a serious of major wars ('47/'48, '67, '73) as well as continuous small scale attacks prior to 1967 and indeed since. Yet some present Israel's actions as though it were in a vacuum.

    Yes, like when you accused me of "Orientalism," an obscure insult which seems to stem from a Postmodernist-Marxist philosophy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    I didn't "accuse" you of Orientalism it isn't a pejorative term, I just said what you were saying resembled those arguments/discussions/descriptions etc. that were used in the past by the old orientalists, your lack of understand of what I'm talking about is showing. If you are actually interested in understanding what I'm talking about, which I doubt, you should read this: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Orientalism-Edward-W-Said/dp/0141187425/. No doubt you'll be back to perform a character assassination of Edward Said after a quick Google but at least I tried.



  • Registered Users Posts: 582 ✭✭✭batman75


    The genocide occurring in Gaza is doing enormous reputational damage to both Israel and the US particularly Joe Biden and Anthony Blinken. Both Biden and Blinken are committed Zionists. The former most likely due to Jewish funding of his political career and the latter due to Jewish ancestry. The moniker genocide Joe is likely to stick and I think Biden is unlikely to be re-elected. Young people in the US can see what is happening in Gaza as genocide. They most likely don't allow Israel a free pass on the basis of what happened in the holocaust.

    Tragically the holocaust has been weaponised by Zionists to shut down criticism and justify barbaric behaviour. Netanyahu and his cabinet are endangering the very existence of Israel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,623 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    The killing would stop tomorrow if Hamas surrendered.

    That won't happen though. You are dealing with an Islamist death cult who would rather see the total destruction of Gaza and everyone in it than stopping the war which they themselves started.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,628 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Yet the killing was there before there was a Hamas, and it exists today elsewhere in Palestine where there is no Hamas.


    Really what you mean is that the killing would stop tomorrow if Israel was allowed to murder everyone it wanted to today.................but there are probably a lot more than every Palestinian man woman and child on that list. I wouldn't be surprised if every Irish person was also on the list - albeit further down.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    2008 to 2020

    Palestinian V Israeli death ratio = 22:1

    Palestinian V Israeli injury ratio = 18:1






  • Registered Users Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭nachouser


    Your first bullet point in that post hasn't aged well. But sure...things are different now that it's Palestine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    You generalising about people you disagree with again despite previously giving out about others doing so in your opinion?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Again, you are probably deliberately (and poorly) trying to mispresent what I am saying. I am directly addressing what he is saying in his broad generalisations about others, your point isn't as clever as you think it is.



Advertisement