Fourteen migrants discovered hidden in refrigerated container at Rosslare Europort

We as honest taxpayers aren’t being charged anything. Funding for immigration control comes from the Exchequer. There’s another terminal planned for Rosslare expected to cost in the region of €200m (I’m being generous, we’re not paying for it), being funded by the EU -

https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/d17fd-minister-donohoe-welcomes-outcome-of-engagement-with-commission-on-brexit-adjustment-reserve-bar/

I don’t imagine it will be quite as simple as back to France, or back to anywhere for that matter, as you’re suggesting. They might be free to go, but they’re in a position right now where they can’t go anywhere and may have to be accommodated by the Irish State.

The gracious thing to do would be to apologise.

That would require a basic level of accountability.

Take care of yourself, I won't be engaging any further with this bizarre conversation.

You’ve nothing to apologise for? You’re not responsible for far right bogeyman rhetoric, you’re just repeating what you heard somewhere else. I’ll be fine btw, precisely because I’m not concerned whatsoever about far right bogeyman or the nonsense they come out with which you shared in your earlier post.

The exchequer is funded by taxpayers, ergo it is taxpayer funded

If I go in a container for a few nights can I have a free house?

you can't have everyone from every small war making their way across several countries to claim a bogus asylum - bogus in the sense that they're being very selective about things

There’s nothing can be done to prevent bogus asylum claims though, all that can be done is to investigate whether the person seeking asylum at the point of entry is making a legitimate claim. That can take months.

In this particular instance though it’s as you’re suggesting most likely that they were trying to gain illegal entry into the UK, and ended up being discovered at Rosslare - there’s no indication of where they are originally from or where they are citizens (because that’s the country they would be returned to, not likely to be France), and they could have travelled through numerous countries already, because people smugglers are known to try different routes, with varying degrees of success:

https://www.france24.com/en/20191024-uk-police-confirm-all-39-lorry-victims-were-chinese-citizens

you still ignore the question of why they skipped over Greece, Italy and France if they were escaping horrors

No I didn't.

I imagine their intended destination was the UK for reasons I have already outlined.

I have no doubt they will try get there yet.

Once they are processed they will be off up the North and onto some sort of vessel.

Sure maybe they will end up in Rwanda.

the vast majority of this sort of act is just chancers with (ironically) too much money on their hands.

You can’t possibly have any idea of the profile of the vast majority of people engaged in this sort of act because the statistics are incredibly unreliable given the nature of the act.

I think it's patronising bordering on racist to describe being born in a poor country as a "**** hand" btw.

The Kurds are technically stateless.

And no that isn't racist, give your head a wobble.

Not relevant to the point I made. Any country can try to put pressure on other countries to help them with refugees. But they cannot dictate individuals who are allowed in.

If someone in the government or civil service here has a Japanese buddy who wants to live in Europe, Ireland cannot grant that person permission to live in France, nor can it unilaterally order France to issue that Japanese buddy a visa to live there.

The examples you gave of interviews which support your views, supporting your views is hardly surprising? There’s thousands of interviews with the victims of human trafficking which directly contradict your views, and then there’s the victims who are never interviewed:

Women and children are particularly prone to human trafficking and becoming victims of exploitation, such as sexual exploitation, labour exploitation, forced begging, forced marriage, crime, organ trafficking and illegal adoption. The risk is imminent in particular for migrant women and children, not only during dangerous travel routes but also once they arrive in Europe. Children can disappear from reception centres and land in the hands of human traffickers. For example, research conducted in 2019 and published in 2020 in the Netherlands reported that 20% of children in the study (of a total of 1,720 children) disappeared before the end of the asylum procedure between 2015 and 2018 – and a great share of them were Vietnamese minors.

https://euaa.europa.eu/easo-asylum-report-2021/54-victims-human-trafficking

As for the wider picture - countries in the West already do try and discourage this type of illegal activity; EU countries for example have laws against modern slavery, and as for what should happen to the victims in terms of whether they should be granted asylum or not - by virtue of the fact that they are the victims of illegal trafficking, they are not prohibited from applying for asylum.

And there should be no rewards for it as that only encourages more trafficking. Back to their home country or France.

I already told you what I think will happen.

Either way, it's not up to me.

It's the white saviour effect,

They can't see it, but they are the worst type of racist.

Discussing the actual practical implications of emigration on developing countries would mean having to acknowledge that it’s not nearly as simplistic as you’re trying to make out, portraying emigration as having a negative effect, completely ignoring it’s positive effects for developing countries (it’s how Ireland got to where we are for example):

https://www.cgdev.org/article/myth-brain-drain-how-emigration-can-help-poor-countries-harvard-political-review

You asked me what I think would I happen, I pointed out I already told you.

Now you are throwing a strop.

You keep craving nuanced debate but you have proven your interpretation is at best remedial.

You have no intention of moving from your position, so there really is little point, is there?

So if they arrive via a container,or by bus or train via Belfast or flights from the uk or eu they can only have been trafficked,if they destroy their documents on a flight it's only because the traffickers did it ,

They would be eventually they have more chances of getting welfare over Deportation